Feel that this is more down the line of RFC 7511, no? ;-) —Dennis
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 07:25 J. Hellenthal via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > See RFC 1149 & 2549 > > ;-) > > -- > J. Hellenthal > > The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says > a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > > > On Oct 7, 2019, at 11:29, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Monday, 7 October, 2019 08:55, Rich Kulawiec <r...@gsp.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > >>> Otherwise, an impressive amount of WTF. My favorite: "while > >>> communication by servers ___on the ground___ might take hundreds of > >>> milliseconds, in the cloud the same operation may take only one > >>> millisecond from one machine to another" > > > >> My favorite: "The researchers expect their cloud-based system will be > >> more secure than the Internet is today [...]" Apparently they're > > blissfully > >> unaware that there is no such thing as "cloud security". > > > > I would be interested to know how one connects to their "cloud"? Do I > > need an "Evaporation Adapter" for my computer to send to their cloud? > > And do I need a "Rain Collector" to receive from it? I suppose I also > > need the computer to be outside exposed to the elements -- putting it > > under a brolly would interfere with incoming rain from the cloud ... > > Plus I suppose it would not work very well at all in the desert, but > > downloading would be very high bandwidth in the rainforest (or during > > monsoon season). > > > > :) > > > > -- > > The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven > > says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. > > > > > > >