[neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-02 Thread Tobias
Antoine

I am using the HV5522 on my clock and multimeter projects. Using both
SPI (for the HV5522) and I2C bus level shift.
The voltage for the HV5522 is the same that powers the boost
converter. I tested both 9 and 12V and it works just fine.
I based my design on this app note:

http://ics.nxp.com/support/documents/interface/pdf/an97055.pdf

The document describes a bi-directional level shifter but it works
just fine when communication is uni-directional like with the HV5522.
For the FETs I chose BSS138 as they are inexpensive.

Regards
Tobias




On 1 jun, 07:53, Antoine Vanoutryve anto...@blacktrap.net wrote:
 Hi Terry.

 Indeed I found only one schematic using 12V​​. Most of schematics available 
 on Google use 5V. That's why I preferred to ask. I will use 12V with 
 transistors then.

 Thank you for your reply.

 Antoine

 On 01 Jun 2012, at 13:48, Terry S wrote:







  The datasheet does not indicate an operating supply voltage of -0.5 to
  +15v, those are the absolute maximum ratings.

  Use the part within it's recommended ratings of 10.8 to 13.2 volts and
  you won't have any issues. Otherwise, all bets are off.

  It never ceases to amaze me when people use a part outside it's spec
  and then wonder why they have problems. Would you use a lawnmower to
  trim your hedge? Your weed whip to cut down a tree?

  Terry

  On Jun 1, 6:06 am, Pengouin anto...@blacktrap.net wrote:
  Hi,

  I intend to use Supertex HV5522 to build a Nixie clock with four IN-18
  tubes. I found some schematics on the Internet. Some use 5V directly
  connected to HV5522 and some use higher voltages (12V) with a field effect
  transistor connected to a 5V MCU. I plan on using a PIC MCU running at 3.3V
  to drive my HV5522. The datasheet seems to indicate that I can use any
  voltage between -0.5V to +15 V, but the recommended voltage is 10V to 13V.

  Does anyone uses HV5522 connected directly in 3.3? Is it working correctly?

  Thanks for your help

  Antoine

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  neonixie-l group.
  To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



  signature.asc
  1KVisualizarFazer download

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



[neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-02 Thread GastonP


On Jun 1, 12:54 pm, Adam Jacobs a...@jacobs.us wrote:
 I understand your point, Terry.. Which I think is the classic Slippery
 Slope argument. You get used to cutting corners, before you know it
 you're trying the same tricks at work where you design nuclear reactor
 cooling systems, the systems fail due to your design choices that were
 outside of specification, etc.

 Luckily for me, I take mission criticality into account when I make a
 design. A nixie clock project (for me) is foremost a fun chance to try
 new things and sandbox some experimentation. Disclaimer: I don't sell my
 clocks and I also don't use them in mission critical applications such
 as drones or heart pumps.

I'm more concerned when the cut corners are in Friend or Foe
detection systems :D

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



[neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-01 Thread Terry S
The datasheet does not indicate an operating supply voltage of -0.5 to
+15v, those are the absolute maximum ratings.

Use the part within it's recommended ratings of 10.8 to 13.2 volts and
you won't have any issues. Otherwise, all bets are off.

It never ceases to amaze me when people use a part outside it's spec
and then wonder why they have problems. Would you use a lawnmower to
trim your hedge? Your weed whip to cut down a tree?

Terry

On Jun 1, 6:06 am, Pengouin anto...@blacktrap.net wrote:
 Hi,

 I intend to use Supertex HV5522 to build a Nixie clock with four IN-18
 tubes. I found some schematics on the Internet. Some use 5V directly
 connected to HV5522 and some use higher voltages (12V) with a field effect
 transistor connected to a 5V MCU. I plan on using a PIC MCU running at 3.3V
 to drive my HV5522. The datasheet seems to indicate that I can use any
 voltage between -0.5V to +15 V, but the recommended voltage is 10V to 13V.

 Does anyone uses HV5522 connected directly in 3.3? Is it working correctly?

 Thanks for your help

 Antoine

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-01 Thread Antoine Vanoutryve
Hi Terry.

Indeed I found only one schematic using 12V​​. Most of schematics available on 
Google use 5V. That's why I preferred to ask. I will use 12V with transistors 
then.

Thank you for your reply.

Antoine


On 01 Jun 2012, at 13:48, Terry S wrote:

 The datasheet does not indicate an operating supply voltage of -0.5 to
 +15v, those are the absolute maximum ratings.
 
 Use the part within it's recommended ratings of 10.8 to 13.2 volts and
 you won't have any issues. Otherwise, all bets are off.
 
 It never ceases to amaze me when people use a part outside it's spec
 and then wonder why they have problems. Would you use a lawnmower to
 trim your hedge? Your weed whip to cut down a tree?
 
 Terry
 
 On Jun 1, 6:06 am, Pengouin anto...@blacktrap.net wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I intend to use Supertex HV5522 to build a Nixie clock with four IN-18
 tubes. I found some schematics on the Internet. Some use 5V directly
 connected to HV5522 and some use higher voltages (12V) with a field effect
 transistor connected to a 5V MCU. I plan on using a PIC MCU running at 3.3V
 to drive my HV5522. The datasheet seems to indicate that I can use any
 voltage between -0.5V to +15 V, but the recommended voltage is 10V to 13V.
 
 Does anyone uses HV5522 connected directly in 3.3? Is it working correctly?
 
 Thanks for your help
 
 Antoine
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 neonixie-l group.
 To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-01 Thread Adam Jacobs
That is interesting. My guess is that there are lots of lazy engineers 
out there that have figured out that the part works OK on 5v. That's why 
experimentation is so important. If I was going to make a WAG, I'd bet 
that it works at 5v although probably at slower speeds. Try it with 5v 
if it is a huge savings in parts for your. Maybe it will work. If it 
doesn't, then change it to 12v. (shrug) I'm assuming this isn't a 
mission critical device or something that you are planning to sell, of 
course.


I think that most people here don't have much experience with the 
Supertex parts, although they do look neat. I have a tube of them but 
haven't had a chance to try them out.


-Adam


On 6/1/2012 4:53 AM, Antoine Vanoutryve wrote:

Hi Terry.

Indeed I found only one schematic using 12V​​. Most of schematics available on 
Google use 5V. That's why I preferred to ask. I will use 12V with transistors 
then.

Thank you for your reply.

Antoine


On 01 Jun 2012, at 13:48, Terry S wrote:


The datasheet does not indicate an operating supply voltage of -0.5 to
+15v, those are the absolute maximum ratings.

Use the part within it's recommended ratings of 10.8 to 13.2 volts and
you won't have any issues. Otherwise, all bets are off.

It never ceases to amaze me when people use a part outside it's spec
and then wonder why they have problems. Would you use a lawnmower to
trim your hedge? Your weed whip to cut down a tree?

Terry

On Jun 1, 6:06 am, Pengouinanto...@blacktrap.net  wrote:

Hi,

I intend to use Supertex HV5522 to build a Nixie clock with four IN-18
tubes. I found some schematics on the Internet. Some use 5V directly
connected to HV5522 and some use higher voltages (12V) with a field effect
transistor connected to a 5V MCU. I plan on using a PIC MCU running at 3.3V
to drive my HV5522. The datasheet seems to indicate that I can use any
voltage between -0.5V to +15 V, but the recommended voltage is 10V to 13V.

Does anyone uses HV5522 connected directly in 3.3? Is it working correctly?

Thanks for your help

Antoine

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



[neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-01 Thread Terry S
The part is fabbed in HVCMOS, so yes, it will continue to function at
some level down to where the CMOS transistor structures no longer
switch -- probably well below 3 volts. But...

The problem with using a part like that outside its spec is that you
simply can't predict what parameters won't be met. What if it affects
set-up or hold times? What if it affects output drive or input
impedance? There are simply so many things that can go wrong --
internal timing conditions that might not be met. As a hobbyist, you
might be forgiving of a misbehavior if it doesn't manifest itself
visibly on your clock display, or you find a work around for a timing
problem -- but what if this were a life critical medical or industrial
application, or a mission critical military app? As an engineer or
designer, your butt would be on the line should you use a part outside
its specs and someone gets hurt or dies, or your drone crashes...

Speaking of drones, Obama is in town today, about 6 blocks from here,
speaking at Honeywell. I bet I can't even go out for lunch today
without running into his entourage. Gonna be another vending machine
lunch I guess.

Terry

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.



Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Supertex HV5522 supply current

2012-06-01 Thread Adam Jacobs
I understand your point, Terry.. Which I think is the classic Slippery 
Slope argument. You get used to cutting corners, before you know it 
you're trying the same tricks at work where you design nuclear reactor 
cooling systems, the systems fail due to your design choices that were 
outside of specification, etc.


Luckily for me, I take mission criticality into account when I make a 
design. A nixie clock project (for me) is foremost a fun chance to try 
new things and sandbox some experimentation. Disclaimer: I don't sell my 
clocks and I also don't use them in mission critical applications such 
as drones or heart pumps. If something fails because of a design choice 
that I made, then I make a note of it and change the experimental 
design. The fact is that mission criticality is just another input in 
the requirements phase of the design. Things like component count, size, 
feature set, hazard analysis. Take the time to come up with some real 
product requirements before you start drawing a schematic. Makes things 
a lot easier.


-Adam W7QI


On 6/1/2012 8:09 AM, Terry S wrote:

The part is fabbed in HVCMOS, so yes, it will continue to function at
some level down to where the CMOS transistor structures no longer
switch -- probably well below 3 volts. But...

The problem with using a part like that outside its spec is that you
simply can't predict what parameters won't be met. What if it affects
set-up or hold times? What if it affects output drive or input
impedance? There are simply so many things that can go wrong --
internal timing conditions that might not be met. As a hobbyist, you
might be forgiving of a misbehavior if it doesn't manifest itself
visibly on your clock display, or you find a work around for a timing
problem -- but what if this were a life critical medical or industrial
application, or a mission critical military app? As an engineer or
designer, your butt would be on the line should you use a part outside
its specs and someone gets hurt or dies, or your drone crashes...

Speaking of drones, Obama is in town today, about 6 blocks from here,
speaking at Honeywell. I bet I can't even go out for lunch today
without running into his entourage. Gonna be another vending machine
lunch I guess.

Terry



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
neonixie-l group.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.