RE: [OT] Email heaaders and threading (was Re: update MySQL)

2004-10-07 Thread David Brodbeck
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Stassen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This tells the recipient's email client that your message is 
 a reply, not a new message, despite your efforts to change the subject and

 recipients.  Many email clients use that header to decide which thread a
message 
 belongs to.  That's actually the point of the header.

I get it now. I wasn't aware of that, since every email client I've ever
seen seems to thread strictly by subject.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 15:18, Ed Lazor wrote:

 Also, back to my original question, what are you seeing that denotes the
 difference between whether I reply or create a new message when starting a
 new topic?  After all, I took care of changing the recipient list and the
 subject field.  Is header information different?  Does your email client
 sort or group messages differently?

I haven't been following this, but I can make a good guess.

Some email clients can thread messages - my client (KMail) is one of them. If 
you hit reply, your message gets placed in the thread that you replied to. It 
is *NOT* based on the subject, it uses the In-Reply-To header. If you enter 
a new message, it begins a new thread.

If it is really a new message, it is out of context to put it into an existing 
thread. If it is really a reply, it may be lost in a new thread.

Because of threaded emails, it is considered bad practice to start new threads 
by a reply - or use New to reply to a thread. I won't claim I've never done 
it, but it is bad practice.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBZC6mjeziQOokQnARAp5wAJ9QehvPkNRVwKGgUkAjAm7jkQfRowCgrWaH
BwWO1G8aButW0ejjh3P2O4w=
=EkBR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 14:23, David Brodbeck wrote:
 Well, that's nice...

 I just don't see what difference it makes.  As far as I can see, the
 outcome is identical either way...

If the recipients email program threads messages, it makes a big difference.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBZEG6jeziQOokQnARAq2qAJ9dHUqz+mmTGTNp7xRiu4hZipIBcwCgpfxX
lnNkjyvux/GUi/pZCgNzmJ8=
=f0bF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 14:39, Scott Hamm wrote:
 Jeff,

   If you sort it by conversation topic, then it will seem to group by
 threads.
 I'm running Outlook 2000.

Not the same thing. Threading uses the In-reply-to header. Messages will 
stay in the correct thread even if the subject changes - which is why it 
makes a difference.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBZEH2jeziQOokQnARAmKiAJ4ww4xc4BOGxnOoXaXlNPxOYvM18gCfVQy1
E+90ewHDuSc7AKQGkjBzIEc=
=1mEs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Scott Hamm
Like I said before it seems to group by threads.  Therefore, it is close
enough.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Satterwhite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: update MySQL


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 14:39, Scott Hamm wrote:
 Jeff,

   If you sort it by conversation topic, then it will seem to group by
 threads.
 I'm running Outlook 2000.

Not the same thing. Threading uses the In-reply-to header. Messages will 
stay in the correct thread even if the subject changes - which is why it 
makes a difference.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBZEH2jeziQOokQnARAmKiAJ4ww4xc4BOGxnOoXaXlNPxOYvM18gCfVQy1
E+90ewHDuSc7AKQGkjBzIEc=
=1mEs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Jim Winstead
Hey folks.

Apparently I need to say it again: this discussion is off-topic for this
mailing list. Please either let it die or take the discussion off-list.

Thanks.

Jim Winstead
MySQL Inc.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-06 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 02:10 pm, Scott Hamm wrote:

 Like I said before it seems to group by threads.  Therefore, it is
 close enough.

Right! thats why Microsoft thrives. Because as long as it appears to work, its 
all good.. :)

Jeff


pgpAXe4d5h6QD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:14 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
 Does anything need to be done to my data while upgrading the server from
 3.23 to 4.0.21?

Whats the deal and this list? No one can ever just hit new message, they 
always hit reply and put a new subject in..

Geez.. This list is horrible with it..

Jeff


pgpZ3q0X0WvJ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Ed Lazor
You're close.  I hit reply to all, typed in a new subject, and then modified
the To field by removing all but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.

Come to think of it, I'm hitting reply on this message as well.

What difference are you seeing that makes this significant?

-Ed


 -Original Message-
 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:14 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
  Does anything need to be done to my data while upgrading the server from
  3.23 to 4.0.21?
 
 Whats the deal and this list? No one can ever just hit new message, they
 always hit reply and put a new subject in..
 
 Geez.. This list is horrible with it..
 
 Jeff


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Scott Hamm
We're not perfectionist like you. :)



 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Smelser [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:23 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: update MySQL
 
 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:14 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
  Does anything need to be done to my data while upgrading the server from
  3.23 to 4.0.21?
 
 Whats the deal and this list? No one can ever just hit new message, they 
 always hit reply and put a new subject in..
 
 Geez.. This list is horrible with it..
 
 Jeff

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread David Brodbeck
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Smelser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Whats the deal and this list? No one can ever just hit new 
 message, they 
 always hit reply and put a new subject in..

Saves having to retype the list address, or look it up.  I don't see what
difference it makes...

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:55 pm, you wrote:
 We're not perfectionist like you. :)

Actually its proper email etticate.. look it up if you don't believe me..

Jeff


pgpjB48FEXyL0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:56 pm, David Brodbeck wrote:

 Saves having to retype the list address, or look it up.  I don't see what
 difference it makes...

Click on the email, on mine, it brings up a nice to empty message with the 
email address..

Jeff


pgp50O9uZVT4t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread David Brodbeck
 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Smelser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:56 pm, David Brodbeck wrote:
 
  Saves having to retype the list address, or look it up.  I 
 don't see what
  difference it makes...
 
 Click on the email, on mine, it brings up a nice to empty 
 message with the 
 email address..

Well, that's nice...

I just don't see what difference it makes.  As far as I can see, the outcome
is identical either way...

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:23 pm, David Brodbeck wrote:

 Well, that's nice...

Hmm

 I just don't see what difference it makes.  As far as I can see, the
 outcome is identical either way...

Cause your doesnt support threads.. Outlook was the only one I knew off that 
did not.

Jeff


pgp1rxawLcFkW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Scott Hamm
Jeff,

If you sort it by conversation topic, then it will seem to group by
threads.
I'm running Outlook 2000. 


Scott

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Smelser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: update MySQL


On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:23 pm, David Brodbeck wrote:

 Well, that's nice...

Hmm

 I just don't see what difference it makes.  As far as I can see, the
 outcome is identical either way...

Cause your doesnt support threads.. Outlook was the only one I knew off that

did not.

Jeff

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:39 pm, Scott Hamm wrote:

  If you sort it by conversation topic, then it will seem to group by
 threads.
 I'm running Outlook 2000.

Seem.. Thats the key word.. Its not true threading support..

These are not there for looks.. 

References: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jeff.


pgpgRjZu4Ewfs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Jim Winstead
Hi.

This discussion is very off-topic for this list. Please take the
discussion of how to use your email client off-list.

Thanks.

Jim Winstead
MySQL Inc.

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Ed Lazor
 -Original Message-
 Actually its proper email etticate..  look it up if you don't believe me..

That sounds like a copout.  Could present formal references to back this up?
I'm trying to substantiate your claims, but a Google search failed to bring
up anything relevant when searching with the keywords of etiqette, email,
and replying.

Here are some of the references that did come up:

http://coco.essortment.com/emailetiquette_rtqh.htm
http://www.dynamoo.com/technical/etiquette.htm
http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/success/sl6.htm

Also, back to my original question, what are you seeing that denotes the
difference between whether I reply or create a new message when starting a
new topic?  After all, I took care of changing the recipient list and the
subject field.  Is header information different?  Does your email client
sort or group messages differently?

-Ed



-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: update MySQL

2004-10-05 Thread Ed Lazor
Outlook 2003 here and its working just like Scott's (Converation, Subject,
etc.).


 -Original Message-
   If you sort it by conversation topic, then it will seem to group by
 threads.
 I'm running Outlook 2000.
 
 Cause your doesnt support threads.. Outlook was the only one I knew off
 that
 
 did not.


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[OT] Email heaaders and threading (was Re: update MySQL)

2004-10-05 Thread Michael Stassen
Ed Lazor wrote:
-Original Message-
Actually its proper email etticate..  look it up if you don't believe me..

That sounds like a copout.  Could present formal references to back this up?
I'm trying to substantiate your claims, but a Google search failed to bring
up anything relevant when searching with the keywords of etiqette, email,
and replying.
Here are some of the references that did come up:
http://coco.essortment.com/emailetiquette_rtqh.htm
http://www.dynamoo.com/technical/etiquette.htm
http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/success/sl6.htm
Also, back to my original question, what are you seeing that denotes the
difference between whether I reply or create a new message when starting a
new topic?  After all, I took care of changing the recipient list and the
subject field.  Is header information different?  Does your email client
sort or group messages differently?
-Ed
Ed,
When you *reply* to a message, most mail clients (including yours) add a header 
like this:

  In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That stuff in between the  and  is the message-id of the replied-to message.
This tells the recipient's email client that your message is a reply, not a new 
message, despite your efforts to change the subject and recipients.  Many email 
clients use that header to decide which thread a message belongs to.  That's 
actually the point of the header.

I'm not interested in a debate over the relative merits of different mail 
clients and view modes.  The point is simply this: Many people choose to view 
their mail in threaded mode.  When you start a new topic by replying to an old 
topic, you disrupt that organization.

Ultimately, etiquette is about choosing to accomodate the needs of other people, 
not about rules.  You didn't know the effect you were having before, but now you 
do.  What you do with that information is up to you, but I would suggest that 
starting a new message is no more work than changing the subject and recipients 
list of a reply.

Michael
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [OT] Email heaaders and threading (was Re: update MySQL)

2004-10-05 Thread Ed Lazor
 Ed,
 
 When you *reply* to a message, most mail clients (including yours) add a
 header
 like this:
 
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 That stuff in between the  and  is the message-id of the replied-to
 message.
 
 This tells the recipient's email client that your message is a reply, not
 a new
 message, despite your efforts to change the subject and recipients.  Many
 email
 clients use that header to decide which thread a message belongs to.
 That's
 actually the point of the header.
 
 I'm not interested in a debate over the relative merits of different mail
 clients and view modes.  The point is simply this: Many people choose to
 view
 their mail in threaded mode.  When you start a new topic by replying to an
 old
 topic, you disrupt that organization.
 
 Ultimately, etiquette is about choosing to accomodate the needs of other
 people,
 not about rules.  You didn't know the effect you were having before, but
 now you
 do.  What you do with that information is up to you, but I would suggest
 that
 starting a new message is no more work than changing the subject and
 recipients
 list of a reply.
 
 Michael

Thanks Michael.  I think you've done an excellent presentation on the merits
of starting a new topic with a new message.  I'm definitely convinced and
will be happy to do my part to help out.

-Ed




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



re: update mysql

2002-12-22 Thread Egor Egorov
On Friday 20 December 2002 22:08, John Chang wrote:

 I e-mailed the list but haven't received a response.  I have win2k w/
 3.23.53 and need to update it to 54.  Is there a patch or do I have to do a
 reinstall or install on top of it?

You can just install 3.23.54 over 3.23.53, but backup of the databases is 
recommended. 



-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Egor Egorov
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
   ___/   www.mysql.com




-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




RE: update mysql database via php form

2002-03-15 Thread Gurhan Ozen

Hi,
didn't really understand what you are asking.. Can you please be more
specific? What exactly you are asking?

Gurhan


-Original Message-
From: Valerie Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: update mysql database via php form


Hi,

I'm using php form to update mysql database, the form has several drop down
menus to choose from.  What would the best way of updating information in
the
database, update, as a function?  Any help will be greatly appericated.

Thanks.


-


Valerie Brooks
Fujitsu Software
Voice: (408)456-7222
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


There's no limit to what can be accomplished
 if it doesn't matter who gets the credit


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: Update MYSQL command with PHP

2001-11-08 Thread Kodrik

 $query1 = UPDATE Qusers SET $field_str WHERE UserName='$username';
 $result2 = mysql_query($query1);

It should be:
update Qusers set field_name='$field_str' where username='$username';

-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php




Re: Update MYSQL command with PHP

2001-11-08 Thread DL Neil

 Question is there something wrong with this syntax when using the MYSQL
 Update command in PHP , where I change the record by users editing the
 fields on a web form then  those are extracted to update a  record in a
 table.
 Here's what I have tried I don't get any syntax errors with either of
 these attempts

 $query1 = UPDATE Qusers SET $field_str WHERE UserName='$username';
 $result2 = mysql_query($query1);


 Second Example

 $query1 = UPDATE Qusers SET BillAmt='$billamt' WHERE
 UserName='.$username.' AND Qusers.RID ='.$keyid.';
 $result2 = mysql_query($query1);



Kory,

The PHP-db list (and archive) is full of answers to this question.
The first example looks a bit suspect unless $field_str holds a set clause in the 
form: column_name=expression,
and further that expression does NOT contain double quotes, eg a string value's 
delimiters.
You should precede these with several function calls to 'open' the db, and should 
follow every mysql_...() call
with an error check.
Prevailing wisdom suggests putting an echo between the two lines, so that you can see 
exactly what will be
passed as the query to MySQL.
Finally, if there is any question, that output can be copied-and-pasted into a command 
line query or a MySQL
administration tool to verify/confirm the SQL syntax.

Regards,
=dn


-
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/   (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php