Re: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

2001-04-19 Thread craig miller

I'll have you know that four of my 35 Minneapolitan  renters are now driving
SUV's.

I guess suburb bashing never really goes out of style, does it?

Craig Miller
Former Fultonite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Waltenbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps


>Greg,
>
>If the parking downtown is really that frustrating to SUV-driving, suburban
>T-Wolves fans, why not post a flyer on how to take the bus?
>
>Or better yet, how to take the new light rail system.  Oh, wait, that's
only
>in places like Portland...
>
>---
>Kurt Waltenbaugh
>ECCO, Ward 10
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>List Manager
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:48 PM
>To: Mpls list
>Subject: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps
>
>Forwarded on behalf of Greg Finstad - David Brauer, list manager
>
>Hello.  I'm Greg Finstad, director of transportation, City of Minneapolis.
>David Brauer's posting of Tuesday, April 17th implying that the City is
>turning away business at its parking ramps on downtown's western edge isn't
>really accurate and needs some context. On Sunday, April 15, those arriving
>for the Timberwolves game and parking in the City's ramps at 5th Street and
>7th Street were given a flier that alerted them to parking alternatives
>within reasonable distance of the Target Center. The major message was that
>there are lots of places to park downtown and if you are concerned about
>congestion at one ramp, walking a little further can mean a shorter wait.
>
>Here's why the flyer:
>
>1.  The Timberwolves approached us at the City because they had gotten
>feedback from some frustrated ticket holders that, in their view, it was
>taking them too long to exit the ramps after the games.  Minneapolis' ramps
>are well designed for timely exiting, but a nearly full ramp is going to
>take longer to empty. The City's two ramps close to the Target Center are
>favorites because of their skyway connections to the Target Center.
>
>2.  The City's ramp management and the Timberwolves felt it would be
>helpful if people just knew more about all the available parking facilities
>so that if they needed to leave quicker, there are alternatives that might
>suit them.
>
>3.  We were thinking that if 200 to 300 folks (NOT 1,000 to 2,000, as
>David Brauer said) parked in an alternative ramp, the congestion would be
>eased noticeably.  And we also know that while there are three private
ramps
>listed on the flyer (some have special arrangements with the Timberwolves),
>the three City ramps listed, such as the new Hawthorne ramp, the ramp at
>10th and Hennepin or the 4th Street ramp, would be chosen by many of these
>folks who decide to park further away.  So revenues won't be noticeably
>reduced, which David Brauer also projected.  It just won't be the case.
>
>4.  As for the state of parking in that area if a baseball stadium is
>built, we can all assume that parking, and the ease of entering the area
and
>exiting, will be an important part of the planning.  Our existing ramps
will
>be of great service when it comes to planning such a facility and, if
built,
>for its ticket-holders, given that we have 8,470 City ramp spaces within
>walking distance, and the fact that we now bring in and then exit folks in
>very good time (better than most).
>
>So the bottom line:  if you are parked in a full ramp anywhere, it takes
>time to empty, especially after an event.  If you can't spend the time
>waiting, look for parking alternatives that may be less utilized and thus
>will be less congested.
>
>
>
>___
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
>
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>___
>Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
>Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
>http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

2001-04-18 Thread R.T.Rybak

Nice suggestion, Kurt.  The Twins currently have a promotion in which you
get a discount with a bus ticketsounds like this could help the Wolves,
too.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kurt Waltenbaugh
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps


Greg,

If the parking downtown is really that frustrating to SUV-driving, suburban
T-Wolves fans, why not post a flyer on how to take the bus?

Or better yet, how to take the new light rail system.  Oh, wait, that's only
in places like Portland...

---
Kurt Waltenbaugh
ECCO, Ward 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
List Manager
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:48 PM
To: Mpls list
Subject: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

Forwarded on behalf of Greg Finstad - David Brauer, list manager

Hello.  I'm Greg Finstad, director of transportation, City of Minneapolis.
David Brauer's posting of Tuesday, April 17th implying that the City is
turning away business at its parking ramps on downtown's western edge isn't
really accurate and needs some context. On Sunday, April 15, those arriving
for the Timberwolves game and parking in the City's ramps at 5th Street and
7th Street were given a flier that alerted them to parking alternatives
within reasonable distance of the Target Center. The major message was that
there are lots of places to park downtown and if you are concerned about
congestion at one ramp, walking a little further can mean a shorter wait.

Here's why the flyer:

1.  The Timberwolves approached us at the City because they had gotten
feedback from some frustrated ticket holders that, in their view, it was
taking them too long to exit the ramps after the games.  Minneapolis' ramps
are well designed for timely exiting, but a nearly full ramp is going to
take longer to empty. The City's two ramps close to the Target Center are
favorites because of their skyway connections to the Target Center.

2.  The City's ramp management and the Timberwolves felt it would be
helpful if people just knew more about all the available parking facilities
so that if they needed to leave quicker, there are alternatives that might
suit them.

3.  We were thinking that if 200 to 300 folks (NOT 1,000 to 2,000, as
David Brauer said) parked in an alternative ramp, the congestion would be
eased noticeably.  And we also know that while there are three private ramps
listed on the flyer (some have special arrangements with the Timberwolves),
the three City ramps listed, such as the new Hawthorne ramp, the ramp at
10th and Hennepin or the 4th Street ramp, would be chosen by many of these
folks who decide to park further away.  So revenues won't be noticeably
reduced, which David Brauer also projected.  It just won't be the case.

4.  As for the state of parking in that area if a baseball stadium is
built, we can all assume that parking, and the ease of entering the area and
exiting, will be an important part of the planning.  Our existing ramps will
be of great service when it comes to planning such a facility and, if built,
for its ticket-holders, given that we have 8,470 City ramp spaces within
walking distance, and the fact that we now bring in and then exit folks in
very good time (better than most).

So the bottom line:  if you are parked in a full ramp anywhere, it takes
time to empty, especially after an event.  If you can't spend the time
waiting, look for parking alternatives that may be less utilized and thus
will be less congested.



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

2001-04-18 Thread Kurt Waltenbaugh

Greg,

If the parking downtown is really that frustrating to SUV-driving, suburban
T-Wolves fans, why not post a flyer on how to take the bus?

Or better yet, how to take the new light rail system.  Oh, wait, that's only
in places like Portland...

---
Kurt Waltenbaugh
ECCO, Ward 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
List Manager
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:48 PM
To: Mpls list
Subject: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

Forwarded on behalf of Greg Finstad - David Brauer, list manager

Hello.  I'm Greg Finstad, director of transportation, City of Minneapolis.
David Brauer's posting of Tuesday, April 17th implying that the City is
turning away business at its parking ramps on downtown's western edge isn't
really accurate and needs some context. On Sunday, April 15, those arriving
for the Timberwolves game and parking in the City's ramps at 5th Street and
7th Street were given a flier that alerted them to parking alternatives
within reasonable distance of the Target Center. The major message was that
there are lots of places to park downtown and if you are concerned about
congestion at one ramp, walking a little further can mean a shorter wait.

Here's why the flyer:

1.  The Timberwolves approached us at the City because they had gotten
feedback from some frustrated ticket holders that, in their view, it was
taking them too long to exit the ramps after the games.  Minneapolis' ramps
are well designed for timely exiting, but a nearly full ramp is going to
take longer to empty. The City's two ramps close to the Target Center are
favorites because of their skyway connections to the Target Center.

2.  The City's ramp management and the Timberwolves felt it would be
helpful if people just knew more about all the available parking facilities
so that if they needed to leave quicker, there are alternatives that might
suit them.

3.  We were thinking that if 200 to 300 folks (NOT 1,000 to 2,000, as
David Brauer said) parked in an alternative ramp, the congestion would be
eased noticeably.  And we also know that while there are three private ramps
listed on the flyer (some have special arrangements with the Timberwolves),
the three City ramps listed, such as the new Hawthorne ramp, the ramp at
10th and Hennepin or the 4th Street ramp, would be chosen by many of these
folks who decide to park further away.  So revenues won't be noticeably
reduced, which David Brauer also projected.  It just won't be the case.

4.  As for the state of parking in that area if a baseball stadium is
built, we can all assume that parking, and the ease of entering the area and
exiting, will be an important part of the planning.  Our existing ramps will
be of great service when it comes to planning such a facility and, if built,
for its ticket-holders, given that we have 8,470 City ramp spaces within
walking distance, and the fact that we now bring in and then exit folks in
very good time (better than most).

So the bottom line:  if you are parked in a full ramp anywhere, it takes
time to empty, especially after an event.  If you can't spend the time
waiting, look for parking alternatives that may be less utilized and thus
will be less congested.



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



RE: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

2001-04-17 Thread Russell W Peterson

Isn't the real question: "Why put all those parked cars in
the same location?" The answer is: Because it continues a
pattern of planning in Minneapolis which defines common
districts, ie Nicollet Mall: The Shopping District,
Marquette Avenue: The Business District; The Warehouse Area:
The Entertainment District; Hennepin Avenue: The Theater
District.  Now Minneapolis is going to put in another huge
sports venue in the Warehouse Area.  That area will
eventually become the Sports & Entertainment District.

Why is this important?  Because human beings love to order
things, unfortunately order of this type in city planning
can lead to chaos.  Instead of approaching our city as a
complex organic structure where venues can exist in multiple
locations and there can be cross pollination, we continue to
push for these overly sanitized, clearly delineated
districts.  Oh there are a few exceptions, but primarily
this one dimensional planning is what Minneapolis does.  So
that's why there are all those cars in the same location at
one time.  If we had scattered our ramps throughout the city
instead of lining them up like the Berlin Wall, we wouldn't
have such a problem.  And if we had a more organic approach,
we'd be putting more housing directly into downtown in each
of these districts, which would in turn help create the
critical mass to sustain livability after the 9-5 working
hour.

Russell W. Peterson
St. Michael


Russell W. Peterson, RA, CID
   Founder

R  U S S E L L   P E T E R S O N   D E S I G N
Architecture / Interior Design / Strategic Planning

   "You can only fly if you stretch your wings."

 Metro Minneapolis - Saint Michael


 13715 Forty-Seventh Street Northeast
  Saint Michael, Minnesota 55376

 (763) 497-1003 phone & fax
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:17 PM
To: David Brauer
Cc: Mpls list
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps



The big ramps were funded in part with substantial federal
funds in a complex cost sharing formula.  In addition, the
ramps were designed primarily as transit hubs, and were
designed for commuter traffic -- not the onslaught you'd see
at the end of a game.  Ramps designed for that kind of
intermittent very high volume exit flow are excessively
expensive to build and an inefficient use of funds, yadda,
yadda, yadda.  Hope this clears up part of the mystery.  For
the rest call the city transportation dept -- they
operate the ramps.







"David Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@mnforum.org on
04/17/2001 03:17:13 PM

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   "Mpls list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps


Went to the Wolves game on Sunday and encountered an
interesting flyer as I
was pulling into the Fifth Street TAD ramp (the middle of
the big 394-linked
suckers on the western edge of downtown).

The flyers, handed out by parking attendants, basically ask
Timberwolves
fans to go elsewhere to park before the game. As I can tell
you from
experience, all those Wolves fans exiting from the 7th and
5th street ramps
causes a tremendous logjam. I talked to a friend at the
Wolves who said the
long wait to get out is one of two perennial complaints fans
have (the other
is the Target Center food service).

I told him, "man, you must have some pull with the city
because you have
people at city-owned ramps, which produce revenue for the
city parking fund,
handing out fliers telling people to go to privately owned
ramps with their
parking money. I know you're a major tenant in our
city-owned building, but
boy, we are putting out for you!"

A couple of points:

1. The fliers do direct people to several other ramps: the
4th street TAD
ramp (publicly owned), but also the LaSalle Court, Dayton's,
and Rapid Park
ramps, which are privately owned. We are doing Wolves fans
(our downtown's
customers) a favor, but we're also helping these private
owners make cash at
our city parking fund's expense. (The Hawthorne
Transportation Center and
Hennepin & 10th ramps are also listed, but I'm not sure who
owns those.)

I asked my Wolves source what the goal of the program was,
and he said to
get 1,000 to 2,000 parkers out of the 5th & 7th street
ramps. At $6 a car,
if half of those people go to privately owned ramps, the
city's parking fund
loses $125,000 to $250,000 a year.

2. If 19,000 Wolves fans cause such commotion, what the heck
is going to
happen if a 40,000-seat ballpark is built on the Rapid Park
site? Massive
parking availability is supposed to be a strength of the
location, but if
we're already admitting

Re: [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps

2001-04-17 Thread tmatula


The big ramps were funded in part with substantial federal funds in a complex cost 
sharing formula.  In addition, the ramps were designed primarily as transit hubs, and 
were
designed for commuter traffic -- not the onslaught you'd see at the end of a game.  
Ramps designed for that kind of intermittent very high volume exit flow are excessively
expensive to build and an inefficient use of funds, yadda, yadda, yadda.  Hope this 
clears up part of the mystery.  For the rest call the city transportation dept -- they
operate the ramps.







"David Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@mnforum.org on 04/17/2001 03:17:13 PM

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   "Mpls list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:  [Mpls] Fun with parking ramps


Went to the Wolves game on Sunday and encountered an interesting flyer as I
was pulling into the Fifth Street TAD ramp (the middle of the big 394-linked
suckers on the western edge of downtown).

The flyers, handed out by parking attendants, basically ask Timberwolves
fans to go elsewhere to park before the game. As I can tell you from
experience, all those Wolves fans exiting from the 7th and 5th street ramps
causes a tremendous logjam. I talked to a friend at the Wolves who said the
long wait to get out is one of two perennial complaints fans have (the other
is the Target Center food service).

I told him, "man, you must have some pull with the city because you have
people at city-owned ramps, which produce revenue for the city parking fund,
handing out fliers telling people to go to privately owned ramps with their
parking money. I know you're a major tenant in our city-owned building, but
boy, we are putting out for you!"

A couple of points:

1. The fliers do direct people to several other ramps: the 4th street TAD
ramp (publicly owned), but also the LaSalle Court, Dayton's, and Rapid Park
ramps, which are privately owned. We are doing Wolves fans (our downtown's
customers) a favor, but we're also helping these private owners make cash at
our city parking fund's expense. (The Hawthorne Transportation Center and
Hennepin & 10th ramps are also listed, but I'm not sure who owns those.)

I asked my Wolves source what the goal of the program was, and he said to
get 1,000 to 2,000 parkers out of the 5th & 7th street ramps. At $6 a car,
if half of those people go to privately owned ramps, the city's parking fund
loses $125,000 to $250,000 a year.

2. If 19,000 Wolves fans cause such commotion, what the heck is going to
happen if a 40,000-seat ballpark is built on the Rapid Park site? Massive
parking availability is supposed to be a strength of the location, but if
we're already admitting it doesn't work for large events...

And of course, the other big question: who designed ramps that lots of
people couldn't get out of quickly? (By the way, on game nights, you pay on
the way in, not out.) It's not like we didn't know Target Center was going
to be there...

David Brauer
King Field - Ward 10

___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls



___
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls