Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Don Redman]

On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:26:33 +0100, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:


2007/3/2, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you want to try Don's suggestion yourself? It would mean editing an
> actual release this way and telling other users you have done so that
> we can see if it works.

I would like to try Don's procedure, but I am unclear as to when the
style becomes "official".  Would editing a 14-disc 'The Ring' set be
enough of a testing ground?  I know that many of those complex
examples exist on a release I own.

I think I will edit that release this afternoon and post the edit #'s
here for everyone to review and we can move forward from there, one
step at a time :)


I suppose we can't really define the number of tests before triggering
the RFV. It depends on the complexity of the rule being tested. For
this one, I suppose the relevant releases are potentially quite
different so we have probably missed problems, but OTOH the rule
itself is pretty simple... and it is really needed! So you can send
the RFV as soon as you think we have enough actual edits to support
it.



My intention was not to place even more burdens on you by having you make  
test edits.
I have explained a bit what I *did* mean, and I have done it as a podcast  
to save my fingers some typing. It's 5 minutes long (and no, it does not  
have a MBID yet ;-) )




listen, then read on:

I would suggest, you delete all the clutter form the wiki page ('cooked'  
discussions, the alternative orderings etc) and then present this as a RFV  
pretty soon and without too much fuss. Then we have a 'beta period' for a  
while (as explained in voice), and then we make the guideline 'stable'.


What do you think?

  DonRedman
--
Words that are written in CamelCase refer to WikiDocs,
the MusicBrainz documentation system.
Go to http://musicbrainz.org/doc/
(you might need to transform the term to singular)

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFV: New AR Type: Music Editor

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

Couldn't we put something in the combo itself; like "(film) editor" or
"editor (film)" ?

2007/3/2, Kerensky97 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


I still think "editor" is ambiguous enough to cause alot of confusion like I
mentioned in the RFC, even labels use it in different ways; but I guess it
could be solved if there's a really good definition of what specifically an
editor is in this AR.

-Kerensky97


Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
>
> Hi,
> any objections against adding this AR type I proposed some time ago?
>
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MusicEditorRelationshipType



--
Frederic Da Vitoria

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFV: New AR Type: Music Editor

[Kerensky97]

I still think "editor" is ambiguous enough to cause alot of confusion like I
mentioned in the RFC, even labels use it in different ways; but I guess it
could be solved if there's a really good definition of what specifically an
editor is in this AR.

-Kerensky97


Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> any objections against adding this AR type I proposed some time ago?
> 
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MusicEditorRelationshipType
> 
> -Lukáš
> 
> 
>  
> ___
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RFV%3A-New-AR-Type%3A-Music-Editor-tf3334314s2885.html#a9274847
Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFV: New AR Type: Music Editor

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2007/3/2, Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hi,
any objections against adding this AR type I proposed some time ago?

http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MusicEditorRelationshipType


Could something remind the user that this is a very specific usage of
the word "edited"? I fear that this relationship would be used in the
wrong places...

--
Frederic Da Vitoria

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

[mb-style] RFV: New AR Type: Music Editor

[Lukáš Lalinský]

Hi,
any objections against adding this AR type I proposed some time ago?

http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MusicEditorRelationshipType

-Lukáš



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2007/3/2, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/2, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/3/2, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la 
mano"
> > >
> > > Yes, our examples should be perfect! I suggest that we keep an
> > > accented example (this one is fine) in order to implicitly remind the
> > > reader that spelling is important.
> >
> > I can definitely throw together "real" examples from multiple works.
> > I used the same example to show the differences between each case.  If
> > there are no real objections with the track title format, how do we
> > move ahead in terms of updating the Wiki page?
> >
> > And I apologize if my original email sounded rushed.  I got sick of
> > seeing opera edits where I wanted to say "by the way, read this and
> > the track titles should be in this format" - but I couldn't because we
> > hadn't really decided upon a format for the track titles.  I want to
> > get this finalized for the benefit of voters *and* editors.
>
> Thanks for doing it. I should have pursued it myself since I started
> the original thread, and I had told Don I would try his suggested new
> style evolution procedure, but my work is requesting 150% of my time
> currently and will probably continue to do so for a few weeks :-(

You're welcome :)  I know how it feels to be swamped with work, but
luckily I ran into some "extra" free time when my only midterm this
week was moved back to next Thursday thanks to poor weather!

> Do you want to try Don's suggestion yourself? It would mean editing an
> actual release this way and telling other users you have done so that
> we can see if it works.

I would like to try Don's procedure, but I am unclear as to when the
style becomes "official".  Would editing a 14-disc 'The Ring' set be
enough of a testing ground?  I know that many of those complex
examples exist on a release I own.

I think I will edit that release this afternoon and post the edit #'s
here for everyone to review and we can move forward from there, one
step at a time :)


I suppose we can't really define the number of tests before triggering
the RFV. It depends on the complexity of the rule being tested. For
this one, I suppose the relevant releases are potentially quite
different so we have probably missed problems, but OTOH the rule
itself is pretty simple... and it is really needed! So you can send
the RFV as soon as you think we have enough actual edits to support
it.

--
Frederic Da Vitoria

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Aaron Cooper]

On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

2007/3/2, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/2, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la 
mano"
> >
> > Yes, our examples should be perfect! I suggest that we keep an
> > accented example (this one is fine) in order to implicitly remind the
> > reader that spelling is important.
>
> I can definitely throw together "real" examples from multiple works.
> I used the same example to show the differences between each case.  If
> there are no real objections with the track title format, how do we
> move ahead in terms of updating the Wiki page?
>
> And I apologize if my original email sounded rushed.  I got sick of
> seeing opera edits where I wanted to say "by the way, read this and
> the track titles should be in this format" - but I couldn't because we
> hadn't really decided upon a format for the track titles.  I want to
> get this finalized for the benefit of voters *and* editors.

Thanks for doing it. I should have pursued it myself since I started
the original thread, and I had told Don I would try his suggested new
style evolution procedure, but my work is requesting 150% of my time
currently and will probably continue to do so for a few weeks :-(


You're welcome :)  I know how it feels to be swamped with work, but
luckily I ran into some "extra" free time when my only midterm this
week was moved back to next Thursday thanks to poor weather!


Do you want to try Don's suggestion yourself? It would mean editing an
actual release this way and telling other users you have done so that
we can see if it works.


I would like to try Don's procedure, but I am unclear as to when the
style becomes "official".  Would editing a 14-disc 'The Ring' set be
enough of a testing ground?  I know that many of those complex
examples exist on a release I own.

I think I will edit that release this afternoon and post the edit #'s
here for everyone to review and we can move forward from there, one
step at a time :)

--
-Aaron

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2007/3/2, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/2, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la mano"
>
> Yes, our examples should be perfect! I suggest that we keep an
> accented example (this one is fine) in order to implicitly remind the
> reader that spelling is important.

I can definitely throw together "real" examples from multiple works.
I used the same example to show the differences between each case.  If
there are no real objections with the track title format, how do we
move ahead in terms of updating the Wiki page?

And I apologize if my original email sounded rushed.  I got sick of
seeing opera edits where I wanted to say "by the way, read this and
the track titles should be in this format" - but I couldn't because we
hadn't really decided upon a format for the track titles.  I want to
get this finalized for the benefit of voters *and* editors.


Thanks for doing it. I should have pursued it myself since I started
the original thread, and I had told Don I would try his suggested new
style evolution procedure, but my work is requesting 150% of my time
currently and will probably continue to do so for a few weeks :-(

Do you want to try Don's suggestion yourself? It would mean editing an
actual release this way and telling other users you have done so that
we can see if it works.

--
Frederic Da Vitoria

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Aaron Cooper]

On 3/2/07, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

2007/3/2, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la mano"

Yes, our examples should be perfect! I suggest that we keep an
accented example (this one is fine) in order to implicitly remind the
reader that spelling is important.


I can definitely throw together "real" examples from multiple works.
I used the same example to show the differences between each case.  If
there are no real objections with the track title format, how do we
move ahead in terms of updating the Wiki page?

And I apologize if my original email sounded rushed.  I got sick of
seeing opera edits where I wanted to say "by the way, read this and
the track titles should be in this format" - but I couldn't because we
hadn't really decided upon a format for the track titles.  I want to
get this finalized for the benefit of voters *and* editors.


--
-Aaron

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Frederic Da Vitoria]

2007/3/2, Marco Sola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


 Original Message 
From: Aaron Cooper
To: MusicBrainz Style Mailing List
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:11 AM
Subject: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

> Okay, I think we need to finally make the OperaTrackStyle and
> official style guideline.
>
> Don Giovanni, Op. 500: Act I, Scene III. (Duettino: Don Giovanni,
> Zerlina) "La ci darem la mano"
>
> Any thoughts, concerns, comments?  I would really like to move ahead
> with this and get it finalized so we can start enforcing it!

Please do not state it down as mandatory with all this details because it's
quite complex for everybody. Consider to add first an example of a simple
but proper edit, till like simply "Là ci darem la mano".


I thought Aaron's examples meant all the variations were ok. (Which
would agree with too)



Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la mano"


Yes, our examples should be perfect! I suggest that we keep an
accented example (this one is fine) in order to implicitly remind the
reader that spelling is important.

--
Frederic Da Vitoria

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

[Marco Sola]

 Original Message 
From: Aaron Cooper
To: MusicBrainz Style Mailing List
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:11 AM
Subject: [mailing] [mb-style] RFC: Opera Track Style

> Okay, I think we need to finally make the OperaTrackStyle and
> official style guideline. 
> 
> Don Giovanni, Op. 500: Act I, Scene III. (Duettino: Don Giovanni,
> Zerlina) "La ci darem la mano" 
> 
> Any thoughts, concerns, comments?  I would really like to move ahead
> with this and get it finalized so we can start enforcing it! 

Please do not state it down as mandatory with all this details because it's 
quite complex for everybody. Consider to add first an example of a simple but 
proper edit, till like simply "Là ci darem la mano".

Second, if you plan to use this aria, please note it's "Là ci darem la mano"

Marco (ClutchEr2)

___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style