Re: [Nanog-futures] janog
fyi, janog in tokyo on last afternoon now. 580 attendees out of 802 registered. as there is no cost to register, over-registration is common. english web page http://www.janog.gr.jp/en/index.php?JANOG final attendance 624. plus 270/thurs 290/fri remote users watched the stream. no archive bummer, the geek tools preso was a classic! janog 27 will be 2011.01.20-21 in kanazawa, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanazawa,_Ishikawa known for great seafood and famous rice and sake. randy ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
Can someone from Level3 contact me off list please
I can see a stray subnet of the IP space we advertise to you in the Level3 looking glass. Thanks, Hampus ** This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any attachments by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Ipreo immediately by replying to this e-mail, and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments. Thank you! **
RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
Definitely worth the try. Your biggest enemy may be 12.4 IOS. It's bloated and buggy in my experience, but that has mostly been edge services. If 12.4 pegs your processor, you may want to check the software/hardware matrix and see if one of the older 12.0/2 service provider trains that they continued to add support for (probably some large customer's special requests). I don't know if it will support the G1, but if so, you might have better performance out of it. Jack We've implemented 400Mbps shaping with over twenty nested child policies (individual customer shaping and queuing within the 400M) on an NPE-G1 running 12.4(12c). CPU does start to become an issue at that point, and by removing the policy we can reach nearly 600Mbps on the same kit. We run standard ACL, OSPF, EIGRP, VRF Selection, MPLS, MP-BGP, etc. but do not run a full Internet BGP feed on these boxes, so you'll need to subtract that process usage if it applies. I would note that upgrading the box to 12.2(33)SRC caused a 20%+ increase in CPU attributed to the HQF (Hierarchical QOS Framework) process. We decided to stay with the 12.4 train. Cory Ayers CCIE #16874 (RS), CCIP Director of Network Strategy Education Networks of America
RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
Pretty funny and good stuffsince no one really acheives true 100MB speeds anyways, then a 100MB port might actually traffic shape itself naturally!!! I forget what the actual speeds truly are... is it 80% advertised speeds? I'm not sure which is cheaper but I think Juniper has some low end Netscreens you can try also that have traffic shaping features. Subject: RE: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router From: gordsla...@ieee.org To: brandon@brandontek.com CC: nanog@nanog.org Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 06:33:04 +0100 On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:01 -0400, Brandon Kim wrote: What about purchasing a low-end packetshaper to be used in between? If - 1/ budget is a problem and 2/ you have no BSD knowledge inhouse and 3/ the LAN side is all ethernet you could have a stab at using a PFsense box with two (and strictly ONLY two, for this use) physical NICs. It has a GUI to set up traffic shaping (see the sticky on the pfsense forums) PFsense 1.2.3 is current, don't go for the experimental 2.0 for production. There's a book and commercial support if you need it, free support via forums if you can't. Only two physical NICs is necessary due to shaper problems with more than two, whereas in a firewalling role the slots are the only limit (but VLANS are the norm for bucketloads of ports on a firewall PFsense box) An ITX (Littlefalls etc) mobo with 512MB RAM with an extra PCI Intel NIC added will do you fine .. PFsense has nice traffic graphs, which helps you with shaping speeds in a big way. It also has a TFTP server available for it so it's handy for unmanned sites with only a few blue boxes ;) PS - a crazy afterthough - surely just about anything with a 10/100 ethernet link running at 100 and placed inline, cannot exceed 100Mbps - and probably less if it's plastic-cased? Try a few 8-port junkers and see what happens if you fancy a walk on the dangerous side. Watch out for errors and smoke :) Gord -- The drinker you are the smoker you get
Hardware for 50Mbs BGP feed.WAS Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
Yesterday we took possession of a free 50Mb connection upgrade from one of our ISPs. The previous connection was 30Mbps with a partial route table via BGP. Other than BGP, the only other complex functions the router performs is access listing the CRYMU Team Bogon table and traffic shaping. We terminate this into a 2811 running 12.4 with 512MB of memory. When the Access lists were applied we peaked the connection at 39Mbps and when the access list was removed we peaked at 43.5Mbps. The CPU was pegged at 65% with the acl and 50% without. Given the recent discussion about 80Mbps and a 7200, what would members here recommend for a 50Mb connection that we expect to grow to 100Mb in the next 18 months. We are also planning on adding netflow collection in the next year as well. We were think of upgrading to a 3900 series, but it sounds like maybe we should be thinking bigger? Also, how do members determine if their routers are overloaded. Besides looking at memory and CPU usage are their other statistics they look at? Are their third party tools that provide some insight into the routers condition? Dylan Ebner -Original Message- From: Alan Bryant [mailto:a...@gtekcommunications.com] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 8:33 PM To: gordsla...@ieee.org Cc: Murphy, Jay, DOH; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router So you guys would not recommend the traffic shaping route on a 7206 with a NPE-G1? Is it the processor or memory that would not be able to handle it? I don't necessarily plan on doing anything other than limiting it at 80Mbps or whatever it is that we are capping ourselves at at the time. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, gordon b slater gordsla...@ieee.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:54 -0500, Jack Bates wrote: underpowered router or poor code Agreed. So which is it? :) To be fair, some IOS versions were better than others at it in my limited experience of that chassis. Gord -- I hold you XAP -- Alan Bryant | Systems Administrator Gtek Computers Wireless, LLC. a...@gtekcommunications.com | www.gtek.biz O 361-777-1400 | F 361-777-1405
Re: Hardware for 50Mbs BGP feed.WAS Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
I think a 7200VXR with NPE-G1 that has 1Gb of ram would work just fine for you. We are running a very similar setup, passing about 70Mbs, full BGP routes, 2 providers and ACLs, only seeing about 20% usage on the CPU at peak times. Chris Gotstein, Network Engineer, U.P. Logon/Computer Connection U.P. http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com On 7/9/2010 11:43 AM, Dylan Ebner wrote: Yesterday we took possession of a free 50Mb connection upgrade from one of our ISPs. The previous connection was 30Mbps with a partial route table via BGP. Other than BGP, the only other complex functions the router performs is access listing the CRYMU Team Bogon table and traffic shaping. We terminate this into a 2811 running 12.4 with 512MB of memory. When the Access lists were applied we peaked the connection at 39Mbps and when the access list was removed we peaked at 43.5Mbps. The CPU was pegged at 65% with the acl and 50% without. Given the recent discussion about 80Mbps and a 7200, what would members here recommend for a 50Mb connection that we expect to grow to 100Mb in the next 18 months. We are also planning on adding netflow collection in the next year as well. We were think of upgrading to a 3900 series, but it sounds like maybe we should be thinking bigger? Also, how do members determine if their routers are overloaded. Besides looking at memory and CPU usage are their other statistics they look at? Are their third party tools that provide some insight into the routers condition? Dylan Ebner -Original Message- From: Alan Bryant [mailto:a...@gtekcommunications.com] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 8:33 PM To: gordsla...@ieee.org Cc: Murphy, Jay, DOH; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router So you guys would not recommend the traffic shaping route on a 7206 with a NPE-G1? Is it the processor or memory that would not be able to handle it? I don't necessarily plan on doing anything other than limiting it at 80Mbps or whatever it is that we are capping ourselves at at the time. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, gordon b slater gordsla...@ieee.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:54 -0500, Jack Bates wrote: underpowered router or poor code Agreed. So which is it? :) To be fair, some IOS versions were better than others at it in my limited experience of that chassis. Gord -- I hold you XAP
RE: Hardware for 50Mbs BGP feed.WAS Rate Limiting on Cisco Router
We have something very similar. We have 2 x 7204VXR/NPE-G1 with 1GB RAM each with a 50Mb connection to an upstream provider with full routes. No cpu or other problems at all. -Original Message- From: Chris Gotstein [mailto:ch...@uplogon.com] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:36 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Hardware for 50Mbs BGP feed.WAS Rate Limiting on Cisco Router I think a 7200VXR with NPE-G1 that has 1Gb of ram would work just fine for you. We are running a very similar setup, passing about 70Mbs, full BGP routes, 2 providers and ACLs, only seeing about 20% usage on the CPU at peak times. Chris Gotstein, Network Engineer, U.P. Logon/Computer Connection U.P. http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com On 7/9/2010 11:43 AM, Dylan Ebner wrote: Yesterday we took possession of a free 50Mb connection upgrade from one of our ISPs. The previous connection was 30Mbps with a partial route table via BGP. Other than BGP, the only other complex functions the router performs is access listing the CRYMU Team Bogon table and traffic shaping. We terminate this into a 2811 running 12.4 with 512MB of memory. When the Access lists were applied we peaked the connection at 39Mbps and when the access list was removed we peaked at 43.5Mbps. The CPU was pegged at 65% with the acl and 50% without. Given the recent discussion about 80Mbps and a 7200, what would members here recommend for a 50Mb connection that we expect to grow to 100Mb in the next 18 months. We are also planning on adding netflow collection in the next year as well. We were think of upgrading to a 3900 series, but it sounds like maybe we should be thinking bigger? Also, how do members determine if their routers are overloaded. Besides looking at memory and CPU usage are their other statistics they look at? Are their third party tools that provide some insight into the routers condition? Dylan Ebner -Original Message- From: Alan Bryant [mailto:a...@gtekcommunications.com] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 8:33 PM To: gordsla...@ieee.org Cc: Murphy, Jay, DOH; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Rate Limiting on Cisco Router So you guys would not recommend the traffic shaping route on a 7206 with a NPE-G1? Is it the processor or memory that would not be able to handle it? I don't necessarily plan on doing anything other than limiting it at 80Mbps or whatever it is that we are capping ourselves at at the time. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, gordon b slater gordsla...@ieee.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:54 -0500, Jack Bates wrote: underpowered router or poor code Agreed. So which is it? :) To be fair, some IOS versions were better than others at it in my limited experience of that chassis. Gord -- I hold you XAP
Weekly Routing Table Report
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith p...@cisco.com. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 10 Jul, 2010 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary BGP routing table entries examined: 325466 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 149552 Deaggregation factor: 2.18 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 158969 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 34308 Prefixes per ASN: 9.49 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 29787 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 14424 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4521 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:105 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 25 Max AS path prepend of ASN (41664) 21 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 302 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 115 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:679 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 817 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:158 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2254936928 Equivalent to 134 /8s, 103 /16s and 155 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 60.8 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 65.6 Percentage of available address space allocated: 92.8 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 83.6 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 155267 APNIC Region Analysis Summary - Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:78693 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 27034 APNIC Deaggregation factor:2.91 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 75569 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:7 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4107 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 18.40 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1132 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:638 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:3.6 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 526528800 Equivalent to 31 /8s, 98 /16s and 49 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 78.5 APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079 55296-56319, 131072-132095 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 43/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:134709 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:69317 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.94 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 107638 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 41899 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:13775 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 7.81 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:5281 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1351 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.4 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 22 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet:
BGP Update Report
BGP Update Report Interval: 01-Jul-10 -to- 08-Jul-10 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS980873291 5.7% 893.8 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 2 - AS24400 70334 5.4%5861.2 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 3 - AS30890 37300 2.9% 84.0 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom s.r.l. 4 - AS201827569 2.1% 132.5 -- TENET-1 5 - AS14420 19813 1.5% 41.6 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICACIONES - CNT EP 6 - AS541616616 1.3% 152.4 -- BATELCO-BH 7 - AS35931 15545 1.2%7772.5 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO HOLDINGS INC 8 - AS32528 12913 1.0%2582.6 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs 9 - AS815112351 0.9% 13.8 -- Uninet S.A. de C.V. 10 - AS238611099 0.9% 15.8 -- INS-AS - ATT Data Communications Services 11 - AS25620 11084 0.9% 61.9 -- COTAS LTDA. 12 - AS580010191 0.8% 48.5 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD Network Information Center 13 - AS9829 9961 0.8% 41.2 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone 14 - AS454649042 0.7% 215.3 -- NEXTWEB-AS-AP Room 201, TGU Bldg 15 - AS279478672 0.7% 50.7 -- Telconet S.A 16 - AS210 8228 0.6% 65.3 -- WEST-NET-WEST - Utah Education Network 17 - AS106208012 0.6% 7.7 -- Telmex Colombia S.A. 18 - AS8866 7832 0.6% 19.5 -- BTC-AS Bulgarian Telecommunication Company Plc. 19 - AS179746903 0.5% 15.8 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 20 - AS6503 6689 0.5% 11.1 -- Axtel, S.A.B. de C. V. TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix) Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS35931 15545 1.2%7772.5 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO HOLDINGS INC 2 - AS24400 70334 5.4%5861.2 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 3 - AS32528 12913 1.0%2582.6 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs 4 - AS130302197 0.2%2197.0 -- INIT7 Init Seven AG, Zurich, Switzerland 5 - AS191741460 0.1%1460.0 -- CNC-USA - China Netcom (USA) Operations Ltd. 6 - AS980873291 5.7% 893.8 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 7 - AS11613 833 0.1% 833.0 -- U-SAVE - U-Save Auto Rental of America, Inc. 8 - AS303721510 0.1% 755.0 -- SBS-NEWARK-CA - SIEMENS BUSINESS SERVICES 9 - AS27027 705 0.1% 705.0 -- ANBELL ASN-ANBELL 10 - AS7737 2050 0.2% 683.3 -- ASWELLNET - Aswell Corporation 11 - AS207081346 0.1% 673.0 -- SKODA-AUTO SKODA AUTO a.s. 12 - AS9969 1944 0.1% 648.0 -- WMS-NET-AS-KR KOREA RESOURCES RECOVERY AND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION 13 - AS15236 600 0.1% 600.0 -- Universidad de Colima 14 - AS9556 1650 0.1% 550.0 -- ADAM-AS-AP Adam Internet Pty Ltd 15 - AS38869 479 0.0% 479.0 -- SKYNET-AS-AP Skynetworks LLC 16 - AS26615 927 0.1% 463.5 -- Tim Celular S.A. 17 - AS26232 432 0.0% 432.0 -- VYATTA - Vyatta, Inc. 18 - AS3505 811 0.1% 405.5 -- WINDSTREAM - Windstream Communications Inc 19 - AS104452291 0.2% 381.8 -- HTG - Huntleigh Telcom 20 - AS28621 371 0.0% 371.0 -- FAROLBR NETWORKS LTDA. TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name 1 - 111.10.4.0/24 14470 1.0% AS9808 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 2 - 111.10.3.0/24 14465 1.0% AS9808 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 3 - 111.10.1.0/24 14465 1.0% AS9808 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 4 - 111.10.0.0/24 14464 1.0% AS9808 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 5 - 111.10.2.0/24 14459 1.0% AS9808 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 6 - 117.136.8.0/2410524 0.8% AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 7 - 117.135.128.0/18 10306 0.7% AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 8 - 117.135.0.0/1710289 0.7% AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 9 - 117.131.0.0/17 9810 0.7% AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 10 - 120.204.0.0/16 9664 0.7% AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd. 11 - 198.140.43.0/248571 0.6% AS35931 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO HOLDINGS INC 12 - 201.218.38.192/2 7096 0.5% AS27947 -- Telconet S.A 13 - 63.211.68.0/22 6974 0.5% AS35931 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO HOLDINGS INC 14 - 130.36.34.0/24 6449 0.5%
The Cidr Report
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 9 21:11:35 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date PrefixesCIDR Agg
02-07-10328551 201935
03-07-10328172 202289
04-07-10328506 202086
05-07-10328496 202285
06-07-10328385 202663
07-07-10328504 202385
08-07-10328535 202851
09-07-10329107 202571
AS Summary
34808 Number of ASes in routing system
14764 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
4480 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS4323 : TWTC - tw telecom holdings, inc.
96501056 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').
--- 09Jul10 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
Table 329268 202640 12662838.5% All ASes
AS6389 3901 295 360692.4% BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
AS4323 4480 1771 270960.5% TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
inc.
AS19262 1827 274 155385.0% VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon
Internet Services Inc.
AS4766 1857 507 135072.7% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS22773 1168 70 109894.0% ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
Cox Communications Inc.
AS4755 1369 292 107778.7% TATACOMM-AS TATA
Communications formerly VSNL
is Leading ISP
AS18566 1087 63 102494.2% COVAD - Covad Communications
Co.
AS17488 1322 325 99775.4% HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
Cable Internet
AS6478 1284 375 90970.8% ATT-INTERNET3 - ATT WorldNet
Services
AS8151 1526 620 90659.4% Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS10620 1063 231 83278.3% Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS5668 948 132 81686.1% AS-5668 - CenturyTel Internet
Holdings, Inc.
AS7545 1376 581 79557.8% TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet
Pty Ltd
AS8452 1164 417 74764.2% TEDATA TEDATA
AS7303 760 116 64484.7% Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS4804 678 72 60689.4% MPX-AS Microplex PTY LTD
AS35805 650 52 59892.0% SILKNET-AS SILKNET AS
AS4808 824 243 58170.5% CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
network China169 Beijing
Province Network
AS7018 1511 965 54636.1% ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT WorldNet
Services
AS7552 653 130 52380.1% VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
Corporation
AS4780 685 165 52075.9% SEEDNET Digital United Inc.
AS1785 1778 1268 51028.7% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
Communications, Inc.
AS3356 1177 668 50943.2% LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
AS9443 570 75 49586.8% INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus
Telecommunications
AS17676 578 83 49585.6% GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS7011 1133 652 48142.5% FRONTIER-AND-CITIZENS -
Frontier Communications of
America, Inc.
AS24560 931 469 46249.6% AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
Services
AS28573 1028 571 45744.5% NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A.
AS7738 477 30 44793.7% Telecomunicacoes da Bahia S.A.
AS36992 648 210 43867.6% ETISALAT-MISR
Total 38453117222673169.5% Top 30 total
Possible Bogus Routes
31.0.0.0/16 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC
