Intel Compiler

2004-06-21 Thread Mike Miller
I am trying to use my binary Intel installation to compile PHP (which seems 
to be doing a _very_ simple program).  So in a statically linked 
installation these references are defined in the embedded C library, but if 
one is linking it with another application, it isn't.
 Possibly the intel C library would need to be distributed with the binary 
application for the sake of linking with other applications?  Thoughts?


To quote the Intel C++ Compiler release notes:
The Intel C++ Compiler uses two routines _intel_fast_memcpy and 
_intel_fast_memset to perform memcpy and memset operations that are not 
macro expanded to __builtin_memcpy and __builtin_memset in the source code. 
These are found in libirc. If you use the gcc compiler to link your 
application or if you directly call the linker, ld, you might find these 
unresolved symbols. For this reason, Intel recomends using the Intel C++ 
Compiler for linking, using the same compiler options used during the 
compilation phase. However, if you see these as undefined externals, either 
add -lirc to your link line, or change your includes so that memcpy and 
memset will be macro expanded to the builtin forms and recompile. The Intel 
C++ Compiler for IA-32 based applications calls a routine intel_proc_init 
from the main routine of any program to ensure that the processor is 
correctly set up. This routine is also found in libirc. These routines used 
further entry points from glibc, so -lirc needs to be placed before -lc on 
your command line.

usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): In function `read_rows':
libmysql.o(.text+0xe60): undefined reference to `_intel_fast_memcpy'
/usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(libmysql.o): In function 
`mysql_real_connect.':
libmysql.o(.text+0x3044): undefined reference to `_intel_fast_memcpy'
/usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(my_malloc.o): In function `my_memdup':
my_malloc.o(.text+0x31): undefined reference to `_intel_fast_memcpy'
/usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(my_malloc.o): In function `my_strdup':
my_malloc.o(.text+0x100): undefined reference to `_intel_fast_memcpy'
/usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(my_malloc.o): In function 
`my_strdup_with_length':
my_malloc.o(.text+0x132): undefined reference to `_intel_fast_memcpy'
/usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.a(my_alloc.o)(.text+0x327): more 
undefined references to `_intel_fast_memcpy' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure: failed program was:
#line 56453 configure
#include confdefs.h
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error.  */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
   builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply.  */
char mysql_error();

int main() {
mysql_error()
; return 0; }
-Mike
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MySQL Web Clustering...

2004-06-18 Thread Mike Miller
Unless you have a specific need for it, you could save yourself a lot of 
trouble by putting select tables or databases or even clients on each 
server.  This also means you don't incur the added overhead of keeping the 
database in sync, creating actions if a master goes down, etc.  Then just 
tell client1 to use database5 as their hostname for example.  Replication 
requires that updates go to the master, which requires client-side code, or 
an intermediate daemon which analyzes the statement and forwards the 
request.

-Mike
From: Peter J Milanese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roy Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL  Web Clustering...
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:25:45 -0400
I currently run LVS (pre-distribution) on my farm, which gets about 100M
hits/month.
Good points about LVS are that it is completely rock solid, and runs on
minimal hardware.
I have never run MySQL behind it, as I think that would be a bit flaky for
a live site. Probably
worth checking out though. I would think that instead of LVS Load
Balancing, server failover
might be a more viable path for MySQL.
P


Roy Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/18/2004 01:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:MySQL  Web Clustering...
Hi All,
We have recently acquired some new machines for our ASP service, and I
am investigating different options and setups to optimize everything.
We currently have one large DB server, with RAID5, etc, running mysql
and a few smaller servers for web applications, and e-mail.  These
smaller servers arent all identical in their software, and they run
different services.
We currently have reached a certain limit in the DB as well as in some
of our applications on the webservers, hence the need for something
expandable.
I have read slightly about MySQLCluster, as well as some other solutions
such as openMosix, Mosix and LVS.  I was wondering if you guys have
experience, and what you would recommend for the DB and for the
webservers.  I still want to maintain them separate, even if I end up
having 2 different clusters, I prefer to keep the DB away from the
application for security reasons.
Thanks!
Roy

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months 
FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MySQL Web Clustering...

2004-06-18 Thread Mike Miller
The meaning of that was client-side being sending inserts/updates to the 
master server.  This would be done in the program/script upon an insert 
query.

A daemon could forward insert/update requests to a master and all others 
round-robin and simply pass packets.  This is if you have to make it 
seamless.  Would require some work to make one though.

-Mike

From: Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL  Web Clustering...
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:43:05 -0500
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:05 am, Mike Miller wrote:
 Unless you have a specific need for it, you could save yourself a lot of
 trouble by putting select tables or databases or even clients on each
 server.  This also means you don't incur the added overhead of keeping 
the
 database in sync, creating actions if a master goes down, etc.  Then 
just
 tell client1 to use database5 as their hostname for example.  
Replication
 requires that updates go to the master, which requires client-side code, 
or
 an intermediate daemon which analyzes the statement and forwards the
 request.

Daemons? Client side code? Can you explain this please?
mysql handles all the replication. Depending on your setup, client won't 
know
the difference. Its really all depends on how your replication is gonna be
set up.
- --
		SUSHIDO--The way of the Tuna.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA0xuZld4MRA3gEwYRAv1EAKCot3j1j16j892FtrTEea8Brlk0NgCcCKou
9K0QzPH4uFz+TYynwdNpxbY=
=a/OR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn Premium. Get 2months 
FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Safe Database Problem

2004-02-13 Thread Mike Miller
Oh Jeeze- why didn't I think of removing this.  When I upgraded the default 
is to have these two as 'Y', however, for some reason, that means that show 
databases shows all databases despite no permissions.  That doesn't seem 
logical on one hand (if they don't have permissions to the database nor its 
tables, how could they create/lock on its tables), but on the other (they 
need to be able to see the databases to do a tmp table and a lock).  In any 
case, problem fixed.  I'm going to add a note to the docs to save people my 
troubles.

 Create_tmp_table_priv: Y
 Lock_tables_priv: Y
Cheers;
-M

From: Victoria Reznichenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Safe Database Problem
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:38:50 +0200
Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  I believe I've done everything from the book and have been fighting 
with
 the same problem for about 6 hours thus far.

  I just upgraded from MySQL 3.23.56 to 4.0.17.   In the old system, I
 prevented show databases from ordinary users using skip-show-databases.  
In
 order to upgrade I used the same data directory and ran the fix_privs 
script
 as instructed to all all of the required fields to the mysql.* tables as 
it
 did.  ALl of this is successful and I can see it all there when I browse
 these tables.  I did a flush privs, reloaded the whole daemon a few 
times to
 no avail.
  All users besides root have been revoked (actually they never had) show
 databases permission, yet all users are still able to execute show 
databses
 and receive a list of hundreds of databases.
  SHOW VARIABLES keeps telling me that skip show database is OFF, yet I
 can't seem to change it with any combo of startup parameters or set 
commands
 due to it being a 'depreciated variable' in all the docs.
  I don't see what I'm missing.  Is there a trick with the new versions
 which I'm not getting?


Check privileges of those users. If they have such global privileges (on 
all databases) as SELECT, UPDATE etc. or CREATE TEMPORARY TABLES, LOCK 
TABLES, they also can see databases in the output of SHOW DATABASES.

--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Victoria Reznichenko
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
   ___/   www.mysql.com




--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Safe Database Problem

2004-02-12 Thread Mike Miller
Hi,

 I believe I've done everything from the book and have been fighting with 
the same problem for about 6 hours thus far.

 I just upgraded from MySQL 3.23.56 to 4.0.17.   In the old system, I 
prevented show databases from ordinary users using skip-show-databases.  In 
order to upgrade I used the same data directory and ran the fix_privs script 
as instructed to all all of the required fields to the mysql.* tables as it 
did.  ALl of this is successful and I can see it all there when I browse 
these tables.  I did a flush privs, reloaded the whole daemon a few times to 
no avail.
 All users besides root have been revoked (actually they never had) show 
databases permission, yet all users are still able to execute show databses 
and receive a list of hundreds of databases.
 SHOW VARIABLES keeps telling me that skip show database is OFF, yet I 
can't seem to change it with any combo of startup parameters or set commands 
due to it being a 'depreciated variable' in all the docs.
 I don't see what I'm missing.  Is there a trick with the new versions 
which I'm not getting?

Thanks in advance,
-M
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/viruspgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thread Stack

2004-02-12 Thread Mike Miller
I receive the following warning in my hostname.err file after upgrading 
from 3.23.56 to 4.0.17.  Any ideas what's causing it and how to fix it?

Warning: Asked for 196608 thread stack, but got 126976

Trying to find the source- maybe a setting is too high?  Linux 2.4.x

Thanks in advance,
-M
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Unique IDs

2004-02-12 Thread Mike Miller
code it within your program.  If this is in fact a primary key (whcih you 
seem to describe it as), then it should be distinct anyway.  So do an INSERT 
IGNORE or even just an INSERT.  It will fail upon duplicates.  Check the 
affected rows or the insert_id (using whatever API you use to access MySQL), 
sleep for a second, then try the insert again.  I doubt there's a good way 
to hang up the database on the issue.

Cheers;
-M


From: Craig Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Unique IDs
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:57:24 -0600
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:47, Keith C. Ivey wrote:
 Craig Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I have a very large web app that uses timestamp for unique IDs.
  Everything was rolling fine until we started getting many users per
  second, causing some of the unique IDs to not be unique -- users were
  being assigned the same timestamp. Since the web app is so large we
  don't want to change the method of assigning IDs as it would create a
  major project.

 I don't understand.  If you're getting many users per second, and
 your timestamps have 1-second resolution, how could you possibly
 solve the problem without changing the method of assigning IDs?
 Are the many users per second periods just short bursts, and you're
 really only getting several hundred users per day?  If so, I guess
 you could keep waiting a second and trying the insert again, but that
 could lead to indefinite delays if traffic gets high.  I think you've
 got to bite the bullet and change the unique ID to something that's
 actually unique -- even an AUTO_INCREMENT would work.
Thanks for the speedy reply and I have already recommended
auto_increment for the solution. We do need that quick fix until the
problem is fixed. How would I go about making Mysql wait one second
between inserts. We only get about 1000 hits per day, but they tend to
be concentrated in short time intervals.

 --
 Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tobacco Documents Online
 http://tobaccodocuments.org
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photospgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Connect to MySQL via PHP

2004-02-12 Thread Mike Miller
The _only_ real benefit of Apache2 over Apache1 is it's thread-based model.  
So why leave a stable, tried-and-true, robust Apache1 platform for no 
additional benefits at all?  Why break compatibility?  Why use the Apache2 
branch if you don't need it?

PHP itself works quite fine in a threaded mode.  However, PHP uses an 
enormous number of libraries (GD, database libs, and many others) which 
may-or-may-not-be thread-safe.  So these libraries can cause some serious 
problems... and when you're in a threaded model, programs doing funny things 
is not only difficult to track down, but also can cause serious issues with 
all of the other threads (due to shared process context on the system and 
shared memory).

Lesson- just avoid it for the time being.  Save a headache and additional 
security patches.
-M


From: Adam Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mysql [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Don Read [EMAIL PROTECTED],Eric W.Holzapfel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connect to MySQL via PHP
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:05:00 -0500
Apache2 and php is a buggy combination? Not that I have seen.

Or are you referring to trying to use the Apache Worker (mutlithreaded) MPM 
with php... I believe that is still a bit buggy, though, no rpms or 
packages seem to install it that way anyways. I'm hoping to get workerMPM 
working for me, too, as I have been having to use thttpd for serving images 
recently.

I'm not sure how horked up RHES3 is, but, std. RH7-9, Mandrake 7.2-9.2, 
Debian 3+ (among others) seem to have no problem what so ever connecting 
php-mysql out of the box, provided you have a user account on mysql to 
connect to and supply it in your my.cnf, php.ini or mysql_connect 
statements.

keep in mind rh and mdk broke up the portions of php into separate 
packages... such as php-imap, php-mysql, php-cli, php-ldap, etc. You will 
need to install the php-mysql package if mysql_connect is not being 
recognized. Also note, mdk has further separated the php.ini file to use 
separate php include files, similar to how they broke up apache's module 
configs...  the structure is /etc/php.ini and 
/etc/php/#_phpmodulename.ini..they load in order of their number... This is 
good to keep in mind, as the mysql settings are no longer included in the 
primary php.ini file but in 34_mysql.ini.

--
Adam Goldstein
White Wolf Networks
http://whitewlf.net
On Feb 10, 2004, at 10:34 PM, Don Read wrote:

On 11-Feb-2004 Eric W. Holzapfel wrote:
Hello Listers,

I have a  problem with my PHP/redhat setup, and possible problem with
my
Mysql setup.
I have Apache (2.0) and PHP (4.3.2) installed on a Red Hat 3.0 ES
system.
Apache 2.0 + PHP is a known buggy combination.

I have MySql installed on a Slackware linux box.
Server on a remote host? Gotcha.

I want to be able to use Apache/PHP to connect to the mysql database
on
the slackware box.
I think that PHP is set up ok, which may be  a lie, because PHP
says
it does not recognize the commands like -  mysql_pconnect and
mysql_connect.
No, wait, lemme guess. Like 'function not defined' ?
(eat your heart out, Miss Cleo)
Also if I try to connect to the database using something like this:
 mysql://user,[EMAIL PROTECTED] demodb this fails and the or die
getMessage() returns
DB: no such database.  (I am trying to use the Pear DB here)
Do I need to have mysql installed on the red hat machine?
You'll need to compile in the client libs at least.

I can connect to the slackware linux box from a Windows machine using
ODBC.
So your server is working and accepting remote connections.
This is a good thing!
Any ideas on what I have not done, or what I have done wrong?

You haven't configured the Redhat PHP install to build in the MySQL
client libraries.
To verify this --try this script:
---
?php
phpinfo();
?
---
Look for '--with-mysql' in the Configure Command section.
Also look for a MySQL Support section.
Regards,
--
Don Read   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- It's always darkest before the dawn. So if you are going tosteal 
the neighbor's newspaper, that's the time to do it.

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


MERGE tables still gamma?

2003-07-28 Thread mike . miller
The manual page for MERGE tables states the code is in gamma since 3.23.25.
But it also says you can only SELECT, DELETE, and UPDATE, which isn't true
since version 4.0.something. 
 
Can anyone verify if the MERGE tables is still in gamma? We occassionally
have diskspace issues on our system, and I'd love to split our invoice table
into years and use pack on the old years and replace the original table with
a MERGE.
 

-- 
Mike Miller 
Business Analyst  Applications Developer 
BMG Canada Inc. 

Tel: 416-586-1646 
Fax: 416-586-0454 
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 


INDEX not getting used

2002-09-20 Thread mike . miller

I get the following results when doing a SELECT off a single table I have.
What's bizarre is that the index is no longer used when i expand my list of
states to be included.

mysql EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM shipping USE INDEX (state) WHERE state IN
('TN','NY');
+--+---+---++-+--+--
++
| table| type  | possible_keys | key| key_len | ref  |
rows | Extra  |
+--+---+---++-+--+--
++
| ship_to_customer | range | state_code| state_code |   3 | NULL |
433 | where used |
+--+---+---++-+--+--
++

mysql EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM shipping USE INDEX (state) WHERE state IN
('TN','NY','MN','LA');
+--+--+---+--+-+--+--+--
--+
| table| type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows |
Extra  |
+--+--+---+--+-+--+--+--
--+
| ship_to_customer | ALL  | state_code| NULL |NULL | NULL | 2298 |
where used |
+--+--+---+--+-+--+--+--
--+

Anyone have any suggestions as to where I could look to fix this up?

-- Mike Miller

--
Happy 20'th Birthday, Mr. Smiley  :-)
http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/Smiley/Smiley.html


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: How to set permissions?

2002-03-14 Thread mike . miller

This might not be the best way, but for the people here at my office who
aren't familiar with command line interfaces, I've setup MyODBC and MS
Access. This let's them add/edit user's account info directly. The only
thing you can't do (afaik), is change a user's password.

-- Mike Miller
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Yana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How to set permissions?


Helo!

Is there any other way to set permissions to the list of
tables in mysql db (big list!) with similar names (f.e. c%),
then running a script on it?

Thanks


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Bug or Misunderstanding

2002-03-07 Thread mike . miller

Perhaps I misunderstand how the UNION statement is to be used, but the
following query doesn't work as I'd expect:

SELECT column_id, SUM(column_a) AS positive_a FROM table_a WHERE column_b =
'positive'
UNION
SELECT column_id, SUM(column_a) AS negative_a FROM table_a WHERE columb_b =
'negative'

I would expect to receive three columns back (column_id, positive_a,
negative_a), but what I receive is two columns, with the duplicate
column_id's and the negative_a results being lumped under the positive_a
column.

Can anyone point me in the right direction on this?  This is MysQL 4.0.1
FreeBSD binary install.

--
Mike Miller, BMG Canada Inc.
Tel: 416-586-1646
Fax: 416-586-1661
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: Wildcard Hostname's in MySQL 3.23.41

2001-09-09 Thread Mike Miller

I just made the upgrade from 3.22 to 3.23.41 this weekend and had one little 
hiccup.

  I have a few users with host entries with wildcards (hostname = '%').
These users stopped working and were not able to login.  When I added one 
for the hosts they were connecting from, it began to work fine.  This is all 
in the users table of the MySQL database.

  Is there something I have to do to get wildcard hostnames to work again?
Networking is enabled in case that makes a difference.

  Please help.  Thanks in advance;
--
Mike


query

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php