Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Not sure what the state of affairs is here. Should this be going back to RFC? There was a lot of support in the RFV, but some objections too. That doesn't seem like it would be reasonable - it's going to be vetoed with the exact same reasoning. The proposal process says if the changes would entail a rewrite, or rethink, of the proposal itself, then a counter-proposal should be created, and the decision as to which proposal will pass should be left to the style list. In this case, clearly the counter-proposal is simply do not add mini-album - so I've created a poll to vote on this. Please do give your opinion: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Mini-Album_Voting Cheers, Nicolás ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
30 januari 2014, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com skrev: What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same thing? I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is somewhere between EP and album length (usually something like 10 or more tracks). It would also be nice to have maxi-single as an option. 30 januari 2014, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com skrev:What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with adifferent name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the samething?I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is somewhere between EP and album length (usually something like 10 or more tracks).It would also be nice to have maxi-single as an option.___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Staffan Vilcans wrote 30 januari 2014, drsaunde lt; drsaunde@ gt; skrev: What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same thing? I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is somewhere between EP and album length (usually something like 10 or more tracks). It would also be nice to have maxi-single as an option. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@.musicbrainz http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style untitled-[2.1] (612 bytes) lt;http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4662342/0/untitled-%5B2.1%5Dgt; +1 also for the reasons I stated in RFV. Not sure what the state of affairs is here. Should this be going back to RFC? There was a lot of support in the RFV, but some objections too. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Re-RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4662342p4662375.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote That's why, given that our definition is circular (it's an EP if it's an EP) I can't see how it can be used to block mini-album. Saying Usually it should only be assumed that a release is a mini-album if the artist/label defines it as such seems perfectly valid. What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same thing? Albums are sometimes called LP's. Should the fact that we have a category Album block us from adding a new category LP, well no, but it doesn't make much sense to me to have 2 different categories to represent the same thing. drsaunde -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661880.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
drsaunde wrote What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with a different name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the same thing? Albums are sometimes called LP's. Should the fact that we have a category Album block us from adding a new category LP, well no, but it doesn't make much sense to me to have 2 different categories to represent the same thing. drsaunde In some cases, such as the examples I posted above, they are treated as something different to EPs. Yes, in other cases the term EP and Mini-Album are used interchangeably, in which case just use EP. But in the cases where the release is specifically called a mini-album, that should be used. I don't see how you can distinguish between and album and and EP, but not an album and a mini album. The terms reflect nothing more than the average number of tracks/length, and what the artist/label decides it is. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661882.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
30 januari 2014, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com skrev:What i'm saying is that mini-album and EP are the same thing with adifferent name. Why should we have 2 categories that represent the samething?I'd say they are not. An EP is generally 4-5 tracks while a mini-album is somewhere between EP and album length (usually something like 10 or more tracks).It would also be nice to have maxi-single as an option. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:41 PM, lixobix arjtap...@gmail.com wrote: drsaunde wrote Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit and see if he clarifies it :) Based on the examples provided and the proposal, I cannot find any measurable difference between a mini-album and an EP, so I don't see why we need 2 categories for the same thing. Well, what's the measurable difference between a single, EP, and album? You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP: http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120 And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album: http://musicbrainz.org/release/d38d37ed-7da8-3105-bc4f-2e7661667126 The only difference is what the artist/label calls it. So how do you justify objecting on the basis of lack of a measurable difference? What measurable difference is there between single/EP/album that is lacking in relation to mini-album? That's pretty much my view of this too, yes. Given our definition of EP is it's an EP if called an EP, something called mini-album isn't an EP. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP: http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120 And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album: http://musicbrainz.org/release/d38d37ed-7da8-3105-bc4f-2e7661667126 The only difference is what the artist/label calls it. So how do you justify objecting on the basis of lack of a measurable difference? What measurable difference is there between single/EP/album that is lacking in relation to mini-album? That's pretty much my view of this too, yes. Given our definition of EP is it's an EP if called an EP, something called mini-album isn't an EP. What's the difference between Album, EP Single? These are common terms used in every music related site. Do people really not know these differences? Sometimes artist will take what we would normally define one of these categories and calls it another one of the categories. Artists are like that, they are creative and like to mess with us discographers concerned with order These exceptions still don't impact our general definitions of what a single/EP/Album is And what about those that are the same release but called Mini-Album in Japan and EP in North America or what about releases that meet our definition or are categorized elsewhere as and EP or mini-album, but aren't called either on the release...what do we call them then? I still don't see any value to have 2 terms for the same thing. drsaunde -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661875.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
drsaunde wrote And what about those that are the same release but called Mini-Album in Japan and EP in North America or what about releases that meet our definition or are categorized elsewhere as and EP or mini-album, but aren't called either on the release...what do we call them then? drsaunde or when they're called mini-album EPs? http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=2221791 -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661876.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:17 AM, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com wrote: Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP: http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120 And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album: http://musicbrainz.org/release/d38d37ed-7da8-3105-bc4f-2e7661667126 The only difference is what the artist/label calls it. So how do you justify objecting on the basis of lack of a measurable difference? What measurable difference is there between single/EP/album that is lacking in relation to mini-album? That's pretty much my view of this too, yes. Given our definition of EP is it's an EP if called an EP, something called mini-album isn't an EP. What's the difference between Album, EP Single? These are common terms used in every music related site. Do people really not know these differences? Sometimes artist will take what we would normally define one of these categories and calls it another one of the categories. Artists are like that, they are creative and like to mess with us discographers concerned with order These exceptions still don't impact our general definitions of what a single/EP/Album is Actually, for EP, we have no general definition at all. http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release_Group/Type#EP Generally an EP will be shorter than a full length release (an LP or Long Play) and the tracks are usually exclusive to the EP, in other words the tracks don't come from a previously issued release. EP is fairly difficult to define; *usually it should only be assumed that a release is an EP if the artist defines it as such* That's why, given that our definition is circular (it's an EP if it's an EP) I can't see how it can be used to block mini-album. Saying Usually it should only be assumed that a release is a mini-album if the artist/label defines it as such seems perfectly valid. I mean, sure, there will be a few cases where the information is conflicting or both are used, but then, we already have those for EP vs. Single (and for EPs repackaged as albums with a couple more tracks, and with vinyl EPs that are CD albums) and we don't say that makes neither EP nor single nor album an invalid choice :) (now I *really* need to go to bed, heh) ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
drsaunde wrote Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit and see if he clarifies it :) Based on the examples provided and the proposal, I cannot find any measurable difference between a mini-album and an EP, so I don't see why we need 2 categories for the same thing. Well, what's the measurable difference between a single, EP, and album? You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP: http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120 And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album: http://musicbrainz.org/release/d38d37ed-7da8-3105-bc4f-2e7661667126 The only difference is what the artist/label calls it. So how do you justify objecting on the basis of lack of a measurable difference? What measurable difference is there between single/EP/album that is lacking in relation to mini-album? -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661826.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit and see if he clarifies it :) Don't proposals require at least a +1 from someone other than the proposer? In this case that didn't happen as the minuses cancel out the plusses, so it should fail whether I veto or not. If that's not the case then fine I will veto. Based on the examples provided and the proposal, I cannot find any measurable difference between a mini-album and an EP, so I don't see why we need 2 categories for the same thing. A possible solution would be to rename the EP category to EP/Mini-Album that would make more sense to me. drsaunde -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661814.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On 27 Jan 2014 20:39, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com wrote: Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit and see if he clarifies it :) Don't proposals require at least a +1 from someone other than the proposer? In this case that didn't happen as the minuses cancel out the plusses, so it should fail whether I veto or not. Yes, which this got in its RFC phase - this is an RFV and +1 / -1 here are pointless. It's only vetoed or it passes. Mind, the entire concept of -1 isn't in the process at all and I have no idea where it came from... ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On 01/27/2014 07:39 PM, drsaunde wrote: Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit and see if he clarifies it :) Don't proposals require at least a +1 from someone other than the proposer? In this case that didn't happen as the minuses cancel out the plusses, so it should fail whether I veto or not. No, the style process isn't that rigid. At the RFC stage we should discuss until there is a rough consensus, +1 and -1 can be used to express agreement or disagreement, but it's not supposed to be an exact score. At the RFV stage anyone who wasn't paying attention during the RFC phase has a final chance to give their opinion. If someone strongly disagrees with the proposal they can veto it, which in my opinion requires the word veto to appear in the body and/or subject of that e-mail -- because otherwise it isn't at all clear wtf is going on :D -- Kuno / warp. ref. http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposals ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
I guess since the vote tally is two positive and two negative, this is in limbo/not passed? Sorry, I’m new at making feature requests to MB... On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 7:49, Mihai Spinei wrote: Hi, Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^ http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 4:39, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hi, On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote: I'd put something like this in the guidelines: A Mini-Album (or Mini-LP) is a release that is in between EP and Album in terms of number of tracks and length. The number of tracks is around 7-9, and the length varies from around 20-35 mins. There is no strict definition along these terms, as many EPs and Albums fit these criteria. What is important is that the artist or label consistently refers to the release as a Mini-Album. Where this is not the case, notably where Mini-Album and EP are used interchangeably, EP should be used. I like this advice of which one to pick if the label/artist/etc.. aren't clear about it. -- kuno / warp. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org (mailto:MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org) http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
This is an RFV, so that may qualify as a veto. On Jan 23, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote: Hello, On 01/23/2014 02:05 AM, Alex Mauer wrote: On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hello, On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote: Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant enough to warrant this distinction in the database, so -1 from me. As this is an RFV: Is that opinion strong enough to warrant a veto? No, that was just a -1. Not a veto. -- kuno / warp. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Mihai Spinei wrote Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282 wiki: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album Expires of 2014-01-25 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@.musicbrainz http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style -1 for me as well. I asked a question whether these mini-albums weren`t also released in other countries using different termanology, and never received a response that addresses that. Perhaps providing some examples as to what is a mini-album (which we haven`t been given) that could show this is more than just regional termanology drsaunde We shouldn`t be u -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661661.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
drsaunde wrote Mihai Spinei wrote Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282 wiki: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album Expires of 2014-01-25 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@.musicbrainz http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style -1 for me as well. I asked a question whether these mini-albums weren`t also released in other countries using different termanology, and never received a response that addresses that. Perhaps providing some examples as to what is a mini-album (which we haven`t been given) that could show this is more than just regional termanology drsaunde We shouldn`t be u +1 from me Here are some examples of mini-albums: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minotaur_(The_Clientele_album) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airbag.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_on_Pilgrim http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under_a_Blood_Red_Sky http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini-album Obviously, not all releases will consistently called one or the other, but in cases such as the two above mini-album should be used. I'd put something like this in the guidelines: A Mini-Album (or Mini-LP) is a release that is in between EP and Album in terms of number of tracks and length. The number of tracks is around 7-9, and the length varies from around 20-35 mins. There is no strict definition along these terms, as many EPs and Albums fit these criteria. What is important is that the artist or label consistently refers to the release as a Mini-Album. Where this is not the case, notably where Mini-Album and EP are used interchangeably, EP should be used. -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661662.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Hi, On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote: I'd put something like this in the guidelines: A Mini-Album (or Mini-LP) is a release that is in between EP and Album in terms of number of tracks and length. The number of tracks is around 7-9, and the length varies from around 20-35 mins. There is no strict definition along these terms, as many EPs and Albums fit these criteria. What is important is that the artist or label consistently refers to the release as a Mini-Album. Where this is not the case, notably where Mini-Album and EP are used interchangeably, EP should be used. I like this advice of which one to pick if the label/artist/etc.. aren't clear about it. -- kuno / warp. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Hi, Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^ http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 4:39, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hi, On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote: I'd put something like this in the guidelines: A Mini-Album (or Mini-LP) is a release that is in between EP and Album in terms of number of tracks and length. The number of tracks is around 7-9, and the length varies from around 20-35 mins. There is no strict definition along these terms, as many EPs and Albums fit these criteria. What is important is that the artist or label consistently refers to the release as a Mini-Album. Where this is not the case, notably where Mini-Album and EP are used interchangeably, EP should be used. I like this advice of which one to pick if the label/artist/etc.. aren't clear about it. -- kuno / warp. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org (mailto:MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org) http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote: Hello, On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote: Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant enough to warrant this distinction in the database Well, given the definition for EP we have is it is an EP if it claims to be an EP, the fact these don't claim to be EPs but mini-albums would sound like a significant enough difference. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
+1 - PATATE12 jesus2099 GOLD MASTER KING FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-STYLE-282-add-mini-album-primary-type-tp4661637p4661640.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hello, On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote: Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant enough to warrant this distinction in the database, so -1 from me. As this is an RFV: Is that opinion strong enough to warrant a veto? ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type
Hello, On 01/23/2014 02:05 AM, Alex Mauer wrote: On 1/22/2014 10:03 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hello, On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote: Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is significant enough to warrant this distinction in the database, so -1 from me. As this is an RFV: Is that opinion strong enough to warrant a veto? No, that was just a -1. Not a veto. -- kuno / warp. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
