More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Timothy Grant

Hi again,

OK, so fetchmail-procmail-mutt now work correctly

Colours aren't working right but I'm getting closer

Thanks for everyone who assisted on the above problems.

Now the newest problem is sending. I have a tremendous hate relationship
with Sendmail, so I use Postfix pretty much everywhere, however on my
puny little notebook computer where I live, I would prefer not to be
running a smtp daemon at all times. I looked at a tool called nbsmtp,
but everytime I attempt to send a message I get a 127 error. Error
sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.).

So, how should I configure my smtp?

Thanks

-- 
Stand Fast,
tjg.

Timothy Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer  www.exceptionalminds.com
Red Hat Certified Engineer   MIG #1433
Avalon Technology Group, Inc.   
Linux...Because rebooting isn't normal



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Timothy Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 07 Jun 2000:
 Now the newest problem is sending. I have a tremendous hate relationship
 with Sendmail, so I use Postfix pretty much everywhere, however on my
 puny little notebook computer where I live, I would prefer not to be
 running a smtp daemon at all times. I looked at a tool called nbsmtp,
 but everytime I attempt to send a message I get a 127 error. Error
 sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.).
 
 So, how should I configure my smtp?

You're on the right track.  I'd recommend a dialup mail sending tool
for you, sounds like you already tried one.  The ones I know of are
sSMTP (*very* simple, not very feature-full either), MasqMail and
nullmailer.  There are links on the Mutt home page to all of those.


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy  scifi, the Corrs /
Don't talk to me about tomorrow -- I'm not even prepared for YESTERDAY yet!



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Sergei Gerasenko

 I would prefer not to be running a smtp daemon at all times. 
 So, how should I configure my smtp?

Well, actually it's not necessary to run sendmail at all times. I think
inetd can call sendmail on demand. Just include the corresponding line in
your inetd.conf. Look at the man page of sendmail and see what flags are
required to do that.  

-- 
"Trust me": 
Translation of the Latin "caveat emptor."



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Nils Vogels

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 06:14:39PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
  I would prefer not to be running a smtp daemon at all times. 
  So, how should I configure my smtp?
 
 Well, actually it's not necessary to run sendmail at all times. I think
 inetd can call sendmail on demand. Just include the corresponding line in
 your inetd.conf. Look at the man page of sendmail and see what flags are
 required to do that.  
 
Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ?

That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ?

Grtz,

Nils.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
Comment: Take a look at http://www.geekcode.com for more info on geek code
GCS/CC d--- s++: a-? C+++ UL(US)$ P+++ L++ !EE? W+ N+ o+ K? w---
O- M-- V-- PS PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5++ X+ !R tv- b DI+ D- G+ e+++ h+ r y+*+++*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Sergei Gerasenko

 Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ?
 That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ?

Yes, but how about receiving mail?

-- 
"Trust me":
Translation of the Latin "caveat emptor."



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Nils Vogels

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 09:10:28PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
  Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ?
  That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ?
 
 Yes, but how about receiving mail?
 
Timothy asked very specificly about sending only, if I'm not mistaken ;-)

Since Mutt can POP too, i would imagine that's how he gets his messages into his 
mailbox ;)

Grtz,

Nils.

--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
Comment: Take a look at http://www.geekcode.com for more info on geek code
GCS/CC d--- s++: a-? C+++ UL(US)$ P+++ L++ !EE? W+ N+ o+ K? w---
O- M-- V-- PS PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5++ X+ !R tv- b DI+ D- G+ e+++ h+ r y+*+++*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Nils Vogels proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 09:10:28PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
  Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ?
  That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ?
 
 Yes, but how about receiving mail?

Use procmail as your mda for this.  Pipe your fetchmail to procmail

user foo with password bar mda "sed -e '1s/^\t/Received: /' | formail 
|/usr/bin/procmail -d foo"

[on one line please, if it wraps, split it with a slash]

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Philosophy will clip an angel's wings.
-- John Keats