RE: mod_perl and mySql

2003-01-05 Thread Haapanen, Tom
We don't cache connections, either, and the connection overhead appears to
be trivial, connecting to a remote MySQL server over the local Ethernet.

50,000 to 100,000 Apache::ASP pages served per day, some with many rather
complex queries.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Michael Bacarella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 05 January, 2003 11:40
To: Chris Faust
Cc: MySql Mailing List
Subject: Re: mod_perl and mySql


Are you sure it would help? MySQL is damn fast at taking connections.

When we converted to mod_perl I made a mental note to switch
to persistent connections.  It turns out that it still
ran fast enough even though every hit results in an RDBMS
connection. And at this point we're doing 5M of them per day.

It has never been a bottleneck for us.

-M

 Due to ever increasing traffic I'm converting my site into mod_perl and
 quite honestly I'm confused about persistent DB connection and DB
connection
 pooling.. I know there is tons of info out there on the goggle groups and
on
 perl.apache.com, I also picked up Mod_Perl Developers cookbook and I
also
 have the awesome Mysql and MySql and Perl for the web. (BTW so far the
 little mod_perl section in MySql and Perl for the web has proven more
 useful then anything I've found in the whole Mod_Perl dev cookbook).

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: PHP bias (Way OT) -- and ASP on UNIX

2002-11-10 Thread Haapanen, Tom
Try Apache::ASP -- ASP syntax with mod_perl on Apache.
http://www.nodeworks.com/asp/

We run a pretty busy database-driven web site with Apache::ASP and MySQL.
I'm quite happy with it, as it gives us access to the massive collection of
Perl modules, and enables us to use a single language for scripting, whether
for web pages or for non-web utilities.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Van [mailto:vanboers;dedserius.com]
Sent: Sunday 10 November 2002 16:01
To: MySQL
Subject: Re: PHP bias (Way OT)


Alan:

ASP only runs on Windows.  [...]

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Query cache size

2002-07-18 Thread Haapanen, Tom

I just upgraded our web server from 3.23.47 to 4.02 -- and I must say that
4.02 performance rocks!  :-)

I was planning to wait for the beta builds, but the thing that triggered my
decision was the discovery of the query cache.  Our database server (1.4 GHz
Athlon on FreeBSD) typically runs between 20% and 40% load, and complex
pages (like our front page!) with many queries were getting the page
processing time (including the web server, a 533 MHz Alpha on NetBSD) up to
4-5 seconds.

With my initial 4.02 configuration, my front page processing times are
between 0.5 and 1.5 seconds -- and the database server load is hovering
around 10-20%.  Excellent!

The query cache, though ... the documentation doesn't make many suggestions
about sizing it.  I started with this:


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Query cache size

2002-07-18 Thread Haapanen, Tom

[Sorry about the early send on the previous one ...]

I just upgraded our web server from 3.23.47 to 4.02 -- and I must say that
4.02 performance rocks!  :-)

I was planning to wait for the beta builds, but the thing that triggered my
decision was the discovery of the query cache.  Our database server (1.4 GHz
Athlon on FreeBSD) typically runs between 20% and 40% load, and complex
pages (like our front page!) with many queries were getting the page
processing time (including the web server, a 533 MHz Alpha on NetBSD) up to
4-5 seconds.

With my initial 4.02 configuration, my front page processing times are
between 0.5 and 1.5 seconds -- and the database server load is hovering
around 10-20%.  Excellent!

The query cache, though ... the documentation doesn't make many suggestions
about sizing it.  I started with this:

set-variable= query_cache_limit=2M
set-variable= query_cache_size=64M
set-variable= query_cache_startup_type=1

Is this reasonable?  This is what my status shows (after 30 minutes or so):

| Qcache_queries_in_cache  | 789  |
| Qcache_inserts   | 1512 |
| Qcache_hits  | 2847 |
| Qcache_not_cached| 0|
| Qcache_free_memory   | 65710008 |

Is that Qcache_free_memory figure really right?  And, more importantly,
should I allocate more memory for this?  This seems like my biggest win, and
I do have 1 GB available.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Count() does not count correctly?

2002-01-07 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Jens,

You need to select on the games on the left, to ensure that you don't end up
with years on the left with no corresponding game records.  Try this:

SELECT years.year AS yearlist, count(years.year) AS gamecount 
FROM games 
LEFT JOIN years 
ON games.release_year = years.year
GROUP BY years.year 
ORDER BY gamecount DESC, yearlist

Or just simply

SELECT release_year AS yearlist, count(release_year) AS gamecount
FROM games 
GROUP BY release_year 
ORDER BY gamecount DESC, yearlist

(Not tested here, sorry ...)


Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Jens Mildner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2002 15:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Count() does not count correctly?


Hello MySQL-users !

Houston, I've got a problem here.

I'm running the following query from a PHP-Script:

SELECT years.year AS yearlist, count(years.year) AS gamecount 

FROM years 

LEFT JOIN games 

ON years.year = games.release_year

GROUP BY years.year 

ORDER BY gamecount DESC, yearlist


This query should do the following: 

Every year from years.year should be returned along with the 
number of games that have been released in that year sorted by 
the gamecount.
years.year and games.release_year both do NOT contain NULL.

The problem is the following:

Years in which no games were released are returned with a 
gamecount of 1. Why that??? All other years with games released 
in it are getting the correct gamecount.

Please help me.

Greetings from Germany, Jens Mildner.


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Mysql daemon monitoring

2002-01-05 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Fred,

You could use something like daemontools (http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html)
or safetynet (http://www.unixpimps.org/software/safetynet/).

All assuming you are using a UNIX-type platform, of course.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Fred Taurus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 January 2002 15:04 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mysql daemon monitoring


Hello ,

I am looking for a solution in order to monitoring mysql daemon to
restart automatically the daemon when is down.

I was thinking maybe there is a possibility like services watching in
the cobalt interface

thanks in advance

@+

Fred mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Full Search

2002-01-03 Thread Haapanen, Tom

And, alas, by the time MySQL finishes building my 500 MB fulltext index
(more than 12 hours) the table is throroughly corrupted, and myisamchk can't
even recover it with -o.

I'm waiting for 4.01 to go beta, and will then give it a try to see if
things are happier there.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Steve Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 January 2002 04:39 
To: Neil Tompkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Full Search


Yes, you can add a FULLTEXT index to that table including all 15 fields,
e.g.
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX findtext ON mytable (field1, field2,
field3,...field15);

Caveats:
The fields must be of type VARCHAR or TEXT to work, (CHAR can be changed to
VARCHAR easily, and often is silently changed.)

Depending on the table size and other things, creating this index can
be very slow, taking hours or even days.  Try in advance to limit the
size and number of fields in the index to what you really want, and
don't plan on re-indexing very often.

Steve.

Neil Tompkins wrote:

 I have a mySQL table which has about 15 fields.  Is it possible using a
 standard SQL statement to do a full text search on all fields ??


-- 
Steve Rapaport
World Citizen


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Importing large text file

2002-01-03 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Greg,

Your best bet is to feed the data into Perl -- relatively simple Perl script
can deal with variances you indicate, and feed the data into MySQL using
DBI.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Greg Peretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 03 January, 2002 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Importing large text file


This is my first post on this list, so bear with me.

I have a text file with 10,000 stories in it (about 130 MB). I would
like to break it up into 10,000 separate files and am trying to figure
out a way to feed it into a MYSQL database.

I have set up the database with the pertinent fields, except the
individual stories do not necessarily follow the same pattern.

For instance, almost all of them have:

Header
Publication
section
edition
date
page number
headline
byline
story

all separated by two returns, with each overall story separated by four
returns.

Now, I can load the file using fields terminated by \n\n and lines
terminated by \n\n\n\n, but if, for instance, a story does not have a
byline, I'm in trouble. It will happily put the story data in the byline
field.

Am I out of luck, or can I specify text to look for in specific fields
as the file is being loaded, i.e. the date field is always preceded by
Date: and if no Date: is found, skip the field?

I'm using 3.23.44


--

Greg Peretti
web developer
www.abqjournal.com
(505) 823-3888

---

The web of our life is of a mingled yarn, good and ill together.
-  William Shakespeare



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: SubSelect Workaround help

2002-01-02 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Is this too simple?

select distinct p.symbol, i.name from portfolio p, stockinfo i 
where p.symbol = i.symbol 
and p.type = '401k' 
and p.owner='jim' 
order by p.symbol

-
Tom Haapanen -- Software Metrics/Equitrac Corp.
Advanced Printing Solutions -- http://www.metrics.com/


-Original Message-
From: Mr. psm996 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 02 January, 2002 09:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SubSelect Workaround help


How would one load the results of the following query into a one line comma 
separated list so that it could be then included with an IN expr to get 
around the lack of subselect in MySQL

select distinct symbol from portfolio where type='401k' AND owner='jim'



select distinct p.symbol, i.name from portfolio p,
stockinfo i where p.symbol = i.symbol and p.symbol in
(string name) order by symbol

Thanks.
Happy New Year
Paul






_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: NetBSD versus RedHat versus Solaris x86

2001-12-29 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Hank,

I suspect some of the NetBSD threading comments you found in the archives
may be mine.  

We run NetBSD/Alpha for our site (motorsport.com) on the web server, our
work server, plus several other boxes.  We originally did the same for the
database server, but, at the time (this being early 2000) MySQL appeared not
to be happy on a 64-bit machine, at least on NetBSD.  (I think this is now
much better ...)

So we switched to generic Intel hardware.  And things ran OK, except that we
had increasing numbers of MySQL restarts (5-20 times/day).  Automatic, true,
but they would always cause a delay in service, and we have a reasonably
busy site -- we serve a few million pages per month, all database-driven.
(I suspect threading issues, but I have no absolute proof of that.)

So this past summer I switched to FreeBSD 4.3, on the same hardware, and
moved the MySQL server over.  I installed FreeBSD on the new server over
FTP, added a preconfigured MySQL binary from http://www.freebsd.org/, and
got it running in less than two hours.  As a result, MySQL is now
rock-solid.  We run on a P3/750 on an ASUS motherboard with 384 MB of memory
and IBM's 7200 rpm IDE disks.

Right now the server uptime is 69+ days (I rebooted in October to change the
hardware configuration), and the mysqld process (version 3.23.36) has since
then accumulated some 250 hours of CPU time without a glitch.

MySQL on NetBSD may have improved since last summer, but I can definitely
vouch for FreeBSD at this point.  The only question mark is the
effectiveness of SMP -- I can't say anything about this, really, since we
run on a single CPU.

Configuring a dedicated MySQL server is straight-forward (much more so than
a web server with integrated Apache and PHP or Apache::ASP).  Once you have
the OS and MySQL installed and tested, you should be able to just move your
databases over, and point your web server at the remote database.

Good luck with your choice ...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Henry Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 December 2001 01:18 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NetBSD versus RedHat versus Solaris x86


Hello all,

  I just ordered a new server to act as a database-only server for my
website
(wheresgeorge.com).  I'm currently running mysql 3.22.29 (I'm stuck there
due
to my web hosting provider).   I plan to upgrade to the latest stable
version
of mysql, but have the following questions about the choice of Operating
System.

The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2550 Dual 1GHZ Pentium/1GB Memory, 3x18GB
SCSI
disks and will be set up as RAID 5 via a PERC3/Di card.  

I also require large file size support (2GB). My current database has over
16
million records and processes about 80 queries per second (on average). Peak
usage could be around 300 queries/second (estimate). It is running on Linux
on
a dual PIII-800.  Performance is very good, but I'm going to hit the 2GB
limit
soon, and need to expand beyond what my ISP can provide with their managed
solutions.  So I am going to co-locate this new DB server as a backend to
the
current webserver. 
   
On to the questions:

I was considering Net/FreeBSD, but read about threading problems in the
archives, so I don't know if they have been resolved.

I was then thinking about RedHat7.2 with the 2.4 kernel (large file size
support, I think).  

I then read about Solaris x86.. which is where I'm leaning, but I was told
Solaris x86 might be slower than Linux of Free/NetBSD.   I'm also thinking
of
installing Oracle 8i as a side-by-side comparison to mySQL running on the
same
HW/OS.

Anyway, I'm not a UNIX whiz/admin by any stretch... I know enough to *NIX to
manipulate files, jobs, processes, etc.  I've even compiled a few packages
in
the past and got PHP/mysql installed and running on a linux box last year. I
can write rudimentary shell scripts.

I'm looking for general comments regarding the current status of any of
these
choices of OS on this hardware in relation to running a fast and stable
mySQL
installation.  Are there any pitfalls I need to watch out for on any one OS?

Is any one significantly more favorable for mysql that the other?   As I've
said, I have searched the archives, but can not find any real-current
comments
on OS selection.

Thanks in advance,

-Hank Eskin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   

RE: mySQL Issues

2001-12-29 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Matthew,

Without any more information, I would put money on this being either a
database design issue or a query design issue.  I really expect that
database optimization would buy you a lot of performance.

But without knowing what kind of database structure you have, what kind of
queries you run, what kind of optimization you have done, what you consider
to be a LOT of traffic, what kind of server settings you are using and what
kind of hardware you run on -- I really can't say much more than that.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 December 2001 00:15 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mySQL Issues


I run a site that gets a LOT of traffic and uses mySQL. But for some reason,
mySQL is making MAJOR load on my server. I have tried it on several servers,
and they all end up with load averages like 10+!  We have optimized our code
as much as possible and STILL are getting super high loads! Is there ANYWAY
to optimize mySQL so it doesn't run s much load??





 Sincerely,
 Matthew Hale
Get paid
cash every time you receive email!
Sign up
FREE at: http://www.MintMail.com/?m=1825549



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Very untidy

2001-10-23 Thread Haapanen, Tom

select hour(ts), count(ts) from dundeefw 
where date=$date and action=1 
group by hour(ts)

Assuming ts is your timestamp column ...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Leon Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 05:45 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Very untidy


Hi all,

can someone look at my very untidy code and maybe give me some pointers.

Searching for values by the hour.

etc

for ($i = 0; $i = 23; $i++)
{
$query = select count(num) as mycount from dundeefw where date=$date
and action=1 and time=hour($i);

// Execute query
$result = mysql_query($query) or die (Query Failed);

while ($row = mysql_fetch_array ($result))
{
$connection[$i] = $row[mycount];
}
}

I am wondering if there is anyway using SQL to avoid doing this the very
messy way.

many thanks

Leon.


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: selecting rows where all rows meet a criterion

2001-10-23 Thread Haapanen, Tom

This might work ... but I don't have a suitable database to test with ...

select * from students,grades 
where students.id=grades.id 
and min(grades.grade - students.average_grade)  0
group by students.id


Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David Hugh-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 October, 2001 13:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: selecting rows where all rows meet a criterion



OK, I have a tricky SQL syntax problem I would like to share.

For simplicity's sake, I'll use an analogy. I have two tables, of students 
and grades, each with a ID column for use in joins, corresponding to a 
student's ID.

The student table has an average grade column which shows that student's 
average grade last year. The grades table has a column for subject (e.g. 
English, Math) and a column for the grade achieved.

Suppose I want to select all my students who have performed very well this 
year. I want to select all the students who have beaten last year's average 
in ALL of this years marks!

SELECT * FROM students,grades WHERE students.ID=grades.ID AND grades.grade 

students.average_grade

This doesn't work. It gets me all the occasions where a student has beaten 
his average. But I only want students who have never gone below their 
average! In other words, I want to select from the students table, based on 
information on multiple rows in the grades table, where ALL the grades rows 
need to fulfil a certain criterion.

Help would be gratefully received!

-- 
Dave

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Database Structures

2001-10-22 Thread Haapanen, Tom

25M tables in one database -- wow.  How big were the tables?

Was this with MySQL?  Which OS and filesystem did you run this on?

Given that MySQL stores each table in three separate files in the database
directory, that would imply 75,000, files in the directory containing
the database -- and non-trivial directory search times every time MySQL had
to open a file (i.e. database table or index), right?

Or did you manage to configure MySQL to cache all these file handles so that
it did not need to reopen the tables (and search the directory for the
appropriate entries)?

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Steve Meyers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 October 2001 03:27 
To: Joe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Database Structures

Creating a new table per image isn't unheard of -- at a company I used to
work for, we estimated that we had around 25 million tables at one point in
time.  There were lots of factors that went into why our database was
structured like that, but it worked for us.

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Database Structures

2001-10-22 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Joe,

It's possible to create a table for each image.  However, as others have
suggested, in most cases, it makes more sense to have an images table, with
all the images, and with a unique image ID for each image (you can create
your own or use autoincrement).  You can then have tables like reviews,
comments and ratings, which all refer to the images table using an image ID
field.

This means you don't have to do a create table each time there is a new
image, but, really, the key advantage to doing this is that it's easy to do
queries to locate ...
- all the images that match certain criteria
- all the reviews for one image 
- all ratings made by one user
- the 100 top-rated images
and so on.  What it really does is enables you to use SQL to locate and
select data in the database, rather than having to write code to locate and
loop through tables to find what you are looking for.


Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 October 2001 02:04 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Database Structures

Hello,

Hi, I need some help on something here. I need to know the best way to set 
up this database.

I have a site with a bunch of images/reviews. What i want is for registered 
users to rate and leave reviews themselves. I'm not sure how I should set 
up this database though.

Now, I have a table that holds the user info. Should I create a new table 
for each image, which holds the user, and his comments/rating? (this seems 
rather bloated, and inefficient) or should I create a table somehow for all 
images and keep track of the user comments/ratings another way?

Thanks. I've been looking for sites about database structuring and stuff, 
but no good luck. If anyone could give me sites or their ideas it would be 
appreciated


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: faster inserts updates

2001-10-22 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Priya,

Need more information ... how long does it take to insert 28,000 records?
On what kind of platform?  How much data do the records contain?  What kind
of primary keys and indices do you have?


Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Priya Ramkumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 October 2001 06:01 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: faster inserts  updates

I have a PHP program which adds records to a MySQL table. The number of
records in the table after the execution of the program is around 28,000. I
also have select  update queries in the program on the same table. The
process takes a very long time to complete all insertions to the table. I
already tried Insert Delayed on a sample segment of data but found that it
does not speed up things. Can anyone suggest a method  so that the
insertions  updates to the table can be faster?


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: faster inserts updates

2001-10-22 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Priya,

I suspect that the primary key and index are causing your problems -- each
time you insert, MySQL must create the indices and validate for uniqueness.

Can you remove the indices and try it that way?  If that is very fast (as I
suspect it will be), then you can focus on coming up with a more efficient
way of indexing the table.

In general, if your database is 99% reads (as ours is, and so are most other
web sites), it makes sense to do fairly heavy indexing, as the savings on
queries far outweighs the cost on updates.  But if that doesn't describe
your database, you should reduce the amount of indexing in order to speed up
your inserts...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Priya Ramkumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 October 2001 06:26 
To: Haapanen, Tom
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: faster inserts  updates


Hi Tom,

Thanks for your response. It takes around 1 hour  40 minutes to insert
28000+ records. Also, I find that the first few thousand transactions  are
quite fast but slows down later. I have MySQL on Linux. I have a
concatenated primary key of multiple fields. And I also have a unique index
on each of these fields. There are
1,734,291 bytes of data in the table with an average row length of 61.

Thanks
Priya

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Non Ascii characters

2001-10-03 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Jamie,

This is likely a client software issue.  We use Perl and DBI, and we have no
trouble storing or retrieving non-USASCII characters.

What are you using to access the MySQL database?

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Jamie Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 October 2001 06:23 
To: Mysql@Lists. Mysql. Com
Subject: Non Ascii characters


I'm having a problem with the sending of the new euro € symbol into the
mysql database through a standard SQL stament. I have tried everything cut
and paste or ALT 0128 on the command line but all I seem to get is a ?
character stored. I know it can be done because I have managed to enter the
symbol using a program 'ArtAdmin' by artronic to enter the data but this
will not be usable because I am trying to write and web based from system to
submit information.
Can anyone tell me how to get this symbol in and are there any others that
might casue trouble.
I have not been able to find anything on this in the manual or previous
posts.

TIA
Jamie


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Counting Sequences Clarified

2001-10-02 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Bruce,

Why not just determine this number when you do a query?  Why do you need to
have it be stored in the database?

It's easy to create a Perl (or probably PHP, but I really don't know PHP)
script to fill in such a column, too, but you would need to manually
maintain that.  And right now I don't understand the problem well enough to
convince me that such maintenance would be worthwhile ...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bruce Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 02 October, 2001 07:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Counting Sequences Clarified


Hello,
Thank's for your interest Paul. I did a poor job
of explaining my problem. Here is another go:
For an athlete's first entry in the database I need a column
value of 1. The second performance entry of the same athlete
would have a value of 2. And so on.
I need to apply this retrospectively to ten
years of performance records. Ongoing updates are not an
issue at present.
Thanks
Bruce

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Is right DB for our purpose

2001-10-02 Thread Haapanen, Tom

A piece of cake for MySQL.

Our news/photo database is growing by nearly 10,000 records per month, with
no noticeable performance impact.  As long as you design your database
structure and queries right ...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Paul Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 02 October, 2001 09:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is right DB for our purpose


Hi,
We are planning to create an web database(6 - 7 tables with the average of 6
columns), where members search for the right person by entering the proper
search criteria. We expect that this database will grow in the rate of 1000
to 2000 records in a month.

Could you please let us know whether the MySQL database is the right choice
for our purpose as soon as possible. Because we are nearly ready to sign an
agreement with a webhosting company.

Please reply to the following email address

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you

Ruthira S
Steinhart Net esolutions


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MS-Access

2001-10-01 Thread Haapanen, Tom

This helps you convert the data to a MySQL database (a much faster and more
robust datastore than JET).

If you need to access the data from both platforms, including existing
Access applications, install  MyODBC on NT, create a suitable ODBC DSN and,
then, in Access, use File  Get External Data  Link Tables to get access to
the data residing on the MySQL server.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 01 October, 2001 10:17
To: Andreas Schmidt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MS-Access


On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Andreas Schmidt wrote:

 Hi List

 I want to migrate from a NT-Server to a Linux Server. Therefore I'm
 looking
 for a solution to run my existing MS-Access-Databases under MySQL. Is
 there a chance to point from a MySQL-DB to a MS-Access-DB in order that
 my data can stay within the MS-Access-DB?


Hi.
I find this:

Exportsql/Importsql. Convert Mircrosoft Access databases to MySQL and
vice versa. These tools are Access functions that can be used to export
Access tables in a format readable by MySql. They can also convert SQL
output from MySQL and mSql into a form readable by access.

I am also interesting in the same question/topic as you. That's why I post
this... Perhaps somebody known this tool or have somethings like a perl
module for this situation??

Karl :-)




-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: why would LOWER

2001-09-30 Thread Haapanen, Tom

MySQL is not Oracle ... and that's a good thing, too!  :-)

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Joe Kaiping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 September 2001 19:37 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: why would LOWER


Thanks to all for your responses.  I had missed this important piece of
information in the documentation that Benjamin pointed to and:

http://www.mysql.com/doc/C/H/CHAR.html

Values in CHAR and VARCHAR columns are sorted and compared in
case-insensitive fashion, unless the BINARY attribute was specified when the
table was created. The BINARY attribute means that column values are sorted
and compared in case-sensitive fashion according to the ASCII order of the
machine where the MySQL server is running. BINARY doesn't affect how the
column is stored or retrieved.

-Joe

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: Powered by MySQL?

2001-09-29 Thread Haapanen, Tom

This is what the MySQL web site says:


D. Use of Powered by MySQL. 

If you are a user of the MySQL database server, (whether under the GPL
licence or a MySQL commercial licence) and have not modified the source code
for the application or use in question, you may request permission to
display the Powered by MySQL logo, as shown in the MySQL AB Mark Table in
Section 4(A), in the user interface (including your website) of the
application that runs on the MySQL server. To request permission, simply
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in which you identify your name (and
company name, if applicable) and the application, and you agree to adhere
strictly to this Trademark Policy. MySQL AB reserves the right not to grant
such permission, or to withdraw any such permission, in its sole discretion.
Use of the Powered by MySQL logo must comply with applicable provisions of
this Trademark Policy, including (without limitation) Sections 3(D) and 4. 


But, what the heck, I'll try to email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Maybe someone
actually reads that mailbox ...

-
Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ouellet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 September 2001 21:31 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Haapanen, Tom
Subject: RE: Powered by MySQL?


True you did email, but look at the email address you send your request;

Quote I have sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I have received no
response.

So, you send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Instead of the one point it out in the doc:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

May be if you try thisone you may get the answer you are looking for.

Daniel


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: mysqld under FreeBSD

2001-07-30 Thread Haapanen, Tom

What hostname are you providing JSP?  If you want to replicate the behaviour
of your mysql command, it needs to be localhost or 127.0.0.1, not the
network name of your server.

If you are using the server name, then you need to use mysql command the
same way, too:
./mysql -u root -h servername -p


Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: gokeeper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 29 July, 2001 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mysqld under FreeBSD


hi all

i am running mysql 3.23.40 and tomcat 3.2.3 on FreeBSD

when i try to connect to the local mysql server in jsp using mm driver

it says:

Server configuration denies access to data source

the userpass i provide is right
i can connect to local mysqld use ./mysql -u root -p
also php+mysql works well.


BTW:the same script can connect to another Mysql server running under
windows2000,so i think this is mysqld's problem


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: FreeBSD issues

2001-07-20 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Michael,

MySQL worked beatifully for us on a vanilla FreeBSD system -- I simply
installed the binary (precompiled) package from the FreeBSD ports
collection.  I recommend you get the binary rather than playing with the
configuration yourself ...

-
Tom Haapanen -- Software Metrics/Equitrac Corp.
Advanced Printing Solutions -- http://www.metrics.com/


-Original Message-
From: Institute For Social Ecology [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 July 2001 18:33 
To: Ken Menzel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FreeBSD issues


Ken,

Thank you for your very helpful notes.  We took your advice and
updated to FreeBSD 4.3 and the last version of MYSQL.  We are still
experiencing problems with MYSQL, though.  We installed it fresh, with
no freeBSD tweaks.  I was not able to locate the email you referred to
regarding FreeBSD installs.  If you have any pointers on tweaking a
freeBSD install, it would be very helpful.

Regards,

Michael Caplan

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: MySQL loves FreeBSD (but not NetBSD) ...

2001-07-18 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Ken,

I have absolutely no complaints at all about the support I got on this
mailing list from the MySQL team -- they were very helpful, and provided
many good suggestions.  Unfortunately none of them worked, but such is life.

I am happy that MySQL is stable on FreeBSD -- I was ready to go all the way
to Red Hat, but I'm glad I was able to get FreeBSD running with the binary
MySQL package with very little pain.  And FreeBSD is close enough to NetBSD
that administration really isn't a big issue.  (Linux would have been far
more painful for us, as we don't run any Linux boxes right now.)

Oh, and I'm quite aware of the difficulty of debugging threading, from my
other life.  It's painful at best of times (with NT and MSVC), and
excruciatingly difficult when you have to work with debuggers that have
minimal threading support -- which, alas, includes most free UNIXes.
(Incidentally, we are in the process of OEM licensing MySQL for that company
as well, so I do hope that provides some support for the project as well.)

Anyway, kudos to MySQL team for creating a great product, and for making it
work on as many platforms as it does ...

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (nights)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (days)


-Original Message-
From: Ken Menzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 July, 2001 10:51
To: Haapanen, Tom; 
Subject: Re: MySQL loves FreeBSD (but not NetBSD) ...


Hi Tom,
   As another user of MySQL on FreeBSD,  I can tell you from my own
experience that the MySQL Team is dedicated to having MySQL run on as
many platforms as possible.  I say this as an almost direct quote from
e-mail Monty sent me.  Things were not always smooth with FreeBSD
threads, it is only through quite a bit of work by some dedicated
people that this has smoothed out.  There are still issues that
remain, but they are not with MySQL.  They MySQL Team has gone out of
thier way to help debug OS threads problems.  I imagine more emphasis
will be placed on reliable pthreads libraries when the new threads
based apache web server moves out of alpha test phase and onto
production systems.

It is not easy to debug these these type of things,  the main issue is
getting some who understands threads debugging on the OS involved to
look at the code and/or writing a test program that duplicates the
problem.  Neither of these is a trivial task,  and of course the MySQL
team needs to feed  thier families, and continue to move the product
forward.  I and my company support MySQL AB (to make it clear) in both
words and financialy (I have a login support contract).   They are a
dedicated hard working group, and I am sure they are as interested as
you in the problems on NetBSD, however I think it is amazing that they
run on as many platforms as they do now without problems!  But there
is a limited amount of resources to go around, and as there are more
Linux (mysql) users than FreeBSD,  problems tend to get noticed and
fixed there first.  I think it might be similer with NetBSD and
OpenBSD,  there just less users, therefor less testing and since MySQL
is very USER supported there exists less support.  I am not saying
anything bad about OpenBSD or NetBSD,  just that it seems there are
less users on this list.  The more users looking at an issue,  the
more likely someone will find the answer/problem.

So in a nutshell what I am saying is you don't have to give up if you
really feel you want to run on NetBSD.  Go rally the people together
to find the problem.  If you can support financialy do it.  If you
support bu collecting the right people, do that.  But if the users
don't get involved at some level the problems may not go away,  or a
different user group may solve the problem for a different reason (IE
Apache).  But the users have to get involved, it's part of what open
source is all about!

Best of luck to you what ever your decison!

Ken

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




MySQL loves FreeBSD (but not NetBSD) ...

2001-07-17 Thread Haapanen, Tom

... or should that be FreeBSD loves MySQL?

I finally caved in after a year of increasing (and unexplained) MySQL
crashes, despite numerous updates to more recent versions of NetBSD and
MySQL, and dozens of experiments with different configuration options.
MySQL would die (and restart automatically) every 5-15 minutes on the
database server acting as the back end for our web site, motorsport.com.
(This on NetBSD/i386, as when we started, MySQL was distinctly unhappy with
NetBSD/Alpha)

So I picked up a clean disk, installed FreeBSD 4.3 over the Internet, booted
to multiuser, and did pkg_add -r mysql-server to installe the prebuilt
MySQL binaries.  Stopped the server, ftp'd the databases over -- and it
worked!  Wonderfully, in fact ... in 48 hours now, not a single crash, and
the CPU utilization has been quite reasonable, too.

In the end, I suspect that MySQL couldn't deal with the threading libraries
available on NetBSD, although I have no proof of this.  No other application
has given us this much trouble, but nothing else we use uses such heavy
threading, either.  (We still continue to use NetBSD/Alpha for all our other
servers.)

If anyone on the list is running MySQL on NetBSD in a reasonably busy
production environment, I would still like to hear about it, though.

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




mysqld keeps falling over on NetBSD

2001-06-11 Thread Haapanen, Tom

Our normally reliable back-end server for our web site has now gone
completely crazy ... it's falling over every few seconds.  Automatic
restarts are nice, but it really makes the web site unusable.

mysqld got signal 11;
The manual section 'Debugging a MySQL server' tells you how to use a
stack trace and/or the core file to produce a readable backtrace that may
help in finding out why mysqld died.
010611 10:06:28  mysqld restarted
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections
mysqld got signal 11;
The manual section 'Debugging a MySQL server' tells you how to use a
stack trace and/or the core file to produce a readable backtrace that may
help in finding out why mysqld died.
010611 10:06:30  mysqld restarted
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections
mysqld got signal 11;
The manual section 'Debugging a MySQL server' tells you how to use a
stack trace and/or the core file to produce a readable backtrace that may
help in finding out why mysqld died.
010611 10:06:32  mysqld restarted
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections

There is very little information available here.  I have tried check table,
and myisamchk with -r, -o and -e options ... and no help.

This is running MySQL 3.23.36 on NetBSD/i386 1.4.1.  Are there any
significant bug fixes in 3.23.38 to make it worthwhile downloading, building
and installing it?

Tom Haapanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php