Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Gabriel


Matthew Zito wrote:

 Hello,

 snip
I've had good luck shipping ~600 lbs of gear next day with Eagle Global 
Logistics. (http://www.eagleusa.com)  It was fairly reasonably priced, too.

HTH,
Gabriel
--
Gabriel Cain   www.dialupusa.net
Systems Administrator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dialup USA, Inc.888-460-2286 ext 208
PGP Key ID: 2B081C6D
PGP fingerprint:   C0B4 C6BF 13F5 69D1 3E6B CD7C D4C8 2EA4 2B08 1C6D
Beware he who would deny you access to information,
for in his heart he dreams himself your master.




RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Matthew Zito


Thanks to everyone for all of the responses.  I got in touch with a number
of companies - the two big common sticking points seem to be insuring
shipments of greater than 50k value and the SLAs on their freight delivery.
Overall (price vs. SLA vs. convenience), FedEx won, though they max out at
50k insurance per shipment.  ForwardAir was the nicest and most helpful, but
they charge $1 per $100 of shipped value and they have very rigid packing
requirements for high-value shipments (plus a 4-day delivery timeframe).
Airborne Express was notable for their willingness to insure well above the
50k max per shipment, though they require advance notice.

Thanks again,
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
GridApp Systems
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: 646-220-3551
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
http://www.gridapp.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Bird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:19 PM
 To: 'Matthew Zito'
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?
 
 
 I have used Federal Express to great effect in the past. I 
 have tended to stay away from Airborne because the local 
 people here in Dallas didn't know not to turn printers full 
 of toner on their sides. Since Airborne packed them, I felt 
 they should not have been full of toner, but that is another story!
 
 Chris
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf Of Matthew Zito
  Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:19 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?
  
  
  
  
  Hello,
  
  I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or
  suggestions on shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, 
  about a half-rack worth of
  gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking 
  to minimize cost, but realistically it can't be in transit 
  for more than two days.  Are there any companies or methods 
  people would recommend?  Thanks in advance for the help.
  
  Thanks again,
  Matt
  
  --
  Matthew Zito
  GridApp Systems
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cell: 646-220-3551
  Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
  http://www.gridapp.com
  
  
 
 
 



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Andy Walden

On 27 Aug 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

 FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
 pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
 other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
 truck.  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
 and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
 when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/

That's it Rob, let it all out. ;) I can certainly empathize, as I have
have my bad experiences with Fedex as well. We also use Emery on a
regular basis for the big things also. The bottom line is, like vendors,
all shippers can suck at times...it really is luck of the draw if some
guy along the line decides that he is going to not care about your gear
at some point while he is handling it. Accidents happen as well...

C'est la vie..what can you do. Counter to counter I find is most
effective, but as mentioned earlier, does require some effort on the
sender's part.

andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Andy Ellifson


A counter-to-counter shipment on a passenger airline is a thing of the
past (at least from my experiences going directly to the passenger
airlines).  After Sept 11 the FAA has required that passenger airlines
only accept shipments from known shippers (unless this has changed in
the last 14 months).  What does this mean?  You need to setup an
account with the airline (may of them will setup the account and still
be able to bill to a credit card).  You also need to become a known
shipper by having their courier/employee visit your location and
verify that you are a known shipper.  Once this occurs you can do
passenger airline counter-to-counter shipments at will.  Setup time
takes 7-10 days from what I remember.

If anybody has counter-to-counter on their disaster recovery plans you
may want to get setup as a known shipper.  I went through the process
with United's Cargo division http://www.unitedcargo.com.  I used them
as a backup to America West Airlines as I am located in Phoenix, AZ.

-Andy


--- Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.
 
 FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
 pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
 other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
 truck.  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
 and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
 when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/
 
  You COULD do a counter to counter shipment via an airline cargo
 desk. 
  That MIGHT be cheaper but you will still have to transport it from
 your 
  spot to their pickup and back again on the other side.
 
 Counter-to-counter is the *last* way you would want to ship that sort
 of thing (handled as luggage on a flight, beat to hell by baggage
 handlers, and you get to retrieve it from baggage claim in an airport
 and schlep it all the way to your car).  Far better (if you have
 access to trucks on both ends) is to ship it air freight.  As you
 enter your favorite airport, follow the signs to Air Cargo, not the
 signs to the passenger terminal.  When you find a place with a lot of
 places for 18-wheelers to back up to loading docks, and relatively
 few
 places for cars to park, you've found the right place.  Matthew
 doesn't mention specific terminus points for the shipment, but based
 on whois information I'll make a wild guess that NYC is one end.  JFK
 appears to be the big United installation (vs LGA and EWR), per
 info
 on www.unitedcargo.com - I tend to prefer them because of their long
 hours for pickup and delivery at IAD, which makes life convenient for
 me.  :)
 
 If you need door-to-door service, there are numerous air freight
 forwarders who can handle palletized equipment and move it around the
 country/world in a timely fashion (and really, if you're talking
 about
 300+ pounds of rackmount equipment, that's how you want to move it
 anyway).
 
 Two companies that I've used and been quite happy with the results
 are
 Cavalier International and Eagle Global Logistics.  You may recognize
 Eagle's logo from stickers on previous shipments that you've gotten
 from major manufacturers who have stuff manufactured in the Far East.
 The Pros Know.
 
 http://www.eaglegl.com/
 http://www.cavalier-intl.com/
 
 ---Rob
 



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Robert E. Seastrom


Andy Walden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 That's it Rob, let it all out. ;) I can certainly empathize, as I have
 have my bad experiences with Fedex as well. We also use Emery on a
 regular basis for the big things also. The bottom line is, like vendors,
 all shippers can suck at times...it really is luck of the draw if some
 guy along the line decides that he is going to not care about your gear
 at some point while he is handling it. Accidents happen as well...

Yes, but my point is that you can stack the deck in your favor by
using a company that uses appropriate material handling devices to
move every package if you are shipping packages that are heavy enough
that moving them with a handtruck or by hand is possible-but-unwise.

 C'est la vie..what can you do. Counter to counter I find is most
 effective, but as mentioned earlier, does require some effort on the
 sender's part.

Do you really mean counter to counter, or do you mean Real Air Freight
(like going to the United Air Cargo facility behind Gate Gourmet in
the same strip as FedEx out at IAD)?  Real Air Freight (tm) rocks my
world.  Going into the terminal to baggage claim and trying to find
someone to help you find your package is annoying.

---Rob


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Robert E. Seastrom


Excellent points; didn't cross my mind since I've had (personal)
accounts with Delta and United for ages now.  Probably a call to
ForwardAir, Cavalier, or EGL would get you their rules of engagement
too.

You might want to try http://www.khcargo.com/ for non-passenger air cargo.


---Rob

Andy Ellifson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 A counter-to-counter shipment on a passenger airline is a thing of the
 past (at least from my experiences going directly to the passenger
 airlines).  After Sept 11 the FAA has required that passenger airlines
 only accept shipments from known shippers (unless this has changed in
 the last 14 months).  What does this mean?  You need to setup an
 account with the airline (may of them will setup the account and still
 be able to bill to a credit card).  You also need to become a known
 shipper by having their courier/employee visit your location and
 verify that you are a known shipper.  Once this occurs you can do
 passenger airline counter-to-counter shipments at will.  Setup time
 takes 7-10 days from what I remember.
 
 If anybody has counter-to-counter on their disaster recovery plans you
 may want to get setup as a known shipper.  I went through the process
 with United's Cargo division http://www.unitedcargo.com.  I used them
 as a backup to America West Airlines as I am located in Phoenix, AZ.
 
 -Andy
 
 
 --- Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.
  
  FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
  pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
  other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
  truck.  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
  and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
  when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/
  
   You COULD do a counter to counter shipment via an airline cargo
  desk. 
   That MIGHT be cheaper but you will still have to transport it from
  your 
   spot to their pickup and back again on the other side.
  
  Counter-to-counter is the *last* way you would want to ship that sort
  of thing (handled as luggage on a flight, beat to hell by baggage
  handlers, and you get to retrieve it from baggage claim in an airport
  and schlep it all the way to your car).  Far better (if you have
  access to trucks on both ends) is to ship it air freight.  As you
  enter your favorite airport, follow the signs to Air Cargo, not the
  signs to the passenger terminal.  When you find a place with a lot of
  places for 18-wheelers to back up to loading docks, and relatively
  few
  places for cars to park, you've found the right place.  Matthew
  doesn't mention specific terminus points for the shipment, but based
  on whois information I'll make a wild guess that NYC is one end.  JFK
  appears to be the big United installation (vs LGA and EWR), per
  info
  on www.unitedcargo.com - I tend to prefer them because of their long
  hours for pickup and delivery at IAD, which makes life convenient for
  me.  :)
  
  If you need door-to-door service, there are numerous air freight
  forwarders who can handle palletized equipment and move it around the
  country/world in a timely fashion (and really, if you're talking
  about
  300+ pounds of rackmount equipment, that's how you want to move it
  anyway).
  
  Two companies that I've used and been quite happy with the results
  are
  Cavalier International and Eagle Global Logistics.  You may recognize
  Eagle's logo from stickers on previous shipments that you've gotten
  from major manufacturers who have stuff manufactured in the Far East.
  The Pros Know.
  
  http://www.eaglegl.com/
  http://www.cavalier-intl.com/
  
  ---Rob
  


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Leo Bicknell

I'm not sure if any of them are here, or if they would make their
info known...but I'm sure vendors have some good data.  I know
Cisco's online ordering tool has about a bazillion (and yes, that's
the right term) shippers, and I'm sure they track the number of
problems reported.  No doubt other vendors do as well.

Anyone friends with someone in the logistics department at a big
hardware vendor care to comment? :)

-- 
   Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Andy Walden

On 27 Aug 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

 Andy Walden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Yes, but my point is that you can stack the deck in your favor by
 using a company that uses appropriate material handling devices to
 move every package if you are shipping packages that are heavy enough
 that moving them with a handtruck or by hand is possible-but-unwise.

I can agree in principal, so long as we can designate a company that will
execute proper company policy and do so *every* time. Unfortunately, for
the purpose of the general well-being of our gear, we arrive back at
generally blue collar, none-the-less, well paid, package handlers that
individually define preferences for how they feel like doing it that day.

  C'est la vie..what can you do. Counter to counter I find is most
  effective, but as mentioned earlier, does require some effort on the
  sender's part.

 Do you really mean counter to counter, or do you mean Real Air Freight
 (like going to the United Air Cargo facility behind Gate Gourmet in
 the same strip as FedEx out at IAD)?  Real Air Freight (tm) rocks my
 world.  Going into the terminal to baggage claim and trying to find
 someone to help you find your package is annoying.

Granted, it's been awhile since I have shipped counter to counter since I
joined the dark side (vendor side), it probably was before 9/11, and
things may be different now. Please forgive any outdated experiences
represented.

andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp




Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Andy Walden


On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:


 I'm not sure if any of them are here, or if they would make their
 info known...but I'm sure vendors have some good data.  I know
 Cisco's online ordering tool has about a bazillion (and yes, that's
 the right term) shippers, and I'm sure they track the number of
 problems reported.  No doubt other vendors do as well.

Certainly, with 4.7 BILLION in revnue last quarter
(http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/030805/55780_1.html), they must have significant
relationships with specific shippers to generate real data. The only
objection I can think of is if you are a shipper doing *that much*
business with a single company, how much extra care are you going to give
boxes with some guy connecting a circuit on the front of them? How much
care are you going to give everyone else? It still comes down to human
nature and the luck of thd draw unless you are a major part of the
shippers revenues and this has been driven into your head?

andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Ray Wong

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:31:58PM -0500, Andy Walden wrote:
 On 27 Aug 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
  Yes, but my point is that you can stack the deck in your favor by
  using a company that uses appropriate material handling devices to
  move every package if you are shipping packages that are heavy enough
  that moving them with a handtruck or by hand is possible-but-unwise.
 
 I can agree in principal, so long as we can designate a company that will
 execute proper company policy and do so *every* time. Unfortunately, for

So your position is that the the existence of exceptions defines the
probability and severity of damage?  That 1% and 40% damage rates are
in fact the same?  $10 and $10,000?

 the purpose of the general well-being of our gear, we arrive back at
 generally blue collar, none-the-less, well paid, package handlers that
 individually define preferences for how they feel like doing it that day.

I still fail to see why I would choose an organiztion with handles hundreds
of times more packages, most weighing less and being less breakable than
mine, over one with the specialized equipment to move it.  An air cargo
carrier with heavy-cargo equipment is still less likely to drop a pallet
off a pallet jack than an express shipper with a handtruck.  That their
respective employees are equally lackadaisical doesn't mean all other
factors have been equalized.

Cargo/freight carriers, in general, are also aware that nearly all their
cargo is of declared value, that the fragility warnings are more likely
correct, and, perhaps most important, that the customers are far more
likely to be filing damage claims against them.  Fedex, et al, know that
most of THEIR packages are paper and other sturdy items, and that their
customers are much less likely to notice/claim damages.

It's somewhat like card counting in blackjack.  The odds are still quite
poor, but that n% shift can make the difference of coming out of the casino
money ahead or behind.

Of course, good packing is critical either way.  If you're going freight,
palletize the items with proper/extra padding/packing material, stick some
damage (shock and tipping) indicators on each side, and tuck an INSPECTION
CHECKLIST for whomever is on the receiving end (not they won't have their
own copy, just sends a sign to anyone handling it that someone's going to
look when it arrives).  If you're still determined to use a shipper, pack
and pad it well, then pack that box into another padded/packed box.

If you're desperate to get it moved ASAP, see if you can find a college
intern you can pay to drive it.  You'll want your own people to load it
in and out of the car/van, but it'll be cheap and probably less risky than
relying on the odds with a shipper.



-- 

Ray Wong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Andy Walden


On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ray Wong wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:31:58PM -0500, Andy Walden wrote:
  On 27 Aug 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
   Yes, but my point is that you can stack the deck in your favor by
   using a company that uses appropriate material handling devices to
   move every package if you are shipping packages that are heavy enough
   that moving them with a handtruck or by hand is possible-but-unwise.
 
  I can agree in principal, so long as we can designate a company that will
  execute proper company policy and do so *every* time. Unfortunately, for

 So your position is that the the existence of exceptions defines the
 probability and severity of damage?  That 1% and 40% damage rates are
 in fact the same?  $10 and $10,000?

Just out of curiosity, What makes them less likely? I still think anyone
driving a pallet for a living (or running a network for that matter;)
could have very well had a binger the night before and still feeling the
effects.

  the purpose of the general well-being of our gear, we arrive back at
  generally blue collar, none-the-less, well paid, package handlers that
  individually define preferences for how they feel like doing it that day.

 I still fail to see why I would choose an organiztion with handles hundreds
 of times more packages, most weighing less and being less breakable than
 mine, over one with the specialized equipment to move it.  An air cargo
 carrier with heavy-cargo equipment is still less likely to drop a pallet
 off a pallet jack than an express shipper with a handtruck.  That their
 respective employees are equally lackadaisical doesn't mean all other
 factors have been equalized.

 Cargo/freight carriers, in general, are also aware that nearly all their
 cargo is of declared value, that the fragility warnings are more likely
 correct, and, perhaps most important, that the customers are far more
 likely to be filing damage claims against them.  Fedex, et al, know that
 most of THEIR packages are paper and other sturdy items, and that their
 customers are much less likely to notice/claim damages.

What insight do you have into each shipper's package types and the
insurance liability?

 It's somewhat like card counting in blackjack.  The odds are still quite
 poor, but that n% shift can make the difference of coming out of the casino
 money ahead or behind.

Maybe, but make sure you are correct when you place you bet.

 Of course, good packing is critical either way.  If you're going freight,
 palletize the items with proper/extra padding/packing material, stick some
 damage (shock and tipping) indicators on each side, and tuck an INSPECTION
 CHECKLIST for whomever is on the receiving end (not they won't have their
 own copy, just sends a sign to anyone handling it that someone's going to
 look when it arrives).  If you're still determined to use a shipper, pack
 and pad it well, then pack that box into another padded/packed box.

 If you're desperate to get it moved ASAP, see if you can find a college
 intern you can pay to drive it.  You'll want your own people to load it
 in and out of the car/van, but it'll be cheap and probably less risky than
 relying on the odds with a shipper.

100% agreed. We are talking about bringing the entire process under your
control in this case. Not always an option, but it certainly let's us feel
better if the option is available. Unfortunately, in the real world, this
isn't always an option.

andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Mark Radabaugh


 I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
 shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize
 cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two days.
Are
 there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in advance
 for the help.

 Thanks again,
 Matt

This probably is too small of a load for this but we have had good luck
moving high value industrial control panels using the special cargo division
of carriers like United Van Lines
(http://www.unitedvanlines.com/spec/highvalue.htm?gid=9).  Basically
standard household moving trucks with crews dedicated to moving high value
electronics, exhibits, art, etc. around the country.With a 2 person crew
in the truck you can go a hell of a long ways in 2 days though the cost may
not be exactly pretty.

Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635




Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread nanog

 I still fail to see why I would choose an organiztion with handles hundreds
 of times more packages, most weighing less and being less breakable than
 mine, over one with the specialized equipment to move it.  An air cargo
 carrier with heavy-cargo equipment is still less likely to drop a pallet
 off a pallet jack than an express shipper with a handtruck.  That their
 respective employees are equally lackadaisical doesn't mean all other
 factors have been equalized.

Fedex != Fedex Freight

I have had fedex heavyweight boxes trashed, but have never had an
issue with Fedex Freight.  They show up with a liftgate or box truck,
and a pallet jack.   If your load is not palletized, they put it on
one in the truck.

I think Fedex Freight is a bit more in the heavy moving industry
than Fedex, agreed.

bill

ps. Is this operational? :)


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread David Lesher

Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
 
 
 Do you really mean counter to counter, or do you mean Real Air Freight
 (like going to the United Air Cargo facility behind Gate Gourmet in
 the same strip as FedEx out at IAD)?  Real Air Freight (tm) rocks my
 world.  Going into the terminal to baggage claim and trying to find
 someone to help you find your package is annoying.

Beware:

IMHE, Real Air Freight seldom comes with a guarantee that it
will travel on a given flight. Some time back, I REALLY REALLY
needed a 235# 20HP 480V motor moved CLE-ORD-MIA. I {well, you..}
paid United ~2X for Priority One and then found out 10 minutes
before its departure they'd bumped it off the ORD-MIA plane
because we gotta bunch of mail on that 727.  [Note the USPS
tariff is very profitable to airlines..]

I pointed out that this was ALSO a USG shipment, and if it was not
at MIA at 1600 that day, United could deliver it to my end point,
as at that time I was leaving for South America, with motor,
on Eastern. [I was in fact going to get the motor there and
install it...]

The motor got there on time. 

(I took it as checked baggage on Eastern; they could not figure
out how to charge me so it was the usual $40 flatrate per bag
for the international leg)

In conclusion:

Air freight may well be best but be sure it's a direct flight,
and know what you are paying for.




-- 
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead20915-1433


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:56:09 PDT, nanog [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:

 ps. Is this operational? :)

It's *NON* operational if they drop the gear. :)


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread just me

On 27 Aug 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

  N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.

  FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
  pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
  other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
  truck.  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
  and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
  when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/


You aren't alone:

http://www.16paws.com/FedEx/

matto


[EMAIL PROTECTED]darwin
   Flowers on the razor wire/I know you're here/We are few/And far
   between/I was thinking about her skin/Love is a many splintered
   thing/Don't be afraid now/Just walk on in. #include disclaim.h



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Eric Kuhnke

http://colofinder.net/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=album18

Although this is a small item, I believe it wins the contest for Most thoroughly 
damaged shipment. 

:-)


 My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
  and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
  when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/


You aren't alone:

http://www.16paws.com/FedEx/




Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread JC Dill
At 08:32 PM 8/27/2003, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
http://colofinder.net/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=album18

Although this is a small item, I believe it wins the contest for Most 
thoroughly damaged shipment.
Oh dear!  Yes, I do think you are the winner (so far).

just me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.16paws.com/FedEx/
The first damaged shipment at this URL was not correctly packed.  You can't 
expect styrofoam peanuts *alone* to properly cushion and center a router in 
a box, even when you wrap the router itself in bubble wrap.  The peanuts 
will shift, your router will end up abutting the box at one point or 
another, especially if the box is dropped (even if it's only dropped a 
short distance, such as can happen when it's being loaded and dropped/slid 
into place on a stack of boxes).  That's why it's important to use the 
packing cases that the router came in from the manufacture (with the 
special styrofoam inserts) whenever possible, to properly center your 
router in the box.  If you can't get the correct inserts, use inserts from 
some other shipment and cut them to fit.  Create a ~3 inch layer below the 
router, add peanuts to fill in that layer between the makeshift inserts, 
set the router in the box, put more inserts next to the router (~3 inches 
on all sides) and fill the gaps with peanuts, put more inserts on top (~3 
inches) and fill the gaps with peanuts.  The inserts will hold the router 
in the *center* of the box and will prevent the peanuts from shifting 
enough to allow the inserts to shift and let the router move towards one of 
the box sides.  And as you can see, the box itself should be large enough 
that you can put ~3+ inches of padding on all sides around the 
computer.  That's why a 1u server typically comes in a box that's 8 to 10 
inches thick.

When you are shipping something heavy and fragile (in that it can be 
damaged if the box is dropped or if something is dropped on the box), you 
have a responsibility to properly pack the box to minimize damage.  Don't 
count on insurance or the shipper to reimburse you if the item is damaged 
due to inadequate packing.  Wrapping an item in bubble wrap and then 
placing it in the middle of styrofoam peanuts may work for some items, but 
a critical and expensive piece of computer hardware NEEDS more protection.

Ebay vendors who specialize in selling fragile items use a process called 
double boxing.  You wrap the item in bubble wrap, put it in a box with at 
*least* 1 inch of space all around the bubble wrap, with styrofoam peanuts 
filling that 1 inch gap.  Then you place this box in a larger box with 
another 1 inch of space all around.  Put 1 inch of peanuts in the larger 
box, place the smaller box on this layer and fill all around and on top 
with more peanuts, filling them in tightly enough to help prevent the box 
from shifting.  So if you are packing an item that's 6 inches across, the 
smaller box is at least 8 inches, the larger box is at least 10 
inches.  For something heavy like a router, you need more than 2 inches of 
padding.

Just some food for thought the next time you pack something for shipment.

jc



Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Brian Dickson

Various war-story authors wrote:
  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
   and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
   when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/
 
 You aren't alone:
 http://www.16paws.com/FedEx/

 Although this is a small item, I believe it wins the contest for Most thoroughly 
 damaged shipment. 
 http://colofinder.net/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=album18

While I sadly no longer have the image, sometimes words paint a more
vivid picture...

We had a 7505 which could have won, simultaneously, awards for:
Most Blantant Disregard For Shipment Contents
Least Excusible or Fathomable Damage Mode
Failure To Note Packing Material Damage - Outstand Achievement
Shipper Rules Weaseling - Special Mention
Vendor Sudden Observance Of Fine Print
One *Tough* Box

We shipped the 7507 in its original packing material, including crimped
straps, to a colo site. The site contact received it, signed for it, and
discarded the packing material, all without noticing the damage.

What damage, you ask?

UPS had driven a forklift tine through its side. As in, straight in,
through packing material, and *pierced* the chassis, right in the center
of the side, ie into the card cage.

Without the packing material, UPS wouldn't pay damages. Cisco
wouldn't RMA the chassis. Not a pleasant situation at all.

However, the router only had a couple of cards, which were installed
(luckily) next to the power supplies, and at the opposite end from the
gaping 3/4 x 2.5 hole.

The site tech suggested seeing if it would boot. Sure enough, it did.
And ran fine. And to the best of my knowledge, is still in service.

It's a good thing the airflow wasn't too badly disrupted by the hole.

It's the last time we used UPS...
-- 
Brian Dickson  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cineclix.comTel  : +1 604 688 2339


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread N. Richard Solis

I've only shipped a few (moderately) heavy things on short notice in my 
career.  Almost all of those involved FedEx because it was simple and 
hassle-free.  If we're talking about shipping palettes of equipment then 
I agree with the  use of air cargo.  It wasn't entirely clear from the 
first post that a few palette's worth of equipment was what was being 
shipped.

BTW, counter-to-counter service isn't always handled as luggage.  In a 
few cases the package is hand-carried over to the cargo terminal where 
it's put on the next flight out.  Then it's held for you at the 
destination, NOT put out on the conveyor belt.

Most air cargo firms are set up to deal with companies that ship 
products as a part of their daily business.  They usually dont do a 
whole lot of business with individual shippers.  YMMV.  I've used air, 
rail, and truck.  IMHO, if you dont know a bill of lading from a hotel 
bill then an air cargo company isn't where you should start.

WRT FedEx: just because your stuff got damaged, don't assume that they 
break everything they touch.  There isn't a single business that I can 
think of that would tolerate a 40% loss rate on anything.  FedEx could 
NOT stay in business long with those kinds of numbers.  Nor could they 
keep an insurance carrier.


Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

 
  N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.
 
  FedEx Heavy = pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
  pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
  other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
  truck.  My experience is a 40% damage rate when shipping Cisco 7507
  and 7513 routers via FedEx Heavy.  Here are some pictures from back
  when I was at AboveNet: http://www.seastrom.com/fedex/
 
   You COULD do a counter to counter shipment via an airline cargo desk.
   That MIGHT be cheaper but you will still have to transport it from your
   spot to their pickup and back again on the other side.
 
  Counter-to-counter is the *last* way you would want to ship that sort
  of thing (handled as luggage on a flight, beat to hell by baggage
  handlers, and you get to retrieve it from baggage claim in an airport
  and schlep it all the way to your car).  Far better (if you have
  access to trucks on both ends) is to ship it air freight.  As you
  enter your favorite airport, follow the signs to Air Cargo, not the
  signs to the passenger terminal.  When you find a place with a lot of
  places for 18-wheelers to back up to loading docks, and relatively few
  places for cars to park, you've found the right place.  Matthew
  doesn't mention specific terminus points for the shipment, but based
  on whois information I'll make a wild guess that NYC is one end.  JFK
  appears to be the big United installation (vs LGA and EWR), per info
  on www.unitedcargo.com - I tend to prefer them because of their long
  hours for pickup and delivery at IAD, which makes life convenient for
  me.  :)
 
  If you need door-to-door service, there are numerous air freight
  forwarders who can handle palletized equipment and move it around the
  country/world in a timely fashion (and really, if you're talking about
  300+ pounds of rackmount equipment, that's how you want to move it
  anyway).
 
  Two companies that I've used and been quite happy with the results are
  Cavalier International and Eagle Global Logistics.  You may recognize
  Eagle's logo from stickers on previous shipments that you've gotten
  from major manufacturers who have stuff manufactured in the Far East.
  The Pros Know.
 
  http://www.eaglegl.com/
  http://www.cavalier-intl.com/
 
  ---Rob
 
 




Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-28 Thread Robert E. Seastrom


N. Richard Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 BTW, counter-to-counter service isn't always handled as luggage.  In a 
 few cases the package is hand-carried over to the cargo terminal where 
 it's put on the next flight out.  Then it's held for you at the 
 destination, NOT put out on the conveyor belt.

Rarely (but it does happen on occasion) put on the conveyor belt,
equally rarely hand-carried to the cargo building -- usually stuck in
a marked cargo container on the ramp.

The big problem that I have with counter-to-counter is that you have
to park your car and hoof it into the terminal to retrieve the package
at baggage claim.  Always inconvenient (particularly on the return
trip with a bunch of boxes) and often pricey if you park anywhere near
the terminal.  Good luck tracking down the baggage agent if a flight
hasn't just come in, and have fun waiting in line with disgruntled
travelers if one has.

Compare and contrast to parking right outside of the air freight or
FedEx station and walking 50 feet, then backing your pickup or u-haul
truck (or unimog ;-)) up to dock 7 to have them fork the pallet in.
Life can be as simple or as difficult as you want to make it.

 Most air cargo firms are set up to deal with companies that ship 
 products as a part of their daily business.  They usually dont do a 
 whole lot of business with individual shippers.  YMMV.  I've used air, 
 rail, and truck.  IMHO, if you dont know a bill of lading from a hotel 
 bill then an air cargo company isn't where you should start.

For the average NANOG denizen, the most difficult part of filling out
bills of lading and commercial invoices for the first time will be the
gymnastics necessary to swallow his pride and politley ask the guy
behind the counter for help determining what goes in one or two
non-obviously-labeled spaces on the form.  :)

 WRT FedEx: just because your stuff got damaged, don't assume that they 
 break everything they touch.  There isn't a single business that I can 
 think of that would tolerate a 40% loss rate on anything.  FedEx could 
 NOT stay in business long with those kinds of numbers.  Nor could they 
 keep an insurance carrier.

Certainly _we_ (the company I was working for at that point) didn't
tolerate the 40% loss rate - we took our business elsewhere.  Those
pictures were taking to support my cast for giving them the final boot
for large objects - such measures had been discussed on previous
occasions.  We still used FedEx for stuff that could be carried under
one arm, and even on one or two occasions for stuff that was
sufficiently large as to discourage even the most intrepid soul from
trying to move it without a pallet jack.  Not, though, for the stuff
in the middle which they showed themselves to be uniquely incompetent
to handle, which explains why our mae-east router (also a 7513 at the
time) ended up with 1800nofedex as an enable password for a while.

---Rob


Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Jay Hennigan

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Matthew Zito wrote:

 I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
 shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize
 cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two days.  Are
 there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in advance
 for the help.

FedEx, or Forward Air.

FedEx - Door-to-door, reliable, easy to do business with.

Forward Air - Terminal to terminal.  You deliver it to their facility near
an airport, they deliver it to a terminal near the destination airport.
This means that you need guys and a truck at both ends.  A bit more trouble
than FedEx to do business with.  You'll typically need to palletize your
gear.

http://www.fedex.com/
http://www.forwardair.com/

-- 
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323  WB6RDV
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  -  http://www.netlojix.com/


RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Temkin, David

FWIW we've had FedEx destroy hundreds of thousands of dollars of gear in
transit (all shipped with full insurance and properly packed).  They're
extremely slow to pay their insurance claims on large amounts, as well.

This has happened to us at least 5 times so far - cross-country,
cross-state, and international.

Choose carefully.



-Original Message-
From: N. Richard Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Matthew Zito
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?



FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.

You COULD do a counter to counter shipment via an airline cargo desk. 
That MIGHT be cheaper but you will still have to transport it from your 
spot to their pickup and back again on the other side.

Rail is not an option because it is across country. Ground/Highway is not an
option because it is across country.

Your only choice is by air.

Use FedEx.  Life is short.

-Richard


Matthew Zito wrote:

 
 
  Hello,
 
  I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on  
shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of  
gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize  
cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two   days.
Are   there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in
advance   for the help. Thanks again,   Matt --   Matthew
Zito   GridApp Systems   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cell: 646-220-3551  
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359   http://www.gridapp.com



RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Deepak Jain


We've shipped (using Fedex International Freight) 300+lb pallets of Sun gear
without any untoward delays or problems. Multiple times. The pricing was
excellent and the service (once they knew freight was involved) was fine.

I think bad experiences with fedex have more to do with the statistical
probability of a problem occurring over x million deliveries rather than a
problem with the vendor itself.

Deepak Jain
AiNET

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Matthew Zito
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?




 Hello,

 I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
 shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize
 cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two
 days.  Are
 there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in advance
 for the help.

 Thanks again,
 Matt

 --
 Matthew Zito
 GridApp Systems
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cell: 646-220-3551
 Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
 http://www.gridapp.com






Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Mehmet Akcin

Well I recieved lots of computer hardware including laptops/desktops with
fedex when I was living in Turkey from USA without any problem, 300 pounds
is quite heavy and I assume this is a couple of thousands computer gear so
the best would be fedex, imho.

Mehmet Akcin
- Original Message - 
From: Temkin, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'N. Richard Solis' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Zito
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?



 FWIW we've had FedEx destroy hundreds of thousands of dollars of gear in
 transit (all shipped with full insurance and properly packed).  They're
 extremely slow to pay their insurance claims on large amounts, as well.

 This has happened to us at least 5 times so far - cross-country,
 cross-state, and international.

 Choose carefully.



 -Original Message-
 From: N. Richard Solis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:27 PM
 To: Matthew Zito
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?



 FedEx will be your best bet.  Trust me.

 You COULD do a counter to counter shipment via an airline cargo desk.
 That MIGHT be cheaper but you will still have to transport it from your
 spot to their pickup and back again on the other side.

 Rail is not an option because it is across country. Ground/Highway is not
an
 option because it is across country.

 Your only choice is by air.

 Use FedEx.  Life is short.

 -Richard


 Matthew Zito wrote:

  
  
   Hello,
  
   I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on  
 shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of  
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize

 cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two   days.
 Are   there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in
 advance   for the help. Thanks again,   Matt --   Matthew
 Zito   GridApp Systems   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Cell: 646-220-3551

 Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359   http://www.gridapp.com




RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Jim Deleskie

I've shipped LOTS of heavy datacenter gear via FedEX cross countryb4 without
problems as well.


-Jim
 



-Original Message-
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:08 PM
To: Matthew Zito; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?




We've shipped (using Fedex International Freight) 300+lb pallets of Sun gear
without any untoward delays or problems. Multiple times. The pricing was
excellent and the service (once they knew freight was involved) was fine.

I think bad experiences with fedex have more to do with the statistical
probability of a problem occurring over x million deliveries rather than a
problem with the vendor itself.

Deepak Jain
AiNET

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Matthew Zito
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?




 Hello,

 I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
 shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize
 cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two
 days.  Are
 there any companies or methods people would recommend?  Thanks in advance
 for the help.

 Thanks again,
 Matt

 --
 Matthew Zito
 GridApp Systems
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cell: 646-220-3551
 Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
 http://www.gridapp.com





RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread JC Dill


At 11:19 AM 8/27/2003, Matthew Zito wrote:

I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or suggestions on
shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, about a half-rack worth of
gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking to minimize
cost, but realistically it can't be in transit for more than two days.
Is the problem moving them ASAP or moving them with the least delay while 
in transit?  If you have enough time to buy airplane tickets at a 
reasonable rate it can often be more cost effective to fly someone to pull 
the gear and fly with the boxes.  I pulled and moved a rack full of servers 
in and out of colos quite a few times, flying out with new equipment and 
bringing the old equipment back, or flying out with empty boxes and packing 
the equipment in the right boxes (with the right foam inserts etc.) and 
bringing them back.  You can save quite a bit by not having to pay remote 
hands at the other end to pull and pack the gear.

I believe that most airlines allow you 3 items of checked luggage up to 70 
lbs at no additional charge.  Extra checked items were ~$50 per box, and 
occasionally ~$50 extra if the box is overweight.  I had a carry-on for my 
personal needs (clothes, laptop).

If you need a rental car, get an SUV and get one where the rear deck folds 
down flat.  The largest passenger SUVs (like a Lincoln or Ford) sometimes 
have a rear seat that sits on top of the rear deck and can NOT be removed, 
check this when making reservations as it's a big PITA to put boxes in and 
over this lump.  I highly recommend a Durango instead.

Every time I shipped boxes instead of flew with them there were shipping 
delays.  *Especially* when going thru international boundaries.  When I 
took boxes with me thru customs as checked luggage, no delays.

If the computers you need to move are going to or from the west coast, I'm 
available if you want to hire someone to do this, if you can't spare a 
person to fly.  Email off-list.

HTH

jc




RE: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?

2003-08-27 Thread Christopher Bird

I have used Federal Express to great effect in the past. I have tended
to stay away from Airborne because the local people here in Dallas
didn't know not to turn printers full of toner on their sides. Since
Airborne packed them, I felt they should not have been full of toner,
but that is another story!

Chris

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Matthew Zito
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:19 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Cross-country shipping of large network/computer gear?
 
 
 
 
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if anyone could provide any advice or 
 suggestions on shipping heavy/bulky equipment (~300 pounds, 
 about a half-rack worth of
 gear) on short notice cross-country?  We're obviously looking 
 to minimize cost, but realistically it can't be in transit 
 for more than two days.  Are there any companies or methods 
 people would recommend?  Thanks in advance for the help.
 
 Thanks again,
 Matt
 
 --
 Matthew Zito
 GridApp Systems
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cell: 646-220-3551
 Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
 http://www.gridapp.com