Re: test shell env in .muttrc
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:18:05PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
I think there may be an internal way as well, but one option would be to
set an env var (e.g., TYPE) depending on the type of session, and then
do something like (untested):
source ~/.mutt/colors.${TYPE:-default}
See also for some examples of
MuttLisp. For example:
source (concat "~/.mutt/colors." (or $TYPE default))
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: test shell env in .muttrc
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:26:16PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to test the
> shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if" statement.
>
> I enter mutt in several ways (direct, aliases, shell scripts,
> functions, etc) and from several devices. My smart phone needs a
> different color scheme than the other devices.
I think there may be an internal way as well, but one option would be to
set an env var (e.g., TYPE) depending on the type of session, and then
do something like (untested):
source ~/.mutt/colors.${TYPE:-default}
Or you could key it on hostname, similar to this example:
https://lwn.net/Articles/587348/
You can also source a shell script to do some stuff
https://mutt-users.mutt.narkive.com/WovuIH31/conditionally-include-a-file-in-the-configuration
there may be some patches to support more within the config itself.
neomutt (which I don't use personally) has some support via this hook:
https://neomutt.org/feature/ifdef
Re: Muttlisp question
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 04:12:01PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: set muttlisp_inline_eval bind index j (if (equal $sidebar_visible "yes") \ 'sidebar-next' \ 'next-undeleted') I realized after I sent that you might be wanting to dynamically determine if the sidebar is visible. The above just affects what is bound to 'j' when evaluated. To do that, you could try a macro: macro index j 'run (if (equal $sidebar_visible "yes") \ "exec sidebar-next" \ "exec next-undeleted")' It's a bit less efficient, so if that's a concern, you could just use a macro to toggle $sidebar_visible and at the same time source a file with the special "sidebar toggling" bind commands. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
test shell env in .muttrc
Perhaps I've overlooked the facility. Is there a way to test the shell environment in .muttrc? Basically an "if" statement. I enter mutt in several ways (direct, aliases, shell scripts, functions, etc) and from several devices. My smart phone needs a different color scheme than the other devices. It is easy enough to use a macro I have to rotate among several color schemes, but I would prefer to automate it on entry if possible. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@labadie.us 154 Milkweed Dr (540) 868-8052 (H) Lake Frederick, VA 22630(703) 935-6720 (M)
Re: Muttlisp question
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 12:24:58AM +0100, Andy Spiegl wrote:
I'm trying to bind the "j" key to the function "sidebar-next" if the sidebar is
visible.
The only doable way seems to be using muttlisp.
I tried to follow the example in the mutt manual but I'm failing to write this
tiny piece of lisp code.
Could someone help me please to correct the follwing?
Or maybe there is a better/easier way to do this?
--
# sidebar visible --> bind index j next-undeleted
# sidebar NOT visible --> bind index j sidebar-next
bind index j '\
(or \
(if (not $sidebar_visible) 'next-undeleted') \
('sidebar-next') \
) \
'
Try something like:
set muttlisp_inline_eval
bind index j (if (equal $sidebar_visible "yes") \
'sidebar-next' \
'next-undeleted')
The muttlisp can't be inside quotes, so I removed the outer single
quotes.
Also, boolean variables evaluate to "yes" or "no". I will add this to
the documentation.
Hope that helps.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Muttlisp question
Good evening,
I'm trying to bind the "j" key to the function "sidebar-next" if the sidebar is
visible.
The only doable way seems to be using muttlisp.
I tried to follow the example in the mutt manual but I'm failing to write this
tiny piece of lisp code.
Could someone help me please to correct the follwing?
Or maybe there is a better/easier way to do this?
--
# sidebar visible --> bind index j next-undeleted
# sidebar NOT visible --> bind index j sidebar-next
bind index j '\
(or \
(if (not $sidebar_visible) 'next-undeleted') \
('sidebar-next') \
) \
'
--
Mutt complains like this:
Error in line 643: (or
(if (not $sidebar_visible) next-undeleted)
(sidebar-next)) : no such function in map
Thanks a lot!
Andy
--
A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on.
(William S. Burroughs)
PGP signed messages and MS Outlook
Hi, a couple of days ago, people using MS Outlook started complaing that my messages looked "strange". I asked for an example and received this: > > Subject: Re: Finanzierung > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; > > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zd5+bFLIq/fPSfy5" > > > > --Zd5+bFLIq/fPSfy5 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Content-Disposition: inline > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Lieber x, > > > > vielen Dank. Wenn wir die Parallelit=C3=A4t ... The headers below the Subject header are visible to the recipient, and the quoted-printable content is not unquoted by the client. The message in question is PGP signed and properly displayed in mutt (of course) and Apple Mail. The source of the message (as received via MS Exchange) looks like this: > Subject: Re: Finanzierung > Message-ID: > References: > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zd5+bFLIq/fPSfy5" > Content-Disposition: inline > In-Reply-To: > Return-Path: my.addr...@hs-duesseldorf.de > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: > eededcf1-f439-486e-1257-08dad6c4c55a > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: zvexch6.IT.lan > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Internal > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthMechanism: 07 > X-Originating-IP: [10.5.7.121] > X-ClientProxiedBy: zvexch6.IT.lan (10.5.7.76) To zvexch6.IT.lan (10.5.7.76) > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0 > X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Recipient-P2-Type: Bcc > X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:00.3281613 > X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.01.2507.016 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-TUID: pVjn50NSefgW > > --Zd5+bFLIq/fPSfy5 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Lieber , > > vielen Dank. Wenn wir die Parallelit=C3=A4t ... The issue only occurs with signed messages – sending the very same (plain text) message without the signature works fine for Outlook-using recipients. I have signed my messages for several months now, without any negative feedback – is anyone aware of recent changes in Outlook which might have caused this? - Jan signature.asc Description: PGP signature
