Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
Many thanks for detail steps and explanation. I compiled and am now using the new mutt. -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
On Monday, 15 June 2009 at 09:25, bill lam wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Brendan Cully wrote: > > Silly autoconf. Try: > > autoreconf -i > > ./config.status --recheck > > ./config.status > > I tried > > $ autoconf -i ./config.status > /usr/bin/m4:aclocal.m4:917: cannot open `m4/libgnutls.m4': No such file or > directory > autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 > > $ ls m4 > codeset.m4 funcdecl.m4 gettext.m4 gpgme.m4 iconv.m4 Makefile.am > README > curslib.m4 funcs.m4 glibc21.m4 gssapi.m4 lcmessage.m4 progtest.m4 > types.m4 > > Apparently that libgnutls.m4 is not inside hg repository. Where can I get > that file? Those were on separate lines because they were meant to be separate commands, issued one after the other. $ autoreconf -i $ ./config.status --recheck $ ./config.status libgnutls.m4 has been deliberately removed, but the build system needs to be hit on the head to figure that out. That's what the steps above do.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Brendan Cully wrote: > Silly autoconf. Try: > autoreconf -i > ./config.status --recheck > ./config.status I tried $ autoconf -i ./config.status /usr/bin/m4:aclocal.m4:917: cannot open `m4/libgnutls.m4': No such file or directory autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 1 $ ls m4 codeset.m4 funcdecl.m4 gettext.m4 gpgme.m4 iconv.m4 Makefile.am README curslib.m4 funcs.m4 glibc21.m4 gssapi.m4 lcmessage.m4 progtest.m4 types.m4 Apparently that libgnutls.m4 is not inside hg repository. Where can I get that file? Linux debian 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu May 28 21:28:49 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
On Monday, 15 June 2009 at 08:46, bill lam wrote: > > Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an > > After hg pull and update. It failed to make or even make clean with error > message. > > make: *** No rule to make target `m4/libgnutls.m4', needed by > `Makefile.in' > > I can build earlier 1.5.19 version without problem. Any idea how to > fix it? Silly autoconf. Try: autoreconf -i ./config.status --recheck ./config.status
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
> Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an After hg pull and update. It failed to make or even make clean with error message. make: *** No rule to make target `m4/libgnutls.m4', needed by `Makefile.in' I can build earlier 1.5.19 version without problem. Any idea how to fix it? -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
Re: Mutt on Mac: MuttToMail
On Sat 13 Jun 2009 at 18:26:27 PDT Greg Darke wrote: Support for this is already built directly into iTerm. You have to set up a bookmark explicitly for mutt (mine has the command '/sw/bin/mutt "$$URL$$"'), and then bind this command to the mailto url (in the application preferences). Cool. When I first installed iTerm long ago, I looked at the URL Handlers tab in iTerm's Preferences, but I didn't grok what they were for. So I completely forgot about them.
Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?
On (23:43 14/06/09), Michael Tatge put forth the proposition: * On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 08:47PM +0100 d...@unrealize.co.uk (d...@unrealize.co.uk) muttered: Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? Are you looking for reverse_name maybe? Yes, reverse_name + alternates seems to work well, and folder-hooks catches thing like mailing list folders. HTH, Michael -- *** PUBLIC flooding detected from erikyyy THAT's an erik, pholx ;) -- Seen on #LinuxGER PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD Jabber: init...@amessage.de -- "Just once, I wish we would encounter an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets" -- The Brigader, "Dr. Who" pgpgIbD7uZ8YF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?
On (15:59 14/06/09), Patrick Shanahan put forth the proposition: * d...@unrealize.co.uk [06-14-09 15:50]: Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based on To: Have you considered send2-hook, described in TFM? I haven't had much success with send2hook or reply-hook. I'm probably not putting in the correct regexp and haven't found much in the way of examples on the intertubes. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org -- Stupidity got us into this mess -- why can't it get us out? pgpBIJuU2cv01.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: "Intelligent" (per-message) mbox-hook?
On 19:18 Sun 14 Jun , Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote: > > > I guess I'm not the first one hitting this problem, so - Is there any > > way to solve it? > > Maybe, use define mbox-hook in message-hook for per-message like so: > > message-hook ~A 'unhook mbox-hook' > message-hook 'mbox-hook ...' > You mean like this (tries to sort mail from two people from this list into different mailboxes. My spool mailbox is called "spool"): message-hook ~A 'unhook mbox-hook' message-hook '~f pdmef' 'mbox-hook spool "=foobar"' message-hook '~f grante' 'mbox-hook spool "=quux"' Sorry, but this does /not/ work, it determines the mbox to use by the message that was viewed last, not individually per message. Any other ideas? It would be so nice if mbox-hook could accept arbitrary patterns... Thanks, Steffen
Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?
* On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 08:47PM +0100 d...@unrealize.co.uk (d...@unrealize.co.uk) muttered: > Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work > out what to put for From:? Are you looking for reverse_name maybe? HTH, Michael -- *** PUBLIC flooding detected from erikyyy THAT's an erik, pholx ;) -- Seen on #LinuxGER PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD Jabber: init...@amessage.de
Re: Set From: address with hook match on To: address?
* d...@unrealize.co.uk [06-14-09 15:50]: > Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work > out what to put for From:? > > At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based > on To: Have you considered send2-hook, described in TFM? -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
Set From: address with hook match on To: address?
Is it possible to apply some sort of regexp on the To: address to work out what to put for From:? At the moment I use folder hooks but it would be useful to do it based on To: Cheers David -- "I wish there was a knob on the TV to turn up the intelligence. There's a knob called `brightness', but it doesn't work." -- Gallagher pgpDMSrookaL4.pgp Description: PGP signature
[ANNOUNCE] 1.5.20 released
Hi all, Mutt 1.5.20 is out at the usual locations. This release contains an enormous number of bugfixes (Rocco has been on a rampage), and the following high-level changes: ! $fcc_attach is a quadoption now + $honor_disposition to honor Content-Disposition headers + $search_context specifies number of context lines for search results in pager/page-based menus ! ssl_use_sslv2 defaults to no + uncolor works for header + body objects, too + the "flagged" and "replied" flags are enabled/supported for POP when built with header caching ! browser correctly displays maildir's mtime + and work in the pager, too + ~x pattern also matches against In-Reply-To + lower case patterns for string searches perform case-insensitive search as regex patterns do (except IMAP) + $ssl_verify_dates controls whether mutt checks the validity period of SSL certificates + $ssl_verify_hostname controls whether mutt will accept certificates whose host names do not match the host name in the folder URL. There are only a few loose ends to tie up before the first release candidate for 1.6, mostly concerning new mail handling. So please test this one as much as you can. Thanks, and happy mutting. pgpbEBUAhJ4DF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mapi support
On 2009-06-14, Asif Iqbal wrote: > Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server > 2007? > > imap or pop3 is not open. Yes, but it's very, very, ugly (which is generally true of anything involving MS Exchange Server). First you need a windows PC with Outlook. Second, you need a copy of a Python program I wrote many years ago that uses Outlook's COM interface to fetch messages. Third, you need an SMTP server to which the Python program can hand off the messages for local delivery. Fourth, you need to customize the Python program's routine that translates Exchange's f'ed up addresses into something real. I haven't used that program in 6-7 years, but I can probably dig up a copy if you want. You'd be far better off if you could convince the Exchange admin to enable IMAP support. -- Grant
Re: mapi support
Hi, * Asif Iqbal wrote: > Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server 2007? At the moment: no. I don't know of anybody working on it. Rocco
Re: "Intelligent" (per-message) mbox-hook?
Hi, * Steffen Schuldenzucker wrote: > I guess I'm not the first one hitting this problem, so - Is there any > way to solve it? Maybe, use define mbox-hook in message-hook for per-message like so: message-hook ~A 'unhook mbox-hook' message-hook 'mbox-hook ...' The drawback like with save-hook is that you have to view the message first to make message-hook trigger. And decoded saving and decoded copying triggers these message-hooks, too. Rocco
mapi support
Is there a way to get mail through mapi from exchange server 2007? imap or pop3 is not open. -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >From: Khusro Jaleel >Replying to myself here. I believe I have found the cause of the problem AND >fixed it. We shall see. > >After finding out about the 'noatime' flag on the partition, googling 'mutt >noatime' immediately gave >results that were much more relevant to my problem. For example, from the Mutt >wiki: > >http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Folder > >Do a search on that page for 'noatime' and you'll find the solution right >there! I had to rebuild mutt >with --enable-buffy-size so that it looks at file sizes instead of atimes. It >says it might give suboptimal >results, so we'll see how well it goes. > >At the moment it seems to be working quite well; those erroneous messages >about new mail are completely gone. > >Many thanks for your help on this, Steve. I've learned how to install CentOS >SRPMS, modify the .spec file >and rebuild it as a result :-) So I'm happy. Good detective work. Glad to have helped. Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAko08+oACgkQX7YJI4BuyDTqTACfTzgw74nKzNHvL70WBCvImh9w X8kAnirI3ATlMgssvqWY+we6Uur06evk =uI0f -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?
Replying to myself here. I believe I have found the cause of the problem AND fixed it. We shall see. After finding out about the 'noatime' flag on the partition, googling 'mutt noatime' immediately gave results that were much more relevant to my problem. For example, from the Mutt wiki: http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Folder Do a search on that page for 'noatime' and you'll find the solution right there! I had to rebuild mutt with --enable-buffy-size so that it looks at file sizes instead of atimes. It says it might give suboptimal results, so we'll see how well it goes. At the moment it seems to be working quite well; those erroneous messages about new mail are completely gone. Many thanks for your help on this, Steve. I've learned how to install CentOS SRPMS, modify the .spec file and rebuild it as a result :-) So I'm happy.
Re: 'mailboxes' command misbehaving?
* Steve Revilak (st...@srevilak.net) wrote: > $ wc -l foo.txt > 2 foo.txt > $ ls -l foo.txt > 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 srevilak users 58 Jun 13 20:20 foo.txt > $ ls -lu foo.txt > 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 srevilak users 58 Jun 13 20:23 foo.txt Many thanks for your investigative work, Steve, I think I know exactly what the problem is know! I'm doing this inside a VM and have just confirmed that my provider is mounting the / partition using "noatime", that might be why! When I do the above on my machine I get: $ date >> foo.txt $ ls -l foo.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 kjaleel kjaleel 58 Jun 14 07:30 foo.txt $ ls -lu foo.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 kjaleel kjaleel 58 Jan 1 00:00 foo.txt $ wc -l foo.txt 2 foo.txt $ ls -l foo.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 kjaleel kjaleel 58 Jun 14 07:30 foo.txt $ ls -lu foo.txt -rw-rw-r-- 1 kjaleel kjaleel 58 Jan 1 00:00 foo.txt So, the atime is never changed. This might explain it. Perhaps I should speak to my hosting provider and request they remove the option or I can probably 'remount' it myself without the "noatime" option.
