Re: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . .
+1 As far as I understand it, branching is done from the head (or any tag I guess). As for blogging, go for it. Posting to the dev list is probably also a good idea. Anon CVS access is rather behind, and less reliable. It may make sense to post on your website a zip of the tree/dist when you want people to try it out. - Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi folks, We'll I think we have had the discussion, so I thought it would be an appropraite time to tag and branch for some of the experimental stuff that we have been talking about. I'd like to start experimenting more publically with the taskdef / element first. If possible I'd like the branch done from the head and not the previous tag since there have been a number of fixes since then that specifically affect the ability to do a successful build. Once I had something working and a patch applied I was hoping to do a blog post and get a bit of end-user feedback on the idea. I know a lot of Nant users are into blogs so I thought it would be a good outlet. They would be able to anon cvs download from that branch and try it out. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . .
Hi Scott, Good idea about the zip. Does the nightly snapshot just take the HEAD? Follow-up Questions: 1. Who can do the branch for me? 2. When I finish patches, who do I send them to? Cheers. - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2004 3:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . . +1 As far as I understand it, branching is done from the head (or any tag I guess). As for blogging, go for it. Posting to the dev list is probably also a good idea. Anon CVS access is rather behind, and less reliable. It may make sense to post on your website a zip of the tree/dist when you want people to try it out. - Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi folks, We'll I think we have had the discussion, so I thought it would be an appropraite time to tag and branch for some of the experimental stuff that we have been talking about. I'd like to start experimenting more publically with the taskdef / element first. If possible I'd like the branch done from the head and not the previous tag since there have been a number of fixes since then that specifically affect the ability to do a successful build. Once I had something working and a patch applied I was hoping to do a blog post and get a bit of end-user feedback on the idea. I know a lot of Nant users are into blogs so I thought it would be a good outlet. They would be able to anon cvs download from that branch and try it out. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . .
Hi guys, I'm happy to do it that way. Has anyone present done a branch of this particular module before? Any wisdom you want to share? - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . . The nightly snapshot is now a nightly build; it just builds from the head. We used to have a nightly tarball but replaced it when we started using a build server. For the purpose of your branch I think it might be best if you get cvs access so you can manage it. Mitch, is that something you are up for? Gert, Ian, Gerry, does that sound reasonable? I'd rather take the enabling approach than to put more levels of indirection in... :) - Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 6:19 AM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Experimental branches . . . Hi Scott, Good idea about the zip. Does the nightly snapshot just take the HEAD? Follow-up Questions: 1. Who can do the branch for me? 2. When I finish patches, who do I send them to? --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
