Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??

2004-03-25 Thread Jxrgen Pedersen
well, thats no big deal, it's just a new version of the source... The rework
have saved me a lot of work, to enhance it even more ;o)
The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 of the program, so newbies will download the source instead of
the maintained version. So maybe I should send a mail here and on
www.MQSeries.Net when there are new versions released ? Personally I think
of such mails as spam, your oppinion wanted here :o)
I'm quite happy that Sid did a redesign, I'm shure that the version soon
vill be available from my website. I just have to run it thru my testcases
to see if it work, I shure it works ;o)
When I look a year back, and see how BlockIP have changed, and the
requirements, from just a simple conname filtering program to what it is
today.
I see that it gives www.mrmq.dk a lot of traffic, so it have been a great
success, and it know that the z/OS version of the original exit have been
used for design base in some vendor packages.
The language used here might offend some persons.. Politeness please
here :-o
Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP




From: Wyatt, T. Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:59:55 -0600
Actually Sid, you just released it.  :-0

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??




G'Day Jxrgen,

Well I went a bit overboard with the additional functionality and after
studying your code I decided to do a complete re-write... I figured you
would be pissed at me so I have not yet released it but essentially I split
out all the code into a modular form so that the main block of logic is no
longer a big bloatted mess.
I have also made a fundamental change to the logic of the exit so that it
denied everything and if criterior failed it exited with the SUPPRESS flag
already set. So if you pass everything that needs to be done then you set
OK
as the LAST step.
The original code did a lot of duplication in checking and was not very
modular so when I tried to add the logging functionality I needed I found
it
very difficult with the original structure.
Basically each group of checks now has it's own method/function call. So
there is Pattern checking, CON= checking (you already had that one in a
function), SSL checking, UserId, MqmUsers ids and a method to process the
file and a method to process an array of options (which means the options
could be in a file or in the exit data field.
It is now easier to add additional options and the code to handle them. the
code is not yet finished but I have attached todays effort, if you don't
want it thats fine, I'll keep it in house for my own use.
Sid

-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2004 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Hi, Sid  Co.

I'll look into it, but it should, match up both conname and userid before
accepting the connection and allow evt. the change of MCAUSER.
Have you a debug sysprint (with the -d; option), pls. send for
investigation.
Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:31:16 +1000


G'Day all,

Has anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c
??

I get odd results when the host IP I am on is different to the pattern to
match on, it seams that the user id is matched but the IP is ignored...
not
quite what I would have expected which is if the IP matchs AND the user
matchs then set the MCA to new_user_id


Any thoughts anyone ??


Sid Young
QML Pathology
_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??

2004-03-25 Thread Wyatt, T. Rob
Actually, I miss the days when we used to get announcements of new and
updated Support Pacs here.  Personally, I don't mind your announcing new
versions of BlockIP here, especially since it's grown to the stature of an
unofficial Support Pac.  Your work on the program and willingness to add
features and incorporate code from others is greatly appreciated.

Don't worry about the language, the code page conversion is automatic!

-- T.Rob

-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??


The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 of the program, so newbies will download the source instead of
the maintained version. So maybe I should send a mail here and on
www.MQSeries.Net when there are new versions released ? Personally I think
of such mails as spam, your oppinion wanted here :o)

The language used here might offend some persons.. Politeness please
here :-o

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??

2004-03-25 Thread Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)
Seeing that you are giving it away for free, and since you are not claiming
it will make any body parts bigger, I would not consider it spam if you let
us know when new versions come out.


-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??


well, thats no big deal, it's just a new version of the source... The rework
have saved me a lot of work, to enhance it even more ;o)

The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 of the program, so newbies will download the source instead of
the maintained version. So maybe I should send a mail here and on
www.MQSeries.Net when there are new versions released ? Personally I think
of such mails as spam, your oppinion wanted here :o)

I'm quite happy that Sid did a redesign, I'm shure that the version soon
vill be available from my website. I just have to run it thru my testcases
to see if it work, I shure it works ;o)

When I look a year back, and see how BlockIP have changed, and the
requirements, from just a simple conname filtering program to what it is
today.
I see that it gives www.mrmq.dk a lot of traffic, so it have been a great
success, and it know that the z/OS version of the original exit have been
used for design base in some vendor packages.

The language used here might offend some persons.. Politeness please
here :-o

Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP





From: Wyatt, T. Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:59:55 -0600

Actually Sid, you just released it.  :-0

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??





G'Day Jxrgen,

Well I went a bit overboard with the additional functionality and after
studying your code I decided to do a complete re-write... I figured you
would be pissed at me so I have not yet released it but essentially I split
out all the code into a modular form so that the main block of logic is no
longer a big bloatted mess.

I have also made a fundamental change to the logic of the exit so that it
denied everything and if criterior failed it exited with the SUPPRESS flag
already set. So if you pass everything that needs to be done then you set
OK
as the LAST step.

The original code did a lot of duplication in checking and was not very
modular so when I tried to add the logging functionality I needed I found
it
very difficult with the original structure.

Basically each group of checks now has it's own method/function call. So
there is Pattern checking, CON= checking (you already had that one in a
function), SSL checking, UserId, MqmUsers ids and a method to process the
file and a method to process an array of options (which means the options
could be in a file or in the exit data field.

It is now easier to add additional options and the code to handle them. the
code is not yet finished but I have attached todays effort, if you don't
want it thats fine, I'll keep it in house for my own use.


Sid


-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2004 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??


Hi, Sid  Co.

I'll look into it, but it should, match up both conname and userid before
accepting the connection and allow evt. the change of MCAUSER.

Have you a debug sysprint (with the -d; option), pls. send for
investigation.

Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP





 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:31:16 +1000
 
 
 G'Day all,
 
 Has anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c
??
 
 I get odd results when the host IP I am on is different to the pattern to
 match on, it seams that the user id is matched but the IP is ignored...
not
 quite what I would have expected which is if the IP matchs AND the user
 matchs then set the MCA to new_user_id
 
 
 Any thoughts anyone ??
 
 
 Sid Young
 QML Pathology

_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk

Instructions

Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??

2004-03-25 Thread Tim Armstrong
From my point of view, whilst it is still freeware, please go right ahead.
You are contributing to the community and so any minor inconvenience of
deleting an occasional message is by far outweighed by the advantages to be
gained by all of us. Also entirely up to you have you contemplated going the
supportpac route.

Regards
Tim A

-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 March 2004 6:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??


well, thats no big deal, it's just a new version of the source... The rework
have saved me a lot of work, to enhance it even more ;o)

The biggest problem can be the search engines/spiders, which will find this
version 2.0 of the program, so newbies will download the source instead of
the maintained version. So maybe I should send a mail here and on
www.MQSeries.Net when there are new versions released ? Personally I think
of such mails as spam, your oppinion wanted here :o)

I'm quite happy that Sid did a redesign, I'm shure that the version soon
vill be available from my website. I just have to run it thru my testcases
to see if it work, I shure it works ;o)

When I look a year back, and see how BlockIP have changed, and the
requirements, from just a simple conname filtering program to what it is
today.
I see that it gives www.mrmq.dk a lot of traffic, so it have been a great
success, and it know that the z/OS version of the original exit have been
used for design base in some vendor packages.

The language used here might offend some persons.. Politeness please
here :-o

Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP





From: Wyatt, T. Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:59:55 -0600

Actually Sid, you just released it.  :-0

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??





G'Day Jxrgen,

Well I went a bit overboard with the additional functionality and after
studying your code I decided to do a complete re-write... I figured you
would be pissed at me so I have not yet released it but essentially I split
out all the code into a modular form so that the main block of logic is no
longer a big bloatted mess.

I have also made a fundamental change to the logic of the exit so that it
denied everything and if criterior failed it exited with the SUPPRESS flag
already set. So if you pass everything that needs to be done then you set
OK
as the LAST step.

The original code did a lot of duplication in checking and was not very
modular so when I tried to add the logging functionality I needed I found
it
very difficult with the original structure.

Basically each group of checks now has it's own method/function call. So
there is Pattern checking, CON= checking (you already had that one in a
function), SSL checking, UserId, MqmUsers ids and a method to process the
file and a method to process an array of options (which means the options
could be in a file or in the exit data field.

It is now easier to add additional options and the code to handle them. the
code is not yet finished but I have attached todays effort, if you don't
want it thats fine, I'll keep it in house for my own use.


Sid


-Original Message-
From: Jxrgen Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2004 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??


Hi, Sid  Co.

I'll look into it, but it should, match up both conname and userid before
accepting the connection and allow evt. the change of MCAUSER.

Have you a debug sysprint (with the -d; option), pls. send for
investigation.

Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP





 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:31:16 +1000
 
 
 G'Day all,
 
 Has anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c
??
 
 I get odd results when the host IP I am on is different to the pattern to
 match on, it seams that the user id is matched but the IP is ignored...
not
 quite what I would have expected which is if the IP matchs AND the user
 matchs then set the MCA to new_user_id
 
 
 Any thoughts anyone ??
 
 
 Sid Young
 QML Pathology

_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Re: BlockIP logic incorrect ??

2004-03-24 Thread Jxrgen Pedersen
Hi, Sid  Co.

I'll look into it, but it should, match up both conname and userid before
accepting the connection and allow evt. the change of MCAUSER.
Have you a debug sysprint (with the -d; option), pls. send for
investigation.
Kind regards

Jxrgen

www.mrmq.dk
the author of BlockIP




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BlockIP logic incorrect ??
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:31:16 +1000
G'Day all,

Has anyone tested the CON= commands in the latest version of BlockIP2.c ??

I get odd results when the host IP I am on is different to the pattern to
match on, it seams that the user id is matched but the IP is ignored... not
quite what I would have expected which is if the IP matchs AND the user
matchs then set the MCA to new_user_id
Any thoughts anyone ??

Sid Young
QML Pathology
_
Fe alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive