Re: Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-29 Thread malcolm.boekhoff

On 2001-03-29 12:11:57, Bob Bell wrote:

Unfortunately I can't use procmail because there it isn't in Cygwin yet and it don't 
compile OOTB (I am Cygwin on NT4).

> You might try using emil in your procmailrc to convert uuencoded
> files into MIME attachments.  If that works, you should then be able to
> deal with the BMP as a MIME attachments.  As things currently stand, it
> would just be treated as part of the message.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:08:18PM +, malcolm.boekhoff 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can some clever person please post a mailcap entry to deal with messages from
> > Microsoft Outlook Express, where the sender has attached a BMP.
> > 
> > The BMP kind of gets in-lined into the message, so that if you were reading it
> > with OE you would see the picture (some kind of OLE stuff, I think). I.e. you
> > don't have to explicitly open the attachment, you can see it in the preview
> > window.
> > 
> > The properties you get from OE are:
> > 
> > --> Message properties start here <--
> > Received: from boekhoffm (BOEKHOFF_M [10.16.92.39]) by cloisters-exch.actfs.co.uk 
>with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
> > id G683370T; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:55:34 +0100
> > Message-ID: <000801c0b869$0bc7bc50$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: etst
> > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:58:06 +0100
> > X-Priority: 3
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > begin 600 1.bmp
> > M0DU6$@H``#8HD`$``"8"```!`!@``"`2"@#$#@``Q`X`
> > M
> > M
> > M
> > M
> > M
> > M
> > M
> > 
> > .. and loads more.
> > --> Message properties end here <--
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -
>  "Linux represents a best-of-breed Unix, that is trusted in mission
>   critical applications, and -- due to it's open source code -- has
>   a long term credibility which exceeds many other competitive OS's."
>-- Microsoft "Halloween" Document



Re: Procmail & user+ext@bla.com addresses

2001-03-29 Thread Christian R Molls

* Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 19:15]:

>> I can use a (folder)-hook to set my From: header and envelope from to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> But how can I motivate procmail to filter my mail into
>> /home/user/Maildir/muttusers
>> if a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes back in?

>  What about
> :0:
> * ^TO_user+muttusers@her\.com
> /home/user/Maildir/muttusers/

I think he was looking for a somewhat more general solution:) Maybe:

:0:
* ^TO_user+\/.*@her\.com
`echo $MATCH | sed "s/@.*//"`

Untested, of course. (You might have to escape the "+" in the second
line, cannot remember the procmail regex syntax right now, too late:)

-- 
christian r. mollsthe rain descended,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   and the floods came



Re: regexp invalid range problem

2001-03-29 Thread Peter BARABAS

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:55:59PM +0200, HEGEDUS Ferenc wrote:
> 
> Error in /h/d/dark/.muttrc, line 98: Invalid range end
> 

It has something to do with locales. If you use LANG='C' it doesn't give
error about the range end.


Regards,
Z.

-- 

^ { Peter BARABAS } { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } $ {\n}
^ $me = 'Z0D'; $me_regexp = '/^(Z[03]D|q{Z0D})$/';  $ {\n}
^ @_o_pe_ra_tors_ = qw~q '' qq "" qx `` qw qr m // ?? qr s tr y~;   $ {\n}
^ ^|`-  _,-  '\_  <-_-_->  ,/^  {$+$}  :-) ::: ::: ::: : <- $ {\n}




macro trouble

2001-03-29 Thread Matt Dunford

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could help me with this macro.  I'm
trying to pipe messages with patches in them through sed.  But nothing
I'm doing is working.  Here's how I think it should look.

# extract patch from email
# sed command removes email signatures, 
macro index ,p '| sed \'N;/^\n-- $/,$d\' | (cd src/vim/src; patch)'

What am I doing wrong?

-- 
Justice keepeth the way of the innocent: 
but wickedness overthroweth the
sinner.
   -- Proverbs 13:5
--




regexp invalid range problem

2001-03-29 Thread HEGEDUS Ferenc

Hi

I have a following line in my .muttrc:

color body blue black [a-z]

This causes:

Error in /h/d/dark/.muttrc, line 98: Invalid range end

This regex only work if i writing [a-b]
Why? I tried " ' \ characters a lot. :)
Thanks.

d

Ps: Mutt 1.3.15i (2001-02-12), debian woody




Re: Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-29 Thread Enoch Wu

Yes,

When you are reading that email, press v to find out what it tells you
about the application type, something like:

application/vnd.ms-

So then you put this in .mailcap in your home directory:

application/vnd.ms- ; /usr/local/bin/gimp %s;  copiousoutput

The above assumes that you have Unix OS and that you want to run gimp as a
viewer.

Hope that helps.
EW

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, malcolm.boekhoff wrote:

> 
> Can some clever person please post a mailcap entry to deal with messages from
> Microsoft Outlook Express, where the sender has attached a BMP.
> 
> The BMP kind of gets in-lined into the message, so that if you were reading it
> with OE you would see the picture (some kind of OLE stuff, I think). I.e. you
> don't have to explicitly open the attachment, you can see it in the preview
> window.
> 
> The properties you get from OE are:
> 
> --> Message properties start here <--
> Received: from boekhoffm (BOEKHOFF_M [10.16.92.39]) by cloisters-exch.actfs.co.uk 
>with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
>   id G683370T; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:55:34 +0100
> Message-ID: <000801c0b869$0bc7bc50$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: etst
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:58:06 +0100
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> begin 600 1.bmp
> M0DU6$@H``#8HD`$``"8"```!`!@``"`2"@#$#@``Q`X`
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> 
> .. and loads more.
> --> Message properties end here <--
> 




Re: Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-29 Thread Bob Bell

You might try using emil in your procmailrc to convert uuencoded
files into MIME attachments.  If that works, you should then be able to
deal with the BMP as a MIME attachments.  As things currently stand, it
would just be treated as part of the message.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:08:18PM +, malcolm.boekhoff 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can some clever person please post a mailcap entry to deal with messages from
> Microsoft Outlook Express, where the sender has attached a BMP.
> 
> The BMP kind of gets in-lined into the message, so that if you were reading it
> with OE you would see the picture (some kind of OLE stuff, I think). I.e. you
> don't have to explicitly open the attachment, you can see it in the preview
> window.
> 
> The properties you get from OE are:
> 
> --> Message properties start here <--
> Received: from boekhoffm (BOEKHOFF_M [10.16.92.39]) by cloisters-exch.actfs.co.uk 
>with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
>   id G683370T; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:55:34 +0100
> Message-ID: <000801c0b869$0bc7bc50$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: etst
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:58:06 +0100
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> begin 600 1.bmp
> M0DU6$@H``#8HD`$``"8"```!`!@``"`2"@#$#@``Q`X`
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> M
> 
> .. and loads more.
> --> Message properties end here <--
> 

-- 
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
 "Linux represents a best-of-breed Unix, that is trusted in mission
  critical applications, and -- due to it's open source code -- has
  a long term credibility which exceeds many other competitive OS's."
   -- Microsoft "Halloween" Document



Re: Procmail & user+ext@bla.com addresses

2001-03-29 Thread Lars Hecking

Ralf Hildebrandt writes:
> I can use a (folder)-hook to set my From: header and envelope from to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But how can I motivate procmail to filter my mail into
> /home/user/Maildir/muttusers
> if a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes back in?

 What about

:0:
* ^TO_user+muttusers@her\.com
/home/user/Maildir/muttusers/

 ?




Procmail & user+ext@bla.com addresses

2001-03-29 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt

I can use a (folder)-hook to set my From: header and envelope from to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But how can I motivate procmail to filter my mail into
/home/user/Maildir/muttusers
if a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes back in?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]innominate AG
System EngineerDon't be afraid of what you see -
Diplom-Informatiker be afraid of what you don't see!
tel: +49.(0)7000.POSTFIX  fax: +49.(0)30.308806-698 




Re: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Wade A. Mosely

Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
> However, I obviously expressed myself badly. What I actually want is
> the ability to hit
>  ^foo 
> 
> and have it change the From and Sig to a pre-determined one,
> presumably using a :set command. ^bar to change to a different
> one. I'd prefer to be able to do this _after_ composing a message, but
> will accept answers on how to do it in the index.

I'm not sure about the signature being changed after composition by a
keyboard macro, an example to change the "From:" address to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED] (name)' using ^W :

macro compose \cw '( \
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name)' 'change to "From: name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'

I hope it helps!

-- Mr. Wade

-- 
Linux: The Choice of the GNU Generation





Re: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Brian Foley

* Ailbhe Leamy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [29-03-01] wrote:
> However, I obviously expressed myself badly. What I actually want is
> the ability to hit
>  ^foo 
> and have it change the From and Sig to a pre-determined one,
> presumably using a :set command. ^bar to change to a different
> one. I'd prefer to be able to do this _after_ composing a message, but
> will accept answers on how to do it in the index.

Here is a solution, provided you use vim as your editor.  If you don't
then the general idea should allow you to create a similar function
for your own editor.

:map ;f /-- dGo-- :r !/usr/games/fortune/^From:C
\From: Brian Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

:map ;g /-- dGo-- :r !/usr/games/fortune/^From:C
\From: Brian Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

the "\" in front of the second lines of both macros are line
continuation characters, if they dont work then just remove them and
join the two lines before you put them in your .vimrc.

These will toggle between two set From: lines while you are composing
and randomise the sig.  It could be easily adapted to use fixed sigs
as well, just change the !/usr/games/fortune bit to some fixed text
(or a unique sig file).  Setting the Reply-To: would also be trivial.

This assumes a couple of things:
1. you already have a sig in the file with a "-- " seperator
2. you have edit_headers turned on
3. you don't have any other lines beginning with "From:"

I hope this helps.  But please note that I havent acutally tested any
of this.
  Brian.


P.S.
This has nothing to do with your post, but here is another cool vim
trick that I discovered on this list a while back, and which may be of
interest to the rest of the group.  Put the following in your
.vimrc.mail (or whatever .vimrc you source while editing mail):

" Give mutt's window a proper header when composing
let i = 1
let line = getline(i)
while (match(line, "To:") == -1 && line != "")
let i = i + 1
let line = getline(i)
endwhile
if (line != "")
let i = match(line, " ") + 1
let j = match(line, "<") - 1
if j == -2
let j = match(line, ",")
endif
if j == -1
let j = strlen(line)
endif
let len = j - i
let address = strpart(line, i, len)
let title = "Mail to " . address
let title = substitute(title, " ", " ", "g")
let title = substitute(title, "\"", "", "g")
execute 'set titlestring=' . title
execute 'set iconstring=' . title
else
execute 'set titlestring=Mutt'
execute 'set iconstring=Mutt'
endif
execute 'set titleold=Mutt'

This will give a meaningful title to your xterm window when you are
composing mail.  If anybody has the time to improve it (eg when you
send mail to mulitple people) I would be interested!!!


-- 
Brian Foley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- www.maths.tcd.ie/~brianf
Visit the Intervarsity Track & Field web-site:  www.iv2001.com



How to get 'N' next to folder containing new messages?

2001-03-29 Thread malcolm.boekhoff


I have messages marked "N" in +cygwin, +mutt, but these folders are marked with
"N" in the folder viewer (the screen you get if you "").

I have +cygwin and +mutt in "mailboxes".

Funny that "N" appears next to "mbox" and "postponed", but not the other
mailboxes containing new messages.

Note that I have ""'d the messages from +inbox (the "spoofile").
They are still marked with "N" after saving though.



Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-29 Thread malcolm.boekhoff


Can some clever person please post a mailcap entry to deal with messages from
Microsoft Outlook Express, where the sender has attached a BMP.

The BMP kind of gets in-lined into the message, so that if you were reading it
with OE you would see the picture (some kind of OLE stuff, I think). I.e. you
don't have to explicitly open the attachment, you can see it in the preview
window.

The properties you get from OE are:

--> Message properties start here <--
Received: from boekhoffm (BOEKHOFF_M [10.16.92.39]) by cloisters-exch.actfs.co.uk with 
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id G683370T; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:55:34 +0100
Message-ID: <000801c0b869$0bc7bc50$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: etst
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:58:06 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600






begin 600 1.bmp
M0DU6$@H``#8HD`$``"8"```!`!@``"`2"@#$#@``Q`X`
M
M
M
M
M
M
M

.. and loads more.
--> Message properties end here <--



Re: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

On (29/03/01 10:06), Wade A. Mosely wrote:

> send-hook . "set from=\"`~/.mutt/selectfrom`\""
> (Note the use of backquotes for command substitution.)

> set signature='~/.mutt/createsig|'

This is lovely and I fully intend to use it, as soon as I write the
appropriate scripts.

However, I obviously expressed myself badly. What I actually want is
the ability to hit
 ^foo 

and have it change the From and Sig to a pre-determined one,
presumably using a :set command. ^bar to change to a different
one. I'd prefer to be able to do this _after_ composing a message, but
will accept answers on how to do it in the index.

And then I shall write some help docs on Macros. I couldn't find
anything I understood.

Ailbhe

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



Re: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Wade A. Mosely

Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
> Subject: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros
> 
> Is this possible? I can't find anything really useful using a Google
> search.

For the "From:" you could specify a shell script that outputs
your desired "From:" address on stdout, then use a send-hook to
call it.  For example, if the script to generate your "From:"
address is ~/.mutt/selectfrom (and is mode +x) you could:

send-hook . "set from=\"`~/.mutt/selectfrom`\""

(Note the use of backquotes for command substitution.)

For the signature, just specify the script with a pipe.  If
$signature ends with a pipe ('|'), it is treated as a shell
command and its stdout is used as the signature.  If you had a
script ~/.mutt/createsig that delivered a random signature on
stdout, then:

set signature='~/.mutt/createsig|'

Good luck.  :)

-- Mr. Wade

-- 
Linux: The Choice of the GNU Generation





Re: "Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Ailbhe Leamy proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

> Is this possible? I can't find anything really useful using a Google
> search.

For your .sig, it can be a shell script that calls (say) fortune.
For the from header, I suggest you use set envelope_from and a set of vim
macros.

-s

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



"Randomly" change From: and signature using Macros

2001-03-29 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

Is this possible? I can't find anything really useful using a Google
search.

Ailbhe

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



Re: mutt-qmail-procmail, cannot send mail

2001-03-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

> i find this changing operation to another list-folder
> a bit clumsy -c? choose from a list-, is there another way?

Just press c, and then =foldername will take you to the folder called
foldername

> and a second question: how to take the reply to: address
> as e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to bother a person
> unwillingly by private email, you dont seem to mind:-)

In most mailing lists, dont set a reply-to header.  The list will add its own
header.

> #default folder hooks
> folder-hook . set sort=threads
> folder-hook . set signature=/tmp/sig.mallet
> folder-hook . 'set attribution = "Using a large mallet, %n whacked out:"'
> folder-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
> folder-hook . my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
> folder-hook . my_hdr Organization: The Lumber Cartel, India (tinlcI)
> folder-hook . my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -mnrs`
> 
> #mutt folder hooks
> folder-hook mutt unmy_hdr reply-to
> folder-hook mutt set sort=threads
> folder-hook mutt set signature=/tmp/sig.mallet
> folder-hook mutt 'set attribution="%n proclaimed on mutt-users that: "'
> folder-hook mutt my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
> folder-hook mutt my_hdr Organization: The Lumber Cartel, India (tinlcI)
> folder-hook mutt my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -mnrs`

ps - as for the "stormy weather train driver", spammers are stupid - so
expecting them to speak any language grammatically (even their own language)
would be expecting a bit too much :)

-s

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin