Re: [Nanog-futures] Stenographers for Future NANOGs?

2010-10-07 Thread Aaron Hughes
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:54:57AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
  Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:42:16 -0400
  From: Randy Whitney randy.whit...@verizonbusiness.com
  
  As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
  person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
  for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
  the plenary of the conference. Matt has done an admirable job over the
  past few years volunteering to do this, but perhaps there might be some
  way to lift this burden from him?
 
 While I really appreciate Matt's efforts in posting the notes, the cost
 of stenographers seems hard to justify. After all, the slides and the
 A/V streams of all General Session presentations is archived and
 available at any time.


ARIN utilizes two stenographers / court reporters for each meeting. If cost is 
a significant consideration, perhaps working a deal with them (for at least 
joint meetings) would be a good idea. I'll grab a business card from them today 
and inquire about day rates.

Cheers,
Aaron

 
 I really hope Matt will continue his efforts or that someone else would
 volunteer to take over should Matt decide to stop, but unless the cost
 of stenographers is far lower than I expect, I'd have a hard time
 justifying the cost.
 -- 
 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
 Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
 Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
 E-mail: ober...@es.netPhone: +1 510 486-8634
 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
 
 -- 
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
aar...@bind.com
+1-831-824-4161
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


Re: SBC/ATT Contact

2009-11-17 Thread Aaron Hughes
I can confirm serious problems reaching att DSL customers. The majority seem 
to be in the Pacbell regions.

Cheers,
Aaron

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28:17PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
 Not personally, but it's being documented here:
 http://www.internetpulse.net/
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Kirk [mailto:sk...@godaddy.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:25 PM
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: SBC/ATT Contact
 
 Is anybody experiencing any issues with customer traffic originating
 from either of these carriers?  If anybody from SBC or ATT can contact
 me off-list I would appreciate it.  Thank you.
 
 --Stuart
 
 
 
 

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
aar...@bind.com
+1-831-824-4161
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/



Re: Fiber cut in SF area

2009-04-09 Thread Aaron Hughes
200 Paul Ave is seeing several carriers down.  I am also in Santa Cruz and 
cannot make or receive long distance calls on my land lines.  Unconfirmed 
reports of Caltrain cut.

Cheers,

Aaron

On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:37:14PM +, Stefan Molnar wrote:
 
 VZ in the South Bay (San Jose) is out.   As per news reports I watched at 6am 
 PDT.
 
 
 --Original Message--
 From: Craig Holland
 To: NANOG
 Subject: Fiber cut in SF area
 Sent: Apr 9, 2009 8:14 AM
 
 Just dropping a note that there is a fiber cut in the SF area (I have a
 metro line down).  AboveNet is reporting issues and I've heard unconfirmed
 reports that ATT and VZW are affected as well.
 
 Rgs,
 craig
 
 
 
 
 
 

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
aar...@bind.com
(703) 244-0427
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/



Peering Personals BoF NANOG45, Attention Peering Coordinators

2008-12-03 Thread Aaron Hughes
Attention Peering Coordinators,

NANOG45 is approaching quickly and it's time to get our Peering Personals 
participants lined up for the Peering BoF.

Peering Personals is part of the Peering BoF (Birds Of a Feather) session and 
provides a forum for Peering Coordinators to meet each other with the goal of 
establishing peering relationships.

Participating Peering Coordinators will complete and email the form below to 
the Peering BOF moderator in advance of the BOF.

Peering Coordinators will have ~two minutes at the BOF to introduce themselves, 
their networks, where they currently peer and where they intend to be peering 
in the next several months, a little bit about what they require of potential 
peers and what they are looking for in a peering candidate. Peering 
Coordinators who would like to participate in Peering Introductions should 
e-mail the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject of 
NANOG 45 Peering BOF no later than Dec 31, 2008.:

Name: _
Company:__
AS#: _
Email Address: 
Peering Locations Today: __
Peering Locations in the next 3-6 months: 
Is your network more Content-Heavy or Access-Heavy ?
Do you source/sink more than 5Gbps of traffic?
Do you require Contracts for Peering?
Do you have an Open Peering Policy (meaning you will peer with anyone in any 
single location), Selective Peering Policy (meaning you will peer but have 
some prerequisites that must be met first)?, or Restrictive Peering Policy 
(meaning you generally will not peer with anybody else)?

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to send me an e-mail.

Cheers,

Aaron

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(703) 244-0427
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/



Re: [Nanog-futures] Subject line Tag and footer

2008-05-07 Thread Aaron Hughes
+1 as well

Cheers,

Aaron

On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 02:55:17PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
 
 On May 7, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
 
  On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:04AM -0700, Steve Gibbard wrote:
  For what it's worth, I find the NANOG subject line tag rather useful.
  Most of the ohter mailing lists I'm on have such a tag, and in the  
  past
  I've found it annoying that NANOG didn't.
 
  Ditto, my vote is to keep it.
 
 Wheee... If we are voting
 
 +1
 
 W
 
 
 
  -- 
  Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
  GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1  
  2CBC)
 
  ___
  Nanog-futures mailing list
  Nanog-futures@nanog.org
  http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
 
 
 -- 
 Being the Fun-Police in the global Internet is a thankless - and  
 probably futile - task.
   --  R. Whittle (draft-whittle-sram-ip-forwarding-01.txt)
 
 Warren Kumari
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Nanog-futures mailing list
 Nanog-futures@nanog.org
 http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

-- 

Aaron Hughes 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(703) 244-0427
Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8
http://www.bind.com/

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures