Re: reviews for 7200720 and 8003948 [7u-dev]
On 10/12/12 20:48, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Michael, On 2012-12-10 23:35, Michael McMahon wrote: Could I get the following webrevs reviewed please? They are identical changes (except for one small change suggested by Dmitry) to what was done in 8 for the same issues http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7200720.7u-dev/webrev.1/ I see a comment // MMM 7200720 ?? at ll: 202 of NTLMAuthentication.java - Does it make sense to change it to something more verbose? Otherwise looks good for me. Yes, I'll change that Dmitry. Thanks! Michael http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8003948.7u-dev/webrev.1/ Looks good for me. -Dmitry
Re: reviews for 7200720 and 8003948 [7u-dev]
Michael, On 2012-12-10 23:35, Michael McMahon wrote: > Could I get the following webrevs reviewed please? > They are identical changes (except for one small change suggested by > Dmitry) > to what was done in 8 for the same issues > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7200720.7u-dev/webrev.1/ I see a comment // MMM 7200720 ?? at ll: 202 of NTLMAuthentication.java - Does it make sense to change it to something more verbose? Otherwise looks good for me. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8003948.7u-dev/webrev.1/ Looks good for me. -Dmitry -- Dmitry Samersoff Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia * Give Rabbit time, and he'll always get the answer
reviews for 7200720 and 8003948 [7u-dev]
Could I get the following webrevs reviewed please? They are identical changes (except for one small change suggested by Dmitry) to what was done in 8 for the same issues http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7200720.7u-dev/webrev.1/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8003948.7u-dev/webrev.1/ Thanks Michael
