[nant-dev] task bug in nested build
Hi All,
I have a large multi-solution project and the solution task does not build
properly if it is called within a nested task because the full path
to the solution file is not used. Patch attached.
Cheers,
Eddie
Index: src/NAnt.VSNet/Solution.cs
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/nant/nant/src/NAnt.VSNet/Solution.cs,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 Solution.cs
--- src/NAnt.VSNet/Solution.cs 3 Nov 2003 09:46:04 - 1.19
+++ src/NAnt.VSNet/Solution.cs 3 Nov 2003 22:03:50 -
@@ -51,13 +51,13 @@
string fileContents;
-using (StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(solutionFileName)) {
+using (StreamReader sr = new
StreamReader(_solutionTask.SolutionFile)) {
fileContents = sr.ReadToEnd();
}
Regex re = new
Regex(@"Project\(\""(?\{.*?\})\"".*?\""(?.*?)\"".*?\""(?.*?)\"".*?\""(?.*?)\""");
MatchCollection mc = re.Matches(fileContents);
-FileInfo fiSolution = new FileInfo(solutionFileName);
+FileInfo fiSolution = new FileInfo(_solutionTask.SolutionFile);
foreach (Match m in mc) {
string project = m.Groups["project"].Value;
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] FxCop task
Hi all. Now that the solution task have pre/post events and my builds at work are running smothly I was thinking I wanted to do a tag for easy usage of of the FxCop program. I could see there where activity in this direction earlier on the list and wanteded to know the current position. Is someone doing something like that? If not, can I contribute it? Maybe NAntContributions is a better place for it? /Nicke --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] FYI
Let me be the first to say welcome. >>> Thank you! I'm glad to hear it! Do you know if microsoft has any submitted or ourstanding patends on the technologies included in the MSBuild stuff? We will want to make sure we are not accepting code from people who have access to or copies of the MSBuild source if there are license restrictions or patent issues. >>> This is a tricky question but I'll do my best to answer it openly and honestly :). 1) Microsoft has submitted and has some outstanding patents on technologies included in the MSBuild engine (core platform stuff). 2) MSBuild is written 100% in managed code and will not be obfuscated by us. With this said, as of today there are no plans to release sources for MSBuild Engine stuff. Not even as shared source. We are currently debating releasing sources for our tasks and loggers, but we haven't discussed license issues yet. Let me know if you have any other questions, Alex Kipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED] Program Manager Visual Studio Core Team -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -Original Message- From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 2:28 PM To: Alex Kipman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] FYI RE: [nant-dev] FYILet me be the first to say welcome. Our archives are open and monitoring the list is great. From what I understand of MSBuild, and the difference from NAnt, it sounds like they will always have slightly different goals and features. There is also the issue of open vs. shared source which will divide and seperate our users at a philosophical level. Do you know if microsoft has any submitted or ourstanding patends on the technologies included in the MSBuild stuff? We will want to make sure we are not accepting code from people who have access to or copies of the MSBuild source if there are license restrictions or patent issues. Thank you for following up on the information about NAnt. If you, or if any other MSPress writers, need any information about NAnt we would be more than willing to help out. This list is a great way to get information about the state of NAnt, and its features. - Original Message - From: Alex Kipman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 12:11 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] FYI The book they handed out with the PDC alpha bits, "Introducing Longhorn for Developers", Brent Rector, Microsoft Press, has a fairly unflattering description of NAnt in it. >>> I have to agree with this and for that I must apologize. I saw that book and the chapter on MSBuild for the first time at PDC. The content of that chapter is inaccurate in some parts, and in particular in the final section of MSBuild vs NAnt. Upon returning to Microsoft on Monday I will be having a serious conversation with the publisher at MSPress and Brent to find out where they got their information from since no one in the MSBuild team was aware of the content of that chapter. Again my apologies for the description of MSBuild vs NAnt since that is the polar opposite of how I think we should interact. It is not about us vs NAnt and we shouldn't let it become that way. As I have told Gert Driesen before we love the NAnt community!! You guys are a thriving .NET community and are enabling people to build .NET applications TODAY. The more successful NAnt becomes, the more successful .NET becomes. It's really a win/win situation for everyone: Microsoft, the NAnt community, and our customers. I have just subscribed to both nant-dev and nant-user so that I can answer questions about MSBuild if/when you guys have them. My objective is to give you facts rather than leave things up to speculation. Please let me know if my lurking upsets you and I will respect that and unsubscribe from the mailing lists. Alex Kipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Program Manager Visual Studio Core Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Expansion of properties in target descriptions
--- Scott Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The projecthelp uses xsl templates to transform the source document (build > file) without doing any includes (or actually running any tasks; like > ). This makes it pretty useless in many cases. > > At this point I think we need to re-write the projecthelp stuff to load the > document, run (the tasks only?) global tasks, and then provide > help about the build file. I've already done this for my command line replacement gui, except for the include target descriptions. What I have observed is that the need for the xslt is removed, as you are generally interested in a list of targets, and then of those, the descriptions of just some of them. Quite often on larger builds with lots of targets, you may be interested in only those targets with descriptions, or targets that don't start with an "_", or some other way of filtering the list. In a point and click gui, this is a much easier way to explore the build file than trying to read a full formatted document. The expansion of properties is a good question. In my properties grid, I show the unexpanded value, and I *think* this is what people would want. If a property is in the description, I think the opposite may be true. From the execution point of view you may want to see all expanded values, but if the gui is hosting an editor, you may want to leave the expansion off. I think the best answer is to expose some non instance code that takes a string with property "templates", and the property collection and returns the string with the templates expanded. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] asminfo task??
This task was moved into NAnt after the 0.8.3 release. Its available in the 0.8.4 nightly builds (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds), see http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/help/tasks/asminfo.html for more information. Gert - Original Message - From: "Brandon Lonac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:38 AM Subject: [nant-dev] asminfo task?? > I was wondering why the AssemblyInfoTask.cs is in cvs but is not > included in the 0.8.3 build or src files? I have added it into my > build, but I am curious, as there have been updates made to recently. > > Thanks. > -Brandon > > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > ___ > nant-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
