[neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Terry S
Padded envelope? They would never survive my mail carrier.

On Nov 27, 5:35 pm, Dan Foster danfoster3...@gmail.com wrote:
 $1.25 per tube, any quantity. Shipping is a USPS padded flat rate envelope. 
 $5.30 inside US,  $12.95 to Canada or Mexico, and $16.95 to any other country.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] low power nixie tubes?

2012-11-28 Thread John Rehwinkel
 And if you want something truly bizarre and high-voltage, there are
 devices like the ITS1A, which uses 50V, 100V, and -300V supplies, but
 the segments are directly controllable with TTL logic!

 Any ideas on where to buy these tubes? Very cool. Bet I can't afford 'em 
 anyway.

Vitaly might have some, or you can check eBay.  I bought some there, 4 for $26.

- John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[neonixie-l] Re: 5BP1 CRT

2012-11-28 Thread Oscilloclock
Not that I'm biased (!), but if you are able to roll your own, you can 
see two nice designs employing circle graphics at Grahame's 
sitehttp://www.sgitheach.org.uk/scope2.html and 
at Oscilloclock.com . These are based on David's original design at 
cathodecorner.com .
 
There are many other raster graphics based designs, which have kits 
available. Dutchtronix http://www.dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm must 
surely be the most common, but a google will show more.
 
Aaron

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:54:24 PM UTC+9, Terry S wrote:

 Interesting offer -- now the dilemma -- do I open the box and test the 
 tube, or leave it in the box untested, where it is perhaps worth more 
 to a collector? 

 I'm really interested in building a scope clock with the tube. Trying 
 to find a kit I like is the problem. 

 Any recommendations? 

 Terry 

 On Nov 25, 3:39 pm, threeneurons threeneur...@yahoo.com wrote: 
  No, I have 2 5BP4s (white phosphor), and they are rather large animals. 
 I 
  don't know what I'm going to do with mine either. On top of that I also 
  have 2 5UP1s. 
  
  But, I did make a little tube checker, to at least, light them up, and 
 do 
  rough deflection tests. 
  
  http://threeneurons.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/crt_tst01.jpg 
  
  It doesn't have a socket, but individual socket pins, so it can be 
 hooked 
  up to just about any electrostatically deflected tube, that can be lit 
 up 
  with ~1700V. The 5BP1 can be operated at 1500V. The tester is small, so 
 if 
  you're interested I could loan it to you. 
  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/HC2tjp1_2ToJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[neonixie-l] Re: 5BP1 CRT

2012-11-28 Thread Nick
On Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:39:43 UTC, Oscilloclock wrote:

 Not that I'm biased (!), but if you are able to roll your own, you can 
 see two nice designs employing circle graphics at Grahame's 
 sitehttp://www.sgitheach.org.uk/scope2.html and 
 at Oscilloclock.com . These are based on David's original design at 
 cathodecorner.com .
  
 There are many other raster graphics based designs, which have kits 
 available. Dutchtronix http://www.dutchtronix.com/ScopeClock.htm must 
 surely be the most common, but a google will show more.
  
 Aaron

 No disrespect to David, but the original idea comes from old examples of 
character generation for RADAR  ATC (air traffic control) screens etc. 
when everything was analogue.

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-F5dLVuJRvYg/ULZljAfjb5I/Aow/W4AIoC2ynNo/s1600/2009716214148489.gif
R. L. White, Forming Handwritten. Like Digits on CRI Display, 
Electronics,32:11, p 138-140 

Nick

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/aPpwoCQLKTkJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[neonixie-l] Re: 5BP1 CRT

2012-11-28 Thread threeneurons


Here's the checker schematic.

http://threeneurons.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/crt_tstr.gif

It uses 2 MC34063 chips. One for the HV, and the other for the 6V heater. 
10 signals go to the CRT tube.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/1JyMovqOdZ0J.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: 5BP1 CRT

2012-11-28 Thread Charles MacDonald

On 12-11-28 02:59 PM, threeneurons wrote:

Here's the checker schematic.

http://threeneurons.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/crt_tstr.gif

It uses 2 MC34063 chips. One for the HV, and the other for the 6V
heater. 10 signals go to the CRT tube.


A lot of the old scope circuits used to run the cathode at a negative 
voltage.  (this required a well insulated filament transformer.) but 
meant that the defection plates were almost at ground potential.  One 
could create a test signal that would draw an pattern on the screen.



--
Charles MacDonald Stittsville Ontario
cm...@zeusprune.ca  Just Beyond the Fringe
http://Charles.MacDonald.org/tubes
No Microsoft Products were used in sending this e-mail.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Michel
Just out of interest, is the IN-9 brighter than the IN-13? IN-9 requires 
10mA current for full bar and IN-13 4mA. Wondering where the extra 6mA goes 
to, heat or light?

Michel


On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:41:16 AM UTC+11, Dan Foster wrote:

 Hello,
 I have a few (10) IN-9 Bargraph tubes that I no longer want, thought I'd 
 ask here before I list them on eBay. Anyone interested?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/tokUQ1-9DFMJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Adam Jacobs

I found this at radiomuseum.org:
quote

At this point, I should clarify the difference between the IN-9 and the 
IN-13


The IN-13 takes up to 5mA for a 12cm orange glow from Neon gas, and has 
three electrodes. One  perforated cylinder as the anode, a central wire 
cathode for the glow, and a short pilot cathode to start the glow.


Most IN-9 take up to 10mA for a 10cm purple glow from Argon gas, and 
only have two electrodes.


But some IN-9, like the one used in this thread, are filled with Neon 
gas and glow orange, but the current rating and size are still same.


Confusion between the two glow colors caused me to make a mistake I made 
in this thread: The tube you see in this thread is a*2 pin IN-9*, not a 
3 pin IN-13.


In terms of application of the tube, the two glow tubes the significant 
differences are the maximum current and the extra pilot cathode for the 
IN-13. The strike voltage around 120V and sustain voltage around 100V 
are similar among all three tubes.


The IN-13 has twice the sensitivity of the IN-9, so this should be taken 
into account when applying the tube. If the glow swing is too extreme, 
some resistance in series with the tube can be added.


The pilot cathode of the IN-13 requires a small current to insure that 
the main cathode starts properly. This negative bias could be obtained 
with a 100-500kOhm resistor to the grid circuit of the local oscillator. 
The grid of the local oscillator, usually develops around -10V, which is 
enough to supply up to 100uA into the pilot cathode of the IN-13.


The extra -10V of bias at the pilot cathode of the IN-13, eliminates the 
need for the startup circuit with a diode and resistor, which I included 
in the circuit above for the IN-9. This was necessary because the low B+ 
of an AC/DC 117VAC radio may not guaranty the starting voltage for the 
two terminal IN-9.


Best regards,

-Joe

/quote

-Adam

On 11/28/2012 1:08 PM, Michel wrote:
Just out of interest, is the IN-9 brighter than the IN-13? IN-9 
requires 10mA current for full bar and IN-13 4mA. Wondering where the 
extra 6mA goes to, heat or light?


Michel


On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:41:16 AM UTC+11, Dan Foster wrote:

Hello,
I have a few (10) IN-9 Bargraph tubes that I no longer want,
thought I'd ask here before I list them on eBay. Anyone interested?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups neonixie-l group.

To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/tokUQ1-9DFMJ.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Dan Foster
My PayPal email is danfoster3...@gmail.com
I'll send it in a box, same shipping cost. Send me an email with your 
address, etc.

On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:27:30 PM UTC-5, bryan wrote:

  I am interested. I'll send the money for 4 tubes and shipping in USA this 
 Friday and as soon as you receive the payment from me, you can ship them. 

 Do you have PayPal? 

 Thanks!

 -- 
 Bryan Goines
 Sent with Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig

 On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dan Foster wrote:

 $1.25 per tube, any quantity. Shipping is a USPS padded flat rate 
 envelope. $5.30 inside US, $12.95 to Canada or Mexico, and $16.95 to any 
 other country. 

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 neonixie-l group.
 To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 To view this discussion on the web, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/5JnFXN31eBAJ.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/gjUcMBy7-3sJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Michel
Thanks for the info Adam. It doesn't really explain why the current is 
higher / sensitivity is lower for the IN-9. I still expect the IN9 to be 
brighter as the higher current should ionize more neon. Maybe I should 
measure it one day.

Michel




On Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:25:31 AM UTC+11, Adam Jacobs wrote:

  I found this at radiomuseum.org:
 quote

 At this point, I should clarify the difference between the IN-9 and the 
 IN-13

 The IN-13 takes up to 5mA for a 12cm orange glow from Neon gas, and has 
 three electrodes. One  perforated cylinder as the anode, a central wire 
 cathode for the glow, and a short pilot cathode to start the glow.

 Most IN-9 take up to 10mA for a 10cm purple glow from Argon gas, and only 
 have two electrodes.

 But some IN-9, like the one used in this thread, are filled with Neon gas 
 and glow orange, but the current rating and size are still same.

 Confusion between the two glow colors caused me to make a mistake I made 
 in this thread: The tube you see in this thread is a *2 pin IN-9*, not a 
 3 pin IN-13.

 In terms of application of the tube, the two glow tubes the significant 
 differences are the maximum current and the extra pilot cathode for the 
 IN-13. The strike voltage around 120V and sustain voltage around 100V are 
 similar among all three tubes.

 The IN-13 has twice the sensitivity of the IN-9, so this should be taken 
 into account when applying the tube. If the glow swing is too extreme, some 
 resistance in series with the tube can be added.

 The pilot cathode of the IN-13 requires a small current to insure that the 
 main cathode starts properly. This negative bias could be obtained with a 
 100-500kOhm resistor to the grid circuit of the local oscillator. The grid 
 of the local oscillator, usually develops around -10V, which is enough to 
 supply up to 100uA into the pilot cathode of the IN-13.

 The extra -10V of bias at the pilot cathode of the IN-13, eliminates the 
 need for the startup circuit with a diode and resistor, which I included in 
 the circuit above for the IN-9. This was necessary because the low B+ of an 
 AC/DC 117VAC radio may not guaranty the starting voltage for the two 
 terminal IN-9.

 Best regards,

 -Joe
 /quote
  
 -Adam

 On 11/28/2012 1:08 PM, Michel wrote:
  
 Just out of interest, is the IN-9 brighter than the IN-13? IN-9 requires 
 10mA current for full bar and IN-13 4mA. Wondering where the extra 6mA goes 
 to, heat or light? 

  Michel


 On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:41:16 AM UTC+11, Dan Foster wrote: 

 Hello,
 I have a few (10) IN-9 Bargraph tubes that I no longer want, thought I'd 
 ask here before I list them on eBay. Anyone interested?

  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 neonixie-l group.
 To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 To view this discussion on the web, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/tokUQ1-9DFMJ.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  


  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/9dhUW-PyGOwJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Jon
Michel - that's exactly what happens. IN-9 tubes are significantly brighter 
than IN-13, and to my eyes much better for general use. I made this thing (
http://youtu.be/mQ1567EFCY0) with IN-13 and both flavours of IN9. Although 
the IN-13 were bigger, used less current and were more predictable to play 
with, the dimmer display meant that version needed a fairly low ambient 
light environment. FYI IN9 are also more prone to 'sleeping sickness', 
particularly the argon ones.
 
Cheers,
 
Jon.
 

On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:00:26 PM UTC, Michel wrote:

 Thanks for the info Adam. It doesn't really explain why the current is 
 higher / sensitivity is lower for the IN-9. I still expect the IN9 to be 
 brighter as the higher current should ionize more neon. Maybe I should 
 measure it one day.

 Michel
  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/F-SXQ1p0qHIJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




RE: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Michel van der Meij
That is an interesting display Jon, thanks for the info and link! How do you
make the step down animation? Did you post a schematic somewhere of this
clock? The sleeping sickness is probably related to the part of the tube
that is not lit? I mean, in your clock setup this wouldn't really be an
issue, right?

 

Michel

 

 

From: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 9:50 AM
To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

 

Michel - that's exactly what happens. IN-9 tubes are significantly brighter
than IN-13, and to my eyes much better for general use. I made this thing
(http://youtu.be/mQ1567EFCY0) with IN-13 and both flavours of IN9. Although
the IN-13 were bigger, used less current and were more predictable to play
with, the dimmer display meant that version needed a fairly low ambient
light environment. FYI IN9 are also more prone to 'sleeping sickness',
particularly the argon ones.

 

Cheers,

 

Jon.

 


On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:00:26 PM UTC, Michel wrote:

Thanks for the info Adam. It doesn't really explain why the current is
higher / sensitivity is lower for the IN-9. I still expect the IN9 to be
brighter as the higher current should ionize more neon. Maybe I should
measure it one day.

 

Michel

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/F-SXQ1p0qHIJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2629/5905 - Release Date: 11/19/12
Internal Virus Database is out of date.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




RE: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Michel van der Meij
I think I know how to do the step-down animation, you probably switch anode
and cathode in an H-bridge style circuit. Anyway, I think the tubes are
really interesting so I bought myself a bunch on ebay. Amazing how cheap
they actually are!! Even a complete clock with 4 7-segment displays cost
only a little bit.

 

Michel

 

 

 

 

From: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 9:50 AM
To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

 

Michel - that's exactly what happens. IN-9 tubes are significantly brighter
than IN-13, and to my eyes much better for general use. I made this thing
(http://youtu.be/mQ1567EFCY0) with IN-13 and both flavours of IN9. Although
the IN-13 were bigger, used less current and were more predictable to play
with, the dimmer display meant that version needed a fairly low ambient
light environment. FYI IN9 are also more prone to 'sleeping sickness',
particularly the argon ones.

 

Cheers,

 

Jon.

 


On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:00:26 PM UTC, Michel wrote:

Thanks for the info Adam. It doesn't really explain why the current is
higher / sensitivity is lower for the IN-9. I still expect the IN9 to be
brighter as the higher current should ionize more neon. Maybe I should
measure it one day.

 

Michel

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/F-SXQ1p0qHIJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2629/5905 - Release Date: 11/19/12
Internal Virus Database is out of date.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IN-9's for sale

2012-11-28 Thread Jon
Glad you liked it - was my first venture into designing my own clocks. I 
haven't posted a schematic, but there isn't really much to it in hardware. 
The tubes are driven by single transistor voltage-controlled current sinks 
which are run by an octal DAC controlled by a PIC. The rest is just HV 
generation, managing the RTC and USB interface etc. The complexity is in 
the software rather than the hardware (in part because that's my 
background!). Grahame has also built a similar single digit clock using 
IN-13 and the same octal DAC. The step down animation doesn't use any 
clever hardware like you suggest in the other post - all the effects are 
done in firmware.
 
Sleeping sickness refers to the observation that you won't be able to light 
the full length of the tube with the rated current when you receive it from 
the supplier. Storage results in some kind of aging of the cathode surface 
which makes them resistant to glow. You can burn it off with over-current 
treatment, but not all tubes recover satisfactorily. My sense is that the 
effect hits IN9 argon  IN9 neon  IN13.
 
Cheers,
 
Jon.

On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 11:12:22 PM UTC, Michel wrote:

 That is an interesting display Jon, thanks for the info and link! How do 
 you make the step down animation? Did you post a schematic somewhere of 
 this clock? The sleeping sickness is probably related to the part of the 
 tube that is not lit? I mean, in your clock setup this wouldn’t really be 
 an issue, right?

  

 Michel

  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/1ZLVDwwmhsYJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.