Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:22 PM Hunter Fuller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:42 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > > I can already hear the QUIC WG types blaming the network in abstentia, > because well, why would an operator want to keep their network functioning? > :-) > > In fairness, it's not actually functioning. For one thing, it's > passing some traffic at an abysmal rate. ;) > Life and engineering are full of trade-offs.
Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:42 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I can already hear the QUIC WG types blaming the network in abstentia, > because well, why would an operator want to keep their network functioning? > :-) In fairness, it's not actually functioning. For one thing, it's passing some traffic at an abysmal rate. ;)
Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I can think of many legitimate cases, but i think this is where you have > internet for everyone and internet for the tech-savvy/business split that > becomes interesting. > > I’ve generally been willing to pay more for a business class service for > support and improved response SLA. The average user isn’t going to detect > that 10% of their UDP has gone missing, nor should they be expected to. I really hope my constituents don't have to get business class connections just to get decent performance out of our services, such as UDP based tunnels. They barely care what a VPN is, much less what UDP is. And if our VPN software detects that UDP is available, it will use it, so I suspect it would be (or is being) affected by this.
