Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On 2001.12.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do
> not want just
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
> | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy
>
> because I would like to make it to work even when I would change
> my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would
> prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail.
Maybe you've already decided on another approach, but I'd do it this
way. I use essentially the same formula for some list-munging of my own.
## No ":" needed, since there's no file to lock here
:0
* ^TOcstex
{
## First rewrite the reply-to using a known, safe mail-munging
## tool. Rename (don't remove) the header so there's a record of
## this event.
:0 f
| formail -R Reply-To Old-Reply-To
## Next append to the mail folder, with locking.
:0 :
listy
}
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like > :0 hf: > * ^TOcstex > | grep -v '^Reply-To:' > > should do what you want. Look in "man procmailrc" for filter. You need > of course a second recipe to deliver the mail. Thanks Matej -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
Hello, On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte wrote: > Is it possible to set something like > > :0: > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be > linux Seems that this will match only messages sent to both lists, which is probably not what you want. What about :0 * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.(linuxbe\.org|unixtech\.be) linux I'm new to procmail, so please test. Hope this helps, Baurjan.
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > > Hi, > I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too. > Actually, I have this > > :0: > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org > linux > > :0: > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be > linux > > Is it possible to set something like > > :0: > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org > * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be > linux The two regex are combined with "and", so both of them must match, and I don't think that would be what you want ;-) I would try: :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.(linuxbe\.org|unixtech\.be) linux > which is shortest ;) I use something similar. Nicolas
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
hello, On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Hi, I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too. Actually, I have this :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org linux :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be linux Is it possible to set something like :0: * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be linux which is shortest ;) > ---end quoted text--- cu, binny -- "I'm trying to install the game on my new PC running Windows 2000 Professional" "You must have installed windows 2000 by mistake. to reinstall linux just insert your distribution cd, reboot the system" -- lu sur loki.games.civ-ctp °v° Benjamin Michotte<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
Ok. Just after I sent that mail I somehow got the feeling I had made a fool out of myself. And yes, I re-read the procmailrc man page and found out what the 'h' flag is for. Well, that's me, always trying to be smart. At least this time I learned something :) -- Johan Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG public key id: 0x6415B9F7 msg21414/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like > :0 hf: > * ^TOcstex > | grep -v '^Reply-To:' > > should do what you want. Look in "man procmailrc" for filter. You need > of course a second recipe to deliver the mail. I would rather use formail than grep -v, just in case there should ever be a non-header line beginning with "Reply-To:" Something like | formail -R Reply-To: Stupid-Reply-To: feels slightly safer. -- Johan Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG public key id: 0x6415B9F7 msg21413/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On Sun 09-Dec-2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote: > > However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to > the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask > procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it > would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? You should investigate this magic mutt setting: :set ignore_list_reply_to -- Bruno
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
* Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar
> with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very
> simple recipe in my .procmailrc:
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
> listy
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do
> not want just
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
> | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy
>
I'm not expert nor is this tested but something like:
:0
* ^TOcstex
{
:0 fhw
| grep -v '^Reply-To:'
:0:
$MAILDIR/listy
}
> because I would like to make it to work even when I would change
> my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would
> prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matej
>
Curt
--
Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked
something.
Re: OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar > with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very > simple recipe in my .procmailrc: > > :0: > * ^TOcstex > listy > > However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to > the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask > procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it > would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do > not want just > > :0: > * ^TOcstex > | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy > > because I would like to make it to work even when I would change > my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would > prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail. I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like :0 hf: * ^TOcstex | grep -v '^Reply-To:' should do what you want. Look in "man procmailrc" for filter. You need of course a second recipe to deliver the mail. Try it out before you use it, I don't know if it works or if it would destroy your mails. Nicolas
OT: procmail recipe for two actions for a message?
Hi, sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very simple recipe in my .procmailrc: :0: * ^TOcstex listy However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do not want just :0: * ^TOcstex | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy because I would like to make it to work even when I would change my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail. Thanks Matej -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 ...every Man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has any Right to but himself. The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we may say, are properly his. The great and chief end therefore, of Mens uniting into Commonwealths, and putting themselves under Government, is the Preservation of their Property. -- John Locke, "A Treatise Concerning Civil Government"
