Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-07 Thread Yang Yu
Also if your upstream has Google Global Cache (or whatever it's
called), the results can be very different I suppose.


Does Google use different naming structure for IPv6 CDN? Maybe this
particular cache does not offer IPv6.

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;r3---sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
r3---sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. 60 IN CNAME
r3.sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com.
r3.sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. 1800 IN A   64.53.1.78



;; QUESTION SECTION:
;r3---sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. IN 

;; ANSWER SECTION:
r3---sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com. 60 IN CNAME
r3.sn-n2uxaxjvh-j5xe.c.youtube.com.



Level3 peers with Google, I am curious why it hand the traffic off to XO.

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Mark Jeremy mej...@rit.edu wrote:

 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 30 hops
 max,
 60 byte packets
  3  rit-rit1-pp-core1-vlan2811.rit.edu (129.21.8.42)  0.508 ms  0.497 ms
 0.484 ms
  4  te-7-2.car2.Buffalo1.Level3.net (4.59.214.21)  2.293 ms  2.294 ms
  2.282
 ms
  5  ae-4-4.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.140.242)  10.332 ms  10.339 ms
 11.022 ms
  6  ae-72-72.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.38)  15.274 ms  10.212 ms
 ae-92-92.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.46)  10.204 ms
  7  ae-1-60.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.16)  10.202 ms
 ae-2-70.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.80)  10.174 ms  10.171 ms
  8  206.111.13.65.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.13.65)  10.160 ms  10.345 ms
 10.336 ms
  9  207.88.14.185.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.185)  18.555 ms  18.541 ms
 20.749 ms
 10  ae0d1.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (207.88.13.65)  16.241 ms  16.322 ms
 16.261 ms
 11  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  16.673 ms  64.114 ms  64.054 ms
 12  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  16.313 ms  16.306 ms  16.486 ms



Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-07 Thread Warren Bailey
I had the opportunity to look at this from a TWC fiber customer in Ohio, and 
this did not seem to affect them.


From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.



 Original message 
From: Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
Date: 03/07/2013 2:22 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Mark Jeremy mej...@rit.edu
Cc: John Zettlemoyer j...@razorservers.com,nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling


RIT is probably on a commercial circuit and from what i have seen on this
chain so far, it is only affecting home/consumer users.  At MSOE (msoe.edu)
i dont show any latency but we are on TWTC.  Anyone chime in if that is
wrong.

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Mark Jeremy mej...@rit.edu wrote:

 Jumping into the bandwagon here to help out.

 Here's the result from RIT to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com, going through
 at least 4 hops through XO territory.

 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 30 hops
 max,
 60 byte packets
  1  rit-west1-gw-014-vlan453.rit.edu (129.21.153.254)  0.593 ms  0.584 ms
 0.576 ms
  2  rit-core1-pp-west2-vlan824.rit.edu (129.21.8.93)  1.938 ms  1.941 ms
 2.116 ms
  3  rit-rit1-pp-core1-vlan2811.rit.edu (129.21.8.42)  0.508 ms  0.497 ms
 0.484 ms
  4  te-7-2.car2.Buffalo1.Level3.net (4.59.214.21)  2.293 ms  2.294 ms
  2.282
 ms
  5  ae-4-4.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.140.242)  10.332 ms  10.339 ms
 11.022 ms
  6  ae-72-72.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.38)  15.274 ms  10.212 ms
 ae-92-92.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.46)  10.204 ms
  7  ae-1-60.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.16)  10.202 ms
 ae-2-70.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.80)  10.174 ms  10.171 ms
  8  206.111.13.65.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.13.65)  10.160 ms  10.345 ms
 10.336 ms
  9  207.88.14.185.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.185)  18.555 ms  18.541 ms
 20.749 ms
 10  ae0d1.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (207.88.13.65)  16.241 ms  16.322 ms
 16.261 ms
 11  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  16.673 ms  64.114 ms  64.054 ms
 12  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  16.313 ms  16.306 ms  16.486 ms

 -MJ

 -Original Message-
 From: John Zettlemoyer [mailto:j...@razorservers.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:19 PM
 To: 'Derek Ivey'
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: RE: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

 Yup... This might be more helpful.
 I went to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com for better comparison.

 Verizon FIOS

   1 8 ms 4 ms 4 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net
 [98.110.113.1]
   2 9 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-6.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net
 [130.81.182.44]
   310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-9-1-2-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net
 [130.81.209.144]
   4 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms  0.xe-3-1-0.br3.nyc4.alter.net
 [152.63.26.117]
   523 ms24 ms24 ms  204.255.168.118
   633 ms34 ms34 ms  144.232.4.93
   722 ms22 ms22 ms  sl-crs4-nyc-0-3-5-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.7.122]
   825 ms22 ms24 ms  sl-crs2-dc-0-4-0-2.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.8.164]
   922 ms21 ms22 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-2-0-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.25.15]
  1050 ms49 ms49 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.228.205.34]
  1120 ms19 ms19 ms  208.117.251.184

 Comcast
   127 ms31 ms21 ms  68.38.220.1
   2 8 ms 9 ms11 ms
 xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
   311 ms 9 ms 9 ms
 xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
   415 ms16 ms15 ms
 pos-4-0-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.233]
   514 ms14 ms13 ms  be-27-pe06.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net
 [68.86.82.174]
   615 ms13 ms14 ms  144.232.6.97
   715 ms14 ms15 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.3.169]
   834 ms32 ms31 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.228.205.34]
   930 ms31 ms31 ms  208.117.251.184

 Our DC
   11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
   21 ms1 ms1 ms  mx1.razorinc.net [70.34.252.9]
   31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net
 [199.168.63.233]
   4 3 ms 8 ms 3 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net
 [89.149.181.174]
   5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  as2828.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.14]
   6 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net[216.156.8.189]
   7 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  209.48.42.86
   8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  208.117.251.184



 John







Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-07 Thread Elijah Savage
Jumping on the bandwagon. I have not had the chance to follow the entire thread 
but have seen this behavior from ATT Uverse, Time Warner, and Verizon FIOS. I 
believed initially this was a capacity issue with Google and Youtube. The 
reason for this thought is fairly simple with no scientific troubleshooting 
invested at this time. I can replicate slowness on ATT Uverse and Time Warner 
at the exact same times, the anomoly is Verizon FIOS does not align with the 
other two. 

When there is slowness on Uverse 99% of the time my Time Warner connections to 
Youtube will be slow as well even if you are streaming different video's.

- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 3:11:50 PM
Subject: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling


We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube on our home 
connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:

Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.

This makes speeds go from ~1 Mb/s to the full connection speed (30 Mb/s in my 
case). It appears that TWC is forcing traffic to this netblock over a congested 
link, or otherwise throttling it.

Trying to communicate this to tech support results in the typical Derrr, what?

Does anyone at Time Warner care to comment on WTF?


thanks,
-Randy




Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:

 We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube on our 
 home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
 Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:

 Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.


this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)

 This makes speeds go from ~1 Mb/s to the full connection speed (30 Mb/s in my 
 case). It appears that TWC is forcing traffic to this netblock over a 
 congested link, or otherwise throttling it.

 Trying to communicate this to tech support results in the typical Derrr, 
 what?

 Does anyone at Time Warner care to comment on WTF?


 thanks,
 -Randy




Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Randy Carpenter

- Original Message -
 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
 rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
  We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
  on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
  Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
 
  Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
 
 
 this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
 not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
 troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)

I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.

-Randy



Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:

 - Original Message -
 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
 rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
  We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
  on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
  Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
 
  Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
 

 this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
 not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
 troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)

 I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.

excellent.. I'll arrange my ducks, let's chat offlist?



Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Rick Coloccia
I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with 650 Mbps 
bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.

-Rick

Sent from my iPhone 4S

On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
 rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
 We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
 on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
 Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
 
 Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
 
 this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
 not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
 troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)
 
 I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.
 
 excellent.. I'll arrange my ducks, let's chat offlist?
 



Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey
I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I have
Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it still is
since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in the
Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr

Derek


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:

 I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with 650 Mbps
 bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.

 -Rick

 Sent from my iPhone 4S

 On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
 wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
  rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
  We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
  on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
  Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
 
  Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
 
  this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
  not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
  troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)
 
  I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.
 
  excellent.. I'll arrange my ducks, let's chat offlist?
 




Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Grant Ridder
Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
correlation between last mile providers?

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:

 I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I have
 Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it still is
 since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in the
 Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr

 Derek


 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia coloc...@geneseo.edu
 wrote:

  I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with 650 Mbps
  bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.
 
  -Rick
 
  Sent from my iPhone 4S
 
  On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
  wrote:
  
   - Original Message -
   On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
   rcar...@network1.net wrote:
  
   We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
   on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
   Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
  
   Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
  
   this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO space,
   not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in some
   troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)
  
   I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.
  
   excellent.. I'll arrange my ducks, let's chat offlist?
  
 
 



Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey
I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over 
my Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer 
on my FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't 
even come close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.


Here are a few traceroutes:

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute 
r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops 
max, 40 byte packets
 1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 
ms  0.834 ms
 2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 
ms  2.589 ms  2.443 ms
 3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms  
14.614 ms  14.698 ms
 4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms  
14.696 ms  14.552 ms
 5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms  
15.064 ms
 6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms  
36.033 ms  34.816 ms
 7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms  
29.194 ms

 8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
 9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute 
r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops 
max, 40 byte packets
 1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 
ms  0.968 ms
 2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 
ms  2.265 ms  2.456 ms
 3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms  
14.666 ms  14.643 ms
 4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms  
14.479 ms  16.041 ms
 5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 
ms  14.975 ms

 6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
 7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
 8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms  
122.780 ms  121.535 ms

 9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute 
r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops 
max, 40 byte packets
 1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 
ms  0.806 ms
 2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms  
2.435 ms  2.167 ms
 3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms  
14.767 ms  14.695 ms
 4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074 
ms  15.024 ms

 5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
 6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms  
117.698 ms

sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
 7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms  
124.402 ms  125.384 ms

 8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms

Derek

On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any 
correlation between last mile providers?


-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com 
mailto:de...@derekivey.com wrote:


I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I have
Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it
still is
since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in the
Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr

Derek


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia
coloc...@geneseo.edu mailto:coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:

 I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with
650 Mbps
 bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.

 -Rick

 Sent from my iPhone 4S

 On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net mailto:rcar...@network1.net
 wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
  rcar...@network1.net mailto:rcar...@network1.net wrote:
 
  We have recently been having some serious speed issues with
YouTube
  on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
  Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
 
  Block 206.111.0.0/16 http://206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
 
  this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's XO

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Min
3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
second last hub.  Interesting.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
 I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over my
 Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer on my
 FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even come
 close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.

 Here are a few traceroutes:

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
 r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 ms
 0.834 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 ms
 2.589 ms  2.443 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms  14.614
 ms  14.698 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
 14.696 ms  14.552 ms
  5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
 15.064 ms
  6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms  36.033
 ms  34.816 ms
  7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
 29.194 ms
  8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
  9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
 r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 ms
 0.968 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 ms
 2.265 ms  2.456 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms  14.666
 ms  14.643 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
 14.479 ms  16.041 ms
  5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
 14.975 ms
  6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
  7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
  8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms  122.780
 ms  121.535 ms
  9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
 r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 ms
 0.806 ms
  2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
 2.435 ms  2.167 ms
  3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms
 14.767 ms  14.695 ms
  4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074 ms
 15.024 ms
  5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
  6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms  117.698
 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
  7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms  124.402
 ms  125.384 ms
  8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms

 Derek

 On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:

 Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
 correlation between last mile providers?

 -Grant

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com
 mailto:de...@derekivey.com wrote:

 I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I have
 Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it
 still is
 since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in the
 Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr

 Derek


 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia
 coloc...@geneseo.edu mailto:coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:

  I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with
 650 Mbps
  bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.
 
  -Rick
 
  Sent from my iPhone 4S
 
  On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow
 morrowc.li...@gmail.com mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
   On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter
 rcar...@network1.net mailto:rcar...@network1.net
  wrote:
  
   - Original Message -
   On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
   rcar...@network1.net mailto:rcar...@network1.net wrote:
  
   We have recently been having some serious speed issues with
 YouTube
   on our home connections, which are all Time 

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Grant Ridder
The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.

Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
assigned to Google by XO.

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Created:20120917
network:Updated:20121018
network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
 second last hub.  Interesting.

 Min

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
  I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over
 my
  Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer on
 my
  FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
 come
  close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.
 
  Here are a few traceroutes:
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
  r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
 max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 ms
  0.834 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 ms
  2.589 ms  2.443 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
  14.614
  ms  14.698 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
  14.696 ms  14.552 ms
   5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
  15.064 ms
   6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
  36.033
  ms  34.816 ms
   7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
  29.194 ms
   8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
   9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
  r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
 max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 ms
  0.968 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 ms
  2.265 ms  2.456 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
  14.666
  ms  14.643 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
  14.479 ms  16.041 ms
   5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
  14.975 ms
   6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
   7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
   8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
  122.780
  ms  121.535 ms
   9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
  r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops
 max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 ms
  0.806 ms
   2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
  2.435 ms  2.167 ms
   3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms
  14.767 ms  14.695 ms
   4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074 ms
  15.024 ms
   5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
   6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms
  117.698
  ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
   7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms
  124.402
  ms  125.384 ms
   8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms
 
  Derek
 
  On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
 
  Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
  correlation between last mile providers?
 
  -Grant
 
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com
  mailto:de...@derekivey.com wrote:
 
  I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I
 have
  Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it
  still is
  since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in
 the
  Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:
 
  http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds
 
 
 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr
 
  Derek
 
 
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia
  coloc...@geneseo.edu mailto:coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:
 
   I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC 

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Grant Ridder
One thing to keep in mind is that youtube may be anycast.  Google's
distributed file system is pretty amazing and it could be traffic to one
specific datacenter that is possibly slow.

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

 I use FIOS.  In my case, I suspected two things.

   1. congestion (my first hub appeared over subscribed)
   2. packet out of order (high packet drop in alternet-google could be
 a symptom of multipath)

 Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.

 Min

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.
 
  Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
  assigned to Google by XO.
 
  network:Class-Name:network
  network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
  network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
  network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
  network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
  network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
  network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
  network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
  network:Created:20120917
  network:Updated:20121018
  network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com
 
  -Grant
 
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
  second last hub.  Interesting.
 
  Min
 
  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
   I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues
 over
   my
   Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer
 on
   my
   FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
   come
   close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.
  
   Here are a few traceroutes:
  
   [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
   r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
   traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64
 hops
   max,
   40 byte packets
1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms
 1.348 ms
   0.834 ms
2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839
 ms
   2.589 ms  2.443 ms
3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
   14.614
   ms  14.698 ms
4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
   14.696 ms  14.552 ms
5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004
 ms
   15.064 ms
6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
   36.033
   ms  34.816 ms
7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
   29.194 ms
8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms
  
   [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
   r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
   traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64
 hops
   max,
   40 byte packets
1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms
 0.863 ms
   0.968 ms
2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429
 ms
   2.265 ms  2.456 ms
3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
   14.666
   ms  14.643 ms
4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
   14.479 ms  16.041 ms
5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109
 ms
   14.975 ms
6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
   sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
   sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
   122.780
   ms  121.535 ms
9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms
  
   [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
   r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
   traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops
   max,
   40 byte packets
1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms
 0.831 ms
   0.806 ms
2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396
 ms
   2.435 ms  2.167 ms
3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms
   14.767 ms  14.695 ms
4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074
 ms
   15.024 ms
5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms
   117.698
   ms
   sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms
   124.402
   ms  125.384 ms
8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms
  
   Derek
  
   On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
  
   Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
   correlation between last mile providers?
  

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Min
I use FIOS.  Here is my result:

 HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home0.0%   165  285.1 563.9  68.2 2007. 376.1
 2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-127.verizon-gn  0.0%   165  299.8 560.3  59.1 2021. 384.4
 3. G0-9-4-1.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-g  0.6%   165  241.3 698.7  64.6 24918 1938.
 4. so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-  0.0%   165  217.2 705.7 100.6 24817 1926.
 5. 0.xe-4-1-0.XL4.IAD8.ALTER.NET 0.0%   165  308.0 714.6 109.8 24717 1920.
 6. TenGigE0-7-2-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%   165  265.3 722.6 103.5 24617 1911.
TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
TenGigE0-5-0-1.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
 7. google-gw.customer.alter.net 59.4%   165  281.3 982.9 162.3 24516 2940.
 8. 216.239.46.2480.6%   164  247.3 726.7 112.2 24416 1903.
 9. 72.14.238.173 0.0%   164  203.1 729.7  85.9 24315 1895.
10. iad23s05-in-f6.1e100.net  0.6%   164  343.2 712.9  35.1 24215 1890.

In my case, I suspected two things.

  1. congestion (verizon over subscribed)
  2. packet out of order (high packet drops in alternet-google could be
a symptom of multipath)

Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
 The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.

 Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
 assigned to Google by XO.

 network:Class-Name:network
 network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
 network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
 network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
 network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
 network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
 network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
 network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
 network:Created:20120917
 network:Updated:20121018
 network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com

 -Grant

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
 second last hub.  Interesting.

 Min

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
  I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over
  my
  Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer on
  my
  FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
  come
  close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.
 
  Here are a few traceroutes:
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
  r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
  max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 ms
  0.834 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 ms
  2.589 ms  2.443 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
  14.614
  ms  14.698 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
  14.696 ms  14.552 ms
   5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
  15.064 ms
   6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
  36.033
  ms  34.816 ms
   7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
  29.194 ms
   8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
   9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
  r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
  max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 ms
  0.968 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 ms
  2.265 ms  2.456 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
  14.666
  ms  14.643 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
  14.479 ms  16.041 ms
   5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
  14.975 ms
   6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
   7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
   8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
  122.780
  ms  121.535 ms
   9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms
 
  [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
  r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
  traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops
  max,
  40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 ms
  0.806 ms
   2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
  2.435 ms  2.167 ms
   3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net 

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey
Why are your response times so high at your first hop? Are you maxing 
out your connection or connected to your router over wireless?


Derek

On 3/6/2013 9:58 PM, Min wrote:

I use FIOS.  Here is my result:

  HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home0.0%   165  285.1 563.9  68.2 2007. 376.1
  2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-127.verizon-gn  0.0%   165  299.8 560.3  59.1 2021. 384.4
  3. G0-9-4-1.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-g  0.6%   165  241.3 698.7  64.6 24918 1938.
  4. so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-  0.0%   165  217.2 705.7 100.6 24817 1926.
  5. 0.xe-4-1-0.XL4.IAD8.ALTER.NET 0.0%   165  308.0 714.6 109.8 24717 1920.
  6. TenGigE0-7-2-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%   165  265.3 722.6 103.5 24617 1911.
 TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
 TenGigE0-5-0-1.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
 TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
 TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  7. google-gw.customer.alter.net 59.4%   165  281.3 982.9 162.3 24516 2940.
  8. 216.239.46.2480.6%   164  247.3 726.7 112.2 24416 1903.
  9. 72.14.238.173 0.0%   164  203.1 729.7  85.9 24315 1895.
10. iad23s05-in-f6.1e100.net  0.6%   164  343.2 712.9  35.1 24215 1890.

In my case, I suspected two things.

   1. congestion (verizon over subscribed)
   2. packet out of order (high packet drops in alternet-google could be
a symptom of multipath)

Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:

The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.

Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
assigned to Google by XO.

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Created:20120917
network:Updated:20121018
network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
second last hub.  Interesting.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:

I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over
my
Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer on
my
FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
come
close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.

Here are a few traceroutes:

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
max,
40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 ms
0.834 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 ms
2.589 ms  2.443 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
14.614
ms  14.698 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
14.696 ms  14.552 ms
  5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
15.064 ms
  6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
36.033
ms  34.816 ms
  7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
29.194 ms
  8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
  9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
max,
40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 ms
0.968 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 ms
2.265 ms  2.456 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
14.666
ms  14.643 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
14.479 ms  16.041 ms
  5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
14.975 ms
  6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
  7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
  8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
122.780
ms  121.535 ms
  9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops
max,
40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 ms
0.806 ms
  2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
2.435 ms  

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Min
yes, i'm use wireless at home.

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
 Why are your response times so high at your first hop? Are you maxing out
 your connection or connected to your router over wireless?

 Derek

 On 3/6/2013 9:58 PM, Min wrote:

 I use FIOS.  Here is my result:

   HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst
 StDev
   1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home0.0%   165  285.1 563.9  68.2 2007.
 376.1
   2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-127.verizon-gn  0.0%   165  299.8 560.3  59.1 2021.
 384.4
   3. G0-9-4-1.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-g  0.6%   165  241.3 698.7  64.6 24918
 1938.
   4. so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-  0.0%   165  217.2 705.7 100.6 24817
 1926.
   5. 0.xe-4-1-0.XL4.IAD8.ALTER.NET 0.0%   165  308.0 714.6 109.8 24717
 1920.
   6. TenGigE0-7-2-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%   165  265.3 722.6 103.5 24617
 1911.
  TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-5-0-1.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
   7. google-gw.customer.alter.net 59.4%   165  281.3 982.9 162.3 24516
 2940.
   8. 216.239.46.2480.6%   164  247.3 726.7 112.2 24416
 1903.
   9. 72.14.238.173 0.0%   164  203.1 729.7  85.9 24315
 1895.
 10. iad23s05-in-f6.1e100.net  0.6%   164  343.2 712.9  35.1 24215
 1890.

 In my case, I suspected two things.

1. congestion (verizon over subscribed)
2. packet out of order (high packet drops in alternet-google could be
 a symptom of multipath)

 Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.

 Min

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.

 Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
 assigned to Google by XO.

 network:Class-Name:network
 network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
 network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
 network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
 network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
 network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
 network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
 network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
 network:Created:20120917
 network:Updated:20121018
 network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com

 -Grant

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
 second last hub.  Interesting.

 Min

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:

 I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues
 over
 my
 Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer
 on
 my
 FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
 come
 close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.

 Here are a few traceroutes:

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
 r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
 max,
 40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348
 ms
 0.834 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839
 ms
 2.589 ms  2.443 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
 14.614
 ms  14.698 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
 14.696 ms  14.552 ms
   5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
 15.064 ms
   6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
 36.033
 ms  34.816 ms
   7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
 29.194 ms
   8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
   9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
 r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
 max,
 40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863
 ms
 0.968 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429
 ms
 2.265 ms  2.456 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
 14.666
 ms  14.643 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
 14.479 ms  16.041 ms
   5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109
 ms
 14.975 ms
   6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
   7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
   8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
 122.780
 ms  121.535 ms
   9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
 r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to 

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey
That looks like your problem right there. Have you tried connecting via 
ethernet instead and seeing how Youtube performs?


On 3/6/2013 10:09 PM, Min wrote:

yes, i'm use wireless at home.

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:

Why are your response times so high at your first hop? Are you maxing out
your connection or connected to your router over wireless?

Derek

On 3/6/2013 9:58 PM, Min wrote:

I use FIOS.  Here is my result:

   HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst
StDev
   1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home0.0%   165  285.1 563.9  68.2 2007.
376.1
   2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-127.verizon-gn  0.0%   165  299.8 560.3  59.1 2021.
384.4
   3. G0-9-4-1.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-g  0.6%   165  241.3 698.7  64.6 24918
1938.
   4. so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-  0.0%   165  217.2 705.7 100.6 24817
1926.
   5. 0.xe-4-1-0.XL4.IAD8.ALTER.NET 0.0%   165  308.0 714.6 109.8 24717
1920.
   6. TenGigE0-7-2-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%   165  265.3 722.6 103.5 24617
1911.
  TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-5-0-1.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
  TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
   7. google-gw.customer.alter.net 59.4%   165  281.3 982.9 162.3 24516
2940.
   8. 216.239.46.2480.6%   164  247.3 726.7 112.2 24416
1903.
   9. 72.14.238.173 0.0%   164  203.1 729.7  85.9 24315
1895.
10. iad23s05-in-f6.1e100.net  0.6%   164  343.2 712.9  35.1 24215
1890.

In my case, I suspected two things.

1. congestion (verizon over subscribed)
2. packet out of order (high packet drops in alternet-google could be
a symptom of multipath)

Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com
wrote:

The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.

Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
assigned to Google by XO.

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
network:Created:20120917
network:Updated:20121018
network:Updated-By:ipad...@eng.xo.com

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min qiu.mi...@gmail.com wrote:

3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
second last hub.  Interesting.

Min

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:

I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues
over
my
Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer
on
my
FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
come
close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.

Here are a few traceroutes:

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
max,
40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348
ms
0.834 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839
ms
2.589 ms  2.443 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
14.614
ms  14.698 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
14.696 ms  14.552 ms
   5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
15.064 ms
   6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
36.033
ms  34.816 ms
   7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
29.194 ms
   8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
   9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
max,
40 byte packets
   1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863
ms
0.968 ms
   2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429
ms
2.265 ms  2.456 ms
   3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
14.666
ms  14.643 ms
   4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
14.479 ms  16.041 ms
   5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109
ms
14.975 ms
   6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
   7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
   8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
122.780
ms  121.535 ms
   9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

[2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): 

Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread John Zettlemoyer
I've been seeing the same thing and was thinking it was me.
Just to add to some of the results here...

Verizon FIOS
  132 ms 3 ms 5 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net 
[98.110.113.1]
  233 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-7.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net 
[130.81.183.186]
  322 ms22 ms21 ms  xe-4-1-8-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net 
[130.81.209.84]
  422 ms21 ms21 ms  0.so-0-0-0.xt2.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.17.21]
  558 ms24 ms24 ms  tengige0-5-4-0.gw8.nyc4.alter.net 
[152.63.18.206]
  6 *   76 ms76 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
  725 ms21 ms24 ms  209.85.255.68
  821 ms34 ms34 ms  209.85.252.242
  930 ms28 ms31 ms  209.85.249.11
 1031 ms29 ms29 ms  72.14.236.149
 1138 ms36 ms36 ms  72.14.238.173
 1231 ms29 ms31 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


Comcast
 133 ms15 ms25 ms  68.38.220.1
 2 8 ms10 ms15 ms  
xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
 310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net 
[68.85.62.89]
 414 ms15 ms15 ms  pos-3-6-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
[68.86.92.161]
 515 ms13 ms14 ms  pos-0-0-0-0-pe01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
[68.86.86.26]
 6 *   23 ms25 ms  75.149.231.62
 717 ms15 ms14 ms  209.85.252.46
 817 ms16 ms15 ms  72.14.238.173
 917 ms15 ms16 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


Our datacenter
 11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
 21 ms1 ms1 ms  70.34.251.9
 31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
 4 2 ms 3 ms 2 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
 5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  72.14.213.61
 6 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  216.239.46.248
 7 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms  72.14.238.173
 8 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


It would be nice if the ISPs and content providers could work out something 
when dealing with this much traffic and clearly needing to add capaicty. It's 
nice to dream too...
 
John




Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey

On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Robert M. Enger en...@enger.us wrote:

 
 1) You can use wireshark or other monitor to determine the IP address that 
 your video stream is originating from.

I just used the Developer Tools in Google Chrome to figure this out. 

 
 2) Upstream traceroutes to that address are probably not of that much 
 interest.  The downstream path (carrying the video from the server to your 
 house) can follow a different path.  Downstream traceroute is what is needed.

Good point.

 
 3) Before pointing fingers at anyone, you need to get your own house 
 (literally) in order.  Get off wifi, that is just muddying the water.  
 Shutdown wifi so there are no other users.  Get off MocA.  You need to be all 
 hard-wired and totally error free and reliable in your local LAN before you 
 can cast stones at carriers and/or inter-carrier interconnection

Agreed. My trace routes were straight from my pfsense firewall, which is 
connected to my ONT via ethernet (I specifically asked Verizon to turn the 
ethernet port on instead of MoCA when I had it setup over 2 years ago).

Derek


Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Derek Ivey
I think your trace routes are just to their web servers. You need to figure out 
where the actual videos are being streamed from. I used the Developer Tools 
(Network tab) in Google Chrome to figure this out. The FQDNs will probably look 
like the ones in my trace routes. 

Derek

On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:38 PM, John Zettlemoyer j...@razorservers.com wrote:

 I've been seeing the same thing and was thinking it was me.
 Just to add to some of the results here...
 
 Verizon FIOS
  132 ms 3 ms 5 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net 
 [98.110.113.1]
  233 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-7.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net 
 [130.81.183.186]
  322 ms22 ms21 ms  xe-4-1-8-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net 
 [130.81.209.84]
  422 ms21 ms21 ms  0.so-0-0-0.xt2.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.17.21]
  558 ms24 ms24 ms  tengige0-5-4-0.gw8.nyc4.alter.net 
 [152.63.18.206]
  6 *   76 ms76 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
  725 ms21 ms24 ms  209.85.255.68
  821 ms34 ms34 ms  209.85.252.242
  930 ms28 ms31 ms  209.85.249.11
 1031 ms29 ms29 ms  72.14.236.149
 1138 ms36 ms36 ms  72.14.238.173
 1231 ms29 ms31 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
 
 
 Comcast
 133 ms15 ms25 ms  68.38.220.1
 2 8 ms10 ms15 ms  
 xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
 310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net 
 [68.85.62.89]
 414 ms15 ms15 ms  pos-3-6-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
 [68.86.92.161]
 515 ms13 ms14 ms  pos-0-0-0-0-pe01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
 [68.86.86.26]
 6 *   23 ms25 ms  75.149.231.62
 717 ms15 ms14 ms  209.85.252.46
 817 ms16 ms15 ms  72.14.238.173
 917 ms15 ms16 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
 
 
 Our datacenter
 11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
 21 ms1 ms1 ms  70.34.251.9
 31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
 4 2 ms 3 ms 2 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
 5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  72.14.213.61
 6 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  216.239.46.248
 7 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms  72.14.238.173
 8 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
 
 
 It would be nice if the ISPs and content providers could work out something 
 when dealing with this much traffic and clearly needing to add capaicty. It's 
 nice to dream too...
  
 John
 
 




Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Robert M. Enger


1) You can use wireshark or other monitor to determine the IP address that your 
video stream is originating from.

2) Upstream traceroutes to that address are probably not of that much interest. 
 The downstream path (carrying the video from the server to your house) can 
follow a different path.  Downstream traceroute is what is needed.

3) Before pointing fingers at anyone, you need to get your own house 
(literally) in order.  Get off wifi, that is just muddying the water.  Shutdown 
wifi so there are no other users.  Get off MocA. You need to be all hard-wired 
and totally error free and reliable in your local LAN before you can cast 
stones at carriers and/or inter-carrier interconnection

4) Run some speed-tests to COMPETENT speed test servers (not just the VZ, 
Time-warner or other in-house speed-test server, but COMPETENT 3rd-party 
servers).  Run those tests during middle-of the night (idle) as well as evening 
(peak-use) periods.  Compare the results.  Make sure your ISP last-mile network 
isn't collapsing under evening (peak hour) load.


After all is said and done, you probably still can't do anything except 
complain to Google.   Without the downstream traceroute, you can't really point 
fingers at a carrier or interconnect.

So far as I am aware, google/youtube does not provide a looking-glass or 
downstream traceroute from any of its (numerous) server sites.

So Google staff would have to run the tests.
They would have to be adequately staffed to provide that level of investigation 
and remediation.
Google management would have to get involved.

How is the consumer ever going to enjoy OTT video with image fidelity suitable 
for large-screen, lean-back viewing (HD cable-TV quality, if not Bluray 
quality), if even moderate-rate data flows cannot be sustained into the home 
when the flow crosses multiple providers?
Cable/Satellite, networks, studios will continue to have monopoly on high 
fidelity lean-back viewing until such time as we can deliver high rates from a 
remote source into the home. *Clearly FTTH last-mile is not in itself 
sufficient to guarantee success.*

The carriers have to bury the hatchet and start playing nice with one another.  
As long as they try to gouge money out of both direct customer (receiver) as 
well as the content provider (sender), this problem will likely not be resolved.

Given the big bucks involved, it seems likely that the issue will persist in 
perpetuity.  Regulators and legislators won't act.  Their allegiance is not to 
the citizen consumer.




RE: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread John Zettlemoyer
Yup... This might be more helpful. 
I went to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com for better comparison.

Verizon FIOS

  1 8 ms 4 ms 4 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net 
[98.110.113.1]
  2 9 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-6.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net 
[130.81.182.44]
  310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-9-1-2-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net 
[130.81.209.144]
  4 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms  0.xe-3-1-0.br3.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.26.117]
  523 ms24 ms24 ms  204.255.168.118
  633 ms34 ms34 ms  144.232.4.93
  722 ms22 ms22 ms  sl-crs4-nyc-0-3-5-0.sprintlink.net 
[144.232.7.122]
  825 ms22 ms24 ms  sl-crs2-dc-0-4-0-2.sprintlink.net 
[144.232.8.164]
  922 ms21 ms22 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-2-0-0.sprintlink.net 
[144.232.25.15]
 1050 ms49 ms49 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net 
[144.228.205.34]
 1120 ms19 ms19 ms  208.117.251.184

Comcast
  127 ms31 ms21 ms  68.38.220.1
  2 8 ms 9 ms11 ms  
xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
  311 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net 
[68.85.62.89]
  415 ms16 ms15 ms  pos-4-0-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
[68.86.93.233]
  514 ms14 ms13 ms  be-27-pe06.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net 
[68.86.82.174]
  615 ms13 ms14 ms  144.232.6.97
  715 ms14 ms15 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net 
[144.232.3.169]
  834 ms32 ms31 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net 
[144.228.205.34]
  930 ms31 ms31 ms  208.117.251.184

Our DC
  11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
  21 ms1 ms1 ms  mx1.razorinc.net [70.34.252.9]
  31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
  4 3 ms 8 ms 3 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
  5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  as2828.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.14]
  6 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.8.189]
  7 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  209.48.42.86
  8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  208.117.251.184


 
John





Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Fried
I know only too well that Verizon's peering with Cogent in the DC/IAD
area is beyond saturated.  Looking at the traceroute you have below it
would appear to be the same problem:

  5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
 14.975 ms
  6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms

A handoff between Verizon and Sprint shouldn't incude a 100ms delay.

Andy

Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com

On 3/6/13 9:25 PM, Min wrote:
 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
 second last hub.  Interesting.
 
 Min
 
 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
 I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues over my
 Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer on my
 FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even come
 close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.

 Here are a few traceroutes:

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
 r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348 ms
 0.834 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839 ms
 2.589 ms  2.443 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms  14.614
 ms  14.698 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
 14.696 ms  14.552 ms
  5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
 15.064 ms
  6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms  36.033
 ms  34.816 ms
  7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
 29.194 ms
  8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
  9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
 r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863 ms
 0.968 ms
  2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429 ms
 2.265 ms  2.456 ms
  3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms  14.666
 ms  14.643 ms
  4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
 14.479 ms  16.041 ms
  5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109 ms
 14.975 ms
  6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
  7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
  8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms  122.780
 ms  121.535 ms
  9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms

 [2.1-BETA0][root@pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
 r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
 traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops max,
 40 byte packets
  1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831 ms
 0.806 ms
  2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
 2.435 ms  2.167 ms
  3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms
 14.767 ms  14.695 ms
  4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074 ms
 15.024 ms
  5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
  6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms  117.698
 ms
 sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
  7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms  124.402
 ms  125.384 ms
  8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms

 Derek

 On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:

 Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
 correlation between last mile providers?

 -Grant

 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com
 mailto:de...@derekivey.com wrote:

 I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I have
 Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it
 still is
 since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads in the
 Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds

 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr

 Derek


 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia
 coloc...@geneseo.edu mailto:coloc...@geneseo.edu wrote:

  I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with
 650 Mbps
  bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.
 
  -Rick
 
  Sent from my iPhone 4S
 
  On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow
 

RE: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Mark Jeremy
Jumping into the bandwagon here to help out.

Here's the result from RIT to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com, going through
at least 4 hops through XO territory.

traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 30 hops max,
60 byte packets
 1  rit-west1-gw-014-vlan453.rit.edu (129.21.153.254)  0.593 ms  0.584 ms
0.576 ms
 2  rit-core1-pp-west2-vlan824.rit.edu (129.21.8.93)  1.938 ms  1.941 ms
2.116 ms
 3  rit-rit1-pp-core1-vlan2811.rit.edu (129.21.8.42)  0.508 ms  0.497 ms
0.484 ms
 4  te-7-2.car2.Buffalo1.Level3.net (4.59.214.21)  2.293 ms  2.294 ms  2.282
ms
 5  ae-4-4.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.140.242)  10.332 ms  10.339 ms
11.022 ms
 6  ae-72-72.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.38)  15.274 ms  10.212 ms
ae-92-92.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.46)  10.204 ms
 7  ae-1-60.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.16)  10.202 ms
ae-2-70.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.80)  10.174 ms  10.171 ms
 8  206.111.13.65.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.13.65)  10.160 ms  10.345 ms
10.336 ms
 9  207.88.14.185.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.185)  18.555 ms  18.541 ms
20.749 ms
10  ae0d1.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (207.88.13.65)  16.241 ms  16.322 ms
16.261 ms
11  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  16.673 ms  64.114 ms  64.054 ms
12  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  16.313 ms  16.306 ms  16.486 ms

-MJ

-Original Message-
From: John Zettlemoyer [mailto:j...@razorservers.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:19 PM
To: 'Derek Ivey'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

Yup... This might be more helpful. 
I went to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com for better comparison.

Verizon FIOS

  1 8 ms 4 ms 4 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net
[98.110.113.1]
  2 9 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-6.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net
[130.81.182.44]
  310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-9-1-2-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net
[130.81.209.144]
  4 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms  0.xe-3-1-0.br3.nyc4.alter.net
[152.63.26.117]
  523 ms24 ms24 ms  204.255.168.118
  633 ms34 ms34 ms  144.232.4.93
  722 ms22 ms22 ms  sl-crs4-nyc-0-3-5-0.sprintlink.net
[144.232.7.122]
  825 ms22 ms24 ms  sl-crs2-dc-0-4-0-2.sprintlink.net
[144.232.8.164]
  922 ms21 ms22 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-2-0-0.sprintlink.net
[144.232.25.15]
 1050 ms49 ms49 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
[144.228.205.34]
 1120 ms19 ms19 ms  208.117.251.184

Comcast
  127 ms31 ms21 ms  68.38.220.1
  2 8 ms 9 ms11 ms
xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
  311 ms 9 ms 9 ms
xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
  415 ms16 ms15 ms
pos-4-0-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.233]
  514 ms14 ms13 ms  be-27-pe06.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net
[68.86.82.174]
  615 ms13 ms14 ms  144.232.6.97
  715 ms14 ms15 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net
[144.232.3.169]
  834 ms32 ms31 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
[144.228.205.34]
  930 ms31 ms31 ms  208.117.251.184

Our DC
  11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
  21 ms1 ms1 ms  mx1.razorinc.net [70.34.252.9]
  31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net
[199.168.63.233]
  4 3 ms 8 ms 3 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net
[89.149.181.174]
  5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  as2828.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.14]
  6 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.8.189]
  7 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  209.48.42.86
  8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  208.117.251.184


 
John





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

2013-03-06 Thread Grant Ridder
RIT is probably on a commercial circuit and from what i have seen on this
chain so far, it is only affecting home/consumer users.  At MSOE (msoe.edu)
i dont show any latency but we are on TWTC.  Anyone chime in if that is
wrong.

-Grant

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Mark Jeremy mej...@rit.edu wrote:

 Jumping into the bandwagon here to help out.

 Here's the result from RIT to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com, going through
 at least 4 hops through XO territory.

 traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 30 hops
 max,
 60 byte packets
  1  rit-west1-gw-014-vlan453.rit.edu (129.21.153.254)  0.593 ms  0.584 ms
 0.576 ms
  2  rit-core1-pp-west2-vlan824.rit.edu (129.21.8.93)  1.938 ms  1.941 ms
 2.116 ms
  3  rit-rit1-pp-core1-vlan2811.rit.edu (129.21.8.42)  0.508 ms  0.497 ms
 0.484 ms
  4  te-7-2.car2.Buffalo1.Level3.net (4.59.214.21)  2.293 ms  2.294 ms
  2.282
 ms
  5  ae-4-4.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.140.242)  10.332 ms  10.339 ms
 11.022 ms
  6  ae-72-72.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.38)  15.274 ms  10.212 ms
 ae-92-92.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.148.46)  10.204 ms
  7  ae-1-60.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.16)  10.202 ms
 ae-2-70.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.155.80)  10.174 ms  10.171 ms
  8  206.111.13.65.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.13.65)  10.160 ms  10.345 ms
 10.336 ms
  9  207.88.14.185.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.14.185)  18.555 ms  18.541 ms
 20.749 ms
 10  ae0d1.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (207.88.13.65)  16.241 ms  16.322 ms
 16.261 ms
 11  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  16.673 ms  64.114 ms  64.054 ms
 12  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  16.313 ms  16.306 ms  16.486 ms

 -MJ

 -Original Message-
 From: John Zettlemoyer [mailto:j...@razorservers.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:19 PM
 To: 'Derek Ivey'
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: RE: Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

 Yup... This might be more helpful.
 I went to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com for better comparison.

 Verizon FIOS

   1 8 ms 4 ms 4 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net
 [98.110.113.1]
   2 9 ms 6 ms 7 ms  g0-3-3-6.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net
 [130.81.182.44]
   310 ms 9 ms 9 ms  xe-9-1-2-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net
 [130.81.209.144]
   4 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms  0.xe-3-1-0.br3.nyc4.alter.net
 [152.63.26.117]
   523 ms24 ms24 ms  204.255.168.118
   633 ms34 ms34 ms  144.232.4.93
   722 ms22 ms22 ms  sl-crs4-nyc-0-3-5-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.7.122]
   825 ms22 ms24 ms  sl-crs2-dc-0-4-0-2.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.8.164]
   922 ms21 ms22 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-2-0-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.25.15]
  1050 ms49 ms49 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.228.205.34]
  1120 ms19 ms19 ms  208.117.251.184

 Comcast
   127 ms31 ms21 ms  68.38.220.1
   2 8 ms 9 ms11 ms
 xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
   311 ms 9 ms 9 ms
 xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
   415 ms16 ms15 ms
 pos-4-0-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.93.233]
   514 ms14 ms13 ms  be-27-pe06.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net
 [68.86.82.174]
   615 ms13 ms14 ms  144.232.6.97
   715 ms14 ms15 ms  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net
 [144.232.3.169]
   834 ms32 ms31 ms  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net
 [144.228.205.34]
   930 ms31 ms31 ms  208.117.251.184

 Our DC
   11 ms1 ms1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
   21 ms1 ms1 ms  mx1.razorinc.net [70.34.252.9]
   31 ms1 ms1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net
 [199.168.63.233]
   4 3 ms 8 ms 3 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net
 [89.149.181.174]
   5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  as2828.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.14]
   6 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net[216.156.8.189]
   7 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  209.48.42.86
   8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms  208.117.251.184



 John