Re: [naviserver-devel] release ?

2005-05-04 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic

Am 04.05.2005 um 16:54 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:

Any ideas what? Stephen suggested 4.99. Why not use that? Or more 
radically, 5.0 as we

do have virtual hosting now which can justify the release bump.


Okay, 4.99 and we'll switch to 5.0 when docs will be ready.



Good. I'm still having open discussion with Andreas (Kupries) from Tcl 
project
about doctools package we could use to write nice-looking docs. I think 
I

will have to speed-up this.

Zoran




Re: [naviserver-devel] release ?

2005-05-04 Thread Vlad Seryakov


Any ideas what? Stephen suggested 4.99. Why not use that? Or more 
radically, 5.0 as we

do have virtual hosting now which can justify the release bump.


Okay, 4.99 and we'll switch to 5.0 when docs will be ready.

--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/



Re: [naviserver-devel] release ?

2005-05-04 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic

Am 04.05.2005 um 16:45 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:


We just do not have Web site, at least first page with some details 
would be nice. I guess, hosting on sourceforge gives us html version 
of web page only.




Bernd can take this on his shoulders, I think. Bernd?

Also, until we have docs we can release snapshots without tagging CVS, 
kind of working release, i am not comfortable with CVS tagging and 
branching:-)))




Oh, tagging is absolutely crucial! We do not need to work on the 
branches (yet) but it
is important for us to be able to checkout the released version and 
make any fixes
if necessary. You could ignore the branches if you like and always 
commit to cvs-head

but we must have versioning.

Using versions 4.0.x will be in collision with AS, i think new version 
scheme should be used.




Any ideas what? Stephen suggested 4.99. Why not use that? Or more 
radically, 5.0 as we

do have virtual hosting now which can justify the release bump.

Zoran




Re: [naviserver-devel] release ?

2005-05-04 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I agree we can make public release, we wanted to do this with docs but 
it may take longer, so public release with official use in commercial 
product could be enough reason to make first appearance.


We just do not have Web site, at least first page with some details 
would be nice. I guess, hosting on sourceforge gives us html version of 
web page only.


Also, until we have docs we can release snapshots without tagging CVS, 
kind of working release, i am not comfortable with CVS tagging and 
branching:-)))


Using versions 4.0.x will be in collision with AS, i think new version 
scheme should be used.


Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:

Hi friends,

I have updated our product to use NaviServer now. It will be distributed as
update to about 500 installations worldwide.
I have tested it thoroughly and apart from the (already noted) ns_urlencode
(incompatibility) it seems that other things are backward-compatible 
with the

aolserver. We still do not use any new features, though. This will be added
as we pass first field-tests.

I could use this occasion to raise the "are we about to make a release" 
question
again. As it seems, it would be fine for us to tag the CVS and make a 
tarball.

What do you think? If yes, which version? 4.99?

Zoran



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel


--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/



[naviserver-devel] release ?

2005-05-04 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic

Hi friends,

I have updated our product to use NaviServer now. It will be 
distributed as

update to about 500 installations worldwide.
I have tested it thoroughly and apart from the (already noted) 
ns_urlencode
(incompatibility) it seems that other things are backward-compatible 
with the
aolserver. We still do not use any new features, though. This will be 
added

as we pass first field-tests.

I could use this occasion to raise the "are we about to make a release" 
question
again. As it seems, it would be fine for us to tag the CVS and make a 
tarball.

What do you think? If yes, which version? 4.99?

Zoran