Re: generic bind q.
Hello, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000: > this works, but q. is why does not work "generic" ? I just noticed that when you do "help" in the index, you get a listing of "generic bindings" after the "index bindings". But for the pager, you don't get that. I don't know why, but this would lead me to believe that the generic bindings aren't looked up in the pager. Strange. Regards, Mikko Oh, a question: How did you manage to send the email to both me privately and the mailing list? You must have set Mutt to *not* honour the Mail-Followup-Header, which is a bad idea... Or did you do "reply" and then add the mutt-users address yourself, or otherwise change the headers? I'm on the mutt-users list so you don't need to send replies to me. -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs / "I think sex is better than logic, but I can't prove it."
Re: generic bind q.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:48:44PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24 >Feb 2000: > > bind generic '?' search-opposite > > bind generic '' help > > > > but this does not work in pager. > > > > generic does not match pager section ? > > It should match, provided that there's no specific binding for the keys > in that map (=the context, index/pager/etc.). "The generic menu is not a real menu, but specifies common functions (such as movement) available in all menus except for pager and editor." -- The Manual Marius Gedminas -- MCSE == Marginal Computer Software Enthusiast
Re: generic bind q.
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24
>Feb 2000:
>
> It should match, provided that there's no specific binding for the keys
> in that map (=the context, index/pager/etc.). Ie. the map-specific
> bindings always override generic bindings. So you can't make a generic
> binding and expect it to work immediately in all the different contexts,
> it only takes effect if those contexts don't have a definition in their
> map.
understant, but I have no map-specific bindings in pager bind to ?.
> So, I'm guessing that you have ? bound to help in the pager.
yes, but it's mutt default, but it's default for index too and there it works.
>
> Possible solutions:
>
> 1) bind ? in pager (and all the other maps where you want it to work)
> specifically to search, and do the same for
this works, but q. is why does not work "generic" ?
Here are bindings and macros from my .muttrc
#some vi like bindings in pager
bind pager 'j' next-line
bind pager 'k' previous-line
bind pager \Cu half-up
bind pager \Cf half-down
bind pager \CU previous-page
bind index '{' previous-thread
bind index '}' next-thread
#go to first mail
bind index '+' first-entry
#go to last mail
bind index '=' last-entry
#opposite search
bind generic '?' search-opposite
#redefine help
bind generic '' help
#rebind alias
bind index 'A' create-alias
bind pager 'A' create-alias
#clear N flag from messages
macro index \eN T~N\n\;WN\;W*
#delete big messages need sync mailbox for sucess
macro index \eD T~z>1\n\;d
#macros for urlview(ctrl-b)
macro index \cb |urlview\n
macro pager \cb |urlview\n
#macro for jumping to flaged message
macro index a /~F\n
--
Keso
don't worry about glory
Re: generic bind q.
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24 Feb 2000: > bind generic '?' search-opposite > bind generic '' help > > but this does not work in pager. > > generic does not match pager section ? It should match, provided that there's no specific binding for the keys in that map (=the context, index/pager/etc.). Ie. the map-specific bindings always override generic bindings. So you can't make a generic binding and expect it to work immediately in all the different contexts, it only takes effect if those contexts don't have a definition in their map. So, I'm guessing that you have ? bound to help in the pager. Possible solutions: 1) bind ? in pager (and all the other maps where you want it to work) specifically to search, and do the same for 2) un-bind ? in pager, so that the generic binding will take effect. There's no un-bind command, you do it by binding the key to the special function "noop" -- "bind pager ? noop" I recommend approach 1. If this doesn't help, please be more specific about your "this does not work" -- which keys, both? What happens when you press them: nothing, some error, wrong function gets called? Regards, Mikko (... who couldn't get "bind generic ? search" to work either, even though ? was un-bound in pager -- Mutt said "key not bound" when I pressed the ? key. Also, does anyone know how can I view the current generic key bindings?) -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs / "HTML needs a rant tag." -- Alan Cox
generic bind q.
Hi, I have defined #opposite search bind generic '?' search-opposite #redefine help bind generic '' help but this does not work in pager. generic does not match pager section ? -- Keso don't worry about glory
