Re: Problem with Replication - Slave Option replicate-ignore-tabl e and replicate-wild-ignore-table

2004-09-13 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

I have had similar problems with do-table, but never succeded finalizing
my bug-report.

I have added (on master) ...
SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 0 as start of each action where not to replicate data
SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 1 as start of each action where to replicate data

Further I have had some issues where data seams to be lost during
replication, mainly index, hardly data. For the last couple of days it
seams OK after having added FLUSH LOGS (save log-files) after each action
where data must be replicated.

This migh give a number of smal replication-files, but actually they seams
to be replicated faster than one big file.

So right now, my master and two slaves seams to be in fine condition.

Further I have made ans ASP/XML program where to read table-status from
master and each slave, and comparing datasize, indexsize and so, for having
a complete database-status view .

Best regards
Peter


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Lohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Victor Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with Replication - Slave Option replicate-ignore-tabl e
and replicate-wild-ignore-table


 Yes. I also tried that. Are there any other suggestions?

 What's about the different sections in my.cnf?

 Should these statements beeing written under [mysqld_safe], too?



 Victor Pendleton wrote:

  In the slave's my.cnf have you tried just expliciting statement what
tables
  to ignore?
  replicate-ignore-table=db.table1
  replicate-ignore-table=db.table2
  ...
  replicate-ignore-table=db.tablen
 
  And remove the other statements?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Mike Lohman
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 9/10/04 10:53 AM
  Subject: Problem with Replication - Slave Option replicate-ignore-table
and
  replicate-wild-ignore-table
 
  Hi,
 
  I've got a running Master-Slave environment with 8 Slaves and 1 Master.
 
  The problem is not the replication itself, but to exclude some tables
  out of
  it. Excluding databases runs without problems. All server are of the
  same
  version:
 
  mysql --version
  mysql  Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.18, for pc-linux-gnu (i686)
 
 From several forums, discussion groups and the manual I found out, that
  I
  have no mistake in my configs. But I cannot get it to run. Worse.
  Perhaps
  someone has an idea. I found some statements in this list, generated
  earlier, but never be answered:
 
  http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/153722
 
  I tried several times to delete the master.info on the slave and restart
  the
  slave-server. Replication allways got up to work again. But the
  replicate-wild and replicate-ignore-table entries are never used.
 
  Please help.
 
  Part of the slave- my.cnf, concerning replication:
 
  master-host=masterip
  master-user=repl
  master-password=password
  master-port=3306
  server-id   = 2
  replicate-ignore-db = mysql
  replicate-ignore-db = test
  replicate-do-db=normal
  replicate-wild-ignore-table=normal.page%
 
  Part of the master- my.cnf, concerning replication:
 
  server-id   = 1
  log-bin = /var/log/mysql/mysql-bin.log
  #log-update = /var/log/mysql/mysql-update.log
  binlog-do-db= normal
  binlog-ignore-db= mysql
 
 
  SHOW MASTER STATUS:
 
  mysql SHOW MASTER STATUS;
  +---+--+--+--+
  | File  | Position | Binlog_do_db | Binlog_ignore_db |
  +---+--+--+--+
  | mysql-bin.002 | 761239   | normal| mysql|
  +---+--+--+--+
  1 row in set (0.02 sec)
 
 
  SHOW SLAVE STATUS:
 
  mysql SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G
  *** 1. row ***
Master_Host: master IP
Master_User: repl
Master_Port: 3306
  Connect_retry: 60
Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.002
Read_Master_Log_Pos: 774689
 Relay_Log_File: slave-relay-bin.006
  Relay_Log_Pos: 323911
  Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.002
   Slave_IO_Running: Yes
  Slave_SQL_Running: Yes
Replicate_do_db: normal
Replicate_ignore_db: mysql,test
 Last_errno: 0
 Last_error:
   Skip_counter: 0
Exec_master_log_pos: 774689
Relay_log_space: 323911
  1 row in set (0.00 sec)
 
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Mike
 
 
 
 
 

 -- 
 [werk01] - Mike Lohmann
 Software Engineering | System Administration
 Herforder Strasse 24
 33602 Bielefeld

 Telefon:+49 52 1 - 96 74 26 1
 Fax:+49 52 1 - 96 74 36 4
 Mobil:  +49 17 1 - 27 04 15 6
 http://www.werk01.de
 http://mike.werk01.de

 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL 

Re: Drop all keys / indexes on a table?

2004-03-30 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

Take at look at CHECK TABEL - as far as I remember, the CHECK TABLE EXTENDED
will do a re-index (check index), otherwise some of the other OPTIMIZE, etc.
can help on this.

Take a look in the exellent manual.

Best regards
Peter


- Original Message - 
From: Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:44 PM
Subject: RE: Drop all keys / indexes on a table?


 Ugh. I was afraid you were going to say that...
 Seriously, there's no way to just 'wildcard' ALL indexes, someone should
add
 that as a feature request. We're using 4.0.17 BTW.

 What happens if I list out all the indexes that there _could_ be in one
 ALTER line like that, and one of the indexes doesn't actually exist? Will
 the whole ALTER fail?

 Here's the situation, I wrote a script that runs recursively through a
 directory and applies all the .sql files it finds (in alpha order). This
 script runs as part of a client update, and doesn't necessarily run the
same
 number of times for everyone. So, some clients may have extra indexes:
 foo_1, foo_2, foo_3, ... foo_15 etc. (the problem at hand), and other
 clients may just have: foo_1, foo_2, foo_3.

  -Original Message-
  From: Victoria Reznichenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:48 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Drop all keys / indexes on a table?
 
  Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It has come to my attention that we have maxed out our keys
  due to a stupid
   update script bug. It seemst that we've not been explicitly
  naming our keys
   and therefore mysql tried to be helpful and adds a new key
  each time!
   *sigh*.
  
   Is there a SQL command to DROP ALL keys on a table, so I
  can just ALTER it
   and add them specifically again?
  
 
  Specify several DROP INDEX clause in the single ALTER TABLE statement:
  ALTER TABLE table_name DROP INDEX index_name1, DROP
  INDEX index_name2, .. , DROP INDEX index_nameN;
 
 
  -- 
  For technical support contracts, goto
  https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
  This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
 __  ___ ___   __
/  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Victoria Reznichenko
   / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  /_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
 ___/   www.mysql.com
 
 
 
 
 
  -- 
  MySQL General Mailing List
  For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
  To unsubscribe:
  http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dream MySQL Server?

2004-03-02 Thread PeterWR
Hi Alec,

You are not mentioning the application, if this is a web-based
application/interface or some internal heavy stuff.

I'm running Windows 2000 and MySQL (and are happy, sleep fine every night !)
for web-sites, and have only a P4 1.6 processor - and this is working very
fine so far. So, if You are running a web-based application/interface, You
have to focus on harddisk speed and security/redundency and LAN-I/O (100Mbit
is fine), the remaining hardware will cover very well.

Best regards
Peter
Copenhagen Denmark


- Original Message - 
From: Sasha Pachev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: Dream MySQL Server?


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  I have a requirement for a system that is of the order of 8-10 times the
  size of my current system. Unfortunately (a) I don't know how many times
  larger it actually is, and (b) my current system, while very happy, even
  relaxed, on its current hardware, has not yet been subjected to the full
  rigour of the target number of users. So it is very difficult to
estimate
  what hardware I need to specify for the new system.
 
  Fortunately, the budget is fairly generous. Obviously, we don't want to
  gold-plate the system - but if a bit of overspend gives
  faster-than-specified performance, that will be a gain rather than
wasted
  money. So I can get a lot of hardware - if I can confidently state that
it
  will improve MySQL performance. So what should I be planning to use?
 
  The database is quite small - 2-4 Gb, but high churn: maybe 25% of it
  replaced every day. Reads dominate writes, but not overwhelmingly: at a
  guess, 10:1. The current hardware is dual Xeon 2.0, 2Gb, single Scsi
disk.
  The one fixed factor is that the OS is Windows 2000 (I know the
arguments
  for Linux/BSD, but that is not feasible).
 
  Scanning a PC manufacturer's website, it seems easy to get 4x2.5GHz
Xeon,
  1Mb L3, 8Gb ram, dual 15000 rpm Scsi with Raid 1 (for performance as
well
  as reliability).
 
  Does this sound balanced for a MySQL engine? Or what would other people
  advise?

 My advice is that in the end, hardware does not matter that much. If it
solves a
 problem, it solves it until your data outgrows it again, and eventually
you hit
 your budget limitations and cannot afford an upgrade. Of course, there are
 certain common sense rules that need to be followed, eg. if you have a 20
GB
 database, you need at least a 20 GB disk, but otherwise, if your
application is
 good, it runs well on modest hardware, and if not, doubling the data is
likely
 to kill it no matter how powerful hardware you use on it. A good case in
point
 was an earlier post from an 8-CPU Irix user.

 I would suggest you focus on making the application good. It would be wise
to
 invest a portion of the hardware budget into purchasing a MySQL support
contract
 or consulting services.

 Regarding Windows 2000 - I am curious why MySQL is an option, but Linux is
not.
 They kind of go together, almost the same as MS-SQL and Windows, or Oracle
and
 Solaris. Is this a dedicated MySQL machine? If yes, I cannot think of one
 technical reason to run Windows on it, and I've tried hard in the past. If
you
 were using Oracle or especially MS-SQL, it would make sense. But if you've
 decided that MySQL is it for your database, I would really have a hard
time
 coming up with any reasonalbe justification for Windows even if Microsoft
or
 somebody else was going to pay me big money for it.


 -- 
 Sasha Pachev
 Create online surveys at http://www.surveyz.com/

 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: datetime in mysql

2004-02-26 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

If You take Your really exellent MySQL Reference Manual, and search for timestamp 
or look into chapter 6.2, You fill find what You are looking for.

Best regards
Peter



  - Original Message - 
  From: CurlyBraces Technologies ( Pvt ) Ltd 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:09 AM
  Subject: Fw: datetime in mysql



  - Original Message - 
  From: CurlyBraces Technologies ( Pvt ) Ltd 
  To: mos 
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:51 AM
  Subject: Re: datetime in mysql


  sorry , as u said , i did it . it doesn't work for me .This table i want to view in 
the Web. So that date and time must fully automated. Must be keep connect with system 
date and time.plz help me ...exactly i need ur help .

  thanx
- Original Message - 
From: mos 
To: CurlyBraces Technologies ( Pvt ) Ltd 
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: datetime in mysql


At 10:13 PM 2/26/2004, you wrote:

  hi , 
   
  i have created datetime field in the field name abc.
  so i want to get  the system date and time automatically to the abc field for in 
each records. how can i do that ?can somebody help me ..plz
   
  thanx in advance
  curlys
   

Hi Curly, :)
To save the current date time into a DateTime column, make sure column is 
set to Not Null and just save NULL into that column. Or if you don't want to have to 
physically use NULL then you could use a TimeStamp column which will always update the 
column whenever the row is changed (for the first TimeStamp column in the table). 
TimeStamp is more automatic but may be too automatic if some times you don't want the 
timestamp column updated. The choice is yours.

Mike 


--


  -- 
  MySQL General Mailing List
  For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
  To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with Selecting Text and Blob fields

2004-02-20 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

I have had problems reading BLOB fields using MyODBC (I can't see if this is
Your way of doing this).

I have solved reading/updating BLOB using the samples from
http://www.vbmysql.com/  -
http://www.vbmysql.com/articles/visual-basic_mysql/blobaccessvb.html

Best regards
Peter





- Original Message - 
From: Jacob Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 6:32 PM
Subject: Problem with Selecting Text and Blob fields


When a select query is run on a mysql table with text and blob fields, the
text fields return the whole text but the blob fields return only the first
4 bytes of the blob data. I use MySQL 4.0.17 with VB6.0 on Windows 2000.

What should I do to retrieve complete data from the blob field?

Any help is appreciated and thanks in advance.

Jacob Joseph.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 2/13/04


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL big problem

2004-02-14 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

The install of MySQL is mainly only a unpack.

If You make a new folder - ex. C:\mysql02 - and install in this, You have
the \data available and can copy to Your first installation, or change You
my.ini to use second installation.

Best regards
Peter WR



- Original Message - 
From: chatiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: chatiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: MySQL big problem


 I have resolved the problem by:
 - removing the /var/lib/mysql/mysql folder
 - reinstalling the mysql-server package

 Anyway I have no idea of where this can come from. This seems like an
 obscure bug

 Is there a way to reinstall a new 'mysql' database without reinstalling
the
 software ?

 - Original Message -
 From: chatiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:46 PM
 Subject: MySQL big problem


  Since today I can only access to 2 databases (instead of 10) :
  mysql -u root
   show databases shows me only 2 db
  theres 10 in /var/lib/mysql
 
  I suspect that the grant tables are damaged .
  How can I repair them ?
 
  Note that I cannot do
  mysql -u mysql mysql
  which returns access denied to '@localhost'
 
 
 
 
  --
  MySQL General Mailing List
  For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
  To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mysql issues.

2004-02-12 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

Two way, depending on size of Your data ...

- programming if data is more than 64MB
- best way - export MS SQL 7 to MS Access and import MS Access to MySQL (my
experience is only char.data, no image in blob or other things like this)


Best regards
Peter W Rasmussen

- Original Message - 
From: Dale Goolcharan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:07 AM
Subject: Mysql issues.


 Hi,
I am currently migrating data DIRECTLY from a microsoft sql server 7
 database into a mysql database. The sql database supports strings in
 different languages(Japanese French, spanish and so on). The sql 7
database
 has been setup to support unicode.

 1.  How do I create a databese to support unicode in mysql. I read the
doc.
 on mysql.com and it specified about using the database unicode parameter
or
 setting unicode at the column level. How can I perform this at the command
 line. I will prefer to use the Database option.

 2. The above migration only works if I use varchar(255) instead of blob
 datatype. I need in mysql to have columns in tables that will support up
to
 5000 charaters for string data. Sql 7 complains that it does not support
 blob upon exporting data into mysql directly. All other datatypes work.
 How do I solve this and does mysql allow a dataype that can accept string
 data up to 5000 characters.

  I am new to mysql. Any help will be appreciated.

 Thank you.
 Dale Goolcharan.

 _
 MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/viruspgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca


 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: transaction support

2004-01-05 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

I have been using MySQL since 3.2x and now 4.0.1x in Windows NT and Windows
2000 IIS / .asp environment including MyODBC for more than 4 years now, and
never lost any data. Setup problems have been solved by reading and
following instruction in the manual, or asking in the support / newsgroups.

So, you can have a pricewise cheap database (remember to contribute to the
company), with free worldwide support, or a expensive SQL server with only
payable support - if you contribute the same amount to MySQL as to MS, you
might probably (almost) get your personal supportline.

Best regards
Peter
Copenhagen denmark




 - Original Message - 
 From: Bryan Koschmann - GKT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: MySQL List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:37 AM
 Subject: transaction support


  Hi,
 
  I'm trying to get a software designer to write us some software using
  MySQL as the database server (he currently requires MS SQL). It is all
  windows based software (written in VB).
 
  So far his arguments against it are this (not my words):
 
  -No explicit transactional support
  -MySQL is still buggy
  -MyODBC is buggy and not used in production environments
  -Only way to connect using ODBC is third party drivers that cost over
  half as much as MS SQL
 
  This is just for our current software, the new software he is bidding on
  says he would use .NET so that supposedely causes other problems.
 
  Now, I know there are a few discrepancies there but I just don't know
  enough to argue it. I * need* to use MySQL as the server because of cost
  reasons. I *WANT* to use MySQL because I don't care for MS choose not to
  run their products.
 
  If you can give me any information to help me argue this I would really
  appreciate it.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Bryan
 
 
  -- 
  MySQL General Mailing List
  For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
  To unsubscribe:
 http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: More database replication

2003-12-03 Thread PeterWR




Støt Julemærkesagen
Hi,

From my experience, if You have to write 
...

LOAD DATA FROM MASTER

Your replication is not setup 
correctly.

LOAD DATA FROM MASTER is reload of the whole table, 
and by that You also get the updates.

When working correctly, the replication starts when 
MASTER and SLAVE are started and get in contact with each other, the updates are 
stored in a "update-file" and also copyed to the SLAVE - unless You 
useex. SLAVE STOP will stop the 
replication, SLAVE START will start the replication - or,when having added 
commands in the SLAVE myini.cnf file, the SLAVE might delay in starting 
replication.

It is all well explained in the 
manual.

And also You question regarding "both" MASTER / 
SLAVE is explained as far as I remember - I do not think both system can 
be both - one MASTER and one SLAVE (and as far as I remember, it is also in the 
manual shown how to switch).

I would stick to one MASTER which also apply the 
updates, and one SLAVE as backup which will take over if MASTER is down, based 
on latest update-status from MASTER - and, only if MASTER is down for long time, 
I would consider start updating SLAVE.

If You need further backup, it might be backup of 
the database-data in regular dump's, and further the SLAVE can do a 
"file-backup" of changes.

So, there are a lot of options (chapter 
4.10).

Best regards
Peter

- Original Message - 
From: "Richard Bewley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Richard Bewley'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:15 
AM
Subject: RE: More database 
replication
 Anyone have any ideas about this?  Thanks, 
Richard  -Original Message- From: Richard Bewley 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:10 
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 
More database replication  Hi,  I have a 
"mission critical" database, that I want to be redundant, so I'm using, 
as discussed in another thread, the Cisco LocalDirector, two mysql 
machines, and db replication. mySQL version 4.0.16, compiled from 
source.  Should I make both servers both master and slave, or 
will this cause problems? Would it be better, to make one primary 
server master, and just have a slave as a "failover" db server for the 
LocalDirector to send traffic to only if the primary is down? 
 Also, the problem I've come across is, I have gotten replication 
setup correctly, and it works, but only when I type  
mysql LOAD DATA FROM MASTER;  I'd rather have it 
automatically be replicating rather than have to run that command every 
time, or rather than having a cron job do it, which I see as messy at 
best.  Any suggestions?  Thanks, 
Richard--  MySQL General Mailing 
List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql 
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  
MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql 
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


Re: My Company DB Wars

2003-10-27 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

You could bring the attention to www.mysql.com  - probably German software
company SAP would not integrate with MySQL, if there were any kind of
problems.

Further You could look at the success stories (
http://www.mysql.com/press/user_stories/index.html ), and You will find
NASA, Yahoo! Finance among others.

best regards
Peter



- Original Message - 
From: Randy Chrismon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: My Company DB Wars



My old Micro-Economics professor must be chortling in his grave...

The bosses told me a few minutes ago to quit pusing MySQL for an
internal project and to move my proof-of-concept tables from MySQL
running on a Linux desktop with 512mb of ram and the bloody DB on an
external USB to a DB2 database running on a Win2K server with 1GB ram
and a 120 GB raid system. The reason? TPTB simply can't believe that
a
licensed MySQL system at $450 for the base license, no connected user
fees and $2,500 per year for advanced support (we need InnoDB, FK
constraints and transaction safe tables) can possibly be as good as
DB2 at a minimum of 5 times the software cost. Afterall, DB2 has
triggers and stored procedures (although nobody -- including the
contractors actually doing the coding -- can point to a single stored
procedure or trigger that is essential to the project). The
contractors ARE making fairly extensive use of views but I've already
figured out three ways around them.

Go figger.

I will continue to use MySQL for testbedding. Also, since I'm the
gate-keeper for the contractor's code, I'm going to keep their stuff
as generic as possible.

BTW, one question, does MySQL run on the AS400?

Randy

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Selecting on timestamp(14)

2003-09-27 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

I dont think so - the timestamp is a system-field, set by the system and can
not be modifyed by users.

You probably have to make an additional datetime-field for You purpose - if
You can do CONCAT(timestamp + NOW()) when it is INSERT, I dont know - try.

best regards
Peter



- Original Message - 
From: Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MySql [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 4:47 AM
Subject: Selecting on timestamp(14)


 I have a timestamp(14) column, I need to expire/decay certain records over
 time, can I use NOW() and INTERVAL on a timestamp(14) column

 Looking to expire a record that is x hours old

 For example
 Update table set active = '0' where updated = 
 -- 
 -
 Scott HanedaTel: 415.898.2602
 http://www.newgeo.com   Fax: 313.557.5052
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]Novato, CA U.S.A.


 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MySQL - MS SQL

2003-06-21 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

MySQL is running fine on Win2000 and IIS, so why change to MS SQL ?

Best regards
Peter


- Original Message - 
From: Sheni R. Meledath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MySQL Masters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: MySQL - MS SQL


 Hi,

 I have designed a site using PHP  MySQL. Recently an urgent requirement
 has come up from the client side to change the web server to IIS. So I
have
 to migrate the scripts and database to Windows based ASP  MS SQL.

 Can any body provide me some details regarding migrating MySQL databases
to
 MS SQL databases. It would be highly appreciated if you could send me the
 details at the earliest.

 Sheni R Meledath
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Complex SQL involving 10 checkboxes

2003-06-19 Thread PeterWR
When I have these kind of settings/testing, I make one text-field and set a
specific code ex.
age 0-5 [age00-05]
age 6-10 [age06-10]

and so on - then you reduce the SQL to always read that specific tablefield,
and leave the complexity to the program instead.

best regards
Peter



- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hillyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:57 PM
Subject: RE: Complex SQL involving 10 checkboxes


Well, if one checkbox represents ages 1-5, another represents 6-9, and
another represents 10-15, then you have the checkboxes add where
clauses. Here is a pseudocode/basic example:

*START WITH A SELECT*
SQL = SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE

*BUILD THE WHERE CLAUSES*
IF check1 THEN SQL = SQL   age BETWEEN 1 AND 5 AND
IF check2 THEN SQL = SQL   age BETWEEN 6 AND 9 AND
IF check3 THEN SQL = SQL   age BETWEEN 10 AND 15 AND

*TRIM THE UNUSED AND STATEMENT
SQL = left(sql, len(SQL) - 3)

Add some GROUP and ORDER and LIMIT clauses as needed and send the
resulting string to the server.

Regards,
Mike Hillyer
www.vbmysql.com

 -Original Message-
 From: vernon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:53 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Complex SQL involving 10 checkboxes


 I'm trying to setup a SQL statement that involes using 10 different
 checkboxes. The checkboxes repersent age groups that I need
 to forward to an
 SQL statement. What would be the easiest way to do this?

 As I think this through I'm thinking I have to check it 1 and
 2 are checked
 and not 3-9 and so forth which can drive a person to drink
 espically when I
 have other SQL statemenst I need to add to it as well.

 Any ideas on the best way to do this? I have this whole thing
 I was going to
 post to the list but figured I start out with the basic
 question first.

 Thanks

 -- 
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:
 http://lists.mysql.com/mysql? [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



SQL question

2003-06-18 Thread PeterWR
Hi,

I have a SQL issue I cannot figure out, perhaps somebody can help / solve / input on 
this ...

I have a table with stock-status transactions like ...

2003-06-17 06:00 stockA SKU1 QTY 98
2003-06-16 06:10 stockA SKU1 QTY 101
2003-06-15 04:59 stockA SKU1 QTY 111

- the time for updating the transaction
- each specific stock
- each specific SKU / partnumber
- quantity in stock at time of transaction

The SQL issue - are there some way in SQL I can SELECT only latest transaction for 
each stock/SKU no matter date of update, or do I have to read thrue all transactions 
and select in the program ???


Thanks and best regards
Peter Rasmussen
Copenhagen Denmark


Re: mysql.org

2001-07-13 Thread PeterWR

Hi Van,

I have no experience with Progress software.

Once, Progress must have seen their approach as the right way. That they
sonner or later see a need to change, does not approved the way it is done.



In short term, the clients for the NuSphere are already familiar with
MySQL and subscribers to the mysql-email-listings - we have all access to
Montys email from yesterday - and hopeful understand the issues and remain
loyal.
Actually it is the same channels NuSphere have used for spreading their
message (and right now they are reading what we are writing). This is the
best (only) current channel to the MySQL community.

I will call on anybody having web-sites, where they provide software to
MySQL, providing support or information, selling books or what so ever - to
add an easy readable message to their website ...

We support / contribute to the original MySQL initiative at www.mysql.com
(or something like that)

... and by that make it clear to newcomers, that there are something to be
aware of.


Best regards
Peter

- Original Message -
From: Van [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PeterWR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: mysql.org


 PeterWR wrote:
 
  Then you can start wondering why one software company wants to promote
open
  source by using another companys software - why is the Progress
database
  not good enough for NuSphere ???
 
  Best regards
  Peter
  Copnehagen Denmark
 

 Peter:

 Have your ever worked with Progress?  It's ... interesting.

 It's like no other database system I've ever seen, and, it's hardly
 SQL-compliant.  At least when I worked on Progress 6.0 in '98.

 Progress had much to gain by incorporating MySQL features and more-or-less
 SQL-compliant features/syntax.

 That's why the Progress database was possibly not good enough for
NuSphere.

 Best Regards,
 Van
 --
 =
 Linux rocks!!!   http://www.dedserius.com/
 =



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: mysql.org

2001-07-12 Thread PeterWR

Hi Monty,

When reading Your comments, I became very sorry for You and MySQL.

With almost four years experience on MySQL on Windows, I have had no
problems of any kind. You and Your people are doing a great job both on the
software and on the support - other major players could learn from MySQL way
of doing this.

MySQL is probably the most (the only) successfull open source software
today, worldwide.


I also became upset. The Internet is surposed to be a free and open world.

Just because You / MySQL have worked hard on the software and technical, and
perhaps less considering the marketing - some other company finds a free
domain-name and starts making benefits / violations on Your efforts - and
all other peoples free efforts and contributions to MySQL.

This handling of NuSphere also violates the whole idea about open source,
because anybody contributing free stuff now have to consider their
copyrights - and copyrights can only be protected by making none open
protections - and the open source idea is dead.


I propose we all support MySQL in their efforts on this issue, ex. by
sending our comments to NuSphere on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes, it does not says mail: nusphere. Going to
http://www.nusphere.com/about/index.htm mention the email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and also mentioning NuSphere Corporation is a Progress Software Company
formed to provide open source products and services - and You can link to
the www.progress.com

Then you can start wondering why one software company wants to promote open
source by using another companys software - why is the Progress database
not good enough for NuSphere ???


Best regards
Peter
Copnehagen Denmark


- Original Message -
From: Michael Widenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:38 AM
Subject: mysql.org




snip



-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php