what if you had no issues of scaling, which would have less access
time, file system or database?
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arthur Fuller fuller.art...@gmail.com wrote:
I second that emotion (don't store the images in the data file: just store
the paths to said images). Why? Because in the event of an updated image it
is more hassle than it is worth, to drop the old image and replace it with
the new one; if what you store is a simple pointer to an image file, lots of
this work goes away.
A.
--
skype name : mossplix
twitter: @mugisha
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org