Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Martin Aliger]

Maybe I will. But someone with better English have to review it ;-(

Martin

> > Very nice! And that superior documentation Ant have. Wish we have
> > simmilar...
> 
> Feel free to submit patches :-)
> 
> Gert




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


> > in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
> > dramatically.
> >
> > <http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-programming.html>
> > for the short version of something we need to explain in more detail
> > before the beta can become 1.6final.
>
> Very nice! And that superior documentation Ant have. Wish we have
> simmilar...

Feel free to submit patches :-)

Gert



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Stefan Bodewig]

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Martin Aliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> And that superior documentation Ant have.

Go, tell our (Ant's) users ;-)

Stefan


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Martin Aliger]

> in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
> dramatically.
>
> 
> for the short version of something we need to explain in more detail
> before the beta can become 1.6final.

Very nice! And that superior documentation Ant have. Wish we have
simmilar...

Martin




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

Exactly.  is for when you want to explicitly load tasks etc 
from an assembly but maybe only for a specific project - ie you don't 
want to add those tasks at the machine level.

Ian
Mitch Denny wrote:
So would we preload some like it does now when an assembly with tasks is
dropped into the same directory as NAnt.exe? That would be useful too.
For each "buildable unit" I tend to take a snapshot of NAnt and any
custom tasks and drop it into a tools directory. That way I'm not tied
to the version of NAnt (and its associated configuration) that is on the
machine. It helps quite a bit when you are reusing build servers for
multiple projects.

- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-  

 

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:19 PM
To: Stefan Bodewig
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

Interesting.  I think we can easily do the equivalent for 
NAnt by means of a  task  similar to the 
 we have already. We already discover referencable 
datatypes so adding attribute based detection of filters and 
or anything else shouldn't be a big change.
Ian

Stefan Bodewig wrote:

   

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



 

For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported, 
ofcourse.
  

   

in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed 
dramatically.

<http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-progra
 

mming.html
   

for the short version of something we need to explain in 
   

more detail 
   

before the beta can become 1.6final.

Stefan

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
   





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

So would we preload some like it does now when an assembly with tasks is
dropped into the same directory as NAnt.exe? That would be useful too.
For each "buildable unit" I tend to take a snapshot of NAnt and any
custom tasks and drop it into a tools directory. That way I'm not tied
to the version of NAnt (and its associated configuration) that is on the
machine. It helps quite a bit when you are reusing build servers for
multiple projects.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-  

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: Stefan Bodewig
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> Interesting.  I think we can easily do the equivalent for 
> NAnt by means of a  task  similar to the 
>  we have already. We already discover referencable 
> datatypes so adding attribute based detection of filters and 
> or anything else shouldn't be a big change.
> Ian
> 
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported, 
> >>ofcourse.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed 
> >dramatically.
> >
> ><http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-progra
> mming.html
> >> for the short version of something we need to explain in 
> more detail 
> >before the beta can become 1.6final.
> >
> >Stefan
> >
> >
> >---
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >___
> >nant-developers mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

Interesting.  I think we can easily do the equivalent for NAnt by means 
of a  task  similar to the  we have already. We 
already discover referencable datatypes so adding attribute based 
detection of filters and or anything else shouldn't be a big change.
Ian

Stefan Bodewig wrote:

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 

For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
ofcourse.
   

in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
dramatically.

for the short version of something we need to explain in more detail
before the beta can become 1.6final.
Stefan

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

great to see that one of the driving forces behind Ant is also interested in
NAnt :)

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
> > ofcourse.
>
> in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
> dramatically.
>
> <http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-programming.html>
> for the short version of something we need to explain in more detail
> before the beta can become 1.6final.
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Stefan Bodewig]

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
> ofcourse.

in Ant 1.5, that is.  With Ant 1.6beta things have changed
dramatically.


for the short version of something we need to explain in more detail
before the beta can become 1.6final.

Stefan


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

Mitch,

The filterset implementation currently does not allow for other types of
filters to be set, that's what the filterchain support was intended for.

I'm not sure on how to proceed with this, we could rework the filterset
implementation (which, right now, is more or less a port of the Ant
filterset) to allow custom filtersets but this would actually mean that the
filterset implementation is moving toward a filterchain implementation
(which is not bad ofcourse) 

It would change the build layout of the filtersets considerately ofcourse
... It would also mean that we would not be able to use the Element
initialization code that we use for all other types, as this would mean that
we'd need have a separate property for each possible type of filterreader in
the filterchain, and this would prevent further extensibility by third
parties ...

Ant support two notations for built-in filterreaders :

  

  

  

and

  

  

  

For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported,
ofcourse.

If we decide to go for the filterchain implementation instead of the
fitlerset, I might some need help as I don't think I'll be having much time
(at least not enough, I think) in the next week or weeks ...

I certainly would like to avoid having to support both filtersets and
filterchains, like Ant is forced to do because of backward compatibility, so
we should decide on this as soon as possible ...

I'd definitely prefer going for the filterchain support, even if that means
that I've wasted my effort on the filterset implementation, but as I said, I
could use a hand ...

Gert


- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


Cool, so should I bother with the replace task? One of the tasks modes
is NAnt and Regex (as well as simple text substitution). The begin and
end token attributes wouldn't make sense in that case and it would
(possibly) be better to do something like:











This means search on all ${...} tokens and replace them with the
matching property except the nant.project.basedir property.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:22 PM
> To: Ian MacLean
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
> I've just checked in filterset support for both the 
> and  tasks. I still have to add some examples to the
> tasks though. ..
>
> You can now use the following build fragments :
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> I haven't really tested it thoroughly, but it should work :-)
>
> Let me know if you encounter any issues ...
>
> Gert
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 10:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
>
> > Awesome. Good work Gert. This will be nice.
> >
> > Ian
> > Gert Driesen wrote:
> >
> > >I don't think we should rush a task in ...
> > >
> > >However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for
> filterchains is
> > >added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt core, we should
> at least support
> > >both filtersets and filesets ...
> > >
> > >I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> > >(NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> > >NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are
> available in cvs now ...
> > >so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace
> task ... I'll
> > >look into adding support for filtersets to the copy and
> move tasks later
> > >(probable tomorrow or so)
> > >
> > >Gert
> > >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: &

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Cool, so should I bother with the replace task? One of the tasks modes
is NAnt and Regex (as well as simple text substitution). The begin and
end token attributes wouldn't make sense in that case and it would
(possibly) be better to do something like:









 

This means search on all ${...} tokens and replace them with the
matching property except the nant.project.basedir property.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:22 PM
> To: Ian MacLean
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> I've just checked in filterset support for both the  
> and  tasks. I still have to add some examples to the 
> tasks though. ..
>  
> You can now use the following build fragments :
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I haven't really tested it thoroughly, but it should work :-)
>  
> Let me know if you encounter any issues ...
>  
> Gert
>  
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >; 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 10:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> > Awesome. Good work Gert. This will be nice.
> > 
> > Ian
> > Gert Driesen wrote:
> > 
> > >I don't think we should rush a task in ...
> > >
> > >However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for 
> filterchains is
> > >added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt core, we should 
> at least support
> > >both filtersets and filesets ...
> > >
> > >I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> > >(NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> > >NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are 
> available in cvs now ...
> > >so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace 
> task ... I'll
> > >look into adding support for filtersets to the copy and 
> move tasks later
> > >(probable tomorrow or so)
> > >
> > >Gert
> > >
> > >- Original Message - 
> > >From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >;
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
> > >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >>+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our 
> linux build. We
> > >>need to create a nant shell script that contains the full 
> path to the
> > >>just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. 
> So it would be
> > >>a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
> > >>
> > >>Ian
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>The  task could possibly be modified to do it. 
> But replace
> > >>>would possibly be more intuitive for new users than 
> using a filter
> > >>>chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - 
> it might also be
> > >>>cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> > >>>
> > >>>I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now 
> since it would be
> > >>>useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining 
> support is
> > >>>added.
> > >>>
> > >>>What do you all think?
> > >>>
>

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Kræn Munck]

Wouldn't an "echo to file" task be more appropriate for that job? It's a
small file with known content, so nothing should go wrong - but
something in my spine twitches when I think of global replace.

Kræn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
MacLean
Sent: 6. oktober 2003 04:26
To: Mitch Denny
Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. We
need to create a nant shell script that contains the full path to the 
just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. So it would be

a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.

Ian

>The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace 
>would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter 
>chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also 
>be cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
>
>I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would 
>be useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is 
>added.
>
>What do you all think?
>
>
>- Mitch Denny
>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>- http://www.monash.net
>- +61 (414) 610141
>-
>
>  
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
>>To: Gert Driesen
>>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>>
>>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
>>the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish 
>>an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task 
>>called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than 
>>filterchains.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
>>
>>Gert Driesen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could
>>>ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't 
>>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
>>>
>>>Gert
>>>
>>>- Original Message -
>>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -
>>>>
>>>>
>>ie without
>>
>>
>>>>copying/moving the file
>>>>
>>>>Ian
>>>>Gert Driesen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>something like that yes :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>support
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>>would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
>>>>>
>>>>>Gert
>>>>>
>>>>>- Original Message -
>>>>>From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean" 
>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
>>>>>Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So in implementation it would work like this:
>>>>>
>>>>>[FilterChain("filterchain")]
>>>>>public FilterChain FilterChain {
>>>>>...
>>>>>}
>>>>>
>>>>>Then in the execute task:
>>>>>
>>>>>StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...); StreamWriter writer =
>>>>>new StreamWriter(...); this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
>>>>>
>>>>>Or something like that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>- Mitch Denny
>>>>>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>- http://www.monash.net
>>>>>- +61 (414) 610141
>>>>>-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___
nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

I've just checked in filterset support for both the 
 and  tasks. I still have to add some examples to the 
tasks though. ..
 
You can now use the following build fragments 
:
 
encoding="utf-8">            
     
        
                
    
            
    
                
    

encoding="utf-8">            
     
        
                
    
            
    
                
    

I haven't really tested it thoroughly, but it 
should work :-)
 
Let me know if you encounter any issues 
...
 
Gert
 
- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 10:18 
AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next 
release]
> Awesome. Good work Gert. This will be nice.> > 
Ian> Gert Driesen wrote:> > >I don't think we should 
rush a task in ...> >> >However, I agree that we shouldn't 
wait until support for filterchains is> >added.  But if we add 
such a task to NAnt core, we should at least support> >both filtersets 
and filesets ...> >> >I already "ported" the base classes 
for filtersets from Ant> >(NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) 
and> >NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available in 
cvs now ...> >so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your 
replace task ... I'll> >look into adding support for filtersets to the 
copy and move tasks later> >(probable tomorrow or so)> 
>> >Gert> >> >----- Original Message - 
> >From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
>To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;> 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 
AM> >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next 
release]> >> >> >  > >> 
>>+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. 
We> >>need to create a nant shell script that contains the full 
path to the> >>just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we 
build it. So it would be> >>a prime candidate for a use of the 
replace task.> >>> >>Ian> >>> 
>>    > >>> >>>The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace> 
>>>would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a 
filter> >>>chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway 
- it might also be> >>>cool to have a generic  
task too. Next release :)> >>>> >>>I'm thinking 
that we could put the replace task in now since it would be> 
>>>useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support 
is> >>>added.> >>>> >>>What do 
you all think?> >>>> 
>>>> >>>- Mitch 
Denny> >>>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>- http://www.monash.net> >>>- +61 (414) 610141> >>>-> 
>>>> >>>> >>>> 
>>>  > >>>> 
>>>>-Original Message-> >>>>From: Ian 
MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Sent: Monday, 
October 06, 2003 2:03 AM> >>>>To: Gert Driesen> 
>>>>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next 
release]> >>>>> >>>>I just noticed that 
Ant still has both the replaceTask and> >>>>the filtersets in 
copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish> >>>>an in-place 
replace with filtersets but I can see a task> >>>>called 
replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than> 
>>>>filterchains.> >>>>> 
>>>>Ian> >>>>> 
>>>>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html> 
>>>>> >>>>Gert Driesen wrote:> 
>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 
>>>>    > 
>>>>> >>>>>to be honest, I'm not sure about 
that one ... If necessary we could> >>>>>ofcourse create a 
task for that, but I was just saying we don't> 
>>>>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought 
yet ...> >>>>>> >>>>>Gert> 
>>>>>> >>>>>- Original Message 
-> >>>>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL 

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

really ? even if the replace token is somthing like  <%nantpath%> ? - ( 
using asp's format )

echo to file might be useful though
Ian
Kræn Munck wrote:

Wouldn't an "echo to file" task be more appropriate for that job? It's a
small file with known content, so nothing should go wrong - but
something in my spine twitches when I think of global replace.
Kræn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian
MacLean
Sent: 6. oktober 2003 04:26
To: Mitch Denny
Cc: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. We
need to create a nant shell script that contains the full path to the 
just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. So it would be

a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.

Ian

 

The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace 
would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter 
chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also 
be cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)

I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would 
be useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is 
added.

What do you all think?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-


   

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish 
an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task 
called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than 
filterchains.

Ian

http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html

Gert Driesen wrote:

  

 

to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could
ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't 
necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]




   

What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -
  

 

ie without
  

 

copying/moving the file

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
 

  

 

something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
   



   

support



   

would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}
Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...); StreamWriter writer =
new StreamWriter(...); this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
   



   

  

 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___
nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Atleast :( Are the nightly tarballs of the repository happening or are
they lagging too?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:33 PM
> To: Mitch Denny; Ian MacLean
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> No we're working on the main branch, but I noticed that, at 
> times, anoncvs is more than 5 days behind ...
> 
> Gert
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:12 PM
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> Actually, are you guys working off some branch, because I 
> can't see the XmlPeek or XmlPoke tasks in there either. Is it 
> BRANCH-083?
> 
> 
> - Mitch Denny
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - http://www.monash.net
> - +61 (414) 610141
> -
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:22 PM
> > To: Ian MacLean; Mitch Denny
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> > I don't think we should rush a task in ...
> >
> > However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for 
> filterchains 
> > is added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt core, we 
> should at least 
> > support both filtersets and filesets ...
> >
> > I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> > (NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> > NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available 
> in cvs now 
> > ...
> > so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace task ... 
> > I'll look into adding support for filtersets to the copy and move 
> > tasks later (probable tomorrow or so)
> >
> > Gert
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> > > +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our
> > linux build. We
> > > need to create a nant shell script that contains the full
> > path to the
> > > just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it.
> > So it would be
> > > a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > >The  task could possibly be modified to do it. 
> But replace 
> > > >would possibly be more intuitive for new users than 
> using a filter 
> > > >chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it
> > might also be
> > > >cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> > > >
> > > >I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now
> > since it would be
> > > >useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining 
> support is 
> > > >added.
> > > >
> > > >What do you all think?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >- Mitch Denny
> > > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >- http://www.monash.net
> > > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > > >-
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>-Original Message-
> > > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> > > >>To: Gert Driesen
> > > >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > > >>
> > > >>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and the 
> > > >>filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish an 
> > > >>in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task called 
> > > >>replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than 
> filterchains.
> > > >>
> > > >>I

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

No we're working on the main branch, but I noticed that, at times, anoncvs
is more than 5 days behind ...

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


Actually, are you guys working off some branch, because I can't see the
XmlPeek or XmlPoke tasks in there either. Is it BRANCH-083?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:22 PM
> To: Ian MacLean; Mitch Denny
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
>
> I don't think we should rush a task in ...
>
> However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for
> filterchains is added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt
> core, we should at least support both filtersets and filesets ...
>
> I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> (NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available
> in cvs now ...
> so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace
> task ... I'll look into adding support for filtersets to the
> copy and move tasks later (probable tomorrow or so)
>
> Gert
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
>
> > +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our
> linux build. We
> > need to create a nant shell script that contains the full
> path to the
> > just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it.
> So it would be
> > a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > >The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
> > >would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
> > >chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it
> might also be
> > >cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> > >
> > >I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now
> since it would be
> > >useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
> > >added.
> > >
> > >What do you all think?
> > >
> > >
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> > >>To: Gert Driesen
> > >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
> > >>the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish
> > >>an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task
> > >>called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than
> > >>filterchains.
> > >>
> > >>Ian
> > >>
> > >>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
> > >>
> > >>Gert Driesen wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If
> necessary we could
> > >>>ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't
> > >>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
> > >>>
> > >>>Gert
> > >>>
> > >>>- Original Message -
> > >>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> > >>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to ta

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Actually, are you guys working off some branch, because I can't see the
XmlPeek or XmlPoke tasks in there either. Is it BRANCH-083?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:22 PM
> To: Ian MacLean; Mitch Denny
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> I don't think we should rush a task in ...
> 
> However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for 
> filterchains is added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt 
> core, we should at least support both filtersets and filesets ...
> 
> I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> (NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available 
> in cvs now ...
> so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace 
> task ... I'll look into adding support for filtersets to the 
> copy and move tasks later (probable tomorrow or so)
> 
> Gert
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> > +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our 
> linux build. We
> > need to create a nant shell script that contains the full 
> path to the
> > just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. 
> So it would be
> > a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > >The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
> > >would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
> > >chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it 
> might also be
> > >cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> > >
> > >I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now 
> since it would be
> > >useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
> > >added.
> > >
> > >What do you all think?
> > >
> > >----------------------------
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> > >>To: Gert Driesen
> > >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
> > >>the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish
> > >>an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task
> > >>called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than
> > >>filterchains.
> > >>
> > >>Ian
> > >>
> > >>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
> > >>
> > >>Gert Driesen wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If 
> necessary we could
> > >>>ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't
> > >>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
> > >>>
> > >>>Gert
> > >>>
> > >>>- Original Message -
> > >>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> > >>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>ie without
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>copying/moving the file
> > &

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Awesome! I'll do a fetch on the CVS repository tomorrow. Does anyone
know if SourceForge has cut over to the live copy of the CVS repository
for anonymous access yet?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:22 PM
> To: Ian MacLean; Mitch Denny
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> I don't think we should rush a task in ...
> 
> However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for 
> filterchains is added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt 
> core, we should at least support both filtersets and filesets ...
> 
> I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
> (NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
> NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available 
> in cvs now ...
> so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace 
> task ... I'll look into adding support for filtersets to the 
> copy and move tasks later (probable tomorrow or so)
> 
> Gert
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> > +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our 
> linux build. We
> > need to create a nant shell script that contains the full 
> path to the
> > just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. 
> So it would be
> > a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > >The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
> > >would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
> > >chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it 
> might also be
> > >cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> > >
> > >I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now 
> since it would be
> > >useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
> > >added.
> > >
> > >What do you all think?
> > >
> > >----------------------------
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> > >>To: Gert Driesen
> > >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
> > >>the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish
> > >>an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task
> > >>called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than
> > >>filterchains.
> > >>
> > >>Ian
> > >>
> > >>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
> > >>
> > >>Gert Driesen wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If 
> necessary we could
> > >>>ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't
> > >>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
> > >>>
> > >>>Gert
> > >>>
> > >>>- Original Message -
> > >>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> > >>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>ie without
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>copying/moving 

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

Awesome. Good work Gert. This will be nice.

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
I don't think we should rush a task in ...

However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for filterchains is
added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt core, we should at least support
both filtersets and filesets ...
I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
(NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available in cvs now ...
so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace task ... I'll
look into adding support for filtersets to the copy and move tasks later
(probable tomorrow or so)
Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

 

+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. We
need to create a nant shell script that contains the full path to the
just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. So it would be
a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
Ian

   

The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also be
cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would be
useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
added.
What do you all think?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-


 

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish
an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task
called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than
filterchains.
Ian

http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html

Gert Driesen wrote:



   

to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could
ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't
necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]




 

What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -

   

ie without

   

copying/moving the file

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:




   

something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain



 

support



 

would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}
Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...); StreamWriter writer =
new StreamWriter(...); this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-




 



   



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
   



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

I don't think we should rush a task in ...

However, I agree that we shouldn't wait until support for filterchains is
added.  But if we add such a task to NAnt core, we should at least support
both filtersets and filesets ...

I already "ported" the base classes for filtersets from Ant
(NAnt.Core.Types.FilterSet(Collection) and
NAnt.Core.Types.Filter(Collection)) ... these are available in cvs now ...
so it shouldn't really be hard to add this to your replace task ... I'll
look into adding support for filtersets to the copy and move tasks later
(probable tomorrow or so)

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


> +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. We
> need to create a nant shell script that contains the full path to the
> just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. So it would be
> a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.
>
> Ian
>
> >The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
> >would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
> >chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also be
> >cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
> >
> >I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would be
> >useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
> >added.
> >
> >What do you all think?
> >
> >
> >- Mitch Denny
> >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >- http://www.monash.net
> >- +61 (414) 610141
> >-
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> >>To: Gert Driesen
> >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>
> >>I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and
> >>the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish
> >>an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task
> >>called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than
> >>filterchains.
> >>
> >>Ian
> >>
> >>http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
> >>
> >>Gert Driesen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could
> >>>ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't
> >>>necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
> >>>
> >>>Gert
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> >>>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? -
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>ie without
> >>
> >>
> >>>>copying/moving the file
> >>>>
> >>>>Ian
> >>>>Gert Driesen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>something like that yes :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>support
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Gert
> >>>>>
> >>>>>- Original Message -
> >>>>>From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
> >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

+1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our linux build. We 
need to create a nant shell script that contains the full path to the 
just built NAnt.exe which we won't know till we build it. So it would be 
a prime candidate for a use of the replace task.

Ian

The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also be
cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)
I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would be
useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
added.
What do you all think?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
 

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and 
the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish 
an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task 
called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than 
filterchains.

Ian

http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html

Gert Driesen wrote:

   

to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could 
ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't 
necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]



 

What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? - 
   

ie without 
   

copying/moving the file

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
  

   

something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain


 

support

 

would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)

Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}
Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...); StreamWriter writer = 
new StreamWriter(...); this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);

Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-


 



   





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

The  task could possibly be modified to do it. But replace
would possibly be more intuitive for new users than using a filter
chain. It could probably support filter chains anyway - it might also be
cool to have a generic  task too. Next release :)

I'm thinking that we could put the replace task in now since it would be
useful, and then modify its implementation when chaining support is
added.

What do you all think?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:03 AM
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and 
> the filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish 
> an in-place replace with filtersets but I can see a task 
> called replace being easier for new uesrs to deal with than 
> filterchains.
> 
> Ian
> 
> http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html
> 
> Gert Driesen wrote:
> 
> >to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could 
> >ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't 
> >necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
> >
> >Gert
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
> >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? - 
> ie without 
> >>copying/moving the file
> >>
> >>Ian
> >>Gert Driesen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>something like that yes :-)
> >>>
> >>>but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
> >>>  
> >>>
> >support
> >  
> >
> >>>would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
> >>>
> >>>Gert
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>>From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
> >>>Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>So in implementation it would work like this:
> >>>
> >>>[FilterChain("filterchain")]
> >>>public FilterChain FilterChain {
> >>>...
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>>Then in the execute task:
> >>>
> >>>StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...); StreamWriter writer = 
> >>>new StreamWriter(...); this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
> >>>
> >>>Or something like that.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>- Mitch Denny
> >>>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>- http://www.monash.net
> >>>- +61 (414) 610141
> >>>-
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> 
> 
> 
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

I just noticed that Ant still has both the replaceTask and the 
filtersets in copy/zip etc. I'm sure you could accomplish an in-place 
replace with filtersets but I can see a task called replace being easier 
for new uesrs to deal with than filterchains.

Ian

http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/replace.html

Gert Driesen wrote:

to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could ofcourse
create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't necessary need one
... didn't really give it much thought yet ...
Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

 

What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? - ie without
copying/moving the file
Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
   

something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
 

support
 

would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}
Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...);
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(...);
this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could ofcourse
create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't necessary need one
... didn't really give it much thought yet ...

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


> What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? - ie without
> copying/moving the file
>
> Ian
> Gert Driesen wrote:
>
> >something like that yes :-)
> >
> >but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain
support
> >would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
> >
> >Gert
> >
> >- Original Message - 
> >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
> >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> >So in implementation it would work like this:
> >
> >[FilterChain("filterchain")]
> >public FilterChain FilterChain {
> >...
> >}
> >
> >Then in the execute task:
> >
> >StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...);
> >StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(...);
> >this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
> >
> >Or something like that.
> >
> >------------------------
> >- Mitch Denny
> >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >- http://www.monash.net
> >- +61 (414) 610141
> >-
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:38 PM
> >>To: Ian MacLean
> >>Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>
> >>I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like
> >>Ant has with its support for FilterChains ...
> >>
> >>Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt
> >>to-do list in cvs with this information), but he's very busy
> >>so I'm not sure when this will be available ...
> >>
> >>Gert
> >>
> >>- Original Message -
> >>From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
> >>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file
> >>>
> >>>
> >>( or fileset
> >>
> >>
> >>>of text files )
> >>>
> >>>Ian
> >>>Gert Driesen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Mitch,
> >>>>
> >>>>Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>supposed
> >>
> >>
> >>>>to do ?
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>Gert
> >>>>
> >>>>- Original Message - 
> >>>>From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> >>>>Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>like to see 1.1
> >>
> >>
> >>>>as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
> >>>>ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>- Mitch Denny
> >>>>- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>- http://www.monash.net
> >>>>- +61 (414) 610141
> >>>>-
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>&g

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

What if you want to replace strings in a file in place ? - ie without 
copying/moving the file

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain support
would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)
Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}
Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...);
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(...);
this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);
Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
 

-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:38 PM
To: Ian MacLean
Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like
Ant has with its support for FilterChains ...
Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt
to-do list in cvs with this information), but he's very busy
so I'm not sure when this will be available ...
Gert

- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
   

Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file
 

( or fileset
   

of text files )

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
 

Mitch,

Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
   

supposed
   

to do ?

Thanks,

Gert

- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also
   

like to see 1.1
   

as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?

- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-


   

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]




 

---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
   



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 

   



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

something like that yes :-)

but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain support
would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...)

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
}

Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...);
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(...);
this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);

Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:38 PM
> To: Ian MacLean
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
> I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like
> Ant has with its support for FilterChains ...
>
> Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt
> to-do list in cvs with this information), but he's very busy
> so I'm not sure when this will be available ...
>
> Gert
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
>
> > Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file
> ( or fileset
> > of text files )
> >
> > Ian
> > Gert Driesen wrote:
> >
> > >Mitch,
> > >
> > >Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
> supposed
> > >to do ?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Gert
> > >
> > >- Original Message - 
> > >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> > >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >
> > >
> > >It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also
> like to see 1.1
> > >as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
> > >ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> > >
> > >
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > ___
> > nant-developers mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
>
>


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

So in implementation it would work like this:

[FilterChain("filterchain")]
public FilterChain FilterChain {
...
} 

Then in the execute task:

StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(...);
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(...);
this.FilterChain.Filter(reader, writer);

Or something like that.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:38 PM
> To: Ian MacLean
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like 
> Ant has with its support for FilterChains ...
> 
> Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt 
> to-do list in cvs with this information), but he's very busy 
> so I'm not sure when this will be available ...
> 
> Gert
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> > Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file 
> ( or fileset
> > of text files )
> >
> > Ian
> > Gert Driesen wrote:
> >
> > >Mitch,
> > >
> > >Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
> supposed
> > >to do ?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Gert
> > >
> > >- Original Message - 
> > >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> > >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >
> > >
> > >It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also 
> like to see 1.1
> > >as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
> > >ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> > >
> > >
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > ___
> > nant-developers mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
> 
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Hrm, yeah I can see how that would be a better solution.


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
- 

> -Original Message-
> From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:38 PM
> To: Ian MacLean
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like 
> Ant has with its support for FilterChains ...
> 
> Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt 
> to-do list in cvs with this information), but he's very busy 
> so I'm not sure when this will be available ...
> 
> Gert
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> > Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file 
> ( or fileset
> > of text files )
> >
> > Ian
> > Gert Driesen wrote:
> >
> > >Mitch,
> > >
> > >Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
> supposed
> > >to do ?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Gert
> > >
> > >- Original Message - 
> > >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> > >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >
> > >
> > >It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also 
> like to see 1.1
> > >as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
> > >ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> > >
> > >
> > >- Mitch Denny
> > >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >- http://www.monash.net
> > >- +61 (414) 610141
> > >-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-Original Message-
> > >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > >___
> > >nant-developers mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > ___
> > nant-developers mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
> 
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

Hi Ian/Gert,

The current drop of the code I have doesn't work with a fileset,
although I guess it could easily be modified to do so. How long do I
have until the 0.8.4 feature freeze starts?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 7:07 PM
> To: Gert Driesen
> Cc: Mitch Denny; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file ( 
> or fileset of text files )
> 
> Ian
> Gert Driesen wrote:
> 
> >Mitch,
> >
> >Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is 
> >supposed to do ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Gert
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> >It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like 
> to see 1.1 
> >as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the 
> >ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> >
> >
> >- Mitch Denny
> >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >- http://www.monash.net
> >- +61 (414) 610141
> >-
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >---
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >___
> >nant-developers mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >___
> >nant-developers mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

I think we should have a more generic solution for this, like Ant has with
its support for FilterChains ...

Scott has put this on his to-do list (and I updated the NAnt to-do list in
cvs with this information), but he's very busy so I'm not sure when this
will be available ...

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


> Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file ( or fileset
> of text files )
>
> Ian
> Gert Driesen wrote:
>
> >Mitch,
> >
> >Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is
supposed
> >to do ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Gert
> >
> >- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
> >Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >
> >
> >It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like to see 1.1
> >as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
> >ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?
> >
> >
> >- Mitch Denny
> >- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >- http://www.monash.net
> >- +61 (414) 610141
> >-
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >---
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >___
> >nant-developers mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >Welcome to geek heaven.
> >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> >___
> >nant-developers mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Ian MacLean]

Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text file ( or fileset 
of text files )

Ian
Gert Driesen wrote:
Mitch,

Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is supposed
to do ?
Thanks,

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like to see 1.1
as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?

- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
 

-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


   



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
 





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Gert Driesen]

Mitch,

Can you freshen up my memory again, and tell me what this task is supposed
to do ?

Thanks,

Gert

- Original Message - 
From: "Mitch Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]


It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like to see 1.1
as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
>
>
>


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

[Mitch Denny]

It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like to see 1.1
as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the
ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust?


- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
- 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]
> 
> 
> 


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers