Re: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Michael . Dillon

 True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup system is much better than 1 
 month complete loss of service due to *poor* continuity planning.  We 
 all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is 
 it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small 
 enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?

Is it worth it to lose billions of dollars every year
in order to escape unscathed from some hypothetical
future event that may not even affect NY?

You have to take a balanced approach to continuity planning.
Otherwise, you risk going bankrupt long before there is 
any big catastrophe.

Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
Pessimal pessimism at its optimal.

--Michael Dillon



Re: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Josh Cheney

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You have to take a balanced approach to continuity planning.
 Otherwise, you risk going bankrupt long before there is 
 any big catastrophe.
 
 Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
 out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
 Pessimal pessimism at its optimal.
 
 --Michael Dillon

If any of you have not done so, I would highly recommend reading Bruce
Schneier's book 'Beyond Fear'. The particular scenario that is being
described here is what he would call a movie plot scenario, in that
while it would make a very good movie, it is not at all likely to
happen, and is almost impossible to defend against in any sort of a
reasonable fashion.

-- 
Josh Cheney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.joshcheney.com


Re: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Michael . Dillon

  Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
  out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
 If any of you have not done so, I would highly recommend reading Bruce
 Schneier's book 'Beyond Fear'. The particular scenario that is being
 described here is what he would call a movie plot scenario, in that
 while it would make a very good movie, it is not at all likely to
 happen, and is almost impossible to defend against in any sort of a
 reasonable fashion.

About a hundred years ago in a little town on the West Coast,
a natural catastrophe killed 3,000. Six years earlier a different
natural catastrophe killed 8,000 in a small Gulf Coast town.
By these standards the 2986 killed in the biggest terrorist
attack on the USA is not that big. As military planners know,
it is very, very hard to cause largescale damage, even when you
have billions of dollars of equipment and tens of thousands of
well-trained people to do the work. Terrorism is not about large
scale damage, it is about striking fear into large numbers of
people while causing only a small amount of damage.

Advance planning can reduce the damage caused by an event.
In San Francisco, they reinforce the buildings, bridges and
other structures. In Galveston, they tell people to run away
days in advance of a hurricane. To mitigate the damage caused
by a terror attack, you need to help people understand with
their rational minds, that their personal risk is extremely low,
that the damage is limited and contained, and that they can
defeat the terrorists by remaining calm and rational.

During the Katrina incident, a data centre in New Orleans remained
operational and on the air because they had done a lot of
advance planning. They had stocked up supplies that would be
needed including food and water. They approached the situation
calmly and rationally whenever unexpected events occurred like
armed looters entering the building. They did a darn good job
considering their major mistake. For some reason, they didn't
expect the city to be practically wiped out for several months
so they didn't have a live backup site running in another city.
On the other hand, thinking back to pre-Katrina days, what are
the chances that they could have convinced customers to pay
for the existence of a live backup site in another city?

In some ways, Katrina was a movie plot scenario, yet that company
still managed to survive the disaster by combining typical
data center continuity planning along with survivalist
style disaster planning.

--Michael Dillon



Re: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Jeff Hayward
On 4/21/06, Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have locatedbusiness continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses arebased in NYC) than NJ.I'm sure that regulations require them to be x
miles or in another state.But all things should considered... even thecapability for major catastrophic incident(s) to affect primary and(nearby) secondary sites.It's very unlikely that your business needs to plan for something that affects more than about a 20-mile radius. Events like earthquake or hurricane, or even a nuclear disaster, are fairly localized. For disasters the optimum separation is about 30 miles*, which lets people who are not involved in whatever happens to the primary (the other shifts) staff the alternate in an emergency. Add in cost of fiber, latency, etc., and 30 miles is just about perfect.
If your business continuity planning is telling folks anything else, I think perhaps they're not getting what they think.* unless it's just 30 miles further down the eq fault line or hurricane path :-) Local conditions change the rule of thumb as to exact distance/direction.
-- Jeff


Re: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Edward B. DREGER



Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:17:51 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



You have to take a balanced approach to continuity planning.
Otherwise, you risk going bankrupt long before there is
any big catastrophe.


risk analysis



Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
Pessimal pessimism at its optimal.


Who said terrorism?  Come on, people.  Let's not turn NANOG-L into an
RNC sounding board.

I seem to recall a *really big* power outage a few years back.  And does
the New England area ever have major snowstorms?  Each region has plenty
of inherent hazards, both natural and not.

Let's not limit our concerns to the boogeyman is out to get us,
particularly when discussing balance.


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman  Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita

DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.


RE: data center space

2006-04-25 Thread Edward B. DREGER

LD Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:43:51 +1000
LD From: Lincoln Dale

LD I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to
LD deal with synchronous replication.
LD 
LD In the world of storage networking  synchronous I/O, typically
LD anything higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.

This is a big can of worms that's probably OT for NANOG -- not to
mention likely outside most readers' realm of experience.  It _is_ an
interesting field, though.  I recommend the Morgan Kauffman book series
as a good introduction.

One also could argue the necessity and sufficiency of synchronous I/O in
and of itself.  There's a good deal of work, both published and strictly
in the lab dealing with transactional commit mechanisms.


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman  Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita

DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.


Re: data center space

2006-04-24 Thread Michael . Dillon

 Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have located 
 business continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses are 
 based in NYC) than NJ. 

The financial industry has to have their NY backups
somewhere else in the NY area because they generally
require proximity to the NYSE. The latency from the
NYSE to their office is more important than anything
else. 

Also, there are many other stock markets outside
New York in London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, etc. There are
also ECNs which are electronic trading networks that
are not reliant on a single physical location. There
is redundancy at all layers. The NYSE has its own
redundancy, all the brokerage firms have their redundancy,
the banks have theirs, the clearing companies have
theirs, and so on.

Even within a single organization they likely have
different backup locations for servers, for data
backups, for office space, etc. Lots of people have
been working on this for quite a few years now and 
they generally hedge their bets by offsetting the
high risk backup location in Jersey City with some
lower risk backup sites further away. It's all about
risk management, a world in which there are few 
absolutes.

--Michael Dillon



RE: data center space

2006-04-24 Thread Lincoln Dale

 Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have located
 business continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses are
[..]
 Disclaimer: I work for someone who provides outsourcing services
 including the area of business continuity.

I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal with
synchronous replication.

In the world of storage networking  synchronous I/O, typically anything
higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.




Re: data center space

2006-04-24 Thread Jim Popovitch


Lincoln Dale wrote:


I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal with
synchronous replication.

In the world of storage networking  synchronous I/O, typically anything
higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.


True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup system is much better than 1 
month complete loss of service due to *poor* continuity planning.  We 
all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is 
it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small 
enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?


-Jim P.




RE: data center space

2006-04-24 Thread Lincoln Dale

 Lincoln Dale wrote:
 
  I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal
 with
  synchronous replication.
 
  In the world of storage networking  synchronous I/O, typically anything
  higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.
 
 True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup system is much better than 1
 month complete loss of service due to *poor* continuity planning.  We
 all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is
 it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small
 enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?

Once again, I suggest you talk to the folks you work with that deal with
replication.

My experience is that large NY financials do both sync replication for 90
miles and then async replication to a third tertiary location that is 200+
miles away.

Not sure I agree with your on where you think the next big threats are ..
but I don't think we could discuss that with any signal:noise ratio!


cheers,

lincoln.



Re: data center space

2006-04-24 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
 all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is 
 it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small 
 enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?

If I was a Manhattan based company, and an event took out everything within
65 miles of there, whether my backups are OK is suddenly going to be the *least*
of my concerns.

(Hint - what percent of your employees commute *less* than 65 miles to work,
and what disaster-recovery plans do you have for *them*?)


pgpbZkm3vdLBZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: data center space

2006-04-21 Thread Joseph S D Yao

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
 
 Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in 
 New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What 
 happened? 


My guess (this being NJ) is an aftereffect of the 9/11/2001 disaster.
By five years after, most companies who could be affected by such an
outage may have relocated a continuing-operations set of machines to one
or more colo data centers.  I don't know why the data centers would not
have expanded to meet the influx, though.


-- 
Joe Yao
---
   This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.


Re: data center space

2006-04-21 Thread Robert Boyle


At 06:51 AM 4/21/2006, you wrote:

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:

 Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 
10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody 
is at capacity. What happened?


My guess (this being NJ) is an aftereffect of the 9/11/2001 disaster.
By five years after, most companies who could be affected by such an
outage may have relocated a continuing-operations set of machines to one
or more colo data centers.  I don't know why the data centers would not
have expanded to meet the influx, though.


I think most of us have expanded. :)  I know Focal/Broadwing has 
space in Jersey City at 1 Evertrust Plaza. Joe, I know you aren't the 
original poster, but I'm hoping he or she is still reading this thread too.


-Robert



Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211
Well done is better than well said. - Benjamin Franklin



Re: data center space

2006-04-21 Thread Jim Popovitch


Joseph S D Yao wrote:

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What happened? 



My guess (this being NJ) is an aftereffect of the 9/11/2001 disaster.
By five years after, most companies who could be affected by such an
outage may have relocated a continuing-operations set of machines to one
or more colo data centers.  I don't know why the data centers would not
have expanded to meet the influx, though.


Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have located 
business continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses are 
based in NYC) than NJ.  I'm sure that regulations require them to be x 
miles or in another state.  But all things should considered... even the 
capability for major catastrophic incident(s) to affect primary and 
(nearby) secondary sites.


I think the reasons are probably due to companies/governments thinking 
(hoping?) that in the event of a catastrophic event the business would 
be able to get ppl from site A to site B.  To me it is ridiculous to 
assume that anyone would be left at site A, or even in the vicinity of 
site A.  And if they are still around site A after a catastrophic event, 
would they behave normally and could they be counted on (families, 
fears, trauma, etc)?  I'm an employee, but in desperate times my family 
comes first (that is a no brainer decision that every CIO should think 
about).


Put your major data/ops centers on different continents, or at least on 
different coasts.  Not big enough to do that?  Outsource to someone who 
is.  Don't want to spend the money?  Partner with a non-competing 
similar business that is strategically located away from yours.  Don't 
do the minimum to insure your business survival, do the maximum.


Disclaimer: I work for someone who provides outsourcing services 
including the area of business continuity.


-Jim P.




Re: data center space

2006-04-20 Thread John Curran

At 9:36 PM -0400 4/19/06, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Remember when folks thought Exodus was crazy for 220w per square foot?

265w/sqft can just handle today's typical blade server power density
(allowing for a reasonable amount of wire management and slightly less
than full blade loading).   If you look at the densities of newly released
blade servers, it is not hard to hit 300w+ / sq ft.The more amusing
part is those attempting to cool this via raised floor systems, as it takes
24 to 30 of raised floor to achieve the necessary airflow, and this is
only going to get worse.

/John




Re: data center space

2006-04-19 Thread jim bartus
They claim to be full too, at least from a power perspective. They won't run us more power until the city council aproves them running more power to the building.-jimOn 4/18/06, 
Mike Sawicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote: Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What happened?
Try VZN/MCI Carteret, down the Turnpike about 8 miles.--Mike Sawicki


Re: data center space

2006-04-19 Thread Martin Hannigan


At 11:06 AM 4/19/2006, jim bartus wrote:
They claim to be full too, at least from a power perspective.  They 
won't run us more power until the city council aproves them running 
more power to the building.


-jim



There are likely to be sub leases available from tenants in existing.
desirable, colocation and a good way to find them is via brokers.

Be aware of a few things that have recently transpired.

On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
environmental, that most locations really are full or being held
down by lack of cooling for existing dense rack space. Basically
get ready to hold out your wallet.

I'd try Internap as a last resort (but a great one). Internap
presence is not always facilities based (they own) but they tend
to take inventory in good colo, place PNAP's, and sublet adjoining
cabinets as Internap space. The catch is that if the facility is
out of power, Internap is subjected to the same issues by default.
I'm suggesting Internap because they have a good footprint and
there's bound to be something somewhere.


-M







--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff  Network Operations
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  



Re: data center space

2006-04-19 Thread Alex Rubenstein





On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
environmental, that most locations really are full or being held
down by lack of cooling for existing dense rack space. Basically
get ready to hold out your wallet.


Is it that?

Or, is it some of these companies no realising that charging $250 for a 20 
amp outlet is less than their cost, even three years ago?





--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net




Re: data center space

2006-04-19 Thread Martin Hannigan


At 08:11 PM 4/19/2006, Alex Rubenstein wrote:



On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
environmental, that most locations really are full or being held
down by lack of cooling for existing dense rack space. Basically
get ready to hold out your wallet.


Is it that?

Or, is it some of these companies no realising that charging $250 
for a 20 amp outlet is less than their cost, even three years ago?



I don't know, but I was selling only measured power in 2001 and people liked
it. Granted, power was cheaper, but pay as you go was a good model. You still
had to cool to breaker density, but it was nice to have no power risk and I
would recommend that anyone who can, should convert to measured power billing.

Remember when folks thought Exodus was crazy for 220w per square foot?

-M






--
Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663
Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574
Member of Technical Staff  Network Operations
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  



RE: data center space

2006-04-19 Thread Daniel Golding

Marty Said...
 At 08:11 PM 4/19/2006, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
 
 
 On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
 analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
 so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
 fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
 environmental, that most locations really are full or being held
 down by lack of cooling for existing dense rack space. Basically
 get ready to hold out your wallet.

Well, Peter Van Camp of Equinix was asked this during the (extremely
informative) Equinix call for Q1 and said that many contracts being signed
are still 2-year. The analyst who asked it made the (correct) assertion that
shorter contracts are more advantageous now (for IDC providers), considering
the tight data center market. And the market is really tight, especially in
particular areas. I expect to see many more NANOG postings where can I find
good colocation in area X over the next year.

Of course, the colocation companies must raise their prices - for one thing,
many folks got sweetheart deals during the lean years. For another, energy
prices are way up, as we've all noticed, and IDCs use lots of juice.
Finally, its supply and demand. 

 
 Is it that?
 
 Or, is it some of these companies no realising that charging $250
 for a 20 amp outlet is less than their cost, even three years ago?
 
 
 I don't know, but I was selling only measured power in 2001 and people
 liked
 it. Granted, power was cheaper, but pay as you go was a good model. You
 still
 had to cool to breaker density, but it was nice to have no power risk and
 I
 would recommend that anyone who can, should convert to measured power
 billing.

If energy prices keep going up, one would think that submetered power would
be the wave of the future, so that colos can pass through electricity prices
- both direct electrical power consumed by the equipment, and the HVAC
needed to dissipate the heat. The move to super-dense server platforms is a
real killer. Anyone know of many colos currently submetering individual
tenants?

 
 Remember when folks thought Exodus was crazy for 220w per square foot?

Well, in hindsight that aspect of their plan was visionary. I don't suppose
if anyone knows if the Exodus designed were seeking to future-proof in
general, anticipated these dense server platforms, or just wanted to build
more bigger?

- Dan

BTW, for the folks who like this stuff, there will hopefully be some great
datacenter-related talks at NANOG this time, thanks to Josh Snowhorn. Its
not too late to make a submission... :)



data center space

2006-04-18 Thread Philip Lavine

Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in New 
Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What happened? 




Re: data center space

2006-04-18 Thread Mike Sawicki

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
 
 Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in 
 New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What 
 happened? 
 

Try VZN/MCI Carteret, down the Turnpike about 8 miles.

--
Mike Sawicki