Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-14 Thread Torgeir Veimo

Richard Kilgore wrote:
 Joao Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:a6mcd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.

But, despite following the instructions carefully 
(http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
 microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
 microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
 ...
 
 
 These are not the fonts you should look for.  If it's working, you'll see
 font names that are capitalized: like Microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1.
 Shot in the dark, but I run debian, and the libfreetype.so.6.2 that
 was installed didn't do the trick.  I had to compile Freetype2 from src
 (I used http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freetype/freetype-2.0.9.tar.bz2).

Do you still get all truetype fonts rendered in bold?



-- 
-Torgeir





Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-13 Thread Colin Thefleau

Kryptolus wrote:

 Joao Rodrigues wrote:
 I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts
 as well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla
 render fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
 
 But, despite following the instructions carefully
 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was
 unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some
 True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
  microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
  microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
  ...
 
 But they don't look anti-aliased  :-(
 
 I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on SuSE Linux 7.3.
 
 
 Joao
 
 Yes it works. Wait till blizzard's Xft patch is checked -- it kicks even
 more ass.
 
 You have to make sure the fonts you mentioned are actually selected.
 Just having them being listed is not enough.
 
I have also the same problem here. I use the same TT fonts (Arial, Verdana, 
etc...) in mozilla and konqueror, but can not get them antialiazed in 
mozilla. I carrefully followed the instructions and modified the unix.js 
file, but no luck.
Xfree86 4.2
Freetype 2.0.8
FreeBSD 4.5
Mozilla build 2002031207

Ciao
Colin




Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-13 Thread Torgeir Veimo

Joao Rodrigues wrote:
 I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
 well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
 fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
 
 But, despite following the instructions carefully 
 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
 unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
 True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
  microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
  microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1

I tried the 0.9.9 download for linux, and the debug option mentioned in 
the instructions clearly indicate that truetype support was not enabled 
in 0.9.9 for linux. Then I donwloaded the nightly from the same date 
(march 11th), which stated truetype fonts was supported.

It doesn't give too nice rendering yet though. I have been unable to get 
cleartype style subpixel antialiasing to work (will probably work with 
the Xft patch), and the fonts rendered by the freetype renderer looks 
much thicker than fonts rendered by the x font server (I use TT fonts 
from windows).


-- 
-Torgeir





Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-13 Thread Richard Kilgore

Joao Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
news:a6mcd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
 well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
 fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
 
 But, despite following the instructions carefully 
 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
 unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
 True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
  microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
  microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
  ...

These are not the fonts you should look for.  If it's working, you'll see
font names that are capitalized: like Microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1.
Shot in the dark, but I run debian, and the libfreetype.so.6.2 that
was installed didn't do the trick.  I had to compile Freetype2 from src
(I used http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freetype/freetype-2.0.9.tar.bz2).

   - rick




Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-12 Thread Joao Rodrigues

I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.

But, despite following the instructions carefully 
(http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
 microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
 microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
 ...

But they don't look anti-aliased  :-(

I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on SuSE Linux 7.3.


Joao




Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-12 Thread Kryptolus

Joao Rodrigues wrote:
 I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
 well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
 fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
 
 But, despite following the instructions carefully 
 (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
 unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
 True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
  microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
  microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
  ...
 
 But they don't look anti-aliased  :-(
 
 I'm using XFree86 4.2.0 on SuSE Linux 7.3.
 
 
 Joao

Yes it works. Wait till blizzard's Xft patch is checked -- it kicks even 
more ass.

You have to make sure the fonts you mentioned are actually selected.
Just having them being listed is not enough.