Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Ian MacLean wrote:
I'll report the current mono behaviour as a compatibility bug. However
the return type of those functions should probably change.
Someone beat me to it. Its been fixed in mono cvs. See :
http://bugs.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=58804
/Ian/
no leading slash. my NAnt.exe.config is unchanged from the cvs
version. I think there could be a problem with the config file
reading code because:
the following test .build
property name=target.framework
value=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
property name=prefix value=${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')} /
echo message= mono prefix is ${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')}/
echo message= combined value is ${path::combine(prefix,
'lib/mono/1.0')}/
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)} /
echo
message=${framework::get-framework-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-sdk-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
produces the following output:
[echo] mono prefix is /home/ianm/usr/local
[echo] combined value is /home/ianm/usr/local/lib/mono/1.0
[echo] 1.0
[echo] bin
[echo] bin
[echo] mono-1.0
${pkg-config::get-variable('mono', 'prefix')} is whats used in the
config file to produce the assembly directory value. In the build
file it produces the correct output but its not right when coming
from the config file. Unless theres an issue with
framework::get-assembly-directory impl. I'll do somw debuggin
tomorrow and see what I can find.
Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
No I am running rpms from the beta 1 release. This is probably a silly
question but what is the value of your framework directory setting in
NAnt.exe.config? If there is a leading slash Path.Combine might be
taking that as a root path.
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 21, 2004
5:32 AM
To: Clayton Harbour
Cc: Gert Driesen; Giuseppe Greco; Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi Clayton,
Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same
result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed
to /usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll investigate
soem more. Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with
NAnt rebuilt
this morning. There was some oddness with the install as the
config file contained a reference to a tasks folder but the task
binaries were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught
something in mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From:Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To:Giuseppe Greco
Cc:Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my
gentoo image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box
.. shame on me ... blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market...
Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer, ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
it turns out that DirectoryInfo.ToString() returns only the name part
rather than the full path on mono. And since the framework::get-
functions are returning directoryInfo objects they get converted to
strings using ToString(). I think we might be better off returning
strings from those functions. Even on windows relying on the output of
ToString isn't so wise as it returns the path you initialized the
DirectoryInfo object with rather than the FullName.
To illustrate:
DirectoryInfo info = new DirectoryInfo(..\\..\\);
Console.WriteLine(info.ToString());
Console.WriteLine(info.FullName);
produces :
..\..\
H:\dev\test\csharp\ConsoleApplication9\
on windows.
I'll report the current mono behaviour as a compatibility bug. However
the return type of those functions should probably change.
Ian
Ian MacLean wrote:
no leading slash. my NAnt.exe.config is unchanged from the cvs
version. I think there could be a problem with the config file reading
code because:
the following test .build
property name=target.framework
value=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
property name=prefix value=${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')} /
echo message= mono prefix is ${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')}/
echo message= combined value is ${path::combine(prefix,
'lib/mono/1.0')}/
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)} /
echo
message=${framework::get-framework-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-sdk-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
produces the following output:
[echo] mono prefix is /home/ianm/usr/local
[echo] combined value is /home/ianm/usr/local/lib/mono/1.0
[echo] 1.0
[echo] bin
[echo] bin
[echo] mono-1.0
${pkg-config::get-variable('mono', 'prefix')} is whats used in the
config file to produce the assembly directory value. In the build file
it produces the correct output but its not right when coming from the
config file. Unless theres an issue with
framework::get-assembly-directory impl. I'll do somw debuggin tomorrow
and see what I can find.
Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
No I am running rpms from the beta 1 release. This is probably a silly
question but what is the value of your framework directory setting in
NAnt.exe.config? If there is a leading slash Path.Combine might be
taking that as a root path.
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 21, 2004
5:32 AM
To: Clayton Harbour
Cc: Gert Driesen; Giuseppe Greco; Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi Clayton,
Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same
result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed to
/usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll investigate soem
more. Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with
NAnt rebuilt
this morning. There was some oddness with the install as the
config file contained a reference to a tasks folder but the task
binaries were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught something
in mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From:Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To:Giuseppe Greco
Cc:Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my
gentoo image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box ..
shame on me ... blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle
10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer, ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle
RE: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
May be the problem is related to the fact that
I've installed the mono stuff under /usr/local
instead of /usr...
Usually I install unstable or under development
software in the /usr/local directory...
j3d.
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:36, Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with NAnt rebuilt this morning.
There was some oddness with the install as the config file contained a reference to
a tasks folder but the task binaries were not built in a task folder. Maybe I
caught something in mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To: Giuseppe Greco
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my gentoo
image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box .. shame on me ...
blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Giuseppe Greco
::agamura::
phone: +41 91 604 67 65
mobile: +41 76 390 60 32
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.agamura.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi Clayton,
Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same
result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed to
/usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll investigate soem more.
Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with NAnt rebuilt this morning. There was
some oddness with the install as the config file contained a reference to a tasks
folder but the task binaries were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught something in
mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To: Giuseppe Greco
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my gentoo
image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box .. shame on me ...
blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi,
No I am running rpms from the beta 1 release. This is probably a silly
question but what is the value of your framework directory setting in
NAnt.exe.config? If there is a leading slash Path.Combine might be
taking that as a root path.
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 21, 2004 5:32 AM
To: Clayton Harbour
Cc: Gert Driesen; Giuseppe Greco; Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi Clayton,
Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same
result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed to
/usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll
investigate soem more. Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with
NAnt rebuilt
this morning. There was some oddness with the install as the config
file contained a reference to a tasks folder but the task binaries
were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught something in
mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From:Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To: Giuseppe Greco
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my
gentoo image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box ..
shame on me ... blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle
10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149alloc_id66op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
no leading slash. my NAnt.exe.config is unchanged from the cvs version.
I think there could be a problem with the config file reading code because:
the following test .build
property name=target.framework
value=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
property name=prefix value=${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')} /
echo message= mono prefix is ${pkg-config::get-variable('mono',
'prefix')}/
echo message= combined value is ${path::combine(prefix,
'lib/mono/1.0')}/
echo message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-framework-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-sdk-directory(target.framework)} /
echo message=${framework::get-target-framework()} /
produces the following output:
[echo] mono prefix is /home/ianm/usr/local
[echo] combined value is /home/ianm/usr/local/lib/mono/1.0
[echo] 1.0
[echo] bin
[echo] bin
[echo] mono-1.0
${pkg-config::get-variable('mono', 'prefix')} is whats used in the config file to
produce the assembly directory value. In the build file it produces the correct output
but its not right when coming from the config file. Unless theres an issue with
framework::get-assembly-directory impl. I'll do somw debuggin tomorrow and see what I
can find.
Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
No I am running rpms from the beta 1 release. This is probably a silly
question but what is the value of your framework directory setting in
NAnt.exe.config? If there is a leading slash Path.Combine might be
taking that as a root path.
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 21, 2004 5:32 AM
To: Clayton Harbour
Cc: Gert Driesen; Giuseppe Greco; Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi Clayton,
Do you have the lastest mono built from cvs ? I'm getting the same
result as Guis. I'm also on Fedora 1. I don't have mono installed to
/usr but I think its unlikly thats the cause. I'll
investigate soem more. Ian
Clayton Harbour wrote:
Hi,
I get /usr/lib/mono/1.0 on my Fedora Core 1 install with
NAnt rebuilt
this morning. There was some oddness with the install as the config
file contained a reference to a tasks folder but the task binaries
were not built in a task folder. Maybe I caught something in
mid-checkin? Anyway, it seems to work on this install.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/20/2004 6:39 PM
To: Giuseppe Greco
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski; NAnt Developers
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my
gentoo image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box ..
shame on me ... blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle
10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
--
Ian MacLean, Developer,
ActiveState, a division of Sophos
http://www.ActiveState.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Hi all,
could you tell me why the following task always returns
1.0 instead of, for example, /usr/lib or /usr/lib/mono/1.0?
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
Thanks,
j3d.
--
Giuseppe Greco
::agamura::
phone: +41 91 604 67 65
mobile: +41 76 390 60 32
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.agamura.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function That's because mono-1.0 stores assemblies in mono/1.0 and they are referenced as files from this place. Not sure if this is actually an explanation, it should return the full path ... Gert --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
;-) sorry - Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 7:30 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function - Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function That's because mono-1.0 stores assemblies in mono/1.0 and they are referenced as files from this place. Not sure if this is actually an explanation, it should return the full path ... Gert --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 21:55, Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Giuseppe Greco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
;-) sorry
I haven't said sorry for far more worse things ;-)
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
j3d.
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
--
Giuseppe Greco
::agamura::
phone: +41 91 604 67 65
mobile: +41 76 390 60 32
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:www.agamura.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
- Original Message -
From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] get-assembly-direcotry() function
Giuseppe, can you indeed confirm that get-assembly-directory() just
returned
1.0 ?
Yes, I do (of course, on Linux).
I've inserted the following task in one of my project files:
echo
message=${framework::get-assembly-directory(target.framework)}
/
... and the result is 1.0.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue ? (I still have to reload my gentoo
image ... I installed the latest longhorn on my linux box .. shame on me ...
blush :))
Gert
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
