Re: (Slightly OT?) K8S Platform As A Service Recommendations

2021-04-08 Thread M B
You could look at the combo of Tinkerbell and CAPI (ClusterAPI). Happy to
chat more off list.

-matt

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 10:42 AM Charles N Wyble  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
> I know this is primarily a networking list, but I know lots of server
> admins hang out here.
>
> Does anyone have a recommendation for a self-hosted, on premise, platform
> as a service layer for k8s (specifically k3s)?
>
> I have written up some context here:
>
>
> https://github.com/TSYSGroup/docs-techops/blob/master/Applications/AppRuntimeLayerTodo.md
>
> tl:dr : I have about 70 to 200 apps / (micro) services that will need to
> run across a handful of k3s servers . I already have HA
> database/networking/certificate/application load balanacer/authentication
> stacks in production use, I am currently running the actual
> websites/applications on a single Ubuntu LAMP server and want to build out
> an HA runtime layer for all the properties/applications and need a way to
> orchestrate k3s/metallb
>
> Rancher rio has come up a few times in my research:
> https://bram.dingelstad.works/blog/finding-the-right-paas-for-k8s/
> In addition to the web apps , I will also will be running a number of r&d
> applications and CUDA enabled containers (across a mix of physical
> x86/jetson/tegra machines with k3s workers).
>
> Suggestions/comments/questions/flames welcome :)
>
> On or off list as you prefer.
>


Re: (Slightly OT?) K8S Platform As A Service Recommendations

2021-04-08 Thread Charles N Wyble



On 4/7/21 11:38 PM, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
On 4/7/21 9:16 AM, Charles N Wyble wrote:> Does anyone have a 
recommendation for a self-hosted, on premise,

> platform as a service layer for k8s (specifically k3s)?
FWIW:

Maybe you don't need kubernetes:
https://endler.dev/2019/maybe-you-dont-need-kubernetes/



I have considered not running k8s. I didn't run it for a long time. I 
kept an eye on developments and waited for it to mature.


However the amount of applications and services I am now needing to 
support and the HA requirements and need for standardization etc I 
don't know of a better option.





Manually install a single node Kubernetes cluster on Debian
http://meta.libera.cc/2021/03/manually-install-single-node-kubernetes.html 



Or run Salt or something and spin up LXC containers.




Sure and how do I manage IP addresses? Ports? HA? Containers 
(LXC/docker) is the easy part (on a relative basis anyway!) . It's the 
meta stuff around it that gets messy.  The orchestration piece of the 
containers is the difficult part.



As I mentioned, we already have a mature stack outside the app runtime 
layer (for certs/LDAP/database etc). We just want applications/services 
on k8s. Minimize the complexity/blast radius! :)




My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
Sam 'Half As Interesting' Denby actually did a surprisingly good job explaining
this for the average only-vaguely-technical viewer...

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9gnRs33NOk

[ For all the bad dad jokes he tells on HAI, he's got really good research
  skills/staff, and his long-form stuff on Wendover Productions is excellent ]


Cheers,
-- jra

-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274


Comcast Business packet loss in LA

2021-04-08 Thread Spencer Coplin
Can someone from Comcast business contact me off list about resolving heavy 
packet loss that runs through the below hop? I'm seeing >40% loss when coming 
at it from other ISP's or other Comcast connections.

IP: 75.65.163.20
Name: c-75-65-163-20.hsd1.la.comcast.net

Thank you,
Spencer


Spoofer Report for NANOG for Mar 2021

2021-04-08 Thread CAIDA Spoofer Project
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
We are publishing these reports to network and security operations
lists in order to ensure this information reaches operational
contacts in these ASes.

This report summarises tests conducted within usa, can.

Inferred improvements during Mar 2021:
ASNName   Fixed-By
395092 SHOCK-12021-03-10
11650  PLDI   2021-03-11
5078   ONENET-AS-12021-03-16
32489  AMANAHA-NEW2021-03-16

Further information for the inferred remediation is available at:
https://spoofer.caida.org/remedy.php

Source Address Validation issues inferred during Mar 2021:
ASNName   First-Spoofed Last-Spoofed
6939   HURRICANE 2016-02-22   2021-03-17
209CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST   2016-08-16   2021-03-30
7459   GRANDECOM-AS1 2016-09-26   2021-03-08
20412  CLARITY-TELECOM   2016-09-30   2021-03-31
6181   FUSE-NET  2016-10-10   2021-03-29
11427  TWC-11427-TEXAS   2016-10-21   2021-03-19
30036  MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS  2016-11-16   2021-03-29
22898  ATLINK2016-12-16   2021-03-28
63296  AWBROADBAND   2017-09-01   2021-03-31
546PARSONS-PGS-1 2017-11-20   2021-03-31
393564 SPOKANE   2018-06-05   2021-03-23
33452  RW2018-09-19   2021-03-29
20448  VPNTRANET-LLC 2018-09-20   2021-03-30
5078   ONENET-AS-1   2020-04-06   2021-03-27
53356  FREE RANGE CLOUD  2020-05-19   2021-03-13
6391   URBAN-15  2020-05-29   2021-03-30
11814  DISTRIBUTEL-AS11814   2020-11-22   2021-03-12
208188 PUGET-SOUND-NETWORKS  2020-12-04   2021-03-27
53703  KWIKOM2021-01-17   2021-03-11
54527  ASTUTEHOSTING 2021-02-21   2021-03-22
398836 NP-NETWORKS   2021-03-12   2021-03-12
56207  Converge  2021-03-26   2021-03-26
20150  ANYNODE   2021-03-26   2021-03-26

Further information for these tests where we received spoofed
packets is available at:
https://spoofer.caida.org/recent_tests.php?country_include=usa,can&no_block=1

Please send any feedback or suggestions to spoofer-i...@caida.org


Re: Comcast Business packet loss in LA

2021-04-08 Thread David Funderburk
We are finding the routes through Atlanta that use 50.248.116.42 are
having ussies. Not sure if the problems are related.

---
Regards,

David Funderburk
GlobalVision
864-569-0703

For Technical Support, please email gv-supp...@globalvision.net

GlobalVision is a communications company that provides services which
includes Internet, internal and external networks with over 25 years
experience. With our Zero Downtime strategies we help companies increase
up-time and decrease lost productivity and costs. 

On 2021/04/08 12:59, Spencer Coplin wrote:

> Can someone from Comcast business contact me off list about resolving heavy 
> packet loss that runs through the below hop? I'm seeing >40% loss when coming 
> at it from other ISP's or other Comcast connections. 
> 
> IP: 75.65.163.20 
> 
> Name: c-75-65-163-20.hsd1.la.comcast.net 
> 
> Thank you, 
> 
> Spencer 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MAILSCANNER [1], and is 
> believed to be clean.
 

Links:
--
[1] http://www.mailscanner.info/

Re: My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread Matthew Walster
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 17:51, Jay R. Ashworth  wrote:

> Sam 'Half As Interesting' Denby actually did a surprisingly good job
> explaining
> this for the average only-vaguely-technical viewer...
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9gnRs33NOk
>
> [ For all the bad dad jokes he tells on HAI, he's got really good research
>   skills/staff, and his long-form stuff on Wendover Productions is
> excellent ]
>

Indeed, with the exception of getting the expansion of BGP incorrect, he's
simplified it and explained it in a way that the average viewer can
understand... He's really good at that, and has done a great job with this!

Matthew Walster


Re: My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Walster" 

> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 17:51, Jay R. Ashworth  wrote:
> 
>> Sam 'Half As Interesting' Denby actually did a surprisingly good job
>> explaining
>> this for the average only-vaguely-technical viewer...
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9gnRs33NOk
>>
>> [ For all the bad dad jokes he tells on HAI, he's got really good research
>>   skills/staff, and his long-form stuff on Wendover Productions is
>> excellent ]
> 
> Indeed, with the exception of getting the expansion of BGP incorrect, he's
> simplified it and explained it in a way that the average viewer can
> understand... He's really good at that, and has done a great job with this!

He sure is.  I did point up the definition bobble in a comment.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647 1274


Re: My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread Tom Beecher
Very well done , especially for a layman. His snark level is excellent too.

I've definitely shared this around to some people, pointing out that he
seems to know BGP better than they do, and they get paid for it. MY snark
is going over about as good as you might expect. :)

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM Jay R. Ashworth  wrote:

> Sam 'Half As Interesting' Denby actually did a surprisingly good job
> explaining
> this for the average only-vaguely-technical viewer...
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9gnRs33NOk
>
> [ For all the bad dad jokes he tells on HAI, he's got really good research
>   skills/staff, and his long-form stuff on Wendover Productions is
> excellent ]
>
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink
> j...@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647
> 1274
>


Re: My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread Eric Kuhnke
If one follows the social media accounts of the Pakistan version of the
FCC, nowadays they're just banning anything they find insulting or illegal
in the local legal system, and ordering ISPs to null route big chunks of IP
space.

As an anecdotal data point, the only effect this has had is teaching random
14 year olds how to use ordinary consumer grade VPNs, which work just fine.

https://www.pta.gov.pk/en



On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:52 AM Jay R. Ashworth  wrote:

> Sam 'Half As Interesting' Denby actually did a surprisingly good job
> explaining
> this for the average only-vaguely-technical viewer...
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9gnRs33NOk
>
> [ For all the bad dad jokes he tells on HAI, he's got really good research
>   skills/staff, and his long-form stuff on Wendover Productions is
> excellent ]
>
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink
> j...@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates   http://www.bcp38.info  2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA  BCP38: Ask For It By Name!   +1 727 647
> 1274
>


Re: My First BGP-Hijacking Explanation

2021-04-08 Thread scott



On 4/8/2021 12:19 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:


As an anecdotal data point, the only effect this has had is teaching 
random 14 year olds how to use ordinary consumer grade VPNs, which 
work just fine.

-



That's a silver lining in the dark cloud.  They're learning networking; 
sort of. :)


scott