Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Scott Kirkpatrick




The reason I use VNC is because not every machine in my house is a
Linux box. With VNC Client, I can access my Linux desktop from my
Windows machines. I know you can use any browser to access a VNC
server but the performance is much better with VNC Client.

Now for the VNC problem. I'm running the version of VNC that comes
with FC3 and here's what you need to do:
1) Enable and start vncserver in Services.
2) Change to the .vnc directory in your mythuser directory.
3) Edit the file xstartup.
4) The last line of the file probably says "twm " which will start
the TWM window manager for your VNC session. Change it to "startdke
" or "gnome-session " or whatever the start command is for
the window manager you want to use and save the file.
5) Go back to Services and restart vncserver.

Russ Dill wrote:

  On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:02:30 -0800, Peter Loron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
Ok, this is drifting a bit OT, but I'm going to strike while the iron
is hot. I've got my backend machine set up and pretty much working, but
it is going in the closet so I don't have to listen to it. I need to
get VNC working. In the past when I was running FC1, I just did apt-get
for TightVNC and I was all set. Starting a VNC server and connecting
yielded me my complete KDE/Gnome/WhateverWM desktop.

Now that I'm running FC3, TightVNC doesn't seem to be available, and
when I connect using the already installed vncserver, all I get is a
minimalist TWM environment.

How to get a full-on desktop? I'm suspecting I need to edit one or more
of the X config files, but I'm clueless. If there's a FAQ for this one,
please point me to it.


  
  
Why do people keep mentioning VNC? Why not just use ssh? If you want a
login, just use XDMCP
  
  

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
  



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Nathan Ford
VNC is useful for people like me who have Linux and WIndows systems.
My windows machine is my primary system (dual-monitor too), and my
linux machines are very much utility (One is attached to the TV, one
is in the closet.) I have and do run the X server from Cygwin, but it
is buggy to say the least. VNC just works. And when I'm at work (win
2000 workstation) I can use VNC to access my server.

FYI: I built and installed tightvnc (I run slackware) but I had to
modify the code some to get it to compile.

--Nate
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Shawn Willden
Steve Dibb wrote:
I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine 
about dependencies. ;)

I have no sympathy for people who run Debian systems and then whine 
about...  damn.  What is there to whine about again?  I know there must 
be something...

;-)
   Shawn.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 08:54 -0700, Shawn Willden wrote:
 Steve Dibb wrote:
 
  I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine 
  about dependencies. ;)
 
 
 I have no sympathy for people who run Debian systems and then whine 
 about...  damn.  What is there to whine about again?  I know there must 
 be something...

8 year delays between stable releases?

But since I run Sid, that doesn't matter either...

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the
votes decide everything.
Josef Stalin



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread David
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 08:54 -0700, Shawn Willden wrote:
 

Steve Dibb wrote:
   

I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine 
about dependencies. ;)
 

I have no sympathy for people who run Debian systems and then whine 
about...  damn.  What is there to whine about again?  I know there must 
be something...
   

8 year delays between stable releases?
But since I run Sid, that doesn't matter either...
 

But isn't that also the expected uptime for a system _running_ the 
stable release?

David
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:40 +, David wrote:
 Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 08:54 -0700, Shawn Willden wrote:
 
 Steve Dibb wrote:
 
 I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine 
 about dependencies. ;)
 
 I have no sympathy for people who run Debian systems and then whine 
 about...  damn.  What is there to whine about again?  I know there must 
 be something...
 
 8 year delays between stable releases?
[snip] 
 But isn't that also the expected uptime for a system _running_ the 
 stable release?

Can you imagine a machine with an 8 year uptime?  I've heard of
VAXes that have been up that long, but not an Intel system.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of
society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we
shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for
stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.
P. J. O'Rourke



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Friday 11 March 2005 07:54, Shawn Willden wrote:
 Steve Dibb wrote:
  I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine
  about dependencies. ;)

 I have no sympathy for people who run Debian systems and then whine
 about...  damn.  What is there to whine about again?  I know there must
 be something...

How 'bout the installer? ;-)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpxed1FPP4IU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-11 Thread Billy Macdonald
Russ Dill wrote:

Why do people keep mentioning VNC? Why not just use ssh? If you want a
login, just use XDMCP
The problem I get into with XDMCP which I often use from cygwin is that 
my wireless connection goes out for a few seconds for some reason and 
all my processes get killed.

Then I tell myself I should have been using VNC so I could reattach. 
Then I proceed to launch xwin again and not learn from my mistakes.

Billy
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Lasse Lindgård
Quoting Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:05, Jarod Wilson wrote:
  On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
   When I asked, I was told to install X and Qt. Â I agree that
   having to install X on a headless fileserver seems silly.
 
  How else are you going to run the setup utility?
 
 qt-embedded, of course.
 

Hi Jarod,

Thanks for all your replies.

I can see from the archive link you provided me that there must be some bug in 
my ebuild file. Should be fixable - even by someone like me.

So just to get it straight. If I compile mythtv with Qt/E I will be able to 
launch the setup program if I attach a monitor to my server?

On the reasons why I don't want X on my system. I am trying to keep my system 
as minimal and clean as possible. I just don't think it is fair to force me 
into using several hours to install and configure X just to run a silly setup 
program. To the time it will take to install X add the time it will take to 
keep all those extra packages up to date in the future. I just don't want to if 
it is possible to avoid it. The reason I run linux (gentoo) is that I get to 
choose what I want and what I do not want on my system.

/Lasse

--
This mail was sent through Jay.net: http://www.jay.net
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread David George
On 3/9/2005 7:28 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:05, Jarod Wilson wrote:
 

Until someone writes 
something like an ncurses-based setup utility
   

This would still be a nice alternative, but nice to haves need to be coded 
up by someone who really needs/wants it, or it'll likely never happen. :-)
 

Well, I hate to admit it, but I have been toying with writing an ncurses 
based backend setup program.  With multiple slave backends it would be 
nice, but as others have said X over ssh for the few times you actually 
go into the backend setup (I rarely do) is more convenient than writing 
a complete setup program in ncurses (yes, I have written curses programs 
before).

Just more fuel for the fire.  ;-)
--
David
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Lasse Lindgård
Quoting David George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On 3/9/2005 7:28 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
 
 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:05, Jarod Wilson wrote:
   
 
 Until someone writes 
 something like an ncurses-based setup utility
 
 
 
 This would still be a nice alternative, but nice to haves need to be coded
 
 up by someone who really needs/wants it, or it'll likely never happen. :-)
   
 
 Well, I hate to admit it, but I have been toying with writing an ncurses 
 based backend setup program.  With multiple slave backends it would be 
 nice, but as others have said X over ssh for the few times you actually 
 go into the backend setup (I rarely do) is more convenient than writing 
 a complete setup program in ncurses (yes, I have written curses programs 
 before).
 
 Just more fuel for the fire.  ;-)
 
 --
 David
 
I shall be the first to admit that I don't know a toss about it, but doesn't qt 
console look like a cooler way to do it than to rewrite it all in ncurses?

http://www.dailystuff.nl/qtconsole/



--
This mail was sent through Jay.net: http://www.jay.net
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Isaac Richards
On Thursday 10 March 2005 05:14 am, Lasse Lindgård wrote:
 On the reasons why I don't want X on my system. I am trying to keep my
 system as minimal and clean as possible. I just don't think it is fair to
 force me into using several hours to install and configure X just to run a
 silly setup program. To the time it will take to install X add the time it
 will take to keep all those extra packages up to date in the future. I just
 don't want to if it is possible to avoid it. The reason I run linux
 (gentoo) is that I get to choose what I want and what I do not want on my
 system.

If time is so important to you, well, how about just using a real 
distribution, then, and stop wasting the time of people on this list?  X is 
tiny (ie., minimyth is  50MB for a full distribution, including X) compared 
to recorded video.

Isaac
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 02:14, Lasse Lindgård wrote:
 I just don't think it is fair to force me into using several hours to
 install and configure X just to run a silly setup program.

Fair? Its free software. You didn't pay anything for it. You're not entitled 
to anything. If you think its so unfair, you have the source.

 To the time it 
 will take to install X add the time it will take to keep all those extra
 packages up to date in the future. I just don't want to if it is possible
 to avoid it. The reason I run linux (gentoo) is that I get to choose what I
 want and what I do not want on my system.

I can do the same thing on both Debian and Red Hat, and in a lot less time. 
That's the reason I don't run Gentoo.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpEnbHgEVdBm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Lasse Lindgård
Please accept my apologies for bringing religion into the discussion.

Just tell me:
If I compile mythtv with Qt/E I will be able to launch the setup program if I 
just attach a monitor to my server?

Thank you for your time



--
This mail was sent through Jay.net: http://www.jay.net
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 13:38, Lasse Lindgård wrote:
 If I compile mythtv with Qt/E I will be able to launch the setup program
 if I just attach a monitor to my server?

So far as I know, yes, that's the idea. My headless backend has the minimal X 
libs needed to simply launch the normal version to a remote desktop through 
an ssh session. I'd suggest searching the mailing list archive for further 
info on Qt/E.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpmNwtFjtFhN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Aran Cox
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:38:18PM +, Lasse Lindgård wrote:
 Please accept my apologies for bringing religion into the discussion.
 
 Just tell me:
 If I compile mythtv with Qt/E I will be able to launch the setup program if 
 I just attach a monitor to my server?
 
 Thank you for your time
 

There is no reason for you to attach a monitor to your server, no
matter what version of Qt you link mythtv's setup program against.
You must have an X server somewhere if you intend to run
mythfrontend. cygwin's port of XFree86/Xorg will do fine if all you
have is a windows machine.

If you have a linux workstation you just ssh over to the server, run
the X application (setup in this case) and the program's window
appears on your workstation.  Of course, ssh isn't always set up like
this.  You might have to enable X11Forwarding in the sshd_config file
on the server and ForwardX11 in the ssh_config (or .ssh/config) file
on the client side.  Restart sshd on the server and log back in 
from your workstation, if you have to change these config files.

Even if you don't want to monkey with that, on your workstation you
can run something like:

xhost +
or
xhost +thatmythserver

Then, on the server run something like:
export DISPLAY=myworkstation:0

Again, the window opened by the mythtv setup program will magically
appear on your workstation.  It's the power of X!

That's why X11/Qt is no big deal for the setup program... you don't
have to actually run X on the server... you just need the client
libraries.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Russ Dill
BTW, even if there was a CLI and whatever, the mythbackend still uses
QT as a general purpose library. QT-4.0 will have their general
purpose classes and GUI classes broken out into seperate components,
so conceivable, the backend would not require QT+X, only the utility
classes within QT. The backend setup program would still require QT+X.
The split would be similar to the GTK/GLIB split.

Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:18, Russ Dill wrote:
 BTW, even if there was a CLI and whatever, the mythbackend still uses
 QT as a general purpose library.

I thought as much.

[...]
 Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
 complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.

Ditto. :D

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpIg2pRRL2WH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Steve Dibb
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.
I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine 
about dependencies. ;)

Steve
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:32, Steve Dibb wrote:
 Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
 complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.

 I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine
 about dependencies. ;)

Me neither. Nobody was complaining about dependencies though. :-)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpFDfVsx0PwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Robert Denier
You may already know this, but if you need to run _anything_ remotely on
linux including x11 aps, well vnc does the job.  A simple vnc xserver
and vnc client and you can do whatever.

Your approach sounds simpler though which is always good.

I have a vncserver setup to auto load realplayer and then to play a
audio stream I like.  There are audio cables connected various places
and a simple vncserver command from console is enough to get it going.

Of course if anyone knows a way to play .rm internet streams directly
from the console I'd definitely be curious.

-Robert Denier
http://www.finiteinfinity.com


On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 20:46 -0500, Justin Hunt wrote:
 I have been wondering about how i could run setup without being at the
 actual backend for a while, and i just started writing a curses based
 port of the setup program.  I cant promise anything but once i get it
 to do more then a little menu ill post it on the web and hopefully
 someone can give me some ideas to improve it.
 
 Justin
 
 
 On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:24:46 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:32, Steve Dibb wrote:
   Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
   complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.
  
   I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then whine
   about dependencies. ;)
  
  Me neither. Nobody was complaining about dependencies though. :-)
  
  --
  Jarod Wilson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Got a question? Read this first...
   http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
  MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
   http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
  MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
   http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
  
  
  ___
  mythtv-users mailing list
  mythtv-users@mythtv.org
  http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
  
  
  
  
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread cythraul
cool.

you have a canditate to test it. ;)

cyth

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:46:40 -0500, Justin Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have been wondering about how i could run setup without being at the
 actual backend for a while, and i just started writing a curses based
 port of the setup program.  I cant promise anything but once i get it
 to do more then a little menu ill post it on the web and hopefully
 someone can give me some ideas to improve it.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thursday 10 March 2005 17:46, Justin Hunt wrote:
 I have been wondering about how i could run setup without being at the
 actual backend for a while

ssh w/X11 forwarding works just fine for me. Enable X11-forwarding in the 
backend's sshd config file, then:

ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Not sure what else might need doing, this works out of the box on FC3 
(X11-forwarding is already enabled in FC3's sshd, but the -X is needed to 
tell the client to enable X11-forwarding also).

 and i just started writing a curses based 
 port of the setup program.  I cant promise anything but once i get it
 to do more then a little menu ill post it on the web and hopefully
 someone can give me some ideas to improve it.

You should probably collaborate with David George, he mentioned doing the same 
thing earlier in this thread.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpk1FtIQ2wiG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Justin Hunt
Im more than willing to collaborate, however i cant say ive ever
contributed to oss before so i dont know the process.  Do you know a
site that can provide me some info in how to organize it. so far ill
just keep hacking away im learning quite a bit about how myth works in
general.



On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:01:49 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thursday 10 March 2005 17:46, Justin Hunt wrote:
  I have been wondering about how i could run setup without being at the
  actual backend for a while
 
 ssh w/X11 forwarding works just fine for me. Enable X11-forwarding in the
 backend's sshd config file, then:
 
 ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Not sure what else might need doing, this works out of the box on FC3
 (X11-forwarding is already enabled in FC3's sshd, but the -X is needed to
 tell the client to enable X11-forwarding also).
 
  and i just started writing a curses based
  port of the setup program.  I cant promise anything but once i get it
  to do more then a little menu ill post it on the web and hopefully
  someone can give me some ideas to improve it.
 
 You should probably collaborate with David George, he mentioned doing the same
 thing earlier in this thread.
 
 --
 Jarod Wilson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Got a question? Read this first...
  http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
 MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
  http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
 MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
  http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 
 
 
 


-- 
Justin Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bd.a.la
Home: 416-926-1664 x 4238
Cell:  416-779-1201
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Brad Benson
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:01:49 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ssh w/X11 forwarding works just fine for me. Enable X11-forwarding in the
 backend's sshd config file, then:
 
 ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Not sure what else might need doing, this works out of the box on FC3
 (X11-forwarding is already enabled in FC3's sshd, but the -X is needed to
 tell the client to enable X11-forwarding also).
 
If you don't already have it, create ~/.ssh/config on the client
machine.  Then add this:

Host *
ForwardX11 yes

This will automatically enable X11 forwarding for any machine you log
into.  Of course, it's much safer to add, say:

Host mymythbackend
ForwardX11 yes

That way you only explicitly allow X forwarding for the machine named
mymythbackend.  All other machines you log into will not allow X
forwarding unless you include -X on the command line.  You can add as
many Host  entries as you like, but keep in the mind that the
first entry in the file takes precedence so make sure any 'Host *'
entry is the last one in the file.  If 'Host *' is the first entry in
the config file my understanding is that it will override any other
settings you have in there.

Brad
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Peter Loron
Ok, this is drifting a bit OT, but I'm going to strike while the iron 
is hot. I've got my backend machine set up and pretty much working, but 
it is going in the closet so I don't have to listen to it. I need to 
get VNC working. In the past when I was running FC1, I just did apt-get 
for TightVNC and I was all set. Starting a VNC server and connecting 
yielded me my complete KDE/Gnome/WhateverWM desktop.

Now that I'm running FC3, TightVNC doesn't seem to be available, and 
when I connect using the already installed vncserver, all I get is a 
minimalist TWM environment.

How to get a full-on desktop? I'm suspecting I need to edit one or more 
of the X config files, but I'm clueless. If there's a FAQ for this one, 
please point me to it.

Thanks!
-Pete
On Mar 10, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Robert Denier wrote:
You may already know this, but if you need to run _anything_ remotely 
on
linux including x11 aps, well vnc does the job.  A simple vnc xserver
and vnc client and you can do whatever.

Your approach sounds simpler though which is always good.
I have a vncserver setup to auto load realplayer and then to play a
audio stream I like.  There are audio cables connected various places
and a simple vncserver command from console is enough to get it 
going.

Of course if anyone knows a way to play .rm internet streams directly
from the console I'd definitely be curious.
-Robert Denier
http://www.finiteinfinity.com
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 20:46 -0500, Justin Hunt wrote:
I have been wondering about how i could run setup without being at the
actual backend for a while, and i just started writing a curses based
port of the setup program.  I cant promise anything but once i get it
to do more then a little menu ill post it on the web and hopefully
someone can give me some ideas to improve it.
Justin
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:24:46 -0800, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2005 16:32, Steve Dibb wrote:
Also, I have no sympathy for someone who runs gentoo, and then
complains about things taking too long to install/maintain.
I have no sympathy for people who run RPM-based systems and then 
whine
about dependencies. ;)
Me neither. Nobody was complaining about dependencies though. :-)
--
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Russ Dill
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:02:30 -0800, Peter Loron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ok, this is drifting a bit OT, but I'm going to strike while the iron
 is hot. I've got my backend machine set up and pretty much working, but
 it is going in the closet so I don't have to listen to it. I need to
 get VNC working. In the past when I was running FC1, I just did apt-get
 for TightVNC and I was all set. Starting a VNC server and connecting
 yielded me my complete KDE/Gnome/WhateverWM desktop.
 
 Now that I'm running FC3, TightVNC doesn't seem to be available, and
 when I connect using the already installed vncserver, all I get is a
 minimalist TWM environment.
 
 How to get a full-on desktop? I'm suspecting I need to edit one or more
 of the X config files, but I'm clueless. If there's a FAQ for this one,
 please point me to it.
 

Why do people keep mentioning VNC? Why not just use ssh? If you want a
login, just use XDMCP
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-10 Thread Ivor Hewitt
Peter Loron wrote:
Ok, this is drifting a bit OT, but I'm going to strike while the iron is 
hot. I've got my backend machine set up and pretty much working, but it 
is going in the closet so I don't have to listen to it. I need to get 
VNC working. In the past when I was running FC1, I just did apt-get for 
TightVNC and I was all set. Starting a VNC server and connecting yielded 
me my complete KDE/Gnome/WhateverWM desktop.

Now that I'm running FC3, TightVNC doesn't seem to be available, and 
when I connect using the already installed vncserver, all I get is a 
minimalist TWM environment.

How to get a full-on desktop? I'm suspecting I need to edit one or more 
of the X config files, but I'm clueless. If there's a FAQ for this one, 
please point me to it.

Why bother with a full-on desktop anyway? You have X installed on the 
machine, I assume you have X somewhere else too...
ssh into the machine, set your DISPLAY to be your desktop machine, and 
just run your X apps as normal.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:21:07PM +, Lasse Lindgård wrote:

 I do not want X or qt on the server and I can't see why I
 should. All I want to run is the backend for capturing video.
 The frontend will run elsewhere.

Several months back I asked why one had to install X and Qt on
a backend-only system.  The anwswer was that the backend
software uses Qt, and Qt (in practice, if not in theory)
requires X.

 I was wondering if there is a howto somewhere on getting this
 scenario up and running?

AFAIK, you have to install X and Qt.

 I am also looking for some kind of minimal dependency list
 that only covers what I will need to run the backend. The list
 in the documentation seems to cover what I will need for
 everything.

Yup.  

 It is hard to find any info anywhere on how to do this. So I
 am hoping to get some hints from you guys.

When I asked, I was told to install X and Qt.  I agree that
having to install X on a headless fileserver seems silly.

-- 
Grant Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


RE: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread William
 When I asked, I was told to install X and Qt.  I agree that 
 having to install X on a headless fileserver seems silly.
 
 -- 
 Grant Edwards
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have to disagree on the sillyness. There is no easier way to do some
things than to vnc into the box from another machine. Of course if you are
like most linux people then you actually prefer to do things the hard way :)

Bill


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Lasse Lindgård
Quoting Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:21:07PM +, Lasse Lindgård wrote:
 
  I do not want X or qt on the server and I can't see why I
  should. All I want to run is the backend for capturing video.
  The frontend will run elsewhere.
 
 Several months back I asked why one had to install X and Qt on
 a backend-only system.  The anwswer was that the backend
 software uses Qt, and Qt (in practice, if not in theory)
 requires X.
 

I may be a fool. But I don't take no for an answer just like that.
I need to understand *why* QT is needed and why qt-embedded can't replace it.

I have peeked in the source code of mythtv, qt and qt/embedded. I am by no 
means an expert but I still think my findings are valid.

mainserver.cpp in the backend subproject imports the following headers:
#include qapplication.h
#include qsqldatabase.h
#include qdatetime.h
#include qfile.h
#include qdir.h
#include qurl.h
#include qthread.h
#include qwaitcondition.h
#include qregexp.h 

Looking at the source code of qt-embedded I find all of these interfaces 
present. 
So why is it that qt-embedded isn't good enough?

/Lasse

--
This mail was sent through Jay.net: http://www.jay.net
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
 When I asked, I was told to install X and Qt.  I agree that
 having to install X on a headless fileserver seems silly.

How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone writes 
something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are SOL. 
Eliminating the need for a few megabytes of space for X libs and Qt isn't 
exactly high priority. Once you're done with setup, don't run them. If you're 
short on space on a dedicated backend, you've got bigger problems (like, no 
room for recordings :-).

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgp6aKGWlYZg8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:05, Jarod Wilson wrote:
 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
  When I asked, I was told to install X and Qt. I agree that
  having to install X on a headless fileserver seems silly.

 How else are you going to run the setup utility?

qt-embedded, of course.

 Until someone writes 
 something like an ncurses-based setup utility

This would still be a nice alternative, but nice to haves need to be coded 
up by someone who really needs/wants it, or it'll likely never happen. :-)

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpa72RD6paib.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Grant Edwards
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:05:32PM -0800, Jarod Wilson wrote:

 How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone writes 
 something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are SOL.

Edit a few files and type some SQL commands?

Obviously the disk space required for X and Qt is trivial on a
machine intended for video recording.

-- 
Grant

 
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 17:41, Grant Edwards wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:05:32PM -0800, Jarod Wilson wrote:
  How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone writes
  something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are SOL.

 Edit a few files and type some SQL commands?

Hm, was going to say maybe that wouldn't be so hard to make a reality by 
simply editing a few things in mc.sql, but further thought leads me to 
believe this wouldn't be practical at all. Configuring any one of the myriad 
of input devices Myth supports doesn't lend itself very well to making edits 
in a text file, seeing as how Myth's setup util dynamically probes the 
available inputs on most capture devices, assign created channel listings to 
inputs, etc. If your mbe had no cards, then text files and sql might be fine, 
I suppose.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpfHEx9VAlgP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:21, Bryan Halter wrote:
 How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone writes
 something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are SOL.
[...]
 Would a ncurses based mythsetup be out of the question?

That was my suggestion for a no-X, no-Qt setup util.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpG6CkoPE9U0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread James Armstrong
On Mar 9, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:21, Bryan Halter wrote:
How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone 
writes
something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are 
SOL.
[...]
Would a ncurses based mythsetup be out of the question?
That was my suggestion for a no-X, no-Qt setup util.
I run the setup program on my headless backend all the time. I just ssh 
into it from my frontend and run setup. The setup program is displayed 
on the frontend using X but is actually run from the backend and 
modifies the backend's settings. If you have a headless backend then 
you must have a frontend running on X, unless it is on OSX then I don't 
know.

- James
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 19:49, James Armstrong wrote:
 On Mar 9, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
  On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:21, Bryan Halter wrote:
  How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone
  writes
  something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are
  SOL.
 
  [...]
 
  Would a ncurses based mythsetup be out of the question?
 
  That was my suggestion for a no-X, no-Qt setup util.

 I run the setup program on my headless backend all the time. I just ssh
 into it from my frontend and run setup. The setup program is displayed
 on the frontend using X but is actually run from the backend and
 modifies the backend's settings.

I know, I do the same. The question was why X and Qt even have to be on the 
backend though.

 If you have a headless backend then 
 you must have a frontend running on X, unless it is on OSX then I don't
 know.

Run X11 on the Mac and do the exact same thing.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpGTToZyMzK8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread KianTeck




Jarod Wilson wrote:

  On Wednesday 09 March 2005 19:49, James Armstrong wrote:
  
  
On Mar 9, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:


  On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:21, Bryan Halter wrote:
  
  

  

  How else are you going to run the setup utility? Until someone
writes
something like an ncurses-based setup utility, I think folks are
SOL.
  

  

  
  [...]

  
  
Would a ncurses based mythsetup be out of the question?

  
  That was my suggestion for a no-X, no-Qt setup util.
  

I run the setup program on my headless backend all the time. I just ssh
into it from my frontend and run setup. The setup program is displayed
on the frontend using X but is actually run from the backend and
modifies the backend's settings.

  
  
I know, I do the same. The question was why X and Qt even have to be on the 
backend though.

  

When you run an X application remotely, it is the GUI output that gets
displayed at the local machine. In other words, if you ssh into the
backend from a frontend (or any *nix box) and run mythsetup, mythsetup
runs on the backend (ie it's using the backend's CPU cycles), but the
output is displayed on the frontend.

Hope this explains why you'll need X and Qt on the backend.


  
  
If you have a headless backend then 
you must have a frontend running on X, unless it is on OSX then I don't
know.

  
  
Run X11 on the Mac and do the exact same thing.
  


Just my 2 cents worth.



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Re: mythtv backend on a headless fileserver

2005-03-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 22:16, KianTeck wrote:
 I run the setup program on my headless backend all the time. I just ssh
 into it from my frontend and run setup. The setup program is displayed
 on the frontend using X but is actually run from the backend and
 modifies the backend's settings.
 
 I know, I do the same. The question was why X and Qt even have to be on
  the backend though.

 When you run an X application remotely, it is the GUI output that gets
 displayed at the local machine. In other words, if you ssh into the
 backend from a frontend (or any *nix box)

Or from Windows w/an X server running (I've done it w/Cygwin's X server).

 and run mythsetup, mythsetup 
 runs on the backend (ie it's using the backend's CPU cycles), but the
 output is displayed on the frontend.

I know that too. :-)

 Hope this explains why you'll need X and Qt on the backend.

Not exactly, at least, not in the way the OP is after, I believe. I think the 
OP was after a way to do master backend setup without any X or Qt at all. I 
completely understand why X and Qt are needed with the current setup utility. 
I believe the question was more why isn't there a cli way to do it?. The 
main reason is because nobody has written the code to do it. Its been hashed 
over a few times on the list before. Saving a few people a few megabytes of 
storage on a system that should have several GB of storage (for recordings) 
just isn't a priority.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Got a question? Read this first...
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
MythTV, Fedora Core  ATrpms documentation:
 http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/
MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive
 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/


pgpGSyY017g3w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users