group-reply Bcc
Hi I have asked this some time ago [1] but I may have not been specific enough. I'll give it another shot. I have write_bcc=yes set and therefore a copy of a sent mail will have the Bcc header set and filled with recipients. I'd like to to that mail and wonder how to make the reply mail get the Bcc header filled. doesn't do that. Is there any setting that I may have overlooked in the manual? If not, I should be able to write a macro which extracts the Bcc from the mail when replying. I'm thinking along the lines of and "formail -x Bcc" for extracting the header and my_hdr for setting it, but I have kind of a hard time coming up with a working macro, so if someone has some clever hints, that'll be great. Thanks! best, Steve [1] https://marc.info/?l=mutt-users=144239490327363=2
Re: sidebar_whitelist not working
On Mar 21 12:08 -0500, Arturo wrote: > > Hello, I have a ton of Gmail labels/folders i've setup over the years that I > don't want > to see all the time in the sidebar. But there are a few I'd like to be > there whether or not they contain new mail. If you use Gmail and IMAP, you could also (u) from the ones you don't want to see. You may also need to set imap_check_subscribed=yes for this to be useful. best, Steve
Re: can't read sent encrypted mail
On Oct 07 21:02 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:46:42AM +0200, Peter P. wrote: [...] > > How would I add my own key to the encryption in gpgme? > > You could try adding an 'encrypt-to' setting in your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf file. Sorry for being late. I hit the same problem as Peter -- Debian's config sets crypt_use_gpgme=yes in /etc/Muttrc.d/gpg.rc as of 1.7.x I had the encrypt-to set in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf before, which has the downside that it will *always* encrypt with my key also outside of mutt, where I might not want that. That's why I like the option of setting --encrypt-to in gpg.rc using the classic interface -- restrict the encrypt-to to mutt. Since gpgme is a gpg API, there seems to be no gpgme.conf or such where one could set this option. Therefore, I'll use the classic interface as long as it exists :) best, Steve
Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap
On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I think I see the problem. Mutt is using a fixed buffer of size 1024 > when expanding the %r parameter. I think when the system was designed, > no one anticipated expanding 50+ keys in a single gpg invocation. :-) Yes, I was suspecting something like that. > Right now, the best I can suggest is trying gpgme instead. I'll work on > a solution for a future release. Thanks! I'll give gpgme a spin. I didn't find that much documentation, though. I only need to set crypt_use_gpgme crypt_use_pka instead of defining the various pgp_* variables (usually shipped in gpg.rc)? Do they have any effect, then? Thanks, again. best, Steve
crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap
Hi all The following is related to [1], i.e. use multiple crypt-hook commands. I'm using something like this[*] crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com EX9B197029581FAC crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 4C95T7E7F627637D crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 74464897317CDA88 crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com FECEC90758BB1D95 crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 866BAB720X7E9L98 Running this with mutt -d2, I see in the debug log that the list of recipients is passed to pgpewrap, but truncated as follows (lines broken): [2016-07-26 14:49:12] mutt_pgp_command: /usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg2 --batch --quiet --no-verbose --textmode --output - --encrypt --encrypt-to --sign -u Y --armor --always-trust -- -r 0xEX9B197029581FAC 0x4C95T7E7F627637D 0x74464897317CDA -- /tmp/mutt-foo-1000-aaa-bb i.e. mutt * stops at the third[**] key 74464897317CDA88 (length 16) and * passes a truncated version 74464897317CDA (length 14) to pgpewrap which then gives me a "gpg: skipped: Invalid user ID". The related pgp setting is set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="/usr/lib/mutt/pgpewrap gpg2 %?p?--passphrase-fd 0? --batch --quiet --no-verbose --textmode --output %- --encrypt --encrypt-to --sign %?a?-u %a? --armor %--always-trust -- -r %r -- %f" Does anybody know what's going on here (Debian, Mutt 1.6.0 (2016-04-01))? Any hint is appreciated. Thank you very much! best, Steve [1] http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users=146850542227714=2 [*] The key ids are fetched from gpg2 --list-keys --with-colons company.com | grep ^pub:f: | cut -d: -f5 [**] In my tests, I have 64 keys in total and the truncated one is number 54.
Re: gpg groups or encrypt to multiple recipients (mailing list)
On Jul 14 07:07 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com key1 > crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com key2 > crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com keyN > unset crypt_confirmhook That's much better, indeed. I'm now using something like this in a script which I souce: gpg2 --list-key | sed -nre 's/.*<(.*@company\.com)>.*/crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com \1/p' Thank's a lot! best, Steve
gpg groups or encrypt to multiple recipients (mailing list)
Hi I'd like to ask what approach people have to send encrypted mail to multiple mailing list recipients in mailing list via a mailing list address (say mailing.l...@company.com). Sadly, my company's policy is to not have a mailing list key and let the mail server re-encrypt the mail. I know it sucks, but I need to send encrypted mail to the list anyway. I'm aware of [1,2] and used the approach in [2]: # .gnupg/gpg.conf group 0x12345678 = key1 key2 .. keyN # muttrc crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 0x12345678 This is OK for me, apart from making up a hex key -- this is really awkward (I literally used 0x12345678). Are there other workarounds in use? The solution above can't be the only one. Apart from the gpg group thing, I would have been fine with the option of interactively selecting the keys to encrypt to in the PGP menu, independently from the actual recipient's address. Is this possible? Thanks! best, Steve [1] https://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2873 [2] https://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/973
keep Fcc/Bcc when replying
Hello all This is probably trivial, however I could not find the appropriate section in the manual. I have a message that I sent and which may include Cc, Bcc and Fcc headers. Ho do I reply, including all Cc + Fcc + Bcc recipients? seems to work only * for Cc * when the message is not from myself while the Bcc and Fcc headers are never taken over to the reply. Right now I'm saving the to-be-replied-to mail, compose the reply and then copy the Bcc header from the saved one. best, Steve
Re: collapse threads automatically after imap mailbox update
On Sep 12 09:16 -0500, Jeff Melton wrote: > Your mail made it to the list, yes. OK thanks for the info. best, Steve
collapse threads automatically after imap mailbox update
Hello all I'm using folder-hook . "push " to collapse threads. Recently, I started using imapfilter since one of the imap servers to which I'm connecting has no sieve support. The problem is now that when imapfilter alters the mailbox that I am currently viewing (move mail, ...), then mutt will uncollapse all threads. Is there a way to collapse them automatically after a mailbox update? Thanks for any hints! best, Steve
limit to threads with certain number of messages
Hello Is there a way to limit to threads that have only a certain number of messages in it, something like ~(~M 10). I found no pattern modifier to do that. The only related thread I could dig out is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/18902/focus=19085 Thanks for any hints. best, Steve
Re: limit to threads with certain number of messages
On Jul 21 11:35 +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: You might have to patch mutt with this patch to get the ~Z modifier: http://does-not-exist.org/mail-archives/mutt-users/msg19738.html Ah thanks. I think I remember that message. I had to search web archives because I deleted messages from last year. Strangely, the thread did not show up at gmane.org, but I just checked and it does show up at markmail.org. best, Steve
Re: Abbreviate full imap folder names
On Sep 25 01:22 +0300, Cristopher Thomas wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 17:30, Steve Schmerler elcort...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi In the folder browser, can I abbreviate things like 11 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX 12 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/mutt-users to, say 11 0 gmail/INBOX 12 0 gmail/mutt-users I don't know if you've found a solution yet, but offlineimap makes this possible. Setting up 'nametrans' allows offlineimap to read from a folder on the imap server, eg '[Gmail]All Mail', and write to a local folder such as 'archive', and vice-versa. Ah ok good to know. I'll keep that in mind should I switch to offlineimap one day. Thank you. best, Steve
default directory for change-dir
Hi I really like mutt, but fiddling with IMAP is driving me nuts sometimes :) I think I do not understand some fundamental behavior. Say I have two IMAP accounts. In the browser: 1 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/ 2 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX 3 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/foo 4 0 imaps://mail.messagingengine.com:992/ 5 0 imaps://mail.messagingengine.com:992/INBOX 6 0 imaps://mail.messagingengine.com:992/bar I'm using set imap_passive=no set imap_check_subscribed=yes set imap_list_subscribed=yes and have all subscribed folders in the browser. Very nice. But say I want to enter imaps://imap.gmail.com/ anyway to see unsubscribed sub-folders. Highlighting it and pressing Enter puts me in imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX. So I figure that I have to change-dir imaps://imap.gmail.com/ It seems that change-dir has a default dir, which seems to be the current dir where Mutt is running. So, pressing c in the browser gives me my HOME as default dir If I started Mutt there. Chdir to: /home/elcorto This is problematic when I construct macros: macro browser ,gm change-dirimaps://imap.gmail.com macro browser ,fm change-dirimaps://mail.messagingengine.com:992 Then, I get (,gm): Chdir to: /home/elcorto/imaps://imap.gmail.com I tried unsetting $folder and $spoolfile but the default dir is still there. Is there a way to unset this default dir? Or am I totally off the track here? Thanks for your help. best, Steve
Re: default directory for change-dir
On Sep 22 00:46 +0200, Rado S wrote: See wiki - guide - /Folders + /Actions I assume that you are referring to the section TAB completion in editor mode. That kind of explains where the default dir comes from (the internal browsing directory for the next directory scan). Who knew. See editor bindings and use kill-line. That did it. This is very useful. Another command learned. macro browser ,gm change-dirkill-lineimaps://imap.gmail.comenter Thank you! best, Steve
Abbreviate full imap folder names
Hi In the folder browser, can I abbreviate things like 11 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX 12 0 imaps://imap.gmail.com/mutt-users to, say 11 0 gmail/INBOX 12 0 gmail/mutt-users This is with set folder_format=%2C %5N %f I found this thread [1]. Has the situation changed in the meantime? Thanks. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/20058 best, Steve
Re: abook: query notes field
On Sep 02 17:38 -0700, Chip Camden wrote: Sorry to respond to myself -- but this version has minor improvements. That's neat! Thanks for the nice script. So it is either parse-it-yourself or use a full-fledged LDAP. If I script the parser myself, I might as well set up a small sqlite db to hold my contacts. There is no real need to use abook, then. Thanks. best, Steve
abook: query notes field
Hi Say I have abook entries like [0] name=Bob B. email=...@gmail.com nick=bob notes=friend,coworker [1] name=Alice A. email=al...@gmail.com nick=alice notes=friend Is it possible to query the notes field? abook --mutt-query friend abook --mutt-query coworker abook returns Not found in that case and seems to search only in the name and email fields. The background is that I want to high-jack the notes field to tag entries with an arbitrary (comma separated) list of tags (friend, coworker) and, for instance, send a mail to all people with the friend tag. If that is not possible, what other address book systems do people use which can handle tags which can be queried? Thanks. best, Steve
