Re: SCO issue

2005-09-11 Thread Arjen Lentz
Hi Jigal, all,

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 17:30, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
 Schalk Neethling wrote:
  You guys should subscribe to the Planet MySQL RSS feed.
 The entire issue was cleared up there by a member of the MySQL AB staff.
  http://www.planetmysql.org/
 
 Maybe the MySQL AB staff could take the trouble of answering posts 
 about this issue on this list? Maybe the anouncement could be made here? 
 After all, if there is a new version the news is posted here and MySQL 
 AB staff regularly answer technical question on this list...

Indeed. And not a problem.
Nothing to hide, no conspiracy here ;-)

I think the discussion here has hinged on the nature of the
partnership. Let me assure you that no money has gone towards SCO.

They have provided us with the means to build and support binaries on
SCO OpenServer 6. So they're paying us for... developing our software,
which is all GPL licensed (yes we do sell non-GPL licenses as well, for
the same code).

Knowing this fact (SCO funding GPLed development), most people regard
the partnership with a benign smile ;-)


The other issue I spotted was about commercial binaries. Users with
OpenServer 6 get a trial subscription to our MySQL Network subscription
service. These are certified binaries, but still GPL licensed. Non-GPL
(aka commercial) binaries are an optional (but free) extra under MySQL
Network. That option exists mainly to assist companies where using
GPL-licensed software runs into policy problems, etc.
We do also sell non-GPL licenses separately from MySQL Network, to
OEM/embedded customers.


I hope this clarifies the situation to your satisfaction.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask me.

Regards,
Arjen.
-- 
Arjen Lentz, Community Relations Manager
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com

MySQL related blogs @ http://www.planetmysql.org/



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-06 Thread Jigal van Hemert

Schalk Neethling wrote:
You guys should subscribe to the Planet MySQL RSS feed. The entire issue 
was cleared up there by a member of the MySQL AB staff.

http://www.planetmysql.org/


Maybe the MySQL AB staff could take the trouble of answering posts 
about this issue on this list? Maybe the anouncement could be made here? 
After all, if there is a new version the news is posted here and MySQL 
AB staff regularly answer technical question on this list...


Regards, Jigal.

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Mirza

pissed
I would like someone from MySQL AB to clarify issue with SCO asap. I 
wouldn't like to use technologies for my business that later could be 
used against me (in legal sense). Does MySQL AB understand that it helps 
funding their legal cases against us (GPL users) ? If someone feels OK 
with SCO partnership, good luck, but (being long time MySQL user and 
alpha bug reporter) I would switch to Embedded PostgreSQL myself and 
encourage other people to do the same. I use _tons_ of GPL software so 
should I help funding of my own annoyance (albeit poorly supported with 
facts) ?

/pissed

mirza

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Alec . Cawley
__



Mirza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/09/2005 14:31:12:

 pissed
 I would like someone from MySQL AB to clarify issue with SCO asap. I 
 wouldn't like to use technologies for my business that later could be 
 used against me (in legal sense). Does MySQL AB understand that it helps 

 funding their legal cases against us (GPL users) ? If someone feels OK 
 with SCO partnership, good luck, but (being long time MySQL user and 
 alpha bug reporter) I would switch to Embedded PostgreSQL myself and 
 encourage other people to do the same. I use _tons_ of GPL software so 
 should I help funding of my own annoyance (albeit poorly supported with 
 facts) ?
 /pissed

All the press releases I have seen appear to originate from SCO. There is 
not, in any of them, any suggestion that money has passed or will pass 
from MySQL to SCO. SCO has for a long time been one of the many varieties 
of Unix that MySQL supports. MySQL cannot stop SCO from distributing their 
product (hypocritically) under the GPL. On the other hand, if they allow 
SCO to include offical releases of MySQL, they may get some support 
customers - which is where they earn their real income. The press blurbs 
are essentially saying that SCO resellers will market MySQL Network - to 
the benefit of MySQL. If there is any money flow, I would have thought it 
would be more likely to be the other way: SCO paying MySQL to ensure that 
one of the premier Unix applications remains supported on their platform.

Of course, MySQL may say otherwise, but I think this is a piece of SCO 
hype intended to imply MySQL support of SCO when all they are really doing 
is supporting their own product on whatever platform their customers may 
choose - even when that platform is marketed by a company who many of us 
find totally repulsive. If you let yourself be hyped into dropping MySQL, 
you will be harming a company that is, in my opinion, a model of how to 
provide full commercial quality software (or better) with an Open Source 
licence, while not (I think) harming SCO in any way.

Alec Cawley


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Bgs


 Here is the official link: 
http://www.sco.com/products/openserver6/mysql.html


SCO states that they will distribute MySQL with a commercial license.
According to this they do not plan to stick with GPL...

Bye
Bgs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

__



Mirza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/09/2005 14:31:12:



pissed
I would like someone from MySQL AB to clarify issue with SCO asap. I 
wouldn't like to use technologies for my business that later could be 
used against me (in legal sense). Does MySQL AB understand that it helps 



funding their legal cases against us (GPL users) ? If someone feels OK 
with SCO partnership, good luck, but (being long time MySQL user and 
alpha bug reporter) I would switch to Embedded PostgreSQL myself and 
encourage other people to do the same. I use _tons_ of GPL software so 
should I help funding of my own annoyance (albeit poorly supported with 
facts) ?

/pissed



All the press releases I have seen appear to originate from SCO. There is 
not, in any of them, any suggestion that money has passed or will pass 
from MySQL to SCO. SCO has for a long time been one of the many varieties 
of Unix that MySQL supports. MySQL cannot stop SCO from distributing their 
product (hypocritically) under the GPL. On the other hand, if they allow 
SCO to include offical releases of MySQL, they may get some support 
customers - which is where they earn their real income. The press blurbs 
are essentially saying that SCO resellers will market MySQL Network - to 
the benefit of MySQL. If there is any money flow, I would have thought it 
would be more likely to be the other way: SCO paying MySQL to ensure that 
one of the premier Unix applications remains supported on their platform.


Of course, MySQL may say otherwise, but I think this is a piece of SCO 
hype intended to imply MySQL support of SCO when all they are really doing 
is supporting their own product on whatever platform their customers may 
choose - even when that platform is marketed by a company who many of us 
find totally repulsive. If you let yourself be hyped into dropping MySQL, 
you will be harming a company that is, in my opinion, a model of how to 
provide full commercial quality software (or better) with an Open Source 
licence, while not (I think) harming SCO in any way.


Alec Cawley




--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Daniel Kasak

Mirza wrote:


pissed
I would like someone from MySQL AB to clarify issue with SCO asap. I 
wouldn't like to use technologies for my business that later could be 
used against me (in legal sense). Does MySQL AB understand that it 
helps funding their legal cases against us (GPL users) ? If someone 
feels OK with SCO partnership, good luck, but (being long time MySQL 
user and alpha bug reporter) I would switch to Embedded PostgreSQL 
myself and encourage other people to do the same. I use _tons_ of GPL 
software so should I help funding of my own annoyance (albeit poorly 
supported with facts) ?

/pissed

mirza


This is the part that gets me:

As part of the agreement, the companies will work together on a range 
of joint marketing, sales, training, business development and support 
programs that will benefit customers throughout the Americas, Europe 
and Asia.


I suppose it depends on how much 'joint work' is actually involved. As 
another poster pointed out, this could just be SCO up to their usual spin.


But I agree with you - if this is some kind of special business 
relationship, then Postgres is looking all the more inviting.


No press release from MySQL yet ... it would look interesting above 
their 'Novell to Offer MySQL Network' news article :) Clearly one is as 
newsworthy as the other.


--
Daniel Kasak
IT Developer
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Rich Allen


On Sep 5, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Daniel Kasak wrote:




This is the part that gets me:


As part of the agreement, the companies will work together on a  
range of joint marketing, sales, training, business development  
and support programs that will benefit customers throughout the  
Americas, Europe and Asia.




I suppose it depends on how much 'joint work' is actually involved.  
As another poster pointed out, this could just be SCO up to their  
usual spin.


But I agree with you - if this is some kind of special business  
relationship, then Postgres is looking all the more inviting.




MySQL AB doing work for SCO is one thing, partnership would be much  
a different matter which would then lead me to agree that looking at  
Pg would be a good idea. Hopefully MySQL AB will make all this clear  
one way or the other ...


Rich Allen
Dare  Do



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Schalk Neethling
You guys should subscribe to the Planet MySQL RSS feed. The entire issue 
was cleared up there by a member of the MySQL AB staff.

http://www.planetmysql.org/

Rich Allen wrote:



On Sep 5, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Daniel Kasak wrote:




This is the part that gets me:


As part of the agreement, the companies will work together on a  
range of joint marketing, sales, training, business development  and 
support programs that will benefit customers throughout the  
Americas, Europe and Asia.




I suppose it depends on how much 'joint work' is actually involved.  
As another poster pointed out, this could just be SCO up to their  
usual spin.


But I agree with you - if this is some kind of special business  
relationship, then Postgres is looking all the more inviting.




MySQL AB doing work for SCO is one thing, partnership would be much  
a different matter which would then lead me to agree that looking at  
Pg would be a good idea. Hopefully MySQL AB will make all this clear  
one way or the other ...


Rich Allen
Dare  Do




--
Kind Regards
Schalk Neethling
Web Developer.Designer.Programmer.President
Volume4.Business.Solution.Developers
emotionalize.conceptualize.visualize.realize
Landlines
Tel: +27125468436
Fax: +27125468436
Web
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global: www.volume4.com
Messenger
Yahoo!: v_olume4
AOL: v0lume4
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We support OpenSource
Get Firefox!- The browser reloaded - http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/

The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
contact the sender and please delete all traces of this material from all 
devices.



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SCO issue

2005-09-05 Thread Daniel Kasak

Schalk Neethling wrote:

You guys should subscribe to the Planet MySQL RSS feed. The entire 
issue was cleared up there by a member of the MySQL AB staff.

http://www.planetmysql.org/



The argument is given that this is all about helping out the SCO users. 
A counter argument is that by doing so you are attacking Linux and 
open-source users by giving credibility to SCO, as well as defending 
SCO's user base. However, there are a lot more Linux and open-source 
users than SCO users - thankfully. Also, considering Linux is freely 
available, how difficult is it really for SCO users to get MySQL 
running? Can't figure out how to compile MySQL on SCO ... fine ... 
download and install Linux, and get a Linux binary.


I suspect the deal has more to do with MySQL and SCO than with lowly users.

--
Daniel Kasak
IT Developer
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060
T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]