Re: Net-snmp 5.4.2.1/Solaris 5.10 w/ enable-mfd-rewrites: TCP-MIB scalar counters showing up as zero

[Anders Persson]

Hi Wayne,

I did a build of 5.4.2.1 with the following options:

$ ./net-snmp-config --configure-options
'--enable-ipv6' '--with-out-mib-modules=mibII/ipv6'
'--enable-mfd-rewrites'

But I've not been able to reproduce the issue that you are
seeing. However, I've been doing my testing on OpenSolaris (I'll try
it on a S10 box tomorrow).

BTW, did you specify any options other than --enable-mfd-rewrites?

Anders

--
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: Is the IP-MIB fully supported for Solaris with the Net-SNMP ver 5.3.2 & '--enable-mfd-rewrites'

[Anders Persson]

Hi Matt,

Could you provide me with the patch level that your machine is running?

Cheers,

Anders

Matt Matson wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Thank you for the confirmation.  In that case, do you have any input as 
> to the errors I'm receiving on the 5.4.1 compile (see previous post URL 
> and corrections below)? 
> (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=47ACF89D.1050102%40cittio.com&forum_name=net-snmp-users)
>
> Corrections:
> - referenced URL was somebody from Sun, not Thomas Anders...sorry =)
> - I'm getting compile errors when running 'make' not 'make install...' 
> (obviously)
>
> Thank you much!
> Matt
>
> Thomas Anders wrote:
>   
>> Matt Matson wrote:
>>   
>> 
>>> Hi, is the IP-MIB fully supported for Solaris with the 5.3.2 code base
>>> (configured w/ --enable-mfd-rewrites)?
>>> 
>>>   
>> Nope. If you want the full functionality offered by the IP-MIB rewrite
>> on Solaris, you need 5.4.x.
>>
>>
>> +Thomas
>>   
>> 
>
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
> ___
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: [Fwd: Re: Solaris 10 - Counter64 values are not shown]

[Anders Persson]

Frank,

There appears to be a bug in Solaris (libsocket to be specific). I'll 
get a workaround going.

Anders

Frank Munsche wrote:
> It's running within a nonglobal zone
>
> lo0:2: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 
> index 1
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
> e1000g0:2: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
> inet 192.168.100.210 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
>
> Have the output of ./snmpd -D access:interface:container:arch -D 
> kernel_sunos5  
> attached.
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Anders Persson wrote:
>   
>> Hmm... this is looking bogus. Could you please add -D kernel_sunos5.
>> Adding this debug flag will generate a lot of output, so you better
>> redirect to a file.
>>
>> Also, how many interfaces does your system have?
>>
>> Anders
>>
>> Frank Munsche wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Anders,
>>>
>>> here it is:
>>>
>>> No log handling enabled - turning on stderr logging
>>> registered debug token access:interface:container:arch, 1
>>> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
>>> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
>>> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registry.c:535
>>> access:interface:container:arch: load (flags 0)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> access:interface:container:arch: interface '' have 32-bit stat counters
>>> error on subcontainer 'interface container' insert (-1)
>>> access:interface:container:arch: processing ''
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Anders Persson wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>
>>>> So it seems you are still experiencing some problems...
>>>>

Re: Solaris 10 - Counter64 values are not shown

[Anders Persson]

Frank Munsche wrote:
> The problem of counter64 values not showing up has been discussed several 
> times before, but in the majority of cases it has been solved by using snmp v 
> 2c instead of 1 .
>
> Nevertheless I can't get it running. I'm using Solaris 10 X86 (11/06) on an 
> opteron-based machine. NetSnmp verison 5.0.9 is included there.
>
> I've tried to catch the counter64 values:
>
>  /usr/sfw/bin/snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost  | grep -i Counter64
>
> But never get any result back. I've tried the 64 bit snmd located 
> at /usr/sfw/sbin/64/snmpd too, but still no luck.
>
> Then I stopped the original (solaris-included) snmpd and fetched a 5.3.1 from 
> blastwave.org. Nothing changed.
>   
Support for 64-bit counters was added to net-snmp 5.4.1, so anything 
before that will not work.
>
> There was an issue like this before, but no final statement:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=4522AB47.6070004%40arlut.utexas.edu
>
>
> I' ve opened a call at Sun and they told me it will be fixed when they will 
> change to netsnmp 5.4.1 .  
>   
> So finally, I've built the 5.4.1 from source (32 bit), but the result remains 
> the same. No counter64.
>   
64-bit counters is only supported on S10u4 and OpenSolaris. But assuming 
that you have that, you still need to explicitly enabled those counters 
by passing the --enable-mfd-rewrites flag to configure.
>
> The is also a bug reported at
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do;jsessionid=deb872423163030a4b52d081ff3?bug_id=6405447
>   
Right. That is due to the agent that is currently shipped with Solaris.

Regards,
Anders

-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: IF-MIB Solaris 9/SPARC

[Anders Persson]

Hi Joe,

I just tested net-snmp 5.4.1 on a sun4u system running Solaris 9 and it 
worked for me (I used --with-mib-modules="if-mib" 
--enable-mfd-rewrites). Could you run the agent with '-D 
access:interface' and email me whatever the output is?

Thanks,
Anders

Joe Gainey wrote:
> I've seen one other post on here regarding this.  I have compiled and 
> installed version 5.4 of the net-snmp package on a Solaris 9/SPARC 
> system.  Here are the options used to when running the configure script:
>
> --with-perl-modules=no \
> --disable-embedded-perl \
> --disable-shared \
> --enable-mfd-rewrites \
> --with-default-snmp-version=2 \
> --with-sys-contact="Unknown" \
> --with-sys-location="Undefined" \
> --with-logfile=/var/snmp/log/snmpd.log \
> --with-persistent-directory=/var/snmp/private \
> --with-mib-modules="if-mib agentx ucd_snmp mibII" 
> --with-ldflags="-Bstatic"
>
> What I have been bumping my head against for too long now is that an 
> snmpwalk of the interfaces oid only returns information about the 
> loopback interface.  I have boxes with three types of interfaces:  
> bge, eri, and dmfe
>
> None of these are reporting under net-snmp.  Does anyone know what I 
> am doing incorrectly?  I would really like net-snmp to be able to 
> discover the interfaces like it has in the past.  Having to hand 
> configure the interface name type speed etc. on literally hundreds of 
> boxes is not my idea of a good time.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Joe
>
> 
> Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
> Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. 
> 
> 
>
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
>   
> 
>
> ___
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: Compile trouble with 5.4pre3

[Anders Persson]

Hi Mike,

After you run configure, open agent/mibgroup/mib_module_includes.h and 
move the line "#include mibgroup/kernel_sunos5.h" to the top. Then run make.

PS. You also need to include the line "#define 
NETSNMP_INCLUDE_IFTABLE_REWRITES" in include/net-snmp/system/solaris.h 
to get the new tables to work.

Cheers,
Anders

Mike Brodbelt wrote:
> I'm trying to compile the 5.4pre3 from source on Solaris 10, as I'm
> interested in testing the new ifXTable implementation, but I can't get
> it to configure happily. When I configure --with-mib-modules="if-mib", I
> get:-
>
> mib module error
> configure: WARNING: mib module 'mibII/ifTable' requires module
> 'mibII/interfaces' but someone told me to compile without it
>
> Configure does complete, and leaves me with:-
>
>
> -
> Net-SNMP configuration summary:
> -
>
>   SNMP Versions Supported:1 2c 3
>   Net-SNMP Version:   5.4.pre3
>   Building for:   solaris2
>   Network transport support:  Callback Unix UDP TCP
>   SNMPv3 Security Modules: usm
>   *** MIB Module warning *** mib module 'mibII/ifTable' requires module 
> 'mibII/interfaces' but someone told me to compile without it
>   Agent MIB code: if-mib default_modules =>  if-mib/ifTable 
> if-mib/ifXTable snmpv3mibs mibII ucd_snmp notification notification-log-mib 
> target agent_mibs agentx disman/event disman/schedule utilities host
>   Embedded Perl support:  disabled
>   SNMP Perl modules:  disabled
>   SNMP Python modules:disabled
>   Authentication support: MD5 SHA1
>   Encryption support: DES AES
>
> -
>
> However attempting to compile it fails, throwing an error in
> agent/mibgroup/kernel_sunos5.h.
>
> I've tried removing mibII/interfaces, but I seem to get into a circular
> set of dependency issues, and I can't find a combination which will
> compile. Does anyone have a fucntional configure line for Solaris 10?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> __
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>   


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: 64 bit interface counters on Solaris

[Anders Persson]

Thomas Anders wrote:
> Anders Persson wrote:
>   
>> There is ongoing work to rewrite the Solaris bits to use the new framework.
>> 
>
> This is excellent news. Any estimate on when it may be finished? We're 
> planning to start the 5.4 release cycle in September. Wouldn't be too 
> bad to ship 5.4 with your patches included. :-)
>
>
>   
The timing is not really clear, but we will try our best to get the 
patches out in time for 5.4 :)

/Anders

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: 64 bit interface counters on Solaris

[Anders Persson]

Thomas Anders wrote:
> Mike Brodbelt wrote:
>   
>> I'm using the net-snmp shipped by Sun as part of Solaris 10. I'd like to
>> monitor interface traffic on Gig-E interfaces, but can't get any output
>> from the ifXTable. Is ifXTable currently supported at all by net-snmp,
>> and is it supported on Solaris?
>> 
>
> 5.2.x (with --enable-mfd-rewrites) and 5.3.x and later (by default)
> support ifXTable on Linux. 5.4 will likely support it on FreeBSD and
> OpenBSD, too.
>
> Adding the necessary pieces for Solaris will need a volunteer. Please
> refer to http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/IF-MIB_rewrite for details.
>
>   
There is ongoing work to rewrite the Solaris bits to use the new framework.

/Anders

-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: Why are not all columns of udpEndpointTable shown?

[Anders Persson]

Ah! I totally missed that :-/ I guess I was expecting the same behavior 
as tcpConnEntry, where the indices are accessible.


Thanks for making it obvious.
Anders

Thomas Anders wrote:

Anders Persson wrote:

#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MIN_COL   COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS
#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MAX_COL   COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS


That's actually correct, as it's the only accessible column in 
udpEndpointTable. All others are specified as "not-accessible" 
(because they're indices) in UDP-MIB.



+Thomas





---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Re: Why are not all columns of udpEndpointTable shown?

[Anders Persson]

Thomas Anders wrote:

On what platform?

Well, this behavior appears to me to be platform independent, because in 
udpEndpointTable_constants.h the min and max columns are set as follows:


#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MIN_COL   COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS
#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MAX_COL   COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS

Below you will see some sample output that I obtained from a machine 
running Linux:


UDP-MIB::udpInDatagrams.0 = Counter32: 63999
UDP-MIB::udpNoPorts.0 = Counter32: 9
UDP-MIB::udpInErrors.0 = Counter32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpOutDatagrams.0 = Counter32: 830
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.111 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.631 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.953 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.30089 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.32768 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.0.0.0.0.32769 = IpAddress: 0.0.0.0
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.111 = INTEGER: 111
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.631 = INTEGER: 631
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.953 = INTEGER: 953
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.30089 = INTEGER: 30089
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.32768 = INTEGER: 32768
UDP-MIB::udpLocalPort.0.0.0.0.32769 = INTEGER: 32769
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".111.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".631.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".953.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".30089.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".32768.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0
UDP-MIB::udpEndpointProcess.ipv4."0.0.0.0".32769.ipv4."".0.0 = Gauge32: 0


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Why are not all columns of udpEndpointTable shown?

[Anders Persson]

Hi all,

I was looking at udpEndpointTable in 5.3.0.1, and I noticed that the 
only column from the table that is being displayed is 
udpEndpointProcess. Does anyone know why not all columns are being

extracted?

Thanks,
Anders



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users