Re: Correcting bad From formats - alternates
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-15 14:44]: The following bad From formats are displayed with F flag in my index as if they were from me (andre): From: Luca Riazzi LRIAZZIremoveme-cancellami@writeme.com From: Neil Tisdale neil.discard[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: lst_cwby mailto:l_@m_@st_@n_@__c_@wb_@y@@bt_@nt_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@m Can I work around this somehow? mutt uses $alternates to figure this out. what is the value you set? check with set ?alternates or with :set alttab=tab. Sven
Re: Correcting bad From formats - alternates
Sven Guckes wrote: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-15 14:44]: The following bad From formats are displayed with F flag in my index as if they were from me (andre): From: Luca Riazzi LRIAZZIremoveme-cancellami@writeme.com From: Neil Tisdale neil.discard[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: lst_cwby mailto:l_@m_@st_@n_@__c_@wb_@y@@bt_@nt_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@m Can I work around this somehow? mutt uses $alternates to figure this out. what is the value you set? check with set ?alternates or with :set alttab=tab. That has nothing to do with what he was asking about. Those are obviously malformed addresses that Mutt shows as being sent by the user. This is really a bug in the way Mutt handles malformed addresses. If there is a parse error, Mutt will return NULL for the list of addresses. Normally this would not be a problem, but because some old mail clients that people used to use did not write a From: line in the mbox for saved outgoing messages, Mutt will assume that the message from you if there is no From: line. Since Mutt represents no addresses and bad addresses the same way internally, it can't tell the difference.
Re: Correcting bad From formats - alternates
* Michael Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 00:41]: Sven Guckes wrote: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-15 14:44]: The following bad From formats are displayed with F flag in my index as if they were from me (andre): From: Luca Riazzi LRIAZZIremoveme-cancellami@writeme.com From: Neil Tisdale neil.discard[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: lst_cwby mailto:l_@m_@st_@n_@__c_@wb_@y@@bt_@nt_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@m Can I work around this somehow? mutt uses $alternates to figure this out. what is the value you set? Those are obviously malformed addresses that Mutt shows as being sent by the user. This is really a bug in the way Mutt handles malformed addresses. If there is a parse error, Mutt will return NULL for the list of addresses. indeed - all addresses are invalid. i did not check them.. Normally this would not be a problem, but because some old mail clients that people used to use did not write a From: line in the mbox for saved outgoing messages, Mutt will assume that the message from you if there is no From: line. Since Mutt represents no addresses and bad addresses the same way internally, it can't tell the difference. well, there's a difference between No From: line and From: line contains no valid addresses, right? sound like a simple flag needs to be checked for the existance of a From: line.. is that all? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] changing over to mutt-dev? Sven