Re: Changing X-Sender header
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:26:28AM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote: I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both. Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows. Thank you, Kent -- Kent R. Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium Subject: Test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: RO Content-Length: 365 Lines: 14 This action is defined when mutt is compiled and resides in the mutt binary itself. If you want to remove it, you could find the appropriate lines in the source code that adds it and modify the code accordingly. Or you could just leave it in as a way to advertise and advocate the use of mutt. :-) That's primarily why I haven't taken it out. -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "Every successful person has had failures but repeated failure is no guarantee of eventual success." PGP signature
Re: muttzilla
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:19:34PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for it but did not find anything. Where do i find it? Thx in advance. http://www3.bc.sympatico.ca/brian_winters/mutt/ - chris -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "5 out of 4 people don't understand fractions."
Procmail Bug and PGP/GPG
Hello, I've been using mutt for sometime now, but just signed up for this list today, so I apologize if this has already been discussed. :-) There is a bug in the current version of procmail (3.14 - not sure if it goes back further than that) that does not allow the procmail recipe supplied in the FAQ and "Using Mutt with PGP/GPG" to work correctly. I have verified this bug with the procmail maintainer and he's going to hopefully have a fix before the next release. In a nutshell, any line matching the regexp: ^[^ ]+[ ]+: Will lose a whitespace before the colon. I was pulling my hair out for a while trying to find out why some of my signed messages were coming back with bad signature errors. The way to get by this (and streamline the procmail filter in the process), is to add an 'h' flag to the receipe. So instead of: :0 fBw Beginning the receipe, use: :0 fBwh To change only the header of the message. I'm cc'ing the maintainers/creators of the FAQ and PGP/GPG links on the official mutt page in hopes that they can made the above changes to their pages. Thanks, - chris -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "If you can't convince them, confuse them."
Re: Procmail Bug and PGP/GPG
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote: I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under FreeBSD. I'm able to handle both encrypted and signed messages. The only patch applied by the FreeBSD port system to the source code itself is in recommend.c, thus it should not be a issue. Only thing I can think off is that it might have something to do with me using Maildirs. Might be that the bug is somewhere in the mbox specific code. Both procmail and mutt support maildirs tho, so I don't really see any reason not to use them. Try signing the following in-line - without using mutt's built in PGP handling. E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it's signed in-line and flows through procmail, the body get rewritten to: E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since the body is modified, the signature is no longer valid. - chris -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "All general statements are false."
Re: Procmail Bug and PGP/GPG
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote: I'm really tired, but unless I've misunderstood something, you wanted: I was too literal with my writing. :-) I indented the example out of habit. :-) Do what you did, but put it at the beginning of the line with no indentation: E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] That removes the space before the colon and as a result, gives me: gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 29 18:05:37 2000 CST using DSA key ID B7F8A3FD gpg: BAD signature from "Christopher Uy [EMAIL PROTECTED]" - chris -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice."
Re: Procmail Bug and PGP/GPG
PGP message
