Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-21 Thread Gary P. Klos
Thanks for all the information.  You guys have headed me in the right
direction, so I know what to do.

Gary

===
Gary Klos
Online Systems - PSC
United States Steel Corporation
412-433-1225

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-20 Thread Ernest Roberts
Return Receipt

Your  Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question
document
:

was   Ernest Roberts/171/DCAG/DCX
received
by:

at:   02/20/2003 04:26:14 PM

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-20 Thread Miller, Dennis
Architecturally, a triggered program needs to process a queue, not a message. To 
transition to processing just one message you need a Service Initiation Layer. The SIL 
can perform numerous functions, including establishing transaction boundries and 
effecting message-level security.  The CICS Bridge is an exemplary example of an 
SIL--you may want to model your application after it.

Said another way, triggering does not start a transaction for each message--it just 
starts one or more transactions to process the queue. That is true of the bridge 
monitor, as well. The bridge monitor then starts per-message transactions. And that's 
what your SIL program should also do.  When starting per-message transactions, you 
have the option to supply whatever userid you like. You do not need to give the CKTI 
userid access to all transactions that the SIL is going to start, but you do need to 
give it surrogate authority for the userid's you want it to engage.

A custom trigger monitor, as one person suggested, will not solve this problem as 
there is no relationship between a trigger message and the application message that 
caused it. A trigger monitor's duty is to process the INITQ and it has no idea what 
application message caused a given trigger.  To know that, you need to monitor the 
application queue. That's what an SIL, like the bridge monitor, does.  

BTW, I said above that the SIL starts per-message transactions.  Of course, that's a 
simplification. In determining transaction boundries, the SIL can also start one 
transaction  for a series of related messages. That's up to how you design the SIL. 
The bridge monitor uses MQCI_NEW_SESSION as a signal for the start of a new 
transaction.
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Gary P. Klos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:41 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:   CICS Adapter Userid Question
> 
> I guess I'm just looking for some clarification here.  When I use the CICS
> Adapter and place a message on a queue which is triggered on in cics.  Now
> CKTI starts the transaction I specified in the "Process" definition.
> However it starts the transaction with the userid that started the CKTI
> transaction.  That is well and good except for the fact if I want to start
> various transactions for various applications, I have to give the userid
> which started CKTI access to all the transactions that CICS is going to
> start.  Is this correct?  So if I have 15 application transactions to run,
> the same CKTI starting userid has to have access to all of them.  Why isn't
> the Useridentifier of the Mqseries message just passed in, and then CICS
> will use that userid to start the transaction.  You can set the CICS Bridge
> up this way, but why not the adapter?  Am I missing something or is there
> an alternative way to do this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gary
> 
> ===
> Gary Klos
> Online Systems - PSC
> United States Steel Corporation
> 412-433-1225
> 
> Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
> the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
> Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-20 Thread Biermann, Rick J [PCS]
I believe you are correct.  Have you seen the new support pac MA1J yet?  It
provides source for a CICS trigger monitor program.  Perhaps you could use
this and modify it to add an appropriate userid on the exec cics start
command.  If that doesn't work, you could have CKTI trigger a front-end
transaction that you could write which issues a start for the real
application transactions with appropriate userids.

-Original Message-
From: Gary P. Klos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CICS Adapter Userid Question

I guess I'm just looking for some clarification here.  When I use the CICS
Adapter and place a message on a queue which is triggered on in cics.  Now
CKTI starts the transaction I specified in the "Process" definition.
However it starts the transaction with the userid that started the CKTI
transaction.  That is well and good except for the fact if I want to start
various transactions for various applications, I have to give the userid
which started CKTI access to all the transactions that CICS is going to
start.  Is this correct?  So if I have 15 application transactions to run,
the same CKTI starting userid has to have access to all of them.  Why isn't
the Useridentifier of the Mqseries message just passed in, and then CICS
will use that userid to start the transaction.  You can set the CICS Bridge
up this way, but why not the adapter?  Am I missing something or is there
an alternative way to do this?

Thanks,

Gary

===
Gary Klos
Online Systems - PSC
United States Steel Corporation
412-433-1225

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



Re: CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-20 Thread Bruce Giordano
Yup, that's the way it works.  What you're asking for couldn't really be
implemented since a CICS transaction could be triggered once and then
potentially read multiple messages.  These may have differing userids in
the message descriptor.  What you could do is have your own transaction
triggered and then have this transaction start a separate instance of the
application transaction for each message.  It could start each instance
under the userid in the message descriptor.  This has its own issues
though.  It requires that the userid starting your transaction, which is
the same userid that started CKTI, needs authority to start transactions
under each different userid.  I agree that this is a common problem that
IBM should address in some fashion.  I think a good solution though would
require changes not just in MQSeries but in CICS as well.
- Bruce Giordano



  "Gary P. Klos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  To:  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: MQSeries List  cc:
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       Subject:   CICS Adapter 
Userid Question



  Thursday February 20, 2003 11:41 AM
  Please respond to MQSeries List






I guess I'm just looking for some clarification here.  When I use the CICS
Adapter and place a message on a queue which is triggered on in cics.  Now
CKTI starts the transaction I specified in the "Process" definition.
However it starts the transaction with the userid that started the CKTI
transaction.  That is well and good except for the fact if I want to start
various transactions for various applications, I have to give the userid
which started CKTI access to all the transactions that CICS is going to
start.  Is this correct?  So if I have 15 application transactions to run,
the same CKTI starting userid has to have access to all of them.  Why isn't
the Useridentifier of the Mqseries message just passed in, and then CICS
will use that userid to start the transaction.  You can set the CICS Bridge
up this way, but why not the adapter?  Am I missing something or is there
an alternative way to do this?

Thanks,

Gary

===
Gary Klos
Online Systems - PSC
United States Steel Corporation
412-433-1225

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
 Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive



CICS Adapter Userid Question

2003-02-20 Thread Gary P. Klos
I guess I'm just looking for some clarification here.  When I use the CICS
Adapter and place a message on a queue which is triggered on in cics.  Now
CKTI starts the transaction I specified in the "Process" definition.
However it starts the transaction with the userid that started the CKTI
transaction.  That is well and good except for the fact if I want to start
various transactions for various applications, I have to give the userid
which started CKTI access to all the transactions that CICS is going to
start.  Is this correct?  So if I have 15 application transactions to run,
the same CKTI starting userid has to have access to all of them.  Why isn't
the Useridentifier of the Mqseries message just passed in, and then CICS
will use that userid to start the transaction.  You can set the CICS Bridge
up this way, but why not the adapter?  Am I missing something or is there
an alternative way to do this?

Thanks,

Gary

===
Gary Klos
Online Systems - PSC
United States Steel Corporation
412-433-1225

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive