Re: Ssd vs mix of ssd and spinning disk

2017-05-13 Thread shawn l.green

Hi Shain,

On 5/8/2017 1:53 PM, Shain Miley wrote:

Hello,
We have traditionally setup our mysql database servers with a mix of ssd and 
spinning disk drives.

We use the ssd drives (Raid-1) for the mysql tablespace data, and we use the 
spinning disks (15 sas in Raid-1) for the index data, etc.

I am wondering if going forward we should simply put all of the data on the ssd 
drives. Does anyone have any information on whether or not we would see any 
significant performance increase if we made this switch?

I have been thinking about using 4 ssd drives (Raid-10) going forward…and 
wondering if we should expect to see any improvement in the database 
performance.

Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance,

Shain



If you would benefit from shifting storage technologies depends on how 
limiting your current devices are to your overall throughput.


In most cases, workloads are either CPU-bound (normally due to poor 
choices in table design or query patterns) or DISK-bound (too many reads 
and writes, i/o requests,  for the device to keep up).


Occasionally systems become MEMORY-bound (normally due to poor 
configuration choices which push the system to using swap) or 
NETWORK-bound (the number of concurrent network round trips to complete 
a task is higher than the components can handle).



Of those 4 situations, which is contributing most to your total response 
latency?


For example, are you spending more time waiting for data to be buffered 
in from disk than you are computing and returning the results? If so, 
faster disks could help temporarily.


What may help more (and for a longer time) is to improve your storage 
and retrieval patterns (table and query designs) to require less 
frequent trips to disk (aka, better buffering) or to need smaller slices 
of each table (more selective indexes, querying for fewer columns, 
sharding tables, sharding data to different instances, partitioning 
data, ... ).



--
Shawn Green
MySQL Senior Principal Technical Support Engineer
Oracle USA, Inc. - Integrated Cloud Applications & Platform Services
Office: Blountville, TN

Become certified in MySQL! Visit https://www.mysql.com/certification/ 
for details.


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: Ssd vs mix of ssd and spinning disk

2017-05-08 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 08.05.2017 um 19:53 schrieb Shain Miley:

Hello,
We have traditionally setup our mysql database servers with a mix of ssd and 
spinning disk drives.

We use the ssd drives (Raid-1) for the mysql tablespace data, and we use the 
spinning disks (15 sas in Raid-1) for the index data, etc.

I am wondering if going forward we should simply put all of the data on the ssd 
drives. Does anyone have any information on whether or not we would see any 
significant performance increase if we made this switch?

I have been thinking about using 4 ssd drives (Raid-10) going forward…and 
wondering if we should expect to see any improvement in the database 
performance.

Any thoughts?


http://www.tansi.org/hybrid/


CAUTION: only works for RAID1 - not for linux RAID10

if i only woul dhave knwen that 10 years ago i would have my setups with 
4 disks on two RAID1 with a RAID0 on top...


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Ssd vs mix of ssd and spinning disk

2017-05-08 Thread Shain Miley
Hello,
We have traditionally setup our mysql database servers with a mix of ssd and 
spinning disk drives.

We use the ssd drives (Raid-1) for the mysql tablespace data, and we use the 
spinning disks (15 sas in Raid-1) for the index data, etc.

I am wondering if going forward we should simply put all of the data on the ssd 
drives. Does anyone have any information on whether or not we would see any 
significant performance increase if we made this switch?

I have been thinking about using 4 ssd drives (Raid-10) going forward…and 
wondering if we should expect to see any improvement in the database 
performance.

Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance,

Shain