[NetBehaviour] [homage 2 tumblrisms] #[p(E)lasticity]T[Cr]umbling#

[mez breeze]

__
#[p(E)lasticity]T[Cr]umbling# 10:06am 14/07/2011
__

P[F]reying#M#[fr]antically liked this
minusoneidentityred reblogged this from coat-ur-reddened-touch[e] and added:

deaden[e]d [v]enn[diagrammed]u#X#i

coat-ur-reddened-touch[e] reblogged this from
liquidsheeninmyconstrictionthroat
liquidsheeninmyconstrictionthroat reblogged this from sickenedinmypants
broke#E#nream-ings reblogged this from sickenedinmypants
n-dimensionalchunder reblogged this from geosensi[tive]
c[onceptual.g]ruel reblogged this from sickenedinmypants
snatchsnatchandgrunt reblogged this from drinkmeandu
drinkmeandu reblogged this from geosensi[tive]
rollurownp[l]ot liked this
charblackened reblogged this from sickenedinmypants





-- 
Reality Engineer>
Synthetic Environment Strategist>
Game[r + ] Theorist.
::http://unhub.com/netwurker ::
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] drop out

[Alan Sondheim]

drop out

the front story

http://www.alansondheim.org/dropout.mp4
i am falling for you. i will fall for you.

the back story

i try to go home. there is no home. i teleport home.
i end up in the air. i fall through the air. i fall to the ground
i play a game: before i hit the ground, i will teleport home.
i will end up in the air. i will fall through the air.
i will fall to the ground. i will play a game: before i hit the ground,
i will teleport home. i will end up in the air.
i will fall through the air. i will fall to the ground.
i will play a game: before i hit the ground, i will teleport home.
i will end up in the air. i will fall through the air.
i will fall to the ground.

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] Alternative Coverage of the UK Golf Open 2011 at Sandwich

[James Morris]

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB9C64A1CFEE93F82
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery

[dave miller]

This is a fantastic bit of writing Patrick, it's been in my head all
weekend. Me too, I feel I'm a slave to the machine.

I've avoided a cell phone as I also hate being contactable all the time, yet
I can see myself not keeping up with technological change. I'm the only one
on the train who isn't checking mail, doing Facebook, reading a kindle, and
I'm glad! Then again, sometimes it would be useful ...

Work wise I do css/ web development, which has really lost it's allure, now
it's production line stuff. I hate it I have to say.

But I still have this love-hate thing with it, I can't give it up, but often
I'd love to just walk away.

cheers, dave

On 17 July 2011 14:35, mark cooley  wrote:

> I'm right there with you Patrick. I feel the same way. If I didn't feel
> compelled to keep up with technoculture because of the classes I teach, I
> would happily give up most of my computer use. It took me years to kick my
> Television habit and finally I can sit in a quite room without a tv blaring
> in the background. I've resisted using a cell phone and only take one with
> me on trips. I really resent the fact that people think they should have
> constant contact with me. In terms of academics, I see little reason that
> New Media is almost automatically defined in terms of digital technologies.
> I've begun teaching an "agriArt" class as part of the new media curriculum
> where I teach. The reaction has been positive - just one way to redefine new
> media art away from the assumption that it has to be about gadgets.
> ...anyway, thanks for the post and sorry for my half witted response.
>
> ...off to feed the chickens!
>
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:30:25 -0500
>
> From: "Lichty, Patrick" 
> http://mc/compose?to=plic...@colum.edu>
> >
> Subject: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery
> To: 
> "netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org"
> http://mc/compose?to=netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
> >
> Message-ID:
> <
> d5ba7903f469284d8f95ef6e2b83552801a594d6c...@exch07mailbox.admin.colum.edu
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
>
> On networks and control
>
> I received my first computer in 1978 from my parent.  That means that I
> have been in front of a screen for 32 years as of this writing.
>
> And I've had it.  Or at least I'm having severe problems with this
> practice.  You see, I'm a digital native, or at least a technological one,
> with Star Trek before my eyes (the ORIGINAL ONE) before kindergarten, and
> electronics in my hand before puberty.  I have been before a computer
> screen, or a television screen all of my life, but I am not alone.  Let me
> begin that I feel like a unit of livestock in a Web 2.0, or (3.0, or 4.0 by
> now) carrel, tethered by instrumental fear and social panopticism and
> workplace Taylorism, as well as seductive playbourism to keep me immobile.
>
> The Building of the Borg-machine
> Marshall McLuhan wrote on privacy in the electric networks regarding
> ubiquitous interpersonal involvement -
>
> ?Electronic media bring us in touch with everyone, everywhere,
> instantaneously. Whereas the book extended the eye, electronic circuitry
> extends the central nervous system.. Constant contact with the world becomes
> a daily reality. All-at-oneness is our state of being. Closed human systems
> no longer exist. For us, the first postliterate generation, privacy is
> either a luxury or a curse of the past. The planet is like a general store
> where nosy people keep track of everyone else?s business ? a twelve-party
> line or a ?Dear Abby? column writ large. ?The new tribalism is one where
> everyone?s business is everyone else?s and where we are all somewhat testy?.
> []
>
> The key phrase here is ?Constant contact with the world becomes a daily
> reality.?  I believe that McLuhan was dealing with more of the Orwell/Huxley
> milieu of constant broadcast to a passive audience as a measure of
> pacification and control, but this is not the case of the fin de millennium
> culture.  The individual is in constant contact with the world, the virtual,
> and all of its inhabitants. Facebook has over 500 Million subscribers[],
> constituting 1 in every 12 people alive.  Add Twitter, academia.edu,
> Google Wave, LinkedIn, Friendster, Ning, Second Life, and you have a milieu
> what beckons for the individual to go online, work at the computer, shop at
> the computer, play at the computer, and fall asleep while the computer plays
> your favorite music or plays your favorite news.  In many ways, this echoes
> the utopian ideals of 1960's futuristic ephemeral videos of the ?House of
> the Future?
>
> Control
> Paul Virilio, in his essay, ?The Third Interval? described the lack of
> differentiation between the technologically accelerated disabled body, and
> the technologically accelerated able body.  His assertion is that the 

Re: [NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[J. Trautwein]

congrats to you too!
j
On Jul 17, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Andreas Jacobs wrote:


Congratulations!

Andreas



On 17 jul. 2011, at 17:13, "J. Trautwein"  wrote:


ONSPEED
http://www.jtwine.com/010twittspeedset1.html
is part of it too.
cheers,
jurgen
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Andreas Jacobs wrote:


Thanks to the following people who helped to make the project:

MANIK, Ana Valdes, Isabel Brison and Arelis Eleftherios for their  
translations


Special thanks to Judith V. aka The Frontline Princess for her dream

Andreas



On 17 jul. 2011, at 15:40, Andreas Maria Jacobs   
wrote:



Hi list

I am proud to be part of it

Best

Andreas Maria Jacobs

w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl




FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival)
16-07-11 21:28
Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação! http:// 
www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre.aspx http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1





___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[Andreas Jacobs]

Congratulations!

Andreas



On 17 jul. 2011, at 17:13, "J. Trautwein"  wrote:

> ONSPEED
> http://www.jtwine.com/010twittspeedset1.html
> is part of it too.
> cheers,
> jurgen
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Andreas Jacobs wrote:
> 
>> Thanks to the following people who helped to make the project:
>> 
>> MANIK, Ana Valdes, Isabel Brison and Arelis Eleftherios for their 
>> translations
>> 
>> Special thanks to Judith V. aka The Frontline Princess for her dream
>> 
>> Andreas
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 17 jul. 2011, at 15:40, Andreas Maria Jacobs  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi list
>>> 
>>> I am proud to be part of it
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> 
>>> Andreas Maria Jacobs
>>> 
>>> w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
>>> w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl
 
 
>>> 
 
 FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival)
 16-07-11 21:28
 Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação! 
 http://www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre.aspx http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1
 
 
 
>>> ___
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> ___
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[J. Trautwein]

ONSPEED
http://www.jtwine.com/010twittspeedset1.html
is part of it too.
cheers,
jurgen
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Andreas Jacobs wrote:


Thanks to the following people who helped to make the project:

MANIK, Ana Valdes, Isabel Brison and Arelis Eleftherios for their  
translations


Special thanks to Judith V. aka The Frontline Princess for her dream

Andreas



On 17 jul. 2011, at 15:40, Andreas Maria Jacobs   
wrote:



Hi list

I am proud to be part of it

Best

Andreas Maria Jacobs

w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl




FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival)
16-07-11 21:28
Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação! http:// 
www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre.aspx http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1





___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[Andreas Jacobs]

Thanks to the following people who helped to make the project:

MANIK, Ana Valdes, Isabel Brison and Arelis Eleftherios for their translations

Special thanks to Judith V. aka The Frontline Princess for her dream

Andreas



On 17 jul. 2011, at 15:40, Andreas Maria Jacobs  wrote:

> Hi list
> 
> I am proud to be part of it
> 
> Best
> 
> Andreas Maria Jacobs
> 
> w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
> w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl
>> 
>> 
> 
>> 
>> FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival)
>> 16-07-11 21:28
>> Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação! 
>> http://www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre.aspx http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1
>> 
>> 
>> 
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[a bill miller]

High Everyone!
I've got a few things in the Media Art portion of FILE2011 too!

A. Bill Miller
--
 http://www.master-list2000.com/abillmiller/
--


Hi list
>
> I am proud to be part of it
>
> Best
>
> Andreas Maria Jacobs
>
> w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
> w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl
>
> *FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival )*
> 16-07-11 21:28 
> Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação!
> 
> http://www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre.aspx 
> 
> http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1
>
>
>
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] @filefestival, 16-07-11 21:28

[Andreas Maria Jacobs]

Hi list

I am proud to be part of it

Best

Andreas Maria Jacobs

w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl







FILE Festival 2011 (@filefestival)
16-07-11 21:28
Hotsite do FILE SÃO PAULO 2011. Conheça a programação! http://www.filefestival.org/hotsiteSP/Sobre. 
aspx http://fb.me/1b7R3flf1




___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery

[mark cooley]

I'm right there with you Patrick. I feel the same way. If I didn't feel 
compelled to keep up with technoculture because of the classes I teach, I would 
happily give up most of my computer use. It took me years to kick my Television 
habit and finally I can sit in a quite room without a tv blaring in the 
background. I've resisted using a cell phone and only take one with me on 
trips. I really resent the fact that people think they should have constant 
contact with me. In terms of academics, I see little reason that New Media is 
almost automatically defined in terms of digital technologies. I've begun 
teaching an "agriArt" class as part of the new media curriculum where I teach. 
The reaction has been positive - just one way to redefine new media art away 
from the assumption that it has to be about gadgets. ...anyway, thanks for the 
post and sorry for my half witted response.
...off to feed the chickens!


Message: 3
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:30:25 -0500
From: "Lichty, Patrick" 
Subject: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery
To: "netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org" 
Message-ID:
    
    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

On networks and control

I received my first computer in 1978 from my parent.  That means that I have 
been in front of a screen for 32 years as of this writing.

And I've had it.  Or at least I'm having severe problems with this practice.  
You see, I'm a digital native, or at least a technological one, with Star Trek 
before my eyes (the ORIGINAL ONE) before kindergarten, and electronics in my 
hand before puberty.  I have been before a computer screen, or a television 
screen all of my life, but I am not alone.  Let me begin that I feel like a 
unit of livestock in a Web 2.0, or (3.0, or 4.0 by now) carrel, tethered by 
instrumental fear and social panopticism and  workplace Taylorism, as well as 
seductive playbourism to keep me immobile.

The Building of the Borg-machine
Marshall McLuhan wrote on privacy in the electric networks regarding ubiquitous 
interpersonal involvement -

?Electronic media bring us in touch with everyone, everywhere, instantaneously. 
Whereas the book extended the eye, electronic circuitry extends the central 
nervous system.. Constant contact with the world becomes a daily reality. 
All-at-oneness is our state of being. Closed human systems no longer exist. For 
us, the first postliterate generation, privacy is either a luxury or a curse of 
the past. The planet is like a general store where nosy people keep track of 
everyone else?s business ? a twelve-party line or a ?Dear Abby? column writ 
large. ?The new tribalism is one where everyone?s business is everyone else?s 
and where we are all somewhat testy?. []

The key phrase here is ?Constant contact with the world becomes a daily 
reality.?  I believe that McLuhan was dealing with more of the Orwell/Huxley 
milieu of constant broadcast to a passive audience as a measure of pacification 
and control, but this is not the case of the fin de millennium culture.  The 
individual is in constant contact with the world, the virtual, and all of its 
inhabitants. Facebook has over 500 Million subscribers[], constituting 1 in 
every 12 people alive.  Add Twitter, academia.edu, Google Wave, LinkedIn, 
Friendster, Ning, Second Life, and you have a milieu what beckons for the 
individual to go online, work at the computer, shop at the computer, play at 
the computer, and fall asleep while the computer plays your favorite music or 
plays your favorite news.  In many ways, this echoes the utopian ideals of 
1960's futuristic ephemeral videos of the ?House of the Future?

Control
Paul Virilio, in his essay, ?The Third Interval? described the lack of 
differentiation between the technologically accelerated disabled body, and the 
technologically accelerated able body.  His assertion is that the one becomes 
accelerated in its ability to engage in the discourse of the able in virtual 
space while the able becomes paralyzed in its enmeshing in the virtual.  In 
short, under virtual acceleration, the body becomes inert and the virtual 
gesture takes on lines of flight.  The paralysis is the problem.  As in 
Postman's Technopoly, the tool becomes a platform which becomes a societal 
underpinning, then becomes its own mythology.  The shape of society becomes 
such that the indivdual is chaped to fit the machine.  Although this may sound 
like Englebart's ideas of human-computer coevolution in which the development 
of the computer drives the human to adapt and then build the next improvement, 
this is not so.  It is the shaping of the
 individual by the nation-state in its complicity with the corporate oligarchy 
to create desiring-machines and labor-generators in service to the cybernetic 
systems of control of the increasing Fordist/Taylorist regime of First World 
capital.
In many ways, social media are almost akin to Temple Grandin's approach to 
slaughterhouses in which she has designed devices that calm 

Re: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery

[Michael Szpakowski]

This is a great read!
I think it's way too pessimistic because, as in all the history of class 
society, for every strategy intended to corral us some bright spark finds 
possibilities of resistance often within the strategy itself.
I think it's a mistake too, or at least too narrow a view, to assume 
necessarily that solutions will arise in the context of how we relate to or use 
the technology itself - upheavals in the good old fashioned political or 
economic sphere, or both, could have a much more profound impact. ( And we get 
so used to responding quickly to the sheer speed of innovation we sometimes 
forget there are, as it were, still *geological* processes at work in society)
Disagreements aside it's a great and engaging summary of the problem, of one 
side and, as I said, a *pleasure* to read...
michael



--- On Fri, 7/15/11, Lichty, Patrick  wrote:

> From: Lichty, Patrick 
> Subject: [NetBehaviour] Against Machinic Slavery
> To: "netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org" 
> Date: Friday, July 15, 2011, 12:30 PM
> On networks and control
> 
> I received my first computer in 1978 from my parent. 
> That means that I have been in front of a screen for 32
> years as of this writing.
> 
> And I've had it.  Or at least I'm having severe
> problems with this practice.  You see, I'm a digital
> native, or at least a technological one, with Star Trek
> before my eyes (the ORIGINAL ONE) before kindergarten, and
> electronics in my hand before puberty.  I have been
> before a computer screen, or a television screen all of my
> life, but I am not alone.  Let me begin that I feel
> like a unit of livestock in a Web 2.0, or (3.0, or 4.0 by
> now) carrel, tethered by instrumental fear and social
> panopticism and  workplace Taylorism, as well as
> seductive playbourism to keep me immobile.
> 
> The Building of the Borg-machine
> Marshall McLuhan wrote on privacy in the electric networks
> regarding ubiquitous interpersonal involvement -
> 
> “Electronic media bring us in touch with everyone,
> everywhere, instantaneously. Whereas the book extended the
> eye, electronic circuitry extends the central nervous
> system.. Constant contact with the world becomes a daily
> reality. All-at-oneness is our state of being. Closed human
> systems no longer exist. For us, the first postliterate
> generation, privacy is either a luxury or a curse of the
> past. The planet is like a general store where nosy people
> keep track of everyone else’s business – a twelve-party
> line or a “Dear Abby” column writ large. “The new
> tribalism is one where everyone’s business is everyone
> else’s and where we are all somewhat testy”. []
> 
> The key phrase here is “Constant contact with the world
> becomes a daily reality.”  I believe that McLuhan was
> dealing with more of the Orwell/Huxley milieu of constant
> broadcast to a passive audience as a measure of pacification
> and control, but this is not the case of the fin de
> millennium culture.  The individual is in constant
> contact with the world, the virtual, and all of its
> inhabitants. Facebook has over 500 Million subscribers[],
> constituting 1 in every 12 people alive.  Add Twitter,
> academia.edu, Google Wave, LinkedIn, Friendster, Ning,
> Second Life, and you have a milieu what beckons for the
> individual to go online, work at the computer, shop at the
> computer, play at the computer, and fall asleep while the
> computer plays your favorite music or plays your favorite
> news.  In many ways, this echoes the utopian ideals of
> 1960's futuristic ephemeral videos of the “House of the
> Future”
> 
> Control
> Paul Virilio, in his essay, “The Third Interval”
> described the lack of differentiation between the
> technologically accelerated disabled body, and the
> technologically accelerated able body.  His assertion
> is that the one becomes accelerated in its ability to engage
> in the discourse of the able in virtual space while the able
> becomes paralyzed in its enmeshing in the virtual.  In
> short, under virtual acceleration, the body becomes inert
> and the virtual gesture takes on lines of flight.  The
> paralysis is the problem.  As in Postman's Technopoly,
> the tool becomes a platform which becomes a societal
> underpinning, then becomes its own mythology.  The
> shape of society becomes such that the indivdual is chaped
> to fit the machine.  Although this may sound like
> Englebart's ideas of human-computer coevolution in which the
> development of the computer drives the human to adapt and
> then build the next improvement, this is not so.  It is
> the shaping of the individual by the nation-state in its
> complicity with the corporate oligarchy to create
> desiring-machines and labor-generators in service to the
> cybernetic systems of control of the increasing
> Fordist/Taylorist regime of First World capital.
> In many ways, social media are almost akin to Temple
> Grandin's approach to slaughterhouses in which she has
> designed devices that calm the cattle by giv

Re: [NetBehaviour] friend request

[helen varley jamieson]

a wonderful!
thanks :)

On 16/07/11 2:09 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uu6MDdxBork
>
> - Rob.
>
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>


-- 


helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst
he...@creative-catalyst.com
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.avatarbodycollision.org
http://www.upstage.org.nz


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] Distributed Exhibition Project

[Yann Le Guennec]

The Distributed Exhibition Project aims to explore the global framework 
curently available for online networked art. It's a participative 
project based on online spectators contributions.


http://www.yannleguennec.com/dep/





___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour