internet consumers forum?

2003-10-11 Thread Richard Welty

_please reply offlist_

i've sent some time (at least 20 minutes) considering that while there are
forums for operators and engineers to discuss issues (nanog, ietf, others
too numerous to mention), there aren't really forums for informed consumers
of internet services to exchange notes (or for uninformed consumers to
become informed.)

if anyone knows of such, please let me know. otherwise, i'm considering
starting an unmoderated but carefully monitored mailing list for business
oriented discussion from the viewpoint of consumers. i'd probably want to
tie this in with the development of FAQs and tutorials targeted at business
consumers of internet services.

again, comments offlist, please.

richard
-- 
Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security




Re: internet consumers forum?

2003-10-11 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:06:22 EDT, Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:

 i've sent some time (at least 20 minutes) considering that while there are
 forums for operators and engineers to discuss issues (nanog, ietf, others
 too numerous to mention), there aren't really forums for informed consumers
 of internet services to exchange notes (or for uninformed consumers to
 become informed.)

There used to be Usenet, but then the spammers found it.

Remember that Nanog probably has *significant* market penetration - I'll hazard
a guess that at least 40-50% of the service providers in the US have at least one
person lurking here.  Now consider the number of consumers of network services
in the US, and estimate what a 1% market penetration would be.

Ask yourself:  How do I keep spammers out of a group that size?  And if I don't
reach that size, what good am I really doing?


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: internet consumers forum?

2003-10-11 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:06:22 EDT, Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:
 
  i've sent some time (at least 20 minutes) considering that while there are
  forums for operators and engineers to discuss issues (nanog, ietf, others
  too numerous to mention), there aren't really forums for informed consumers
  of internet services to exchange notes (or for uninformed consumers to
  become informed.)
 
 There used to be Usenet, but then the spammers found it.
 
 Remember that Nanog probably has *significant* market penetration - I'll hazard
 a guess that at least 40-50% of the service providers in the US have at least one
 person lurking here.  Now consider the number of consumers of network services
 in the US, and estimate what a 1% market penetration would be.
 
 Ask yourself:  How do I keep spammers out of a group that size?  And if I don't
 reach that size, what good am I really doing?

Ask yourself (in addition):

How is this useful to business users?

  I would think that either businesses are small enough that they depend
  on someone else for information of this sort, or large enough that they
  have multiple listening presences on NANOG.

What is a business user?

  Spammers, after all, are a business. Do you mean them? MSN is a business.
  Do you mean them? Am I a business (you don't know the answer to that,
  trust me)? Do I represent one (you don't know the answer to that one,
  either)?

Outside of a gripe list, what purpose(s) will this server?

  There used to be *.advocacy.* groups, alt.fan.* groups, *.discuss groups,
  all on usenet (as Valdis has already pointed out). They were all nice
  for letting off steam, but they were never really useful in any
meaningful
  way. If this is just a place where you can discuss things that are not
  really on charter for NANOG, it seems like there are already a bunch of
  places to do that.

Personally, I don't see that there's a raging desire by the consumers of
packets to find some place to talk outside of the places already there. It
sounds like you have a solution looking for a problem. There is no such
thing as informed consumers of internet services, at least not in any
reality I inhabit. YMMV, HTH, HAND. 

USENET: *sob* I miss usenet. :-(

--
When you wish to instruct be brief -- so that people's minds
can quickly grasp what you have to say, understand your point,
and retain it accurately. Unnecessary words just spill over the
side of a mind already crammed to the full. (Cicero)


Re: internet consumers forum?

2003-10-11 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:01:49 PDT, Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:
  Do you mean them? Am I a business (you don't know the answer to that,
  trust me)? Do I represent one (you don't know the answer to that one,
  either)?

Heck, some days I don't even know if *I* am a business or not.  We get to
straddle the line between IT/networking for a $400M/yr organization and
ISP for 30-80K users (depending how you count) and a few other things.

 sounds like you have a solution looking for a problem. There is no such
 thing as informed consumers of internet services, at least not in any
 reality I inhabit. YMMV, HTH, HAND. 

A case could be made that the lack of such informed consumers is part of the
reason we're having the concurrent block all servers thread.  On the other hand,
a forum isn't the solution there.  We collectively decided that letting unclued Joe 
Sixpack
get connected for $19.95/mo was a good idea, and we're stuck with it (though
if anybody gets a workable way to charge $24.95/mo for a premier secure filtered
service I'll not fight it unless they flagrantly break truth-in-advertising laws. ;)


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature