Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-04 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi,

One fatal problem. We miss this in contructor:

--- Tasks/SolutionTask.cs 2 Sep 2003 18:54:09 - 1.11
+++ Tasks/SolutionTask.cs 4 Sep 2003 13:39:55 -
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
_referenceProjects = new FileSet();
_excludeProjects = new FileSet();
_webMaps = new WebMapCollection();
+ _assemblyFolders = new FileSet();
}

#endregion Public Instance Constructors


Martin

- Original Message - 
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jaroslaw Kowalski"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders


> Martin,
>
> Your patches were committed to cvs.
>
> Thanks for the contribution,
>
> Gert
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
>
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I review mine patch I sent yesterday and fix problems Jarek found
(thanks
> > again)  [solution.patch]
> > There are still problem with registry read (which Matt point out) and I
> set
> > new includevsfolders attribute default to true (VS compatible, not
> > compatible with current nant, use registry read).
> >
> >
> > 2/ I find problem with project dependencies when you are not explicitly
> use
> > project dependency, but normal one and include dependent project into
> > solution.
> > E.g.
> >
> > project1   standalone
> > project2   depends on project1.dll
> >
> > and build both projects. Dependencies are not correctly found now.
Visual
> > Studio fails as well, but we could be better here :)
> >
> > [b.patch] address this issue (it uses AssemblyFolders from previous
patch,
> > because this do not happen without it)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
> > btw: if someone is better English speaker than I am, please correct mine
> > comments in code
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
> >
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see
few
> > > problems:
> > >
> > > 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have
more
> > > registry keys to consider:
> > >
> > > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> > >
> > > where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I
> think
> > > that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> > > configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply
> have
> > no
> > > paths to examine.
> > >
> > > 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
> > >
> > > +FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> > > +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> > > +
> > > +foreach(string path in
> > > _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> > > +{
> > > +fiRef = new
FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> > > +if ( fiRef.Exists )
> > > +{
> > > +_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> > > +_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> > > +return;
> > > +}
> > > +}
> > >
> > > You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
> > > "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is
not
> > > used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
> > af.DirectoryNames)"
> > >
> > > 3. I think there should be an option to inc

Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-02 Thread Gert Driesen
Martin,

Your patches were committed to cvs.

Thanks for the contribution,

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders


> Hi again,
>
> I review mine patch I sent yesterday and fix problems Jarek found (thanks
> again)  [solution.patch]
> There are still problem with registry read (which Matt point out) and I
set
> new includevsfolders attribute default to true (VS compatible, not
> compatible with current nant, use registry read).
>
>
> 2/ I find problem with project dependencies when you are not explicitly
use
> project dependency, but normal one and include dependent project into
> solution.
> E.g.
>
> project1   standalone
> project2   depends on project1.dll
>
> and build both projects. Dependencies are not correctly found now. Visual
> Studio fails as well, but we could be better here :)
>
> [b.patch] address this issue (it uses AssemblyFolders from previous patch,
> because this do not happen without it)
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> btw: if someone is better English speaker than I am, please correct mine
> comments in code
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
>
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
> > problems:
> >
> > 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
> > registry keys to consider:
> >
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> >
> > where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I
think
> > that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> > configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply
have
> no
> > paths to examine.
> >
> > 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
> >
> > +FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> > +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> > +
> > +foreach(string path in
> > _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> > +{
> > +fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> > +if ( fiRef.Exists )
> > +{
> > +_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> > +_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> > +return;
> > +}
> > +}
> >
> > You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
> > "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
> > used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
> af.DirectoryNames)"
> >
> > 3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
> > "DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:
> >
> > +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> >
> > I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified
> in
> > the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when
the
> > user asks for it"
> >
> > You would have a syntax like this.
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> > I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it
> otherwise
> > would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
> > registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build
> machines.
> >
> > Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
> > Martin. You're very close, though.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> > Subject: [nant

Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi again,

I review mine patch I sent yesterday and fix problems Jarek found (thanks
again)  [solution.patch]
There are still problem with registry read (which Matt point out) and I set
new includevsfolders attribute default to true (VS compatible, not
compatible with current nant, use registry read).


2/ I find problem with project dependencies when you are not explicitly use
project dependency, but normal one and include dependent project into
solution.
E.g.

project1   standalone
project2   depends on project1.dll

and build both projects. Dependencies are not correctly found now. Visual
Studio fails as well, but we could be better here :)

[b.patch] address this issue (it uses AssemblyFolders from previous patch,
because this do not happen without it)

Regards,
Martin

btw: if someone is better English speaker than I am, please correct mine
comments in code


- Original Message -
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders


> Hi all!
>
> That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
> problems:
>
> 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
> registry keys to consider:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
>
> where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I think
> that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply have
no
> paths to examine.
>
> 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
>
> +FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> +
> +foreach(string path in
> _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> +{
> +fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> +if ( fiRef.Exists )
> +{
> +_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> +_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> +return;
> +}
> +}
>
> You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
> "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
> used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
af.DirectoryNames)"
>
> 3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
> "DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:
>
> +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
>
> I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified
in
> the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when the
> user asks for it"
>
> You would have a syntax like this.
>
> 
> 
>
> I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it
otherwise
> would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
> registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build
machines.
>
> Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
> Martin. You're very close, though.
>
> Jarek
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> Subject: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
>
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I implement that  subtag for  as we discused
it
> > here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm
> also
> > totally confused by security checks. Have you any experience with
enabling
> > read from registry? [it is ok for me without it, but...]
> >
> > There will be some other matters regarding project dependencies and
paths
> > but I need to explore it first.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
>
>
>


solution.patch
Description: Binary data


b.patch
Description: Binary data


[attn: Ian, Gert] Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-02 Thread Matthew Mastracci
It might be necessary to move the registry-reading functionality to a
separate Win32-only task DLL.  

I'm not sure what the NAnt policy w.r.t. registry-reading tasks has been
lately, but it seems that we are keeping Win32-dependent tasks separate
from platform-independent ones. 

Ian or Gert - can you provide some input?

Thanks,
Matt.

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 03:16, Martin Aliger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 1/ true and agree. I write it pretty quickly. Could you (or someone else)
> write that configuration stuff?
> 
> 2/ yes. thanks to point it out!
> 
> 3/ I want to simulate same behavior as Visual Studio. Dependancy on registry
> read could be problem but if you use  task it is very propable
> that you use machine with Visual Studio. Of course - it _should_ be ok to
> run it on mono as well (skiping registry read?). Your idea with
> includevsfolders atribute is good, but I still think that default value
> should be true.
> 
> Thanks you, Jarek, for review. I'll revise my code today and address all
> your comments.
> 
> Martin
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
> 
> 
> > Hi all!
> >
> > That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
> > problems:
> >
> > 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
> > registry keys to consider:
> >
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> >
> > where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I think
> > that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> > configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply have
> no
> > paths to examine.
> >
> > 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
> >
> > +FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> > +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> > +
> > +foreach(string path in
> > _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> > +{
> > +fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> > +if ( fiRef.Exists )
> > +{
> > +_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> > +_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> > +return;
> > +}
> > +}
> >
> > You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
> > "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
> > used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
> af.DirectoryNames)"
> >
> > 3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
> > "DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:
> >
> > +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> > af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> >
> > I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified
> in
> > the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when the
> > user asks for it"
> >
> > You would have a syntax like this.
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> > I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it
> otherwise
> > would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
> > registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build
> machines.
> >
> > Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
> > Martin. You're very close, though.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> > Subject: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
> >
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I implement that  subtag for  as we discused
> it
> > > here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm
> > also
> > > to

Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-02 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi,

1/ true and agree. I write it pretty quickly. Could you (or someone else)
write that configuration stuff?

2/ yes. thanks to point it out!

3/ I want to simulate same behavior as Visual Studio. Dependancy on registry
read could be problem but if you use  task it is very propable
that you use machine with Visual Studio. Of course - it _should_ be ok to
run it on mono as well (skiping registry read?). Your idea with
includevsfolders atribute is good, but I still think that default value
should be true.

Thanks you, Jarek, for review. I'll revise my code today and address all
your comments.

Martin

- Original Message -
From: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "! nant"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders


> Hi all!
>
> That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
> problems:
>
> 1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
> registry keys to consider:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
>
> where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I think
> that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
> configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply have
no
> paths to examine.
>
> 2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:
>
> +FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
> +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
> +
> +foreach(string path in
> _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
> +{
> +fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
> +if ( fiRef.Exists )
> +{
> +_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
> +_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
> +return;
> +}
> +}
>
> You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
> "_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
> used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in
af.DirectoryNames)"
>
> 3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
> "DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:
>
> +if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
> af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
>
> I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified
in
> the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when the
> user asks for it"
>
> You would have a syntax like this.
>
> 
> 
>
> I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it
otherwise
> would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
> registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build
machines.
>
> Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
> Martin. You're very close, though.
>
> Jarek
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> Subject: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders
>
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I implement that  subtag for  as we discused
it
> > here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm
> also
> > totally confused by security checks. Have you any experience with
enabling
> > read from registry? [it is ok for me without it, but...]
> >
> > There will be some other matters regarding project dependencies and
paths
> > but I need to explore it first.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
>
>
>




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


Re: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-01 Thread Jaroslaw Kowalski
Hi all!

That's a very good idea, however just by looking at your patch I see few
problems:

1. When you have both VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 you actually have more
registry keys to consider:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.0\AssemblyFolders
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\7.1\AssemblyFolders

where as a rule CURRENT_USER settings override the local machine. I think
that the registry paths should be stored a part of the framework
configuration in NAnt.exe.config. For mono on linux you would simply have no
paths to examine.

2. Looks like there's a mistake in your code:

+FileSet af = _solutionTask.AssemblyFolders;
+if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;
+
+foreach(string path in
_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames)
+{
+fiRef = new FileInfo(Path.Combine(path,justFilename));
+if ( fiRef.Exists )
+{
+_referenceFile = fiRef.FullName;
+_baseDirectory = fiRef.DirectoryName;
+return;
+}
+}

You initialize local variable "af"  to some fileset but iterate over
"_solutionTask.AssemblyFolders.DirectoryNames" so obviously "af" is not
used. I think it was meant to be "foreach(string path in af.DirectoryNames)"

3. I think there should be an option to include/exclude
"DefaultAssemblyFolders" from processing. In your patch there's a line:

+if(af.DirectoryNames.Count==0)
af=_solutionTask.DefaultAssemlyFolders;

I think that the semantics should be: "process all directories specified in
the fileset PLUS any directories found via DefaultAssemblyFolders when the
user asks for it"

You would have a syntax like this.




I think that this new option should default to "false". Having it otherwise
would be dangerous as it would by default introduce a dependency of the
registry and might produce inconsistent results on different build machines.

Overall: the direction is good, but your patch still needs some work,
Martin. You're very close, though.

Jarek

- Original Message - 
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders


> Hi all!
>
> I implement that  subtag for  as we discused it
> here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm
also
> totally confused by security checks. Have you any experience with enabling
> read from registry? [it is ok for me without it, but...]
>
> There will be some other matters regarding project dependencies and paths
> but I need to explore it first.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


[nant-dev] solution task & assemblyfolders

2003-09-01 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi all!

I implement that  subtag for  as we discused it
here. I hope my coding convention is ok (try to be close to yours). I'm also
totally confused by security checks. Have you any experience with enabling
read from registry? [it is ok for me without it, but...]

There will be some other matters regarding project dependencies and paths
but I need to explore it first.

Regards,
Martin


a.patch
Description: Binary data