Re: [Nanog-futures] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

[bmanning]

 
as the named entity, it seems that -ONLY- nanog-futures should respond to the 
request,
none of the folks on the list should respond on behalf of nanog-futures.  I am 
confident
that when nanog-futures is finished doing their nails, they will respond...

/bill


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:03:23PM +, Bill Norton wrote:
> LinkedIn
> 
> 
> 
> 
> nanog-futures,
> 
> I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
> 
> - Bill
> 
> Bill Norton
> Founder, Consultant at DrPeering
> San Francisco Bay Area
> 
> Confirm that you know Bill Norton:
> https://www.linkedin.com/e/-407ijl-h5bap8wb-54/isd/8062550036/Sw72tAl7/?hs=false&tok=0UfGMCnVIXL5k1
> 
> --
> You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe:
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/-407ijl-h5bap8wb-54/iCexT2QsUzi9bkcJMpc1ti_gnHm9KH8BiVtR/goo/nanog-futures%40nanog%2Eorg/20061/I2718363245_1/?hs=false&tok=2rPnftOrgXL5k1
> 
> (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.
> 

> ___
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures@nanog.org
> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures


___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Re: [Nanog-futures] Draft Policy re individual sites

[bmanning]

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:13:26PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> How about a filtered(proactive) -and- an unfiltered(reactive) feed?
> > works for me, though i am not sure what you mean by "reactive" beyond my
> > using the delete functions.
> > Dean.
> 
> what's a dean?
> 
> randy
> 

Usually a title.

Fm Wiki..

The title may refer to:

* Dean (religion), persons in certain positions of authority within a 
religious hierarchy.
* Dean (education), the head of a division, faculty, college, or school in 
a university.
* The head of the Faculty of Advocates in Scottish law.


The title is also given less formally to the longest-serving member of certain 
groups, as:

* Dean of the Diplomatic Corps, the most senior ambassador in a country's 
diplomatic corps.
* Dean of the House, the most senior member of a country's legislature.



--bill

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Re: [Nanog-futures] Fwd: ADMIN: Reminder on off-topic threads

[bmanning]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:10:31PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> 
> On 23 Apr 2009, at 20:55, Jo Rhett wrote:
> 
> > And it wasn't specific.  Nanog shouldn't be everything-Jo-wants-to- 
> > talk-about or everything-Randy-wants-to-talk-about or anything else.

!snork!...  "rubbing the sleep from remaining good eye..."
> 
> Very much agreed, and in that spirit...
> 
> >  It's focus should be on the ONE topic, and related topics are  
> > better covered in their own mailing lists.

AhAH!  the setup

> On futures, however, I just hit send. :-)


and permission!?!!?!  (thanks Joe)

> 
> Joe
> 


EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO MY OPINION - (the old skool NANOG motto)


--bill (settling back into sleep)

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Re: [Nanog-futures] Conference Network Experiment policy

[bmanning]

 i see two sides...  

) sactioned actions - likely controlled, may be publically
  announced -etc. - but known by the net admins and administrative
  staff - maybe even the SC etc.
) grass-roots actions - likely controlled, may be publically
  announced - etc. - but -NOT- known by the net admins, staff
  or even the PHBs

 the second catagory might be extended to everyone using handhelds w/ new
 OS's, radios, stack behaviours (mobile, ad-hoc networks anyone) that are 
 completely unexpected by the planned network/crew.  

as usual, YMMV

--bill


On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:34:23PM -0700, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> So, in the distant past we (there are several we's in this case)
> experimentally deployed IDSes and or inline sniffers with the permission
> of merit staff under the requirement that all the data collected be
> destroyed when the meeting was over. Some of these experiments resulted
> in the announcement of results, some were simply to get an understanding
> of dense wireless network deployments, deal with rogue systems, or
> evaluate the technology.
> 
> Like I said, I could see alternatives and circumstances were other
> approaches would be appropriate, But I would probably not avail myself
> of an experiment where the result to be for example a published set of
> flow data or catch-all packet traces from the meeting.
> 
> joel
> 
> Martin Hannigan wrote:
> > Its pretty easy to assign a Creative Commons license to the work and
> > share it, for example. What could the possible objections be?
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Marty
> > 
> > On 4/9/09, Joel Jaeggli  wrote:
> >>
> >> Martin Hannigan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo  >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming!  We'll pop out
> >>> an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is
> >>> reached, but just to comment on some of the questions and points
> >>> raised so far (both on-list and off):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Costs were intended to be covered under the "Have finite and
> >>>  well-defined requirements for support [...]" (WRT static/sunk
> >>>  costs of labour, etc) and "a statement regarding resources the
> >>>  proposer is committing to supply" (WRT money or specific equipment
> >>>  needed for the experiment).  The draft will be updated to make
> >>>  both more explict.
> >>> -
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It would be interesting to suggest that a copy of all raw data collected
> >>> to be provided back to the community so that they too could share in the
> >>> research or create derivatives from it (with proper attribution for all
> >>> work product of course).
> >> As a goal that's exactly the opposite of how we've done it in the past.
> >> not sure that it's necessarily a bad idea, just saying.
> >>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Martin Hannigan   mar...@theicelandguy.com
> >>> 
> >>> p: +16178216079
> >>> Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Nanog-futures mailing list
> >>> Nanog-futures@nanog.org
> >>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
> > 
> > 
> 
> ___
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures@nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Re: AUP modification - full first and last names

[bmanning]

well... i guess i should stop posting then.

--bill