Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-11 Thread John Daisley
What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the uncertainty
over the deal is hurting MySQL?

I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was dismissed
completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
going. There were a lot of concerns over where future development would
go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they would
just resolve the situation either way very quickly because its hurting
my business and open source software!

regards
John 


On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
 European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
 database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
 Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
 giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
 http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;
 source=features_box1.
 
 PB


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org



Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-11 Thread Xiong HE
I believe MySQL will still have great influence in Open Source area.
The better is that MySQL will be a separate Company which has no relation to
Sun and Oracle.
Maybe Oracle can sell MySQL to a 3rd company.

2009/11/11 John Daisley john.dais...@butterflysystems.co.uk

 What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the uncertainty
 over the deal is hurting MySQL?

 I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was dismissed
 completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
 going. There were a lot of concerns over where future development would
 go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
 support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
 database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
 for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they would
 just resolve the situation either way very quickly because its hurting
 my business and open source software!

 regards
 John


 On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
  European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
  database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
  Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an
 anti-competitive
  giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
 
 http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;
  source=features_box1.
 
  PB


 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=hexi...@gmail.com




-- 
Thanks  Best regards,
Xiong HE


Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-11 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
 European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
 database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
 Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
 giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
 http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;
 source=features_box1.
 What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the uncertainty
 over the deal is hurting MySQL?
 
 I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was dismissed
 completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
 going. There were a lot of concerns over where future development would
 go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
 support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
 database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
 for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they would
 just resolve the situation either way very quickly because its hurting
 my business and open source software!

Please remember that there are 3rd parties offering MySQL support already now, 
outside of MySQL AB.

I'm pretty sure that should Oracle raise these prices, 3rd parties will take up 
that part of the market pretty quickly.



Liz
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org



Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-11 Thread John Daisley
 On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
 European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
 database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball.
 Meanwhile
 Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an
 anti-competitive
 giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
 http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;
 source=features_box1.
 What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the uncertainty
 over the deal is hurting MySQL?

 I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was dismissed
 completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
 going. There were a lot of concerns over where future development would
 go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
 support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
 database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
 for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they would
 just resolve the situation either way very quickly because its hurting
 my business and open source software!

 Please remember that there are 3rd parties offering MySQL support already
 now, outside of MySQL AB.

 I'm pretty sure that should Oracle raise these prices, 3rd parties will
 take up that part of the market pretty quickly.



 Liz

I am aware of this Liz but corporate customers like to see support coming
from 'source'. There is also a bit of an unknown with 3rd party support
whereas MySQL's own support has a very good reputation and from personal
experience I know it to be second to none.

Regards
John

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org



Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-11 Thread Peter Brawley

Martin,

 What does monty say?

Monty made a submission to EU regulators. I can't find the URL just now. 
One-line summary: Letting Oracle have MySQL is worse than putting the 
fox in charge of the henhouse... (Florian Mueller, 
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10379870-38.html).


Other URLs:
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/10/press-release-concerning-oraclesun.html
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10379870-38.html

PB
http://www.artfulsoftware.com

-

Martin Gainty wrote:

tendency to work normal working hours 7am-7pm PST
which could be a problem for someone in Europe, Asia or even GMT+5 who 
needs an immediate answer and cant wait until 7am PST


i too would like MySQL to stay OpenSource
there is no better a feeling of applying a patch (for your own 
purposes) without having to wait for the corporate leviathans 6 month 
cycle to release a minor patch


what does monty say?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
 
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene 
Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede 
unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. 
Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und 
entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten 
Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den 
Inhalt uebernehmen.

Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez 
l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est 
interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe 
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement 
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité 
pour le contenu fourni.





 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:48:28 +
 Subject: Re: Oracle, Sun and MySQL
 From: j...@butterflysystems.co.uk
 To: l...@dijkmat.nl
 CC: john.dais...@butterflysystems.co.uk; 
peter.braw...@earthlink.net; mysql@lists.mysql.com


  On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
  On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
  European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal 
threatens

  database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball.
  Meanwhile
  Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an
  anti-competitive
  giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
  
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;

  source=features_box1.
  What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much the 
uncertainty

  over the deal is hurting MySQL?
 
  I was recently in a project planning meeting where MySQL was 
dismissed

  completely because nobody could give guarantees about where MySQL was
  going. There were a lot of concerns over where future development 
would

  go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
  support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
  database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
  for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they 
would
  just resolve the situation either way very quickly because its 
hurting

  my business and open source software!
 
  Please remember that there are 3rd parties offering MySQL support 
already

  now, outside of MySQL AB.
 
  I'm pretty sure that should Oracle raise these prices, 3rd parties 
will

  take up that part of the market pretty quickly.
 
 
 
  Liz

 I am aware of this Liz but corporate customers like to see support 
coming

 from 'source'. There is also a bit of an unknown with 3rd party support
 whereas MySQL's own support has a very good reputation and from personal
 experience I know it to be second to none.

 Regards
 John

 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=mgai...@hotmail.com



Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try 
it now. 
http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurantsform=MFESRPpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1 





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.60/2496 - Release Date: 11/11/09 07:40:00


  


Oracle, Sun and MySQL

2009-11-10 Thread Peter Brawley
European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14840272;
source=features_box1.

PB


Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Stein
I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have way
to much many to spend/waste?

Greetings from the just wondering...
Olaf

- Confidentiality Notice:
The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Thank you.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip]
I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and
MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have
way
to much many to spend/waste?
[/snip]

Or that Facebook is 'worth' multiple billions when they do not really
have a way to make money yet.

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread MySQL List
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:07:19 -0500
Olaf Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and
 MySQL AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google
 just have way to much many to spend/waste?
 

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:36 -0600
Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Or that Facebook is 'worth' multiple billions when they do not really
 have a way to make money yet.
 

Uh, you both have to be kidding comparing MySQL with Youtube and
Facebook, right?
I'm not saying the $1 billion for MySQL was the right price, I believe
it was a bargain for Sun but you are comparing apples and
oranges.

Go out on the street and ask people if they ever heard of these three.
I bet you a few people will know MySQL, a lot will know Facebook and
everybody will know Youtube.

Youtube and Facebook are websites, visited by millions of people every
day. That's what makes it it's value, future and present
advertisements.

YouTube was even used by CNN for the Republican and Democratic debates.

Did you ever hear of MySQL on TV, anywhere?


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Mark Leith

Olaf Stein wrote:

I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
is probably good for the product itself.

I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
  


Two words:

Marketing Potential.

:)

--
Mark Leith, Manager of Support, Americas
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified?  www.mysql.com/certification


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Stein
I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
is probably good for the product itself.

I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.

Olaf


On 1/17/08 12:10 PM, Barry Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Olaf Stein wrote:
 I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and MySQL
 AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have way
 to much many to spend/waste?
 
 Greetings from the just wondering...
 Olaf
 MySQL A.B., so far as I know, derives income from training, pubs sales,
 and enterprise support, with expense for salaries,  space leases (at
 least some staff work from home), and  equipment.  The value of such an
 organization is inevitably based on somebody's best guess about future
 revenues. I'm encouraged about the prospects of MySQL when I remember
 that Sun is a major sponsor of open source application software.



- Confidentiality Notice:
The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Thank you.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Martijn Tonies


 Olaf Stein wrote:
  I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and
MySQL
  AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have
way
  to much many to spend/waste?
 
  Greetings from the just wondering...
  Olaf
 MySQL A.B., so far as I know, derives income from training, pubs sales,
 and enterprise support, with expense for salaries,  space leases (at
 least some staff work from home), and  equipment.  The value of such an

Don't forget licensing MySQL.

 organization is inevitably based on somebody's best guess about future
 revenues. I'm encouraged about the prospects of MySQL when I remember
 that Sun is a major sponsor of open source application software.



Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle 
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



valuation tangent (was Re: Sun and mysql)

2008-01-17 Thread Ofer Inbar
Olaf Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It will be interesting to see if facebook, youtube and alike websites will
 ever generate enough earnings to cover the costs they were bought for.
 Just because 50 million people know a website, it does not mean it makes
 money automatically.

The Google model shows that if you can get huge numbers of people to
visit your web site(s) *repeatedly*, and target advertising well, you
can make gigantic gobs of money.  Facebook in particular clearly has
the first part down: they've got millions of members who visit the
site several times a day every day (and millions more who visit
several times a week).  I think some of their ways of targeting ads
may work out, and their potential for revenue is far more than MySQL's.

YouTube... got folded into the existing Google.
Google's just trying to make sure every single one of us visits
their sites multiple times every single time we get online :)

 nuts. Maybe I am too old with 30, but I have never even been to facebook.

I think that puts you near the current median age on Facebook.  The
net moves fast!  Facebook as a site mainly for 20-somethings is so 2006 :)
  -- Cos

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Stein
You have a point.
But, facebook makes NO money at this time, has about 400 employees and
Microsoft estimates its values at 15 billion dollars. I simply think this is
nuts. Maybe I am too old with 30, but I have never even been to facebook.

It will be interesting to see if facebook, youtube and alike websites will
ever generate enough earnings to cover the costs they were bought for.
Just because 50 million people know a website, it does not mean it makes
money automatically.

Olaf


On 1/17/08 11:37 AM, Peter   (MySQL List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:07:19 -0500
 Olaf Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and
 MySQL AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google
 just have way to much many to spend/waste?
 
 
 On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:36 -0600
 Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Or that Facebook is 'worth' multiple billions when they do not really
 have a way to make money yet.
 
 
 Uh, you both have to be kidding comparing MySQL with Youtube and
 Facebook, right?
 I'm not saying the $1 billion for MySQL was the right price, I believe
 it was a bargain for Sun but you are comparing apples and
 oranges.
 
 Go out on the street and ask people if they ever heard of these three.
 I bet you a few people will know MySQL, a lot will know Facebook and
 everybody will know Youtube.
 
 Youtube and Facebook are websites, visited by millions of people every
 day. That's what makes it it's value, future and present
 advertisements.
 
 YouTube was even used by CNN for the Republican and Democratic debates.
 
 Did you ever hear of MySQL on TV, anywhere?
 

- Confidentiality Notice:
The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Thank you.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Barry Newton

Olaf Stein wrote:

I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5 billion and MySQL
AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does Google just have way
to much many to spend/waste?

Greetings from the just wondering...
Olaf
MySQL A.B., so far as I know, derives income from training, pubs sales, 
and enterprise support, with expense for salaries,  space leases (at 
least some staff work from home), and  equipment.  The value of such an 
organization is inevitably based on somebody's best guess about future 
revenues. I'm encouraged about the prospects of MySQL when I remember 
that Sun is a major sponsor of open source application software.


--

Barry


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Martijn Tonies


 I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
 is probably good for the product itself.

 I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly
with
 lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.

Much bigger market :-)

Ability to hype something?

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle 
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Stein
I understand the marketing and hype thing.
I still have a hard time believing that the net worth is actually that high.
I guess we will see in 10 years or so...

Maybe facebook should by GM, Ford can use some of that hype


On 1/17/08 12:19 PM, Mark Leith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Olaf Stein wrote:
 I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
 is probably good for the product itself.
 
 I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
 lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
   
 
 Two words:
 
 Marketing Potential.
 
 :)


- Confidentiality Notice:
The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Thank you.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun and mysql - sorry

2008-01-17 Thread Olaf Stein
I guess Ford is not a GM brand.
Just substitute Ford with a GM brand


On 1/17/08 12:23 PM, Olaf Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I understand the marketing and hype thing.
 I still have a hard time believing that the net worth is actually that high.
 I guess we will see in 10 years or so...
 
 Maybe facebook should by GM, Ford can use some of that hype
 
 
 On 1/17/08 12:19 PM, Mark Leith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Olaf Stein wrote:
 I am not judging this move by mysql, as long as it stays open source, this
 is probably good for the product itself.
 
 I just think it is weird that a pure entertainment website (admittedly with
 lots of users) is estimated at so much more than a software company.
   
 
 Two words:
 
 Marketing Potential.
 
 :)

- Confidentiality Notice:
The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Thank you.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [SPAM] - Re: Sun and mysql - Email found in subject

2008-01-17 Thread jmacaranas
 -Original Message-
 From: Olaf Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:13 PM
 To: Peter (MySQL List); MySql
 Subject: [SPAM] - Re: Sun and mysql - Email found in subject
 
 You have a point.
 But, facebook makes NO money at this time, has about 400 employees
 and
 Microsoft estimates its values at 15 billion dollars. I simply
 think this is
 nuts. Maybe I am too old with 30, but I have never even been to
 facebook.
 
 It will be interesting to see if facebook, youtube and alike
 websites will
 ever generate enough earnings to cover the costs they were bought
 for.

With a perfect business plan I bet it will.

 Just because 50 million people know a website, it does not mean it
 makes
 money automatically.

Yes, I agree but once this 50 million visits the website and it would be
a different story.

 
 Olaf
 
 
 On 1/17/08 11:37 AM, Peter   (MySQL List)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:07:19 -0500
  Olaf Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I am still amazed by the fact that youtube is worth 1.5
 billion and
  MySQL AB barely 1 billion. Did they sell under price? Or does
 Google
  just have way to much many to spend/waste?
 
 
  On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:14:36 -0600
  Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Or that Facebook is 'worth' multiple billions when they do not
 really
  have a way to make money yet.
 
 
  Uh, you both have to be kidding comparing MySQL with Youtube and
  Facebook, right?
  I'm not saying the $1 billion for MySQL was the right price, I
 believe
  it was a bargain for Sun but you are comparing apples and
  oranges.
 
  Go out on the street and ask people if they ever heard of these
 three.
  I bet you a few people will know MySQL, a lot will know Facebook
 and
  everybody will know Youtube.
 
  Youtube and Facebook are websites, visited by millions of people
 every
  day. That's what makes it it's value, future and present
  advertisements.
 
  YouTube was even used by CNN for the Republican and Democratic
 debates.
 
  Did you ever hear of MySQL on TV, anywhere?
 
 
 - Confidentiality Notice:
 The following mail message, including any attachments, is for the
 sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
 and privileged information. The recipient is responsible to
 maintain the confidentiality of this information and to use the
 information only for authorized purposes. If you are not the
 intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
 intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any review, use,
 disclosure, distribution, copying, printing, or action taken in
 reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If
 you have received this communication in error, please notify us
 immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message. Thank you.
 
 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:
 http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. It may contain sensitive and private proprietary or legally
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient,
please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system,
destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not,
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any
part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. 
FXDirectDealer, LLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail 
communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this 
message are those of the individual sender, except where the 
message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them.

Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an
offer to deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of
executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject
to our formal confirmation. FXDirectDealer, LLC is not responsible for any
recommendation, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information
about any transaction, customer account or account activity contained in
this communication.


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http

Sun and MySQL

2008-01-16 Thread jekillen

Hello:
Does this mean that MySQL is headed for closed source?
re: Sun buys MySQL.
And does it mean that someone may be wanting back licensing
fees?
Just curious, and too lazy to chase down links and stories.
Jeff K


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]