Re: ServiceFinder: Ärendenummer 185392

2019-12-31 Thread Dennis Lundström
Contacted servicefinder, describing the problem in Swedish, kindly asking
them to unsubscribe.

Best regards.

—Dennis

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 17:24 J. Hellenthal via NANOG 
wrote:

> Well if that ain’t just plain spam I don’t know what is!
>
> --
>  J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> On Dec 29, 2019, at 16:18, i...@servicefinder.com wrote:
>
> 
> __
> Vänligen skriv endast ovanför denna markering när du svarar på meddelandet.
> Hej Scott Weeks,
> Tack för din fråga!
>
> Vi har nu registrerat ditt ärende och du kommer inom kort att bli
> kontaktad av oss på Kundservice.
>
> Du kan också få hjälp själv via vårt Support Center på
> www.support.servicefinder.se. 
>
> Du har ärendenummer *185392* – och alla våra ärenden hanteras i den
> turordning som de kommer in.
>
> Vi kontaktar dig så snart vi bara kan, din fråga är viktig för oss.
>
> Ha en fortsatt bra dag,
> --
>
>
> Med vänliga hälsningar
> *Kundservice*
>
> Öppettider: Vardagar 9-17 | Växel: 08-653 00 00 <+468653>
> Hemsida: www.servicefinder.se [image: ServiceFinder.se]
> --
>
> Detta meddelande skickades till sur...@mauigateway.com med hänvisning
> till ärende 185392.
> [[a6e862e24e9f255dfb1e2e9c14f288dfee770f40-1483209862]]
>
>


Re: ServiceFinder: Ärendenummer 185600

2019-12-31 Thread Dennis Lundström
Hej. Kan ni vänligen avregistrera i...@servicefinder.com på nanog@nanog.org
mailing-listan?

I skrivande stund får alla dom postar till denna lista detta svar tillbaka
vilket är lite irriterande.

Mvh.

—Dennis Lundström

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:33 NANOG  wrote:

> __
> Vänligen skriv endast ovanför denna markering när du svarar på meddelandet.
> Hej Nick Edwards,
> Tack för din fråga!
>
> Vi har nu registrerat ditt ärende och du kommer inom kort att bli
> kontaktad av oss på Kundservice.
>
> Du kan också få hjälp själv via vårt Support Center på
> www.support.servicefinder.se. <http://support.servicefinder.se>
>
> Du har ärendenummer *185600* – och alla våra ärenden hanteras i den
> turordning som de kommer in.
>
> Vi kontaktar dig så snart vi bara kan, din fråga är viktig för oss.
>
> Ha en fortsatt bra dag,
> --
>
>
> Med vänliga hälsningar
> *Kundservice*
>
> Öppettider: Vardagar 9-17 | Växel: 08-653 00 00 <+468653>
> Hemsida: www.servicefinder.se [image: ServiceFinder.se]
> --
>
> Detta meddelande skickades till nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com med hänvisning
> till ärende 185600.
> [[de728c7f1b871ccabccf286b44e42e8f0097f0a7-1483568274]]


Re: DSLAMs

2019-12-31 Thread Dennis Lundström
Found this one:
ftp://ftp2.dlink.com/SUPPORT/End_of_Life_Product_List_091519.pdf


Stating EOL 2015-04-14 for HW revision A1.

—Dennis

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:27 Nick Edwards  wrote:

> Howdy y'all
>
> Chasing some info, does dlink still sell DAS4672 - 672 port adsl2+ dslams?
>
> after simple IP based  units with pppoe pass through.
> We could buy a bunch of planet 48 ports, which we used before, but we
> hoping someone still puts out high capacity (320 plus port) units with
> inbuilt pots splitters
>
> thanks
>


Re: "Using Cloud Resources to Dramatically Improve Internet Routing"

2019-10-10 Thread Dennis Lundström
Feel that this is more down the line of RFC 7511, no? ;-)

—Dennis


On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 07:25 J. Hellenthal via NANOG 
wrote:

> See RFC 1149 & 2549
>
> ;-)
>
> --
>  J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> > On Oct 7, 2019, at 11:29, Keith Medcalf  wrote:
> >
> > 
> >> On Monday, 7 October, 2019 08:55, Rich Kulawiec  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >
> >>> Otherwise, an impressive amount of WTF. My favorite: "while
> >>> communication by servers ___on the ground___ might take hundreds of
> >>> milliseconds, in the cloud the same operation may take only one
> >>> millisecond from one machine to another"
> >
> >> My favorite: "The researchers expect their cloud-based system will be
> >> more secure than the Internet is today [...]"  Apparently they're
> > blissfully
> >> unaware that there is no such thing as "cloud security".
> >
> > I would be interested to know how one connects to their "cloud"?  Do I
> > need an "Evaporation Adapter" for my computer to send to their cloud?
> > And do I need a "Rain Collector" to receive from it?  I suppose I also
> > need the computer to be outside exposed to the elements -- putting it
> > under a brolly would interfere with incoming rain from the cloud ...
> > Plus I suppose it would not work very well at all in the desert, but
> > downloading would be very high bandwidth in the rainforest (or during
> > monsoon season).
> >
> > :)
> >
> > --
> > The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven
> > says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Dennis Lundström
Had some issues in the past with Juniper-coded LR4 with sporadic
disconnections. Apart from those I don’t have any complaints beyond the odd
DOA.

—Dennis

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:32 Nicholas Warren 
wrote:

> Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
>


Re: BGP router question

2019-08-09 Thread Dennis Lundström
Data-sheet appear to say the following:

   - Routing entries: 128000

So No. You will not be able to fit a full table.

—Dennis


On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 17:39 Art Stephens  wrote:

> Hope this is not too off topic but can any one advise if a Dell S4048-ON
> can support full ebgp routes?
>
> --
> Arthur Stephens
> Senior Network Administrator
> Ptera Inc.
> PO Box 135
> 24001 E Mission Suite 50
> 
> Liberty Lake, WA 99019
> 
>
> 509-927-7837
> ptera.com |
> facebook.com/PteraInc | twitter.com/Ptera
>
>  -
> "This message may contain confidential and/or propriety information, and
> is intended for the person/entity to whom it was originally addressed.
> Any use by others is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or
> opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not
> intended to represent those of the company."
>