Re: what's going on with yahoo and gmail lately?
Matt, GMail seems OK to me - i'm on a nac.net line. -- Jonathan - Original Message - From: Matthew McGehrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:30:13 -0400 Subject: what's going on with yahoo and gmail lately? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ever since the 'Akamai' Incident, Yahoo Mail hasn't been the same. I can ping to it just fine, I just can't login and read my yahoo mail. When I can it's really slow. Ever since the Upgrades and the Akamai incident, Yahoo has been really out of whack when accessing from Comcast. I'm also having issues with Gmail. But atleast gmail Isn't as bad, just really slow. ping mail.yahoo.com PING login.yahoo.akadns.net (216.109.127.60): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.109.127.60: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=18.868 ms 64 bytes from 216.109.127.60: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=20.032 ms 64 bytes from 216.109.127.60: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=18.874 ms 64 bytes from 216.109.127.60: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=20.956 ms 64 bytes from 216.109.127.60: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=19.990 ms ^C --- login.yahoo.akadns.net ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 18.868/19.744/20.956/0.792 ms 4 srp-8-1-ar01.verona.nj.nj01.comcast.net (68.87.47.193) 12.870 ms 9.725 ms 5 pos-7-0-cr01.plainfield.nj.core.comcast.net (68.87.19.253) 9.891 ms 8.937 ms 6 12.118.149.5 (12.118.149.5) 10.761 ms 10.216 ms 7 tbr2-p014001.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.3.14) 11.121 ms 19.033 ms 8 ggr2-p390.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.3.62) 10.752 ms 11.037 ms 9 so-1-0-0.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.127.5) 10.067 ms 21.489 ms 10 ge-2-1-0.bbr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (64.159.4.149) 9.882 ms 10.297 ms 11 as-1-0.bbr2.Washington1.Level3.net (64.159.1.86) 17.708 ms 18.743 ms 12 ge-7-2.ipcolo2.Washington1.Level3.net (64.159.18.132) 18.758 ms 18.791 ms 13 unknown.Level3.net (166.90.148.10) 18.932 ms 17.489 ms 14 vl49.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.222) 18.643 ms vl33.bas2-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.154) 23.350 ms 15 alteon2.124.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.124.11) 21.772 ms 20.097 ms Thanks -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help.
Re: real-time DDoS help?
Hmmm. Maybe if NANOG had irc.nanog.org, maybe that might be something to consider - a real-time network of communication for network operators to deal with issues, etc. -- Jonathan On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:04:36 -0400 (EDT), Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, Is there any place where people with experience dealing with DDoS attacks hang out? I'm getting very little assistance from my upstream beyond call whomever is in charge of each IP attacking and make them stop, and even though we null route the destination IP being attacked, this traffic will be billed. I've got a nice snippet of flows, so I can mostly see where everything is coming from, and it's obvious what the target is, but my flow-stat/flow-report skills are pretty weak. Oddly, in eight years of working for smallish ISPs I've never been hit very hard, believe it or not. Is the response from my upstream typical? I was expecting a bit more cooperation rather than them seeing as this as an opportunity to bill me for lots of traffic. Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help.
Re: Network Performance Testing Equipment
Vicky, Hmmm. Netperf usually does the trick for network load testing. At least thats what we use at work :) -- Jonathan On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:39:27 -0700, Vicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, Just wondering what folks out there have used or are using (such as smartbits, etc) for measuring the performance (benchmark) limits for engineering and qa testing. I'm looking at doing end-to-end performance testing to monitor throughput for networking gear. Any insight to this topic will be appreciated. regards, /vicky -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help.
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
Maybe try these guys? http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is99/governance/love.html -- Jonathan On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:38:50 -0700, Peter H Salus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul (et al.), If you can find a willing publisher and an organization able to supply some funds, I would be delighted to work on a real history of Internet governance since RFCs 881-883. (Most of the funds would be for travel, Xeroxing, etc.) Peter - Peter H. Salus, Ph.D. 40 IH 35 N #4A3Austin, TX 78701 consultant author [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 512 478-7562 -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help.
