Re: Rugged wireless bridge

2010-05-13 Thread Henry Linneweh
Blackbox also has some offerings in this area, made to order
http://www.blackbox.com/solutions/infrastructure/Wireless-Bridges.aspx


-henry




From: Andrey Khomyakov khomyakov.and...@gmail.com
To: Nanog nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, May 12, 2010 4:23:24 PM
Subject: Re: Rugged wireless bridge

I found this sucker so far, I guess it has to be waterproof rather than just 
rugged.

http://www.korenixsecurity.com/products/weatherproof-ethernet-switch/jetnet-3706-rj



On May 12, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:

 Not sure how outdoor-worthy those guys are...
 
 -Mike
 
 
 On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
 
 On 5/12/2010 15:53, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
 Hi all again
 
 Thanks for all the links. Lots of wifi solutions. The main problem I'm
 facing is the fact that I need more than one copper ethernet connection at
 those outdoor locations. Meaning that I'll have at least two or three IP
 cameras (PoE desired) and a automatic security gate. So, I feel like some
 outdoor rated copper ethernet switches with PoE is the hardest part here.
 
 Anyone came across any 5-8 port PoE switches that can be put outdoors?
 
 
 Like these?
 
 
 http://www.bb-elec.com/product_multi_family.asp?MultiFamilyId=90Trail=1TrailType=Top
 
 The EIRP305-T and EIRP610-2SFP-T have POE.
 
 ~Seth
 
 



whois.rpki.net

2010-05-13 Thread Randy Bush
ruediger-style pseudo irr route: objects from the rpki testbed are
available from whois.rpki.net

rmac.psg.com:/Users/randy whois -h whois.rpki.net 98.128.0.0/16
route:  98.128.0.0/16
descr:  98.128.0.0/16-24
origin: AS3130
notify: irr-h...@rpki.net
mnt-by: MAINT-RPKI
changed:irr-h...@rpki.net 20100323
source: RPKI

this gives testbed players an easy way to see the state of their valid
roas, as well as providing a path for using the rpki as an irr overlay
(credit to ruediger).

randy



POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Caleb Tennis
We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside our 
facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our facility's 
gate.  

What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire building 
seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut down/off.  
Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It didn't impact 
anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  But it was spread 
across the whole building, across multiple switches.

I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the switches 
is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why any of them 
would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike had some impact 
on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do to prevent future 
strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?




RE: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Matlock, Kenneth L
My first guess would be the lightning was close enough/powerful enough,
to send out an EM Pulse which got picked up by the copper going to the
devices. This EM Pulse may have been interpreted at the switchport as
the device relinquishing power?

Had you tried just unplugging one of the devices from Ethernet, and
plugging it back in to reset the PoE exchange?

Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org



-Original Message-
From: Caleb Tennis [mailto:caleb.ten...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:37 AM
To: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: POE switches and lightning

We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come
inside our facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground
to our facility's gate.  

What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire
building seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just
shut down/off.  Rebooting these switches brought everything back to
life.  It didn't impact anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted
some devices.  But it was spread across the whole building, across
multiple switches.

I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?
Our incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to
the switches is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure
why any of them would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the
strike had some impact on the electrical ground, but I don't know what
we can do to prevent future strikes from causing the same issues.
Thoughts?





Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Larry Sheldon
On 5/13/2010 10:36, Caleb Tennis wrote:
 We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside our 
 facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our 
 facility's gate.  
 
 What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire 
 building seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut 
 down/off.  Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It 
 didn't impact anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  
 But it was spread across the whole building, across multiple switches.
 
 I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
 incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the 
 switches is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why any 
 of them would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike had 
 some impact on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do to 
 prevent future strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?


I don't know how to account for this in a PoE world, but when I last
managed a campus network, we had major issues (particularly in an
active-thunder-storm environment) of severe difference in
ground-potential between buildings.

The only way we could survive was to connect buildings (including
free-standing kiosks) with their own grounds using glass.

Does anybody make a CAT 5 1-to-1 isolation transformer?

-- 
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml





Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Pete Carah
On 05/13/2010 12:19 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
 On 5/13/2010 10:36, Caleb Tennis wrote:
   
 We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside 
 our facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our 
 facility's gate.  

 What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire 
 building seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut 
 down/off.  Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It 
 didn't impact anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  
 But it was spread across the whole building, across multiple switches.

 I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
 incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the 
 switches is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why any 
 of them would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike had 
 some impact on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do to 
 prevent future strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?
 

 I don't know how to account for this in a PoE world, but when I last
 managed a campus network, we had major issues (particularly in an
 active-thunder-storm environment) of severe difference in
 ground-potential between buildings.
   
Cat 5 has isolation transformers in or just behind each jack.  However,
in most equipment the grounds aren't really isolated, and in the case of
POE they (mostly) aren't at all.

Lightning likes to do interesting things.  It can induce a 20kv per
few feet gradient (or more) across the ground mesh of a power substation
(like 4/0 wire in a mesh of 4 foot squares or so; normally more
complicated than that since it has to clear equipment etc...).  It likes
to eat power supplies in well-grounded equipment and leave cheaper stuff
alone.  It can hit an antenna, leave the receiver completely intact, and
fry the power supply of the next box over.  We tended to lose either
fluorescent ballasts or the thermostat transformer in our furnace when I
lived in an active ham's house in Alabama, the radios tended to live. 
(you should have seen his coax entry panel (1/4 inch copper sheet,
grounded outside)), and stuff got manually disconnected from both
antennas and power when a storm was expected (every afternoon :-).

It wouldn't surprise me if the first answer was right and either the
ground pulse or EMP reset the safety switches in the POE feeders.

-- Pete




Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Daniel Senie
While the equipment may well be affected by an EM pulse, if the gear returns to 
normal after a power cycle, then the equipment vendor didn't do their job fully 
developing the product. A product should be tested to take such pulses and 
should recover provided it has not suffered a catastrophic failure (and in fact 
it should contain sufficient protection to avoid such in most cases).

In working on one particular router in the lab some years ago, I was verifying 
some software functionality and the hardware engineer I was working with 
reached over my shoulder and used a device that delivered a high voltage spike 
(simulated lightning) to a 10BaseT network port. After I peeled myself off the 
ceiling (and he stopped laughing), we set to work figuring out how to get the 
device to self-reset after such a strike. One component, an Ethernet hub chip, 
got into a confused state. I was able to detect this in software, so we 
adjusted the product design so that the software could yank the hub chip's 
reset line.

It's unfortunate that products, both hardware and software, receive minimal 
quality testing these days. Guess it's not a surprise, since buyers seemed to 
prefer products that were quick to market, with lots of bugs, rather than 
reliability and resilience.


On May 13, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Pete Carah wrote:

 On 05/13/2010 12:19 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
 On 5/13/2010 10:36, Caleb Tennis wrote:
 
 We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside 
 our facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our 
 facility's gate.  
 
 What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire 
 building seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut 
 down/off.  Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It 
 didn't impact anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  
 But it was spread across the whole building, across multiple switches.
 
 I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
 incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the 
 switches is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why 
 any of them would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike 
 had some impact on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do 
 to prevent future strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?
 
 
 I don't know how to account for this in a PoE world, but when I last
 managed a campus network, we had major issues (particularly in an
 active-thunder-storm environment) of severe difference in
 ground-potential between buildings.
 
 Cat 5 has isolation transformers in or just behind each jack.  However,
 in most equipment the grounds aren't really isolated, and in the case of
 POE they (mostly) aren't at all.
 
 Lightning likes to do interesting things.  It can induce a 20kv per
 few feet gradient (or more) across the ground mesh of a power substation
 (like 4/0 wire in a mesh of 4 foot squares or so; normally more
 complicated than that since it has to clear equipment etc...).  It likes
 to eat power supplies in well-grounded equipment and leave cheaper stuff
 alone.  It can hit an antenna, leave the receiver completely intact, and
 fry the power supply of the next box over.  We tended to lose either
 fluorescent ballasts or the thermostat transformer in our furnace when I
 lived in an active ham's house in Alabama, the radios tended to live. 
 (you should have seen his coax entry panel (1/4 inch copper sheet,
 grounded outside)), and stuff got manually disconnected from both
 antennas and power when a storm was expected (every afternoon :-).
 
 It wouldn't surprise me if the first answer was right and either the
 ground pulse or EMP reset the safety switches in the POE feeders.
 
 -- Pete
 




RE: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Mark Mayfield
About a month ago, we had a lightning strike near our main campus.  We lost one 
POE Cisco 3560 completely (apparently blown power supply), and in a separate 
but nearby building, another 3560 lost the ability to deliver POE, but 
continued to operate as a switch.  Both had to be replaced. Both were on wiring 
closet type UPS'es with surge suppression, and those were unaffected.

Mark

-Original Message-
From: Caleb Tennis [mailto:caleb.ten...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:37 AM
To: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: POE switches and lightning

We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside our 
facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our facility's 
gate.

What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire building 
seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut down/off.  
Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It didn't impact 
anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  But it was spread 
across the whole building, across multiple switches.

I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the switches 
is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why any of them 
would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike had some impact 
on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do to prevent future 
strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?



Confidentiality Statement: The documents accompanying this transmission contain 
confidential information that is legally privileged.  This information is 
intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above.  If you 
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these 
documents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this information in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or 
destruction of these documents.



Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Timmins

Caleb Tennis wrote:
We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside our facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our facility's gate.  


What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire building 
seemed to be affected in that some of their ports they just shut down/off.  
Rebooting these switches brought everything back to life.  It didn't impact 
anything non-POE, and even then, only impacted some devices.  But it was spread 
across the whole building, across multiple switches.

I was just curious if anyone had seen anything similar to this before?  Our 
incoming electrical power has surge suppression, and the power to the switches 
is all through double conversion UPS, so I'm not quite sure why any of them 
would have been impacted at all.  I'm guessing that the strike had some impact 
on the electrical ground, but I don't know what we can do to prevent future 
strikes from causing the same issues.  Thoughts?


I use these on any cable that leaves my building.

http://www.amazon.com/APC-PNET1GB-ProtectNet-Standalone-Protector/dp/B000BKUSS8

It seems to play well with PoE (I put mine before the injector), and 
also works well with T1s and POTS.


-Paul



Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Steven Bellovin

On May 13, 2010, at 2:24 04PM, Daniel Senie wrote:

 While the equipment may well be affected by an EM pulse, if the gear returns 
 to normal after a power cycle, then the equipment vendor didn't do their job 
 fully developing the product. A product should be tested to take such pulses 
 and should recover provided it has not suffered a catastrophic failure (and 
 in fact it should contain sufficient protection to avoid such in most cases).
 
 In working on one particular router in the lab some years ago, I was 
 verifying some software functionality and the hardware engineer I was working 
 with reached over my shoulder and used a device that delivered a high voltage 
 spike (simulated lightning) to a 10BaseT network port. After I peeled myself 
 off the ceiling (and he stopped laughing), we set to work figuring out how to 
 get the device to self-reset after such a strike. One component, an Ethernet 
 hub chip, got into a confused state. I was able to detect this in software, 
 so we adjusted the product design so that the software could yank the hub 
 chip's reset line.
 
 It's unfortunate that products, both hardware and software, receive minimal 
 quality testing these days. Guess it's not a surprise, since buyers seemed to 
 prefer products that were quick to market, with lots of bugs, rather than 
 reliability and resilience.
 
It's not just a matter of these days -- lightning is awfully hard to deal 
with, because of how quirky the real-world behavior can be.  I had to deal with 
this a lot in the 1970s on RS-232 lines -- we could never predict what would 
get fried.  Of course, there was also a ground strikes very near my apartment, 
where the induced current tripped a circuit breaker, blew out a couple of 
lightbulbs, and and came in through the cable TV line to fry the cable box, fry 
the impedance-matching transformer, and fry the RF input stage on the 
television...

--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb








Re: POE switches and lightning

2010-05-13 Thread Pete Carah
On 05/13/2010 02:52 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
 On May 13, 2010, at 2:24 04PM, Daniel Senie wrote:

   
 While the equipment may well be affected by an EM pulse, if the gear returns 
 to normal after a power cycle, then the equipment vendor didn't do their job 
 fully developing the product. A product should be tested to take such pulses 
 and should recover provided it has not suffered a catastrophic failure (and 
 in fact it should contain sufficient protection to avoid such in most cases).

 In working on one particular router in the lab some years ago, I was 
 verifying some software functionality and the hardware engineer I was 
 working with reached over my shoulder and used a device that delivered a 
 high voltage spike (simulated lightning) to a 10BaseT network port. After I 
 peeled myself off the ceiling (and he stopped laughing), we set to work 
 figuring out how to get the device to self-reset after such a strike. One 
 component, an Ethernet hub chip, got into a confused state. I was able to 
 detect this in software, so we adjusted the product design so that the 
 software could yank the hub chip's reset line.
 
Luck.  I've needed that kind of reset a few times...
 It's unfortunate that products, both hardware and software, receive minimal 
 quality testing these days. Guess it's not a surprise, since buyers seemed 
 to prefer products that were quick to market, with lots of bugs, rather than 
 reliability and resilience.
 
That is certainly true (and not entirely modern; you can read about that
problem in old roman literature.  When was Zen and the art of
motorcycle maintainance written? - 1970's); however it is nearly
impossible to protect well against close-by lightning.
 
 It's not just a matter of these days -- lightning is awfully hard to deal 
 with, because of how quirky the real-world behavior can be.  I had to deal 
 with this a lot in the 1970s on RS-232 lines -- we could never predict what 
 would get fried.  Of course, there was also a ground strikes very near my 
 apartment, where the induced current tripped a circuit breaker, blew out a 
 couple of lightbulbs, and and came in through the cable TV line to fry the 
 cable box, fry the impedance-matching transformer, and fry the RF input stage 
 on the television...
   
I can second Steve in spades; I used to work for the power company in
Alabama...  There you learn a LOT more than you ever wanted to know
about lightning.  Consider that one hit can destroy the inside of a
10Mw 66kv-12kv distribution transformer (I actually saw the strike
involved; it was less than a mile from my apartment at the time, and
dropped power to me; the apt was fed from an entirely different
company...  My power came back in a few minutes; the other load took
almost a week (they had a redundant feed; it was a hospital, but they
ran in a low-power mode till a BIG crane and big lo-boy truck came with
another transformer)); how are you going to protect any computer from
*that*...

-- Pete

   --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb







   




Dark fiber / transport in Virginia

2010-05-13 Thread Courtney, Mike
All,

I am interested in finding out about dark fiber / transport resources along 
I-81 or I-64 in the western part of Virginia. I’d like to find a transport 
provider that could connect to a “meet me” room in either Roanoke, 
Charlottesville, Richmond, DC, or even Charleston, WV. I’m trying to price out 
alternatives to the telco transport and data delivery model and I’m new to the 
Virginia market.

Thanks for any help that you can offer!

-Mike


RE: Dark fiber / transport in Virginia

2010-05-13 Thread Gary Gladney
You might try the cable operator Charter.com, I think believe they operate
in that area.

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Courtney, Mike [mailto:mcourt...@wlu.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Dark fiber / transport in Virginia

All,

I am interested in finding out about dark fiber / transport resources along
I-81 or I-64 in the western part of Virginia. I'd like to find a transport
provider that could connect to a meet me room in either Roanoke,
Charlottesville, Richmond, DC, or even Charleston, WV. I'm trying to price
out alternatives to the telco transport and data delivery model and I'm new
to the Virginia market.

Thanks for any help that you can offer!

-Mike





Re: Dark fiber / transport in Virginia

2010-05-13 Thread Mehmet Akcin
Abovenet/Verizon has fibers in those paths.

mehmet


On 5/13/10 2:23 PM, Courtney, Mike mcourt...@wlu.edu wrote:

 All,
 
 I am interested in finding out about dark fiber / transport resources along
 I-81 or I-64 in the western part of Virginia. I¹d like to find a transport
 provider that could connect to a ³meet me² room in either Roanoke,
 Charlottesville, Richmond, DC, or even Charleston, WV. I¹m trying to price out
 alternatives to the telco transport and data delivery model and I¹m new to the
 Virginia market.
 
 Thanks for any help that you can offer!
 
 -Mike




ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

2010-05-13 Thread Michael Ulitskiy
Hello,

We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment - 
learning/labbing/experimenting/etc.
We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6 
allocation from ARIN.
So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support 
native ipv6 connectivity?
I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there anything else? 
Either free or commercial?
Thanks,

Michael



Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

2010-05-13 Thread Jack Carrozzo
Occaid will generally transit you via two tunnels to their endpoints. I used
them for a year with zero issues in addition to an HE tunnel.

-Jack Carrozzo

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.comwrote:

 Hello,

 We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment -
 learning/labbing/experimenting/etc.
 We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6
 allocation from ARIN.
 So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support
 native ipv6 connectivity?
 I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there anything else?
 Either free or commercial?
 Thanks,

 Michael




Re: Abbott dumps NBN from budget reply

2010-05-13 Thread Matt Shadbolt
Sorry guys - meant to send this to AusNOG.

Matt

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Matt Shadbolt matt.shadb...@gmail.comwrote:

 Did anyone hear about this?

 Describing the National Broadband Network as a $43 billion white
 elephant, he confirmed the Coalition would not go ahead with the program
 Prime Minster Kevin Rudd argues will deliver faster internet speeds across
 the country.



 http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/budget/tony-abbott-would-slash-public-service-budget-reply/story-e6frgd66-1225866272354

 So, vote for an internet filter or vote for no NBN?

 Matt.



Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

2010-05-13 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote:
 Hello,

 We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment - 
 learning/labbing/experimenting/etc.
 We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6 
 allocation from ARIN.
 So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support 
 native ipv6 connectivity?
 I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there anything else? 
 Either free or commercial?

1) see gblx/ntt/sprint/twt/vzb for transit-v6
2) tunnel inside your domain (your control, your MTU issues, your
alternate pathing of tunnels vs pipe)
3) don't tunnel beyond your borders, really just don't

tunnels are bad, always.
-chris

 Thanks,

 Michael





RE: BGP and convergence time

2010-05-13 Thread Frank Bulk
What about IP SLA with some EEM?  This link may give you some ideas:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2008/01/ospf-default-route-based-on-ip-sla.html

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Jay Nakamura [mailto:zeusda...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:35 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: BGP and convergence time

So, we have two upstreams, both coming in on Ethernet.  One of our
switch crashed and rebooted itself.  Although we have other paths to
egress out the network, because the router's Ethernet interface didn't
go down, our router's BGP didn't realize the neighbor was down until
default BGP timeout was reached.  Our upstream connectivity was out
for couple minutes.

I am looking for ways to detect neighbor being down faster so traffic
can be re-routed faster.  I can do BFD internally but the issue is how
the upstream is going to detect the outage and stop routing our
traffic to that downed link.  I have asked both of my upstreams and
one said they don't do anything like that, second upstream I am still
waiting on the answer.

My question is, do other carriers do BFD or any other means to detect
the neighbor being down faster than normal BGP will allow?  (Both
upstreams are major telcos [ATT and Qwest], so I think they are less
flexible than some others.)

Or, has anyone succeeded in getting something done with those two carriers?

Thanks!





RE: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.

2010-05-13 Thread Frank Bulk
Thirty percent?  If no access includes financial means or developed
interest, that may be true, but 99% of all zip codes have at least person
with internet access.  And the FCC has stated that 95 percent of Americans,
or 290 million people, have terrestrial broadband access
http://blog.zcorum.com/2010/03/national-broadband-plan-the-debate-begins/. 

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Curtis Maurand [mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:51 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.


30% of all people in the US (110 million) have no access to broadband.  
Large areas of my state have no access to broadband because its rural 
(Maine).

Aastra CVX (it used to be a Nortel product.)

--Curtis

On 5/11/2010 11:29 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
 On 2010-05-11, at 11:08, Leo Bicknell wrote:


 There comes a time when the old tech just doesn't make sense, even
 if a small customer base still wants it.
  
 There will also no doubt continue to be many customers for whom dial is
the only option.

 It's not long ago that I lived in such a house, deceptively close to the
outskirts of town but in terms of wire distance and load coils it might as
well have been on the moon. The house was in a wireless dead zone by a
river, there was no cable, and the only line of sight to another structure
was through several acres of 2.4GHz-absorbing trees.

 The further you move away from urban centres, the easier it is to find
examples of this.


 Joe







Re: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.

2010-05-13 Thread joel jaeggli

On 2010-05-13 19:43, Frank Bulk wrote:

Thirty percent?  If no access includes financial means or developed
interest, that may be true, but 99% of all zip codes have at least person
with internet access.  And the FCC has stated that 95 percent of Americans,
or 290 million people, have terrestrial broadband access
http://blog.zcorum.com/2010/03/national-broadband-plan-the-debate-begins/.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Curtis Maurand [mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:51 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.


30% of all people in the US (110 million) have no access to broadband.
Large areas of my state have no access to broadband because its rural
(Maine).


The rural population represented 20.7% of the us population  in the 2000 
census. about 70% of the US population is concentrated in about 2% of 
the land area.



Aastra CVX (it used to be a Nortel product.)

--Curtis

On 5/11/2010 11:29 AM, Joe Abley wrote:

On 2010-05-11, at 11:08, Leo Bicknell wrote:



There comes a time when the old tech just doesn't make sense, even
if a small customer base still wants it.


There will also no doubt continue to be many customers for whom dial is

the only option.


It's not long ago that I lived in such a house, deceptively close to the

outskirts of town but in terms of wire distance and load coils it might as
well have been on the moon. The house was in a wireless dead zone by a
river, there was no cable, and the only line of sight to another structure
was through several acres of 2.4GHz-absorbing trees.


The further you move away from urban centres, the easier it is to find

examples of this.



Joe