Re: PGP/GPG
1999-11-23-06:04:27 J Horacio MG: > In addition, I also modify gnupg/cipher/Makefile.in to add those > algorithms to it. I'm not sure if this makes a difference at all, > though. I'm happy to say that that doesn't appear to be necessary. Very happy, since my RPMming of the addons is fairly independant of my main gnupg rpm. -Bennett PGP signature
save all attachments
Hi Have anyone suggestion how to save all attachments in tagged mails? It is no problem(with macro) if you have all emails just with one attachment. Here is a problem if here are different count of attachments. -- Keso well done, easy gone
Re: Playing WAV
> How can I set up to play a WAV file, after I receive new mail? > Currently, the mutt can be setup to beep. use procmail. with procmail, you can have it execute a script when new mail arives in a mailbox. man procmail, and procmailrc for info how -b PGP signature
Re: threading & msgs with bad dates
Even after upgrading to 1.0, here's my listing: 8 t Nov 19 brad( 7) Re: today 9 r > Nov 19 To sean ( 11) today 10 T Nov 19 javierc ( 16) |-> 11 > Nov 21 To sean ( 35) |-> I have sorting set to threads. I received 8 after I sent 9. My message 9 was at 17:00 and 8 says it was sent at 16:41 b/c the time on that machine is wrong. Setting sort_aux to date-received doesn't work, either. I appreciate the advice, though, just wish you hadn't been so condescending about it. Brian On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 07:37:54AM +, candypimp wrote: > "X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us" > Maybe you should upgrade to the latest version before complaining.. > I have 1.0, and it works just fine there. > Example: > 1 Nov 22 Gregory Neil Sh ( 73) |-> > 2 Dec 12 Michal Zalewski ( 26) Sendmail 8.x.x - any user may rebuild ali > > Btw: the reason that message 1 is above 2 is that I have > set sort=reverse-threads.. -- The 21st century begins on January 1, 2001.
Re: Odd IMAP bug (feature?)
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:30:49PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned: > I am frankly baffled. Were you low on disk space? Mutt fetches messages > into temp files - it sounds like it might not have been able to write to > them... Actually, I mentioned this to Brendan yesterday too - you have your index format setup to print the number of lines in the mail, not the size. IMAP just reports the size of the mails...so change the %l or %L in the format header to %c. Kate -- Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer. http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~valen
Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:04:57PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned: > On Tuesday, 23 November 1999 at 12:30, John P . Looney wrote: > > Anyone that's using IMAP - change "RECENT" to "UNSEEN" in > > imap/imap.c:1208, and "new mail" checking will feel a lot better. > > > > Thanks to Brendan Cully for pointing me in this direction... > > I haven't used non-IMAP mutt in such a long time I've forgotten how > folders with new mail are dealt with normally. Is this new behaviour > more like normal mutt? I've gotten kind of used to the current (\Recent) > behaviour, but if everyone would prefer going to \Unseen we can > certainly change it? > > In short, does mutt put all folders that have unread mail in the "new > mail" list, or only those that have mail that has arrived since you last > opened the folder? It seems that neither is 100% satisfactory. The way that it is in 1.1.1, is that when mutt scans the folders for new mail, it'll mark the folders as RECENT. If you don't read the folders, and twenty seconds later mutt polls the folders - they are now marked as UNSEEN - even though you have not opened the folder etc. A folder should be considered "New" if the user hasn't looked at the index of that folder since new mail has arrived. So, strictly speaking that change I mentioned isn't quite right either (It'll mark the folder as new, as long as there is a single unread mail in it). The folder should be set to "New" if the server considers it to contain RECENT messages, but this "New" flag should not be cleared until you actually view the folder through the "index" screen - it should not be cleared as soon as the folder status changes to UNSEEN. Does that make sense ? john -- Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer. http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~valen
Re: threading & msgs with bad dates
At 14:55 -0600 22 Nov 1999, brd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed that even though they have the same subject, though, a reply > that comes with a date-sent that shows a time before the original message > (from someone who's time is off on their pc) does not get included as > part of the thread. Any way to change this in the listing (besides At 07:37 + 24 Nov 1999, candypimp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us" > Maybe you should upgrade to the latest version before complaining.. > I have 1.0, and it works just fine there. > Example: > 1 Nov 22 Gregory Neil Sh ( 73) |-> > 2 Dec 12 Michal Zalewski ( 26) Sendmail 8.x.x - any user may rebuild ali > > Btw: the reason that message 1 is above 2 is that I have > set sort=reverse-threads.. It works with real threading, but it won't work that way for subject based threads. This is a feature, people will often reuse short subjects for unrelated messages so to reduce the number of incorrectly threaded messages Mutt will only consider a message to be a reply if it was sent after the original. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the demigodic party. -- Dennis Ritchie
Re: need to get my mail from windows - this sucks
On 1999-11-24 16:28:24 +1000, Darrin Mison wrote: > Any one aware of a dos/window port of mutt (binary) I've been told that some people manage to get mutt to work under Windows occasionaly. However, I can't give you any details about this. > or just a free/evaluation email program which I can use to download > and send which won't butcher my messages. Netscape Communicator should be fine for this purpose. It saves folders in what looks like an (almost) non-castrated mbox format, and I had no problems with accessing such mail folders from mutt - I just copied them over to the Samba server. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Re: Changing IMAP username on same IMAP server
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 02:22:36PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> My username is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, it really is!), would
> mutt cope with {[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mailandnews.co.uk}inbox ?
I posted a new patch to mutt-dev mailing list. It can handle your weird
username. :-]
--
Tommi Komulainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
