RE: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-24 Thread St. Clair, James

..Once again, reason to pursue getting involved with the Telecomm ISAC.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Alert System



I'm certain the government folks working to protect us 24x7 are doing
everything they can, but the fact of the matter is the public alert
systems in the US suck.  Some just suck less.

http://www.nj.com/news/gloucester/index.ssf?/base/news-0/104590500555170.xml

   Butts said he often finds out about things like the change in the
   national threat level on CNN hours before the Communications Center
   receives a teletype about it.

Butts is the Gloucester County Emergency Response Coordinator including
the county 9-1-1 communications center.


ISPs and other communication providers should be prepared to share
information directly and quickly with each other.  If you wait to hear
from government officials to decide what sanitized information to share,
it will be hours later.  If ever.


RE: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-24 Thread Sean Donelan

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, St. Clair, James wrote:
 ..Once again, reason to pursue getting involved with the Telecomm ISAC.

Or FIRST, IT-ISAC, MSC-ISAC, WW-ISAC, ISP-ISAC, IOPS, 




Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-22 Thread Sean Donelan

I'm certain the government folks working to protect us 24x7 are doing
everything they can, but the fact of the matter is the public alert
systems in the US suck.  Some just suck less.

http://www.nj.com/news/gloucester/index.ssf?/base/news-0/104590500555170.xml

   Butts said he often finds out about things like the change in the
   national threat level on CNN hours before the Communications Center
   receives a teletype about it.

Butts is the Gloucester County Emergency Response Coordinator including
the county 9-1-1 communications center.


ISPs and other communication providers should be prepared to share
information directly and quickly with each other.  If you wait to hear
from government officials to decide what sanitized information to share,
it will be hours later.  If ever.



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-22 Thread Johannes Ullrich


 ISPs and other communication providers should be prepared to share
 information directly and quickly with each other.  If you wait to hear
 from government officials to decide what sanitized information to share,
 it will be hours later.  If ever.

If anybody is interested here, I did put together a small group to
experiment with a simple system to exchange and distribute PGP
signed messages quickly.

The basic 'working' of the system is contained within a yet to
be written perl script that will poll a couple of 'master' 
servers for updated messages, validate the signatures and post
the messages to a particular URL. Any server pulling these messages
can become a master for other servers, which makes this kind of
a 'P2P network' among web servers. Gateway to usernet/email/pagers/
instant messengers would be possible. New pgp keys would be distributed
as signed control messages within the system. Each PGP key has a 
certain number of 'points' assigned, and a message becomes 'valid'
as soon as it has enough signatures to make it past a threshold.

Anyway. Depending on how the water in my basement develops, I may
actually get a first alpha of this out later this weekend. (if not
next weekend). At that point, some testers / coders would be welcome
to work on things like gateways and such.

The overall goal: Make this system fast enough to reach 'everyone'
within an hour. Of course, the system will not work once the
internet is down, but its P2P like structure should provide for 
some anti-DDOS robustness.


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Collaborative Intrusion Detection
 join http://www.dshield.org


Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-22 Thread Michael Painter

- Original Message -
From: Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Alert System



 I'm certain the government folks working to protect us 24x7 are doing
 everything they can, but the fact of the matter is the public alert
 systems in the US suck.  Some just suck less.

 http://www.nj.com/news/gloucester/index.ssf?/base/news-0/104590500555170.xml

Butts said he often finds out about things like the change in the
national threat level on CNN hours before the Communications Center
receives a teletype about it.

 Butts is the Gloucester County Emergency Response Coordinator including
 the county 9-1-1 communications center.


 ISPs and other communication providers should be prepared to share
 information directly and quickly with each other.  If you wait to hear
 from government officials to decide what sanitized information to share,
 it will be hours later.  If ever.

Yesterday I was asked to install a DISH Network system for the Transportation
Security Administration so their folks at the Airport can get the news.s

--Michael



RE: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread St. Clair, James

Martin,

From the NANOG perspective, the best place to tie your own alert system to
nat'l threat levels is with the Telecomm ISAC, which is run out of the NCS.
That is the 27/7/365 commander center for telecomm sector security. Bear in
mind, a change in the HSAS may NOT be as a result of a specific threat to
Telecomm, so get with the ISAC instead.

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Hannigan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/20/03 7:35 PM
Subject: Homeland Security Alert System



Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
real time with the DHS? 


-M



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Martin Hannigan


At 01:44 AM 2/21/2003 -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Martin
Hannigan wrote:
 Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
 real time with the DHS?

CNN (or Fox, MSNBC, etc) news satellite feed (for national alerts)

Radio Shack National Weather Service Alert radio (for local alerts)

Individual states have other alert systems. For example,
California
has EDIS, Oklahoma and Florida have their own systems.

When the alert level was raised from Yellow to Orange, the DHS web
site
was updated long after all the 24-hour news networks were running
scrolls across the bottom of the screen announcing the upcoming
press
conference about the change.

But what would you do with the information?

Let the noc know what's up so they can be more vigilant based on the the
threat level. 
Perhaps even use different sets of ACL's on the edge, etc. It could also
be used
to explain an unexpected surge in traffic, calls, or other things. Ever
look at some traffic stats and see a major surge and want to make sure
you understand why?

I'd take it serious and consider NBC as well as cyberAttacks.







Regards,

--
Martin
Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Sean Donelan

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Martin Hannigan wrote:
   But what would you do with the information?

 Let the noc know what's up so they can be more vigilant based on the the
 threat level.

I'm not trying to be sarcastic, because lots of people have been going
through these same conversations.

Threat level is different from an attack.

Isn't your NOC normally vigilant?  If the DHS lowered the threat level to
Green would you stop monitoring your network just because the government
says there is no more threat?  Do you have more or fewer people on duty in
your NOC as the government threat level goes up or down watching the big
TV screens?

 Perhaps even use different sets of ACL's on the edge, etc. It could also
 be used
 to explain an unexpected surge in traffic, calls, or other things. Ever
 look at some traffic stats and see a major surge and want to make sure
 you understand why?

Again wouldn't you also do all of these things normally?  If an ACL is a
good idea at Orange wouldn't you protect your network with those ACL's
when the level is Yellow.  Or would you remove those ACL's when the
threat level is reduced.  How do would you explain to your management when
you are hacked at level Yellow you had better ACL's, but you only used
the good ACL's at level Orange.

 I'd take it serious and consider NBC as well as cyberAttacks.

Secretary Ridge has said to keep the plastic sheets and duct tape in
storage.  Don't start sealing your house (or NOC) yet.  The FEMA/Red Cross
prepardness recommendations are a good idea irregardless of the alert
level.





Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread David Barak

Okay, I'll bite...

--- Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Martin Hannigan wrote:

 Isn't your NOC normally vigilant?  

Of course.


  Perhaps even use different sets of ACL's on the
 edge, etc. It could also
  be used
  to explain an unexpected surge in traffic, calls,
 or other things. Ever
  look at some traffic stats and see a major surge
 and want to make sure
  you understand why?
 
 Again wouldn't you also do all of these things
 normally?  If an ACL is a
 good idea at Orange wouldn't you protect your
 network with those ACL's
 when the level is Yellow.  Or would you remove
 those ACL's when the
 threat level is reduced.  How do would you explain
 to your management when
 you are hacked at level Yellow you had better
 ACL's, but you only used
 the good ACL's at level Orange.

Well, an example could be if threat level is yellow,
permit traffic from $foreign_country_x, but if it goes
to orange, deny all from $foreign_country_x, or
perhaps log all from there.

I know that there are certain ISPs which deny all mail
traffic from certain ASes, because of the volume of
Spam.  The same principle could be at work here: if
(threat_level++) then deny(unknown_from_Source[nasty])
else permit.

-David Barak
fully RFC 1925 compliant


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Peter Salus


David, what does from mean in your rules?

with .cc at the end?  But there are very many
places with addresses in TLDs and ccTLDs other
than the geographical location.

passing through an AS known to be in a given
location?

Peter



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread David Barak

Peter,

I didn't say that I did that, only that I know that
there are networks which deny all mail traffic from
certain ASes and/or TLDs on a fairly regular basis. 
Personally I don't have a problem with .cc

I would say that for a US operator to respond to a
threat by enabling additional, temporary
logging/monitoring of specific ports would not be
unreasonable.  Denying all traffic is a bit harsh,
especially from a paying customer, but I could
understand watching them really closely.  Public
peers, on the other hand, might get a different sort
of treatment entirely...

The only reason this makes any sense at all is that
most networks are basically OK most of the time, so
the rest of your network can probably spare a little
bit of attention for a short period of time.  If it
were forever, then that solution wouldn't work.

-David Barak
fully RFC 1925 compliant


--- Peter Salus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 David, what does from mean in your rules?
 
 with .cc at the end?  But there are very many
 places with addresses in TLDs and ccTLDs other
 than the geographical location.
 
 passing through an AS known to be in a given
 location?
 
 Peter


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Richard Irving

conf t
router warning you cannot configure a router
with this one

Martin Hannigan wrote:
 I have my duct tape and plastic, but haven't applied it to the
 windows.

  I hear it is more effective, if you wrap the plastic
around your head, and seal it with the duck tape
 
  Never had a -single- complaint, from users of this 
methodology. as long as they don't cheat. 

 :P

Nothing gets through ... (of course, including air..)

 But this -=is=- a time of WAR, 
  we MUST be willing to make sacrifices :*
  
FACT:  Did you know that Government studies show 
100% of terrorists, participating in fatal terrorist attacks,
were shown to have been breathing -=air=-, right prior
to the accident.

  That's right, AIR!

 =-All=- of them do it.

  Well, We've got them NOW!

  :\

There are liars, damned liars, and statiticians.

 :O  :*  ;) 

.Richard.

===
Famous President Bush words:

Bush 1: Read my lips, -NO- ... -NEW- ... -TAXES-!
Bush 2: There can -ONLY- ... -BE- ... -=ONE=- ... -POSSIBLE- ... -OUTCOME-!

 Next time, cough up money for the -real- acting class guys,
the William Shatner class is too cheap, and everyone graduates
sounding alike.

 * shrug *

  ;)



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:41:05 EST, Martin Hannigan said:

 Example: DHS sets RED level. Reaction: Move some third level 
 engineers into the SOC. Audit the DR plan if it's not on schedule
 to be audited. Audit the backup plans if not on schedule to be
 audited. Light the medium warm NOC to HOT NOC level.

Do you buy fire extinguishers when there's no fire, or do you do it
when the smoke alarm is already going off?  Or is this the converse, where
a leaky roof doesn't get fixed because you can't work on it on rainy days,
and on sunny days it doesn't leak?

If your DR/backup plan isn't already squared away, RED is a *very* bad time to
be screwing with it.  Anybody who's read this list for a while has seen
enough examples of attempt to fix broken network only makes it worse.

If you audit your backup plan, and discover you're low on tapes to send
off-site, what are the chances that we'll still be at RED when the tapes
actually arrive from the vendor?

-- 
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech




msg09240/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Jeffrey Meltzer



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of David Barak

 Well, an example could be if threat level is yellow,
 permit traffic from $foreign_country_x, but if it goes
 to orange, deny all from $foreign_country_x, or
 perhaps log all from there.
 

Um, you're not really serious, are you?  Are you worried about some cell
being activated by sending a packet through your servers?  I can't think
of one useful purpose to do something like that.

Jeff



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-21 Thread Martin Hannigan

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:32:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:41:05 EST, Martin Hannigan said:
 
  Example: DHS sets RED level. Reaction: Move some third level 
  engineers into the SOC. Audit the DR plan if it's not on schedule
  to be audited. Audit the backup plans if not on schedule to be
  audited. Light the medium warm NOC to HOT NOC level.
 
 Do you buy fire extinguishers when there's no fire, or do you do it
 when the smoke alarm is already going off?  Or is this the converse, where
 a leaky roof doesn't get fixed because you can't work on it on rainy days,
 and on sunny days it doesn't leak?

DR is a continous loop. It's not the kind of thing you 
develop and then toss on a shelf. Right now is always a good 
time to audit your DR planning, or your disaster prevention 
planning.

[ SNIP ]

 If you audit your backup plan, and discover you're low on tapes to send
 off-site, what are the chances that we'll still be at RED when the tapes
 actually arrive from the vendor?

If I didn't audit the backup plan, I wouldn't discover I was low
on tapes. The state of the alert is irrelevant when related to the
DR plan. It's the event itself.

I believe there is no bad time to conduct a drill or audit
a DR plan. In fact, confusing or non-standard conditions would
be optimal for such a test or audit.

-M


Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-20 Thread Martin Hannigan

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:08:58PM -0500, Richard Irving wrote:
 Yes.
 
  But, until elections 2004, the FUD field is hardcoded to High.
 
  However, if there are changes to the -=actual=- dhs.gov status,
 it sends out an automatic Amazon.Com order for
 Hip Boots for all members of the list.
 
 Would you like to subscribe to the notification list ?

[ snip ]


 Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
 real time with the DHS? 


Ok, that was interesting. :) 

The diving thing is my fun stuff. I'm actually working in 
Security. :)

I was writing a little tool that scanned their page for the alert
image name change, but that's subject to them making changes to 
their site and the images are multi layer graphics, etc. etc.

I'm going to call them and see if they can offer
a place to poll something simple that we can trip
changes off in the NOC. 

If anyone does have some insight to anything they are
doing, or a good contact number for the DHS webite, please
ping me in email and I'll follow up if I find something
or get them to do something.

-M




Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-20 Thread Stretch

People who bought HIP BOOTS also shopped for:
* Duct Tape
* Jack Daniels
* Def Leppard CD's
* Clean Underwear

on-topic: I use a plug-in for my NMS that looks for abnormalities in the
load times of various popular sites. (it's helped me spot routing problems
more than once). Looking back at historical data, all the news-related ones
show a clear change immediately after events like the Columbia disaster. I
was not using the same system on 9/11 so I don't know how quickly one would
have spotted an abnormality.

- Original Message -
From: Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Alert System



 On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:08:58PM -0500, Richard Irving wrote:
  Yes.
 
   But, until elections 2004, the FUD field is hardcoded to High.
 
   However, if there are changes to the -=actual=- dhs.gov status,
  it sends out an automatic Amazon.Com order for
  Hip Boots for all members of the list.
 
  Would you like to subscribe to the notification list ?

 [ snip ]


  Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
  real time with the DHS?


 Ok, that was interesting. :)

 The diving thing is my fun stuff. I'm actually working in
 Security. :)

 I was writing a little tool that scanned their page for the alert
 image name change, but that's subject to them making changes to
 their site and the images are multi layer graphics, etc. etc.

 I'm going to call them and see if they can offer
 a place to poll something simple that we can trip
 changes off in the NOC.

 If anyone does have some insight to anything they are
 doing, or a good contact number for the DHS webite, please
 ping me in email and I'll follow up if I find something
 or get them to do something.

 -M





RE: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-20 Thread John Maddaus

All of this begs the question, what specifically would you do if the alert
level went to red or yellow?  Would you broadcast the change to customers,
place disaster recover teams on stand-by or stand-down, implement an
expanded ACL, etc.?  Seriously, I'm interested in a response to this.
Regarding your suggestion of a simple place to poll, I can probably get this
implemented if there is sufficient interest.  I'm reviewing response plans
from others now. If you care to provide them, I'd be interested in comparing
them.

John S. Maddaus
Veridian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Martin Hannigan
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:27 PM
To: Richard Irving
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Alert System



On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:08:58PM -0500, Richard Irving wrote:
 Yes.

  But, until elections 2004, the FUD field is hardcoded to High.

  However, if there are changes to the -=actual=- dhs.gov status,
 it sends out an automatic Amazon.Com order for
 Hip Boots for all members of the list.

 Would you like to subscribe to the notification list ?

[ snip ]


 Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
 real time with the DHS?


Ok, that was interesting. :)

The diving thing is my fun stuff. I'm actually working in
Security. :)

I was writing a little tool that scanned their page for the alert
image name change, but that's subject to them making changes to
their site and the images are multi layer graphics, etc. etc.

I'm going to call them and see if they can offer
a place to poll something simple that we can trip
changes off in the NOC.

If anyone does have some insight to anything they are
doing, or a good contact number for the DHS webite, please
ping me in email and I'll follow up if I find something
or get them to do something.

-M






Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-20 Thread Eric Gauthier

Ok,

What we really need is something like what NOAA has for space weather:
http://www.maj.com/sun/noaa.html
Currently, the weather is active and unsettled...

Eric :)



Re: Homeland Security Alert System

2003-02-20 Thread Sean Donelan

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Martin Hannigan wrote:
 Is anyone running an automated Terror Alert system that's
 real time with the DHS?

CNN (or Fox, MSNBC, etc) news satellite feed (for national alerts)

Radio Shack National Weather Service Alert radio (for local alerts)

Individual states have other alert systems.  For example, California
has EDIS, Oklahoma and Florida have their own systems.

When the alert level was raised from Yellow to Orange, the DHS web site
was updated long after all the 24-hour news networks were running
scrolls across the bottom of the screen announcing the upcoming press
conference about the change.

But what would you do with the information?